Bug#872736: RFS: dtkwidget/2.0.0-1 [ITP]
On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 12:27:48AM +0800, Yanhao Mo wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "dtkwidget"
* For debian/*.install, please use more specific name instead of lib*.so
to detect so bump from upstream.
* Some dependencies are missing? Maybe still in NEW queue? I can sponsor
only when it is buildable.
E: Unable to locate package libdtkcore-dev
E: Unable to locate package libgsettings-qt-dev
--
ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬) czchen@{czchen,debconf,debian}.org
http://czchen.info/
Key fingerprint = BA04 346D C2E1 FE63 C790 8793 CC65 B0CD EC27 5D5B
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Bug#870621: RFS: deepin-gettext-tools/1.0.6+git20170731-1 [ITP]
On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 04:00:57PM +0800, Boyuan Yang wrote:
> Hi Liang,
>
> I have those problems fixed in Git repository as well as uploaded source
> package on
> debomatic-amd64.d.n and mentors.d.n:
>
> * https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-deepin/deepin-gettext-tools.git
* The license of src/desktop_ts_convert.pl is GPL-3, not GPL-3+.
Other part look good to me.
--
ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬) czchen@{czchen,debian}.org
http://czchen.info/
Key fingerprint = BA04 346D C2E1 FE63 C790 8793 CC65 B0CD EC27 5D5B
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Bug#869898: RFS: dtkcore/0.3.3-1 [ITP]
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 09:30:52PM +0800, Boyuan Yang wrote:
> Alioth packaging repository:
>
> https://anonscm.debian.org/git/collab-maint/dtkcore.git
* The copyrights in src/log/* are different from other files, please
check copyright header of every file and list them in
debian/copyright.
* This symbol control file for libdtkcore.so is missing. Please help to
add it.
--
ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬) czchen@{czchen,debian}.org
http://czchen.info/
Key fingerprint = BA04 346D C2E1 FE63 C790 8793 CC65 B0CD EC27 5D5B
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Bug#867544: RFS: golang-github-xiaq-persistent/0.0~git20170614.0.06adb7b-1 [ITP]
On Sun, Jul 09, 2017 at 09:48:06PM -0600, Anthony Fok wrote:
> Hi! I am part of the pkg-go team, and am learning about the new
> "Testsuite: autopkgtest-pkg-go" myself.
>
> What I have learned thus far is that a senior member of the pkg-go
> team has set up some kind of CI server that would check for
> "Testsuite: autopkgtest-pkg-go" and automatically run the tests for
> it, so it is correct the way it is, and has made it into
> dh-make-golang.
>
> Of course, the documentation for Testsuite, as well as the
> corresponding Lintian test, will need to be updated. But for now, I
> wouldn't worry about this Lintian warning, as in personally I wouldn't
> even bother putting in a Lintian override for it. I'm sure the pkg-go
> team will deal with all these (Testsuite documentation and Lintian
> warning) soon enough. :-)
Thanks for the clarification. I has uploaded the package.
--
ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬) czchen@{czchen,debian}.org
http://czchen.info/
Key fingerprint = BA04 346D C2E1 FE63 C790 8793 CC65 B0CD EC27 5D5B
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Bug#867544: RFS: golang-github-xiaq-persistent/0.0~git20170614.0.06adb7b-1 [ITP]
Hi Shengjing,
First of all, thanks for your contribution to Debian. The following is my
review result, please help to update it according:
* Please change the short name of Eclipse Public License 1.0 from
`EPL-10` to `EPL-1.0` to avoid confusion.
* Please fix the following lintian warning.
N: Processing source package golang-github-xiaq-persistent (version
0.0~git20170614.0.06adb7b-1, arch source) ...
W: golang-github-xiaq-persistent source: unknown-testsuite
autopkgtest-pkg-go
N:
N:The dsc file sets Testsuite to a value other than autopkgtest, the
only
N:one allowed. This field is most probably copied by dpkg-source from
N:Testsuite in debian/control.
--
ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬) czchen@{czchen,debian}.org
http://czchen.info/
Key fingerprint = BA04 346D C2E1 FE63 C790 8793 CC65 B0CD EC27 5D5B
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Bug#808976: RFS: abi-tracker/1.6-1 ITP
Uploaded. Thanks for contributing Debian. -- ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬) <czc...@debian.org> Debian Developer (https://nm.debian.org/public/person/czchen) Key fingerprint = EC9F 905D 866D BE46 A896 C827 BE0C 9242 03F4 552D signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#808259: RFS: abi-monitor/1.6-1 ITP
On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 08:46:52AM +0100, Peter Spiess-Knafl wrote: > I modified it and re-uploaded the package to mentors. > > Do you consider sponsoring it? As you might have seen in the ITP/RFS, > I plan to bring the whole abi-tracker of Andrey to Debian. Uploaded. Thanks for contributing Debian. -- ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬) <czc...@debian.org> Debian Developer (https://nm.debian.org/public/person/czchen) Key fingerprint = EC9F 905D 866D BE46 A896 C827 BE0C 9242 03F4 552D signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#808259: RFS: abi-monitor/1.6-1 ITP
On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 10:57:51PM +0100, Peter Spiess-Knafl wrote: > As a first step I therefore packaged abi-monitor, which I am seeking a > sponsor for. Hi, Please help to update the license to GPL-2 or LGPL-2, as describe in copyright header and its LICENSE actully contains GPL-2 and LGPL-2. -- ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬) <czc...@debian.org> Debian Developer (https://nm.debian.org/public/person/czchen) Key fingerprint = EC9F 905D 866D BE46 A896 C827 BE0C 9242 03F4 552D signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#767221: RFS: zeal/0~20141027-1
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package zeal * Package name: zeal Version : 0~20141027-1 Upstream Author : 2013-2014 Jerzy Kozera * URL : http://zealdocs.org/ * License : GPL-3+, LGPL-2.1+, GPL-2+ Section : utils It builds those binary packages: zeal - Simple offline API documentation browser zeal-dbg - Debug symbols for zeal To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/zeal Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/z/zeal/zeal_0~20141027-1.dsc -- System Information: Debian Release: jessie/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 3.16-3-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬) czc...@gmail.com http://czchen.info/ Key fingerprint = EC9F 905D 866D BE46 A896 C827 BE0C 9242 03F4 552D signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#766470: RFS: ibus-libzhuyin/1.6.99.20140929-1 [ITP]
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package ibus-libzhuyin * Package name: ibus-libzhuyin Version : 1.6.99.20140929-1 Upstream Author : Peng Wu alexepico at gmail.com * URL : https://github.com/libzhuyin/ibus-libzhuyin * License : GPL-2+ Section : utils It builds those binary packages: ibus-libzhuyin - New Zhuyin engine based on libzhuyin for IBus ibus-libzhuyin-dbg - Debug symbols for ibus-libzhuyin To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/ibus-libzhuyin Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/i/ibus-libzhuyin/ibus-libzhuyin_1.6.99.20140929-1.dsc -- System Information: Debian Release: jessie/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 3.16-3-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬) czc...@gmail.com http://czchen.info/ Key fingerprint = EC9F 905D 866D BE46 A896 C827 BE0C 9242 03F4 552D signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#745721: Name collision between libpinyin and libzhuyin (Was: Bug#745721: [Pkg-ime-devel] Bug#745721: RFS: libzhuyin/0.9.93-1)
On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 02:20:17PM -0300, Eriberto wrote: Do you removed V=1 from d/rules? Why? Please, review my last mail saying about blhc and test the command to you understand the issue. Try to learn, not execute a command only. Sorry about that, I just used to use DH_VERBOSE=1 to disable silent rules for autotools. As I know, the problem is due to autotools silent rules. To disable it, we can pass --disable-silent-rules during configure or set V=1. Since V=1 is less verbose and shorter then DH_VERBOSE=1, I change to use V=1 now. As for blhc, I use it with the following command. blhc --all libzhuyin_0.9.99.20140929-1_amd64.build Why you did a lintian override to amd64 only? The path contains multiarch tuple, so it only works on amd64. I tried to build i386 package via pbuilder, and there is no tEH in library. So I think it only happens in amd64. If anyone know how to use wildcard in lintian-overrides, I can update this override. As usual, the package is in mentor [0], please help to review and sponsor, thanks. The change is using V=1 instead of DH_VERBOSE=1 to disable silent rules. [0] https://mentors.debian.net/package/libzhuyin -- ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬) czc...@gmail.com http://czchen.info/ Key fingerprint = EC9F 905D 866D BE46 A896 C827 BE0C 9242 03F4 552D signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#745721: Name collision between libpinyin and libzhuyin (Was: Bug#745721: [Pkg-ime-devel] Bug#745721: RFS: libzhuyin/0.9.93-1)
On Fri, Oct 03, 2014 at 09:38:15AM -0300, Eriberto wrote: New situation: we already have a new Lintian (since yesterday). Please, update the Standards-Version to 3.9.6. Just update the Standards-Version to 3.9.6. Looks like nothing need to change for 3.9.5 ~ 3.9.6. The package is in mentor [0], please help to review and sponsor, thanks. [0] https://mentors.debian.net/package/libzhuyin -- ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬) czc...@gmail.com http://czchen.info/ Key fingerprint = EC9F 905D 866D BE46 A896 C827 BE0C 9242 03F4 552D signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#745721: Name collision between libpinyin and libzhuyin (Was: Bug#745721: [Pkg-ime-devel] Bug#745721: RFS: libzhuyin/0.9.93-1)
Hi, Just upload a new version in mentor [0] with the following update: - Fix debhelper version to = 9 - Add lintian-overrides for force positive spelling-error-in-binary - Use hardening=+all - Update Source field in d/copyright to sourceforge - Add github release to d/watch Please help to review and sponsor, thanks. [0] https://mentors.debian.net/package/libzhuyin -- ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬) czc...@gmail.com http://czchen.info/ Key fingerprint = EC9F 905D 866D BE46 A896 C827 BE0C 9242 03F4 552D signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#745721: Name collision between libpinyin and libzhuyin (Was: Bug#745721: [Pkg-ime-devel] Bug#745721: RFS: libzhuyin/0.9.93-1)
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 08:35:35AM -0300, Eriberto wrote: Hi ChangZhuo, Good news. I will wait for you. You're welcome. Upstream released a new version 0.9.99.20140929, and it does not install binary tools and its manpage. So we don't need to decide whether including binary tools or not anymore. I just repacked the package in [0], The only change beside package version is using `dh_install --fail-missing` to prevent missing files from install. Please help to review and sponsor it, thanks. [0] https://mentors.debian.net/package/libzhuyin -- ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬) czc...@gmail.com http://czchen.info/ Key fingerprint = EC9F 905D 866D BE46 A896 C827 BE0C 9242 03F4 552D signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#745721: Name collision between libpinyin and libzhuyin (Was: Bug#745721: [Pkg-ime-devel] Bug#745721: RFS: libzhuyin/0.9.93-1)
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 10:01:39AM -0300, Eriberto wrote: Ok. My suggestion: 1. Put all files in /usr/share/libzhuyin-utils. I think that zhuyin-utils is better for package name. But it is my opinion. Not relevant. 2. Make symlinks in /usr/bin and /usr/share/man. Example: zhuyin_gen_binary_files. Or don't distribute the binaries. I prefer the first option. Note that if you distribute the additional .deb now, you can change the binary names later. If not, generating a new .deb later will put your package in NEW again. Thanks for your efforts ChangZhuo. I know that is being hard for you. Have a nice day. (10:00 AM in Brazil) Cheers, Eriberto Hi Eriberto, Currently upstream is working on this issue [0] now, so I just want to wait a week or so to let upstream fix the name collision issue. [0] https://github.com/libzhuyin/libzhuyin/issues/5 -- ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬) czc...@gmail.com http://czchen.info/ Key fingerprint = EC9F 905D 866D BE46 A896 C827 BE0C 9242 03F4 552D signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#745721: [Pkg-ime-devel] Bug#745721: RFS: libzhuyin/0.9.93-1
On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 10:39:04AM -0300, Eriberto Mota wrote: 1. You didn't install the binaries and manpages. Why? The binary and manpages are for tools to build binary data from dictionary data. It is only useful for developer of libzhuyin. For the developers who want to use libzhuyin to implement input method, these tools are useless because they don't need to modify dictionary at all. Since only developer of libzhuyin needs these manpages and tools, I don't include them into libzhuyin package. 2. The installer is creating the directory usr/include/libzhuyin-0.9.99.[CURRENT DATE]. Example: usr/include/libzhuyin-0.9.99.20140824. Please, solve this issue. Feel free to ask me if needed. Thank for reporting this. I added some perl script in d/rules to modify configure.ac in dh_autoreconf so that the timestamp version is fixed to timestamp version in upstream package. It is slightly more complex than patch, but I don't need to update patch when upstream has new release. The package is in mentor [0], please help to review and sponsor it, thanks. [0] http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libz/libzhuyin/libzhuyin_0.9.99.20140718-1.dsc -- ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬) czc...@gmail.com http://czchen.info/ Key fingerprint = EC9F 905D 866D BE46 A896 C827 BE0C 9242 03F4 552D signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#745721: Name collision between libpinyin and libzhuyin (Was: Bug#745721: [Pkg-ime-devel] Bug#745721: RFS: libzhuyin/0.9.93-1)
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 11:14:03AM -0300, Eriberto wrote: I understood your POV. However, note that is an available resource that you are hiding. When adapting the code to particular needs, a final user will want these binaries. So, why don't distribute it? You can write your POV in long description. Note that I can upload your package. But it is incomplete in resources. Please, reconsider your decision. I will wait your final opinion. Thanks. Hi, Distribute the binary and manpage in libzhuyin as separated package is okay for me. However, current binary names in libzhuyin collided with libpinyin-utils. The issue is reported to upstream [0], but it is not solved yet. I think we just need to wait for upstream to solve the name collision issue. % apt-file -D search libzhuyin-utils_0.9.99.20140718-1_amd64.deb libpinyin-utils: /usr/bin/gen_binary_files libpinyin-utils: /usr/bin/gen_unigram libpinyin-utils: /usr/bin/import_interpolation libpinyin-utils: /usr/share/man/man1/gen_binary_files.1.gz libpinyin-utils: /usr/share/man/man1/gen_unigram.1.gz libpinyin-utils: /usr/share/man/man1/import_interpolation.1.gz [0] https://github.com/libzhuyin/libzhuyin/issues/5 -- ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬) czc...@gmail.com http://czchen.info/ Key fingerprint = EC9F 905D 866D BE46 A896 C827 BE0C 9242 03F4 552D signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#745721: [Pkg-ime-devel] Bug#745721: RFS: libzhuyin/0.9.93-1
On Sat, Aug 23, 2014 at 09:09:17PM -0300, Eriberto Mota wrote: Hi ChangZhuo, The new upstream version has new dates. So, you must update the d/copyright file. Your sintax is wrong, because you put the upstreams names before the years. Another point is that the packaging copyright, usually, is an maintainer name. I suggest this sintax: Thank for the review, I uploaded a new version in mentors in [0], please help to review and sponsor it, thanks. [0] http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libz/libzhuyin/libzhuyin_0.9.99.20140718-1.dsc -- ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬) czc...@gmail.com http://czchen.info/ Key fingerprint = EC9F 905D 866D BE46 A896 C827 BE0C 9242 03F4 552D signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#745721: [Pkg-ime-devel] Bug#745721: RFS: libzhuyin/0.9.93-1
Hi, Since upstream has new version 0.9.99.20140718, I will pack this new version, with the following fix. 1. d/control: - What is '...' in long descriptions? It means etc, and so on. I will change to use etc if ... causes confused. - I didn't understand what is the '-data' package. What is this? Can you improve the long description? Okay I will do that. 2. d/copyright: - I didn't find Peng Huang and BYVoid in upstream code. Can you point me where you found them? - The upstream code haven't a cmake directory. What is this? These are for 0.9.93, not 0.9.99.20140425. I forgot to remove them when upgrading to new version, sorry. - The upstream code is GPL-2+, not GPL-2. 3. d/docs: points to NEWS (empty) and README (useless to final user). Please, remove it. 4. d/rules: remove these comments: # -*- makefile -*- # Uncomment this to turn on verbose mode. Thanks for the review, I will update them. -- ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬) czc...@gmail.com http://czchen.info/ Key fingerprint = EC9F 905D 866D BE46 A896 C827 BE0C 9242 03F4 552D signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#745721: [Pkg-ime-devel] Bug#745721: Bug#745721: RFS: libzhuyin/0.9.93-1
Control: title -1 RFS: libzhuyin/0.9.99.20140718-1 [ITP] Hi, I just upload the latest libzhuyin package into mentor [0], please help to review and sponsor it, thanks. The following is changed list: - d/control - Use 'etc.' to replace '...' - Add more description for libzhuyin-data - Change package names libzhuyin5-* to libzhuyin-* since it is unlikely that we need different version of libzhuyin at the same time. - Let libzhuyin-dev depends libglib2.0-dev for autopkgtest. - d/copyright - Update author list - Update license to GPL-2+ - d/docs - Removed - d/rules - Remove comment - d/test/* - Fix wrong package name [0] http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libz/libzhuyin/libzhuyin_0.9.99.20140718-1.dsc -- ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬) czc...@gmail.com http://czchen.info/ Key fingerprint = EC9F 905D 866D BE46 A896 C827 BE0C 9242 03F4 552D signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#752520: RFS: lilyterm/0.9.9.4-1 [ITP]
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 08:34:22PM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote: Aye, lilyterm-data is only 76K. Even when multiplied by 12 architectures, that's still less than a megabyte. And now for something completely different: You must not remove the alternative in prerm upgrade. See bug #71621 for gory details. Thank for advices. I merged lilyterm-data into lilyterm and remove alternative in prerm only when remove or deconfigure. -- ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬) czc...@gmail.com http://czchen.info/ Key fingerprint = EC9F 905D 866D BE46 A896 C827 BE0C 9242 03F4 552D signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#752520: RFS: lilyterm/0.9.9.4-1 [ITP]
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 04:27:51PM +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote: Besides, why did you create lilyterm-data? Can't you just swallow it by main lilyterm package? You may need extra -data in two cases -- when that -data comes from a separate source, or when you have several different variations of your term package (say, gtk2 and gtk3 versions) which all use a common set of data files. Apparently neither of the two cases applies here. To save space for debian servers. The lilyterm-data contains architecture independent files like i18n. Because they are architecture independent, putting them into lilyterm-data can make it serves all architectures (12 IIRC) in debian. If these files are in lilyterm, which is architecture dependent, debian will have 12 copies of these data. -- ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬) czc...@gmail.com http://czchen.info/ Key fingerprint = EC9F 905D 866D BE46 A896 C827 BE0C 9242 03F4 552D signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#752520: RFS: lilyterm/0.9.9.4-1 [ITP]
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 03:20:46PM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote: * Michael Tokarev m...@tls.msk.ru, 2014-06-25, 16:27: lilyterm - Light and eazy-to-use terminal emulator for X Typo: eazy - easy Thank for the review, just uploading a new one. The third case (likely most common one) is when an arch:any package would otherwise contain huge /usr/share. Which doesn't seem to be the case here either. Actually this is the reason for lilyterm-data. -- ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬) czc...@gmail.com http://czchen.info/ Key fingerprint = EC9F 905D 866D BE46 A896 C827 BE0C 9242 03F4 552D signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#752520: RFS: lilyterm/0.9.9.4-1 [ITP]
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package lilyterm Package name: lilyterm Version : 0.9.9.4-1 Upstream Author : Lu, Chao-Ming (Tetralet) URL : http://lilyterm.luna.com.tw/ License : GPL-3+ Section : x11 It builds those binary packages: lilyterm - Light and eazy-to-use terminal emulator for X lilyterm-data - Data files for lilyterm lilyterm-dbg - Debug symbols for lilyterm To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/lilyterm Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/lilyterm/lilyterm_0.9.9.4-1.dsc -- System Information: Debian Release: jessie/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 3.14-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬) czc...@gmail.com http://czchen.info/ Key fingerprint = EC9F 905D 866D BE46 A896 C827 BE0C 9242 03F4 552D signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#748870: ITP: libr3 -- High-performance URL router library
Hi, I repack the package because upstream released a new version. * Package name: libr3 Version : 1.2.0-1 Upstream Author : Yo-An Lin yoanli...@gmail.com * URL : https://github.com/c9s/r3 * License : MIT Section : libs It builds those binary packages: libr3-0- High-performance URL router library libr3-dbg - High-performance URL router library (debug symbols) libr3-dev - High-performance URL router library (development files) To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/libr3 Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libr/libr3/libr3_1.2.0-1.dsc -- ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬) czc...@gmail.com http://czchen.info/ Key fingerprint = EC9F 905D 866D BE46 A896 C827 BE0C 9242 03F4 552D signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#748870: RFS: libr3/1.0.0-1
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package libr3: * Package name: libr3 Version : 1.0.0 Upstream Author : Yo-An Lin yoanli...@gmail.com * URL : https://github.com/c9s/r3 * License : MIT Section : libs It builds those binary packages: libr3-0: High-performance URL router library libr3-dbg: High-performance URL router library (debug symbols) libr3-dev: High-performance URL router library (development files) To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/libr3 Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libr/libr3/libr3_1.0.0-1.dsc -- ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬) czc...@gmail.com http://czchen.info/ Key fingerprint = EC9F 905D 866D BE46 A896 C827 BE0C 9242 03F4 552D signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#745721: [Pkg-ime-devel] Bug#745721: RFS: libzhuyin/0.9.93-1
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 11:10:56PM +0800, Kan-Ru Chen wrote: Thanks for packaging this library! I'm reviewing this package. Upstream has new version 0.9.99.20140425, so I just repack it with latest version. http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libz/libzhuyin/libzhuyin_0.9.99.20140425-1.dsc -- ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬) czc...@gmail.com http://czchen.info/ Key fingerprint = EC9F 905D 866D BE46 A896 C827 BE0C 9242 03F4 552D signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#745721: RFS: libzhuyin/0.9.93-1
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Hi All, I am looking for a sponsor for libzhuyin: * Package name: libzhuyin Version : 0.9.93 Upstream Author : Peng Wu alexep...@gmail.com * URL : https://github.com/libzhuyin/libzhuyin * License : GPL2 Programming Lang: C++ Description : Zhuyin input method library It builds the following packages: - libzhuyin4 - libzhuyin4-data - libzhuyin4-dev - libzhuyin4-dbg To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/libzhuyin Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libz/libzhuyin/libzhuyin_0.9.93-1.dsc Please help to review if there is any problem in this package, and help to upload if everything is okay. Also, please help to give me DM permission so that I can help to maintain this package, thanks. -- ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬) czc...@gmail.com http://czchen.info/ Key fingerprint = EC9F 905D 866D BE46 A896 C827 BE0C 9242 03F4 552D signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: pkg-has-shlibs-control-file-but-no-actual-shared-libs triggered by a private shared library
On Sat, Jan 04, 2014 at 10:22:29PM +, T o n g wrote: Hi, pkg-has-shlibs-control-file-but-no-actual-shared-libs is sometimes triggered for packages with a private shared library due to a bug in Debhelper That seems to have bitten me. E: zh-autoconvert: pkg-has-shlibs-control-file-but-no-actual-shared-libs W: zh-autoconvert: postinst-has-useless-call-to-ldconfig W: zh-autoconvert: postrm-has-useless-call-to-ldconfig The libs (xchat-autogb.so, xchat-autob5.so) which trigger these warnings are private libs. According to [1], these might be caused by a bug in Debhelper. However, as their names suggested, these two libs are for xchat plugin. Maybe you need to move these libs to properly location (ex: /usr/lib/xchat/plugins) so that xchat can use them. [1] http://lintian.debian.org/tags/pkg-has-shlibs-control-file-but-no-actual-shared-libs.html -- ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬) czc...@gmail.com Key fingerprint = EC9F 905D 866D BE46 A896 C827 BE0C 9242 03F4 552D signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#734726: RFS: cppman/0.3.1-1 [ITP] -- C++ 98/11 manual pages for Linux, with source from cplusplus.com
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for sponsor for my package cppman. Since this package is a python application, I set the maintainer to Python Applications Packaging Team. Please help to review this package for any problem, thanks. The following is package information: Package name: cppman Version : 0.3.1-1 Upstream Author : Wei-Ning Huang (AZ) aitjc...@gmail.com URL : https://github.com/Aitjcize/cppman License : GPL-3 Section : python To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/cppman Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/cppman/cppman_0.3.1-1.dsc -- ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬) czc...@gmail.com Key fingerprint = EC9F 905D 866D BE46 A896 C827 BE0C 9242 03F4 552D signature.asc Description: Digital signature
