Re: Remove package from unstable?
Hi, > a) The version numbering rules provide for a '1:' prefix to be used to >deal with version numbering mistakes. A version number starting with >'1:' counts as higher than any without such a prefix; a '2:' counts as >higher than '1:', etc. So you could re-upload 2.10.08+ds-1 with version >number '1:2.10.08+ds-1' to supplant 2.11.01+ds-3. However the downside >to this approach is that you're forevermore committed to having that >prefix in the version numbering. Don't do this. Using am epoch has to be agreed on in the project, and for good reasons. First and foremost, the epoch is not encoded into the package file name, thus causing trouble when in the future you get to upload 1:2.11.01. -nik
Bug#1060913: Re: Bug#1060913: RFS: sdaps/1.9.11-0.1 [NMU] [RC] -- scripts for data acquisition with paper-based surveys
Hi, > Here I am not a member of DebianEdu team and told if am not a member > of one team there is no reason to do team upload. > Ideally, I should contact the team to join in or tell team I am going > to fix ftbfs issue. Whether the maintainer is a team doesn't matter here (it just means I am not responsible alone for the lack of updates on the package, haha ;)). In general, you always contact the maintainer for every upload before doing an NMU, through the address from the package meta-data or by sending your changes to the BTS into the bug you are fixing. > But I got no response from there(not DebianEdu > team) in the past. Can you point me to message IDs where you requested changes to be uploaded? Ideally, you should just send the changes to the BTS bug you are fixing, and tag it "patch". -nik signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#1060913: RFS: sdaps/1.9.11-0.1 [NMU] [RC] -- scripts for data acquisition with paper-based surveys
Hi, is there a reason why you are not working with the packaging team, and doing NMUs without contacting the team beforehand? -nik
Re: MIT license vs Expat license in packages
Hi, >If I wanted to package software licensed under MIT, and the version given >upstream matches the Expat license word-for-word, does the above sentence mean >I should replace all references to the MIT license with Expat? Yes. > Should my copyright file look like this? No. The MIT block and references should be gone (unless some files use a different version of the MIT license). -nik
Re: New package: ITP or RFP ?
Hi, > Is it ok for source code to be in Github? No. In my opinion (and I am aware that sadly, the majority of the project probably does not share this opinion), that is a direct violation of Debian's Code of Conduct, and its Social Contract as well. GitHub has discriminatory terms of use that contradict Debian's values. They exclude parts of our community as contributors, e.g. persons under 16 years and persons who are unlucky enough to live in Russia, Syria, and other US-embargoed countries. Please do not use GitHub or comparably hostile platforms for Debian. Thanks, Nik
Re: Not install files in Debian package
Hi, > Now I need to move some files to another package. Is there an easy > method the exclude some files from this package or do I have to compile > a positive list (which might vary between versions)? In debian/rules: override_dh_auto_install: dh_install -ppackage1 -Xexclude1 -Xexclude1 dh_install This first installs into package1, excluding some files, then the second call will install into all remaining binary packages. -nik signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: parse SPDX-License-Identifier to produce copyright file
Hi, > Does there exist a tool for Debian that will parse a package directory (its > source files), extract the "SPDX-License-Identifier:" and produce something > that would fit into a machine-readable debian/copyright file? AFAIK, the reuse tool (which also generates these annoying headers) can do that. At least, it has some sort of DEP-5 mode. -nik
Re: vSMTP - looking for a sponsor
Hi, > Written in Rust, it is safer, faster, and greener. There is quite a huge piece missing in this chain of argumentation. -nik
Re: How to use local font in dh_auto_test
Hi,
> I tried to copy that font file to ${HOME}/.fonts and fc-list is even
> listing the font in question[1]:
>
> /tmp/.fonts/yudit.ttf: Yudit Unicode:style=LR
>
> but finally the test fails
have you tried updating the fontconfig cache (using fc-cache -f)?
Cheers,
Nik
Re: URL is OK in browser but returns 404 with uscan
> > Any idea how to help uscan reading that web page? > > https://storage.googleapis.com/broad-alkesgroup-public?delimiter=/&prefix=BOLT-LMM/downloads/ > gets you a step further. Digging a bit, there is actually an example for this in the uscan man page (grep for AWS). Find attached a patch for your package ☺. *snip* uscan info: => Package is up to date from: => https://storage.googleapis.com/BOLT-LMM/downloads/BOLT-LMM_v2.3.5.tar.gz uscan info: => Forcing download as requested uscan info: Downloading upstream package: BOLT-LMM_v2.3.5.tar.gz *snip* HTH, Nik From 8179eb9c8fc787d8d32d5fb5cf9ac9d604af3658 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dominik George Date: Sat, 9 Oct 2021 22:07:39 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Correctly scan S3 bucket in d/watch --- debian/changelog | 4 +++- debian/watch | 4 ++-- 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog index 879f2a0..d2abc9c 100644 --- a/debian/changelog +++ b/debian/changelog @@ -1,7 +1,9 @@ bolt-lmm (2.3.5+dfsg-2) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium * Team upload. - TODO: Try to fix watch file ... but failed + + [ Dominik George ] + * Scan and mangle S3 bucket list in d/watch. -- Andreas Tille Sat, 09 Oct 2021 08:29:36 +0200 diff --git a/debian/watch b/debian/watch index e1e1447..761a3a6 100644 --- a/debian/watch +++ b/debian/watch @@ -1,3 +1,3 @@ version=4 -opts="repacksuffix=+dfsg,dversionmangle=s/\+dfsg//g,repack,compression=xz" \ - https://alkesgroup.broadinstitute.org/BOLT-LMM/downloads/ .*/BOLT-LMM_v@ANY_VERSION@@ARCHIVE_EXT@ +opts="repacksuffix=+dfsg,dversionmangle=s/\+dfsg//g,pagemangle=s%([^<]*)%$1%g,repack,compression=xz" \ + https://storage.googleapis.com/broad-alkesgroup-public?prefix=BOLT-LMM/downloads/ (?:.*)BOLT-LMM_v@ANY_VERSION@@ARCHIVE_EXT@ -- 2.33.0 signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: URL is OK in browser but returns 404 with uscan
Hi, On Sat, Oct 09, 2021 at 09:46:51PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi, > > when I try to visit > > https://alkesgroup.broadinstitute.org/BOLT-LMM/downloads/ > > with any browser I get a list of files. However, the watch file > of bolt-lmm[1] pointing to that web page returns: You don't get a list of files. You get the same 404. Only there is JavaScript on the page that in turn loads and renders the list of files… > Any idea how to help uscan reading that web page? https://storage.googleapis.com/broad-alkesgroup-public?delimiter=/&prefix=BOLT-LMM/downloads/ gets you a step further. It's a brave new world! -nik signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#930633: i3gaps
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Control: tags -1 = moreinfo Control: noowner -1 Hi, > Certainly, a merge is the superior solution and i am glad its actually > being considered, but my understanding is that code refactoring/cleaning > could take a considerable amount of time, and therefore the package should > actually be available as a temporary solution for all those who want to use > it, as it currently is everywhere else. I am hereby refraining from sponsoring your upload: 1. You did not respond to my remarks (yet) 2. Both upstreams said the fork is of minor code quality 3. Efforts are being made to fix that 4. Debian stable is not for temporary solutions You might find someone else to sponsor your upload, so I leave this bug open. Please keep in mind that in the case that someone uploads your package, you are responsible to keep it updated, and probably manually fix all issues yourself if upstream decides to work on vanilla i3 instead, and are also responsible for tidying up once the fork is merged into i3 itself if that happens ☺. Again, thanks for your contribution, though! Cheers, Nik -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQJlBAEBCgBPFiEEPJ1UpHV1wCb7F/0mt5o8FqDE8pYFAl0IyLUxGmh0dHBzOi8v d3d3LmRvbWluaWstZ2VvcmdlLmRlL2dwZy1wb2xpY3kudHh0LmFzYwAKCRC3mjwW oMTylilTD/4ubM8khtlVi9O2j0z0bOLAxJeCHpJnq5Xlw53nIxbWWd5zTeOpY9rH XnQoC9lv5vRVt9Pvd8Y1G0jCy/LKDtboroQQ0VheCPmTXjdHghlhU17utDGjuNlM MYhvSXd0RZgSCfmUy+kxTq7UJ8Z0GfqgAObAe8Xo/t2YjTBCe5gPP/x4yJMOi43S GoxU/YJX/iD4p+3lZBzBfPHFnrs4gPGRsdn6YrI6+f7Y9OT/8rpYMyyWeceb8h1r 8uzYm+TZjN9hKq7yRAxySoeSNvO5iCDtnw3kpCdvH1pQlK/G9jFWM7OToyxxHpJM ESR1CNhvPsj78Nf+HkN1wWN7p5kf4OhOo9BQR1WMqmJ2hsVCHtWCwhQcR7mROcP/ 8ZOFUDnBTPY7GVMQYRxRXG3ix9F83hWeRNbcDyVOB8bFFZhRtUeuWbblxSZ13+9/ ElHEIl8hffr4lRfMd7PVO41WyN6qjUG1GqdFgbdb0VKm2djKI2741WYLhFFsS2Jz KvjYO0qSHEa8HMS/P2jCz1Ai+xBjQST4SS/2nyZFPFmfUj5VJ+bJClXcwzP7neoA DKGA5GYDzXK+msTdwhxfbDALZveDozTajcZ7kKitCtjLn7GW0I+ITtIWs1DgzjOf RAfx22/U86kwd3SOi3aVuh4WrQzxVycgPW1523omPkad/07NBfRt6g== =/4OK -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Bug#930633: i3-gaps RFS/ITP
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi antisocrates, > Ingo will outline what needs to be done to get i3-gaps into a mergable > state, so that we can eventually bring these features to all i3 users. > > For the time being, our recommendation is to NOT add i3-gaps to Debian or > any other Linux distribution. Instead, if you have time and motivation, > please consider helping improve i3-gaps with the goal of a merge. With that in mind, please reconsider your package, antisocrates, and the invitation at hand ☺. I strongly support the view not to add i3-gaps as a separate package, now that it was made clear that there are efforts to get the gaps feature merged. Cheers, Nik -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQJlBAEBCgBPFiEEPJ1UpHV1wCb7F/0mt5o8FqDE8pYFAl0Hz6IxGmh0dHBzOi8v d3d3LmRvbWluaWstZ2VvcmdlLmRlL2dwZy1wb2xpY3kudHh0LmFzYwAKCRC3mjwW oMTyliwpEADbI2jq1IiEhBjBi8qDSPaq3WGG8gNtC6kt57JXysUV+FerDrp9qwax Z9HXHjyHyP4oxq0bpbJQHmYTjnNz4FknN2bqdqWO5/bBodOsYmrs4leailsqzDPX aweB3HB46or6lZhCymwKZhhseL9Sv3aBbRBiusBI5umpuGlIwMm1cjXlGse6jUgp +q28k9dydqHb14yxTjA4HPuWHamcoKAwT28IzTV5T6PaKKRiUgmdH6OqDXLpNTFO 8pWvldEHn8lL4QCFiu2kaDA3AAucAZ8++ebxzfyORksWAsLRT56tu+eBHt6nJyQs hf+BeDAWUjOKmx304N38mPcHrhq+mFnNlaUtspxXhGEWOfSnce8ZDacN/ST6jepV nB4vGdiyl6leUNTq9fDENg8UU00Hkpuz5n4pAzQMLc2nx6YLkujS7NOhNff8gwei HiyYqCNK1ATw/X2r+RLl2oROgd+rBPQ5C2RZw2sm+sDd/hSZLEcO5kjDpXXyAze8 /8YhpbgsC5OSy7gK7UmKYm66pexKoto6VDeyh05gqG2z0eXTjpyM+19Rc6f9nZrv Rnt/ON0xUFldZZ2s71nz0Wzc9zeDNQL40iisUZP1i8+qhoS7cuQKC3Kl0rUHkOqt 1ViYNdBszUkBuvCyuaZuPV3Oi2gpHfWbbqv8UBNjVK6iatZMf0UBgg== =3IgO -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Bug#930633: RFS: i3-gaps/4.16.1-1 [ITP]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 > Thanks for your contribution! I looked into your package and have the > following remarks: Oh, plus, also please fix the issues listed on your package's mentors page as well, obiously ☺. - -nik -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQJlBAEBCgBPFiEEPJ1UpHV1wCb7F/0mt5o8FqDE8pYFAl0Hc8wxGmh0dHBzOi8v d3d3LmRvbWluaWstZ2VvcmdlLmRlL2dwZy1wb2xpY3kudHh0LmFzYwAKCRC3mjwW oMTyloqYEACPi2ZqDp5UT/W7u7sPTr8LimxDciPELohPI4qb0RHGTAT4qpkROeUZ g02E981VpzGrnZ5ycAMxArZKYwGs5lidnsmiyA0ilQDkmeLoE864Rrj9BQUy7YpY bZkk6nzx8iMOd3lURzj7jvIWrDWiVXaABGIrDZA4DbuDzze7T9E293Z24szvUCn6 VqJJ7CivDwcKYHXzwsAAfj5vsUT3CFa2UCy1ycbFUjCWMNVA2DUg1f+2OeoO7/cI krnsnRltoTbqvJGHJh8UJwrDT/UVZ2x57s0hj7lRBQ2mzfOXLdqXRjaO/DWrQelZ HyNHL8zf6PWlZnulHDIiPXZvEWeiT5xIzbHSWToL+uNtF+MzjGpSGvALkYtaAP3T avy7WX5yjeKQ5VZD8fBVutYaRQSDaSQmspeESgHOF3AXjDQKth+R8+YmkZy2QmYq zSS7B9F5Qc+3NtV7GbGo39+jQ6kGjNnmx+upryUfOl32TvirR0YG+2BjjC9TP6is CAINW8xx+eV5kWShDhnwrTFbOQ4BFUA+DO9G1/dOkjuy2D1PxsQm8GuAYUTY6/tw I2u/bHtWfnnEGvgfU6zTcWqoJygS4uQJp5koG5I9FosLkckE90/d2rS2i+V7zKkc Jve5M22cP/mUTN6A2qAmmwuKP1dV+8KC8KxfrrG9r4SUCrdLhmluUQ== =+Aqo -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Bug#930633: RFS: i3-gaps/4.16.1-1 [ITP]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi, On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 04:10:03AM +0300, antisocrates wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "i3-gaps" Thanks for your contribution! I looked into your package and have the following remarks: * Did you talk to the i3-wm maintainer, Michael Stapelberg, about his opinion on this, and also about ways how to avoid the conflict between the packages and instead enable it to co-exist? * Your Recommends is a bit too "fat" IMHO. I would suggest keeping all that stuff aligned with the i3-wm package, and leave everything else to the i3 meta package. After upload, you can then ask the i3 maintainer to include your i3-gaps package as alternative dependency in his i3 meta-package. * Please add a paragraph about what i3 is to your package description, not only the differences in i3-gaps. * Your d/copyright lists i3wm upstream as source rather than the fork, and also lists the original author as upstream contact. It should point to the GitHub source repo and list Ingo Bürk as upstream contact, While at it, please also look into whether Michael Stapelberg is the only copyright holder. At least Ingo's changes might be big enough to be separate copyrightable work. How did you verify the information you put into d/copyright? * I would prefer to have your packaging repository on salsa.debian.org. * Hmm, two almost exact copies of the same code in Debian in two conflicting packages? i3-gaps is a widely accepted fork I suppose, yes. What is Michael's opinion on that? Please go through my remarks and comment each of them with what you think about it, and whether you implemented it, will do so or won't. Cheers, Nik -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQJlBAEBCgBPFiEEPJ1UpHV1wCb7F/0mt5o8FqDE8pYFAl0HcsUxGmh0dHBzOi8v d3d3LmRvbWluaWstZ2VvcmdlLmRlL2dwZy1wb2xpY3kudHh0LmFzYwAKCRC3mjwW oMTylvB8D/0QzHlAilO3kt+nqsvRSQVxqZX1GUYcbvFRbCtxkoHuBAIOrcqPoK7v JtRuDUbz+WkCtgf8o/qC22dytDHx9u4dTdidJu9htw5owJoFJB29ZpFPU9zRXRw+ kD+Fky3TsnvR4GxRIgrepOnQuvewvxBC37g+IteqELHHSG6YRN/JE0g1O5DZ2gV4 H8ngf1+P5jAASvEZmhfATfQdlyIQxiplTPd2P1vW/ux8nIYwpxBfIjfqeBw60PQB Dfjmnw0woQEWq05oZCJjUDPpV6sHoJmwiu/tJgqw87T2+yoxPezPNOJARqpoc6C3 FOnVl8BTDmlpOOogsWzyAbLtzMrFREZiSet2HmbWUiapZb1drR1RrCUQzlc0oZy5 ohWhh4O/MdJtR1OYkp+654H6253jHltHULc1uWnyjrkNvsvTyQ0CPsj7Qac54Lj5 XMYtnGvDB3fiJ8zTZDoQR5CC2S+Raue+5d8Np6Dyepo3B2W3qaERKWeni8miCNxI bBA1Hr83mN53KkUaZotFRipwjCtj8LWj4R4RvyB3KCu1p1dPdQAUvMYQepl9uXGp xCBlWC1bLbZ40yzCBd2Oz2F5DX5vg2nxAEDxxajPWeGuY7YpS+iAmn9/C4p7Kj4/ d07OqHrwh0P8w3kqxlTkhjSIs8r+7PbN7mz/qR8LCvFhAAvLc6aLJw== =rliv -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: GPG Key errors
>To show where you can find the information is more helpful than to one >specific inforamtion. Except that the needed information - how to get debsign to find the correct key - cannot be found where the newcomer was pointed. -nik
Re: Not using the pristine-tar branch
>> I saw many people are stop using the "pristine-tar" branch, since the >> "pristine-tar" tool can do just that. > >To add more content, this is where the idea comes from: >https://joeyh.name/blog/entry/generating_pristine_tarballs_from_git_repositories/ I do not understand what you are trying to say. You can use pristine-tar or not. You cannot use pristine-tar without a pristine-tar branch. -nik
Re: Help with removal of conffiles
Hi, >However, after reading the manpage for dh_installdeb [4] (more >specifically, the section `package.maintscript', I changed my mind and >added lines such as: > > rm_conffile /etc/bash_completion.d/harbour 1:2.8-5~ > >So... Is that the right thing to do? I.e. regardless of the version >at which a conffile was removed, I should use the current release >version in `rm_conffile' calls? This is explicitly answered in [3] under prior-version: If the conffile has not been shipped for several versions, and you are now modifying the maintainer scripts to clean up the obsolete file, prior-version should be based on the version of the package that you are now preparing, not the first version of the package that lacked the conffile. This applies to all other actions in the same way. -nik >[3] >https://manpages.debian.org/unstable/dpkg/dpkg-maintscript-helper.1.en.html
Bug#906536: Bug#915249: ITP: cavestory-nx -- Nostalgic side action adventure game
>Copyright is a severe thing. You can bring Debian into severe legal >problems. >Remove at least the game data from mentors and Debian infrastructure >ASAP until copyright is settled. All very unclear, but very obviously not free: https://www.cavestory.org/forums/threads/cave-story-freeware-license.13817/ -nik
Re: My debian/control and possible-unindented-list-in-extended-description
Hi, > My debian/control has the > possible-unindented-list-in-extended-description warning. > > I've checked back-and-forth several times but really couldn't figure > out where that possibility could be. It comes from the (not possibly, but certainly) unindented list on lines 30 to 45 ;). Cheers, Nik signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#906536: RFS: cavestory-nx/1.2.0-1 [ITP] -- Nostalgic side action adventure game
Hi, >Sorry, is there anything wrong with being on the BSD-2-Clause license >and the non-free/games section? If it's BSD licenced, it's not non-free. Maybe some parts are not BSD? -nik
Bug#906536: RFS: cavestory-nx/1.2.0-1 [ITP] -- Nostalgic side action adventure game
Hi, > * License : BSD-2-Clause > Section : non-free/games Huh? -nik
Bug#860905: RFS: libdsk/1.5.4+dfsg-1 [ITP]
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Control: blocks -1 168591 Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libdsk" * Package name: libdsk Version : 1.5.4+dfsg-1 Upstream Author : John Elliott * URL : http://www.seasip.info/Unix/LibDsk/ * License : LGPL-2+ / MIT Section : ilbs It builds those binary packages: libdsk-utils - library for accessing discs and disc image file (utilities) libdsk4- library for accessing discs and disc image file libdsk4-dev - library for accessing discs and disc image file (development head To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/libdsk Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libd/libdsk/libdsk_1.5.4+dfsg-1.dsc Changes since the last upload: libdsk (1.5.4+dfsg-1) unstable; urgency=low * Initial release (Closes: #168591) -- Dominik George Wed, 19 Apr 2017 18:26:06 +0200 Regards, Dominik George -- PGP-Fingerprint: 3C9D 54A4 7575 C026 FB17 FD26 B79A 3C16 A0C4 F296 Dominik George · Hundeshagenstr. 26 · 53225 Bonn Phone: +49 228 92934581 · https://www.dominik-george.de/ Teckids e.V. · FrOSCon e.V. Fellowship of the FSFE · Piratenpartei Deutschland Opencaching Deutschland e.V. · Debian Maintainer LPIC-3 Linux Enterprise Professional (Security)
watch file - remove or only comments?
Hi, I wonder what of these two options is the "correct" solution for an upstream that is not watch'able (e.g. has no release tarballs, etc.) - besides making upstream have release tarballs, that is ;): a) no watch file b) a watch file with only comments In case a), lintian complains and proposes to place a watch file with a comment explaining why it is otherwise empty [0]. In case b), (at least( the DMD [1] complains about empty uscan output. I am tempted to say this is a bug in the DMD. Any opinions (I won;t dare hoping for the one answer ;)). Cheers, Nik [0]: https://lintian.debian.org/tags/debian-watch-file-is-missing.html [1]: https://udd.debian.org/dmd/?nik%40naturalnet.de -- PGP-Fingerprint: 3C9D 54A4 7575 C026 FB17 FD26 B79A 3C16 A0C4 F296 Dominik George · Hundeshagenstr. 26 · 53225 Bonn Mobile: +49-1520-1981389 · https://www.dominik-george.de/ Teckids e.V. · FrOSCon e.V. Fellowship of the FSFE · Piratenpartei Deutschland Opencaching Deutschland e.V. · Debian Contributor LPIC-3 Linux Enterprise Professional (Security) signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#839831: RFS: bucklespring/1.4.0-1 -- upload new upstream version ☺
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version of my package "bucklespring" * Package name: bucklespring Version : 1.4.0-1 Section : games It builds those binary packages: bucklespring - Nostalgia bucklespring keyboard sound bucklespring-data - Nostalgia bucklespring keyboard sound - sound files To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/bucklespring Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/b/bucklespring/bucklespring_1.4.0-1.dsc Changes since the last upload: bucklespring (1.4.0-1) unstable; urgency=medium * New upstream release. + Add mute function. * Source package contains proper copyright note now. * Fix VCS-Git URL. * Drop Debian patches, upstream incorporated all of them. -- Dominik George Wed, 05 Oct 2016 15:36:56 +0200 Regards, Dominik George -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQJhBAEBCABLBQJX9QxIMRpodHRwczovL3d3dy5kb21pbmlrLWdlb3JnZS5kZS9n cGctcG9saWN5LnR4dC5hc2MSHG5pa0BuYXR1cmFsbmV0LmRlAAoJELeaPBagxPKW OhcP/Rk4SOn3dvXROK2P871nRkS1IWuBomKE1ZVhDQ6B2BRo+aaZBl9xMGeAoN3g MpVh/pDudeghQQaqLS/DeLg3SK+O0BAMCJOB/syrGU53WIDEz7XmSjRE2d2nuyPt GMv32Q6fNqxR2I97MZwBpEMneG1+uq8MnqMstGrwRSt6Il5c+93HpVtOrseEsein lCHUmlVOr5NuSrCrsnfU/8ULazafr2kQuvjYFXV+yYJnrve8jqzvqZvOECRsbEUH gxMGW9zOnm2enrgL7oZnifbe5HVyqGISE+D+LSXOtTf9RL6fJa/yfVd/zJvRAiQa TACCEOfiLO6R6EDD+6yd8W+HDXGjkDcEaqHpUQGcFUkaAGIhStxUgySu14KRAx6T nRwDHY6fABViKmK2ANjX5tbOff0Ym3L1nE/tdhZNXTu5chHCgRoI1/yxuufS1GJP ayUnmEQ+L5UHwWg85WGrJAjcrLDtFAas97sLXP+trL//X2Pa+KDjTkDIG1ms23CE TmiIZ/g7n7oy22+k+boNJUdWYoFxIrkv2nT2vvWGUBRHKitIFoNRK4jiRqa9pWRF xkz1gHx41CCbDk1itUZe5jTHIIc7mrjfUL8BegpMYFnUPaCwniiUd7IB0592CJTQ C9pK2jcHqtITmT8pbuPtW9t7jv9YOup4KlNbz/acB0Hn4Rn5 =8kDJ -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Bug#839650: RFS: xloadimage/4.1-24
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version of my package "xloadimage" * Package name: xloadimage Version : 4.1-24 Section : graphics It builds those binary packages: xloadimage - Graphics file viewer under X11 To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/xloadimage Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xloadimage/xloadimage_4.1-24.dsc Changes since the last upload: xloadimage (4.1-24) unstable; urgency=medium * Add patch to make build reproducible. (Closes: #831743) + Thanks to Chris Lamb! * Bump Standards-Version and compat level. * Fix watch file. + X.org unpublished the R5contrib repo. Using GWDG mirror now. * Make package lintian clean. + Fix order of copyright file. + Fix minor spelling issue with a patch. + Use pathfind() from devref 6.4 in maintainer scripts. * Rename files in debian/ for consequent naming scheme. * Add VCS fields. -- Dominik George Mon, 03 Oct 2016 16:10:21 +0200 Regards, Dominik George -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQJhBAEBCABLBQJX8m+SMRpodHRwczovL3d3dy5kb21pbmlrLWdlb3JnZS5kZS9n cGctcG9saWN5LnR4dC5hc2MSHG5pa0BuYXR1cmFsbmV0LmRlAAoJELeaPBagxPKW 6PgQAK74S8pp7mEoKuZnllGlop5lPzLzEcIZQueKzos6lMnGKLz5SMiVTZTMtFxk bIeUVy+vtKoUIMZ5BbD2s/+h3CRQN6kOFHikJIWTCu4oC9o/+x4GB+bKKqOh4Tkc HeUAdlgYpBu3fi7Gg2g17rZqJRZDhGsqHWNUrCQWhcEhoBnKspLYqZm6O+jky7tQ H8EEUiugW8RMOJZZIJRa2TqMxnHSy4+bBfd8cZq+PFcdG3+vaUzEvm5e/5AaWG8Q JQu6aK7DAMg7PLn3R2yVVPkpqhn5pGi2k1N/aC5Dd8Zn+whW9GaJGJqr4hFIC9vE NP1gabmUTMsNa3pGvblsI7BfXju3RBKYCkfkhF0pInsnZWPGvOx5fAF3MH8Rsijb IhN2hso5LAOevGOndRQ5oJfjVNxBAvbkbRd4dPbTRRpeDFE9z+5BeiMN9KCcbjo3 uaUDrypf4FG5Q5bqa0kwgZ2YLWYCY7DDCeVWa0YFoBBJSbXDrK6VeANR6FCxIyEd A5h7GhQKCLw6n1HxoVV/D6SVSLT0qDx3FbUSscaqvSutmHY0KmPe6sjm4n1j0+bB lSopW7hYpr8sCJLn7i0IWmsmciBRGkn8FwJHUuREla1efqqTtUWmiPF+DaKpShwE 03p8hHNiTXurfU5ZLWlW0FMWW2JG9V7GfzY0oHn4GfDm7449 =m08/ -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Bug#839648: RFS: morse2ascii/0.2+dfsg-2
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version of my package "morse2ascii" * Package name: morse2ascii Version : 0.2+dfsg-2 Section : hamradio It builds those binary packages: morse2ascii - tool for decoding the morse codes from a PCM WAV file To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/morse2ascii Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/morse2ascii/morse2ascii_0.2+dfsg-2.dsc Changes since the last upload: morse2ascii (0.2+dfsg-2) unstable; urgency=medium * Move $(LIBS) to end of $(CC) call. (Closes: #733645) * Raise Standards-Version and compat level. + No changes needed. * Fix copyright file style. * Enable hardening flags. * Make package lintian clean. * Add VCS URLs. -- Dominik George Mon, 03 Oct 2016 15:12:54 +0200 Regards, Dominik George -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQJhBAEBCABLBQJX8mMrMRpodHRwczovL3d3dy5kb21pbmlrLWdlb3JnZS5kZS9n cGctcG9saWN5LnR4dC5hc2MSHG5pa0BuYXR1cmFsbmV0LmRlAAoJELeaPBagxPKW yhMQAK2CCcj7zOqSkb7CghcZY7PA5jqIB+8Ut+Z8oedP0rGWkr+YOPdC6PyJeiIO JiO4g5E+BjfSAnNdENR0uP4hczPZwiaZ7vXK9hhcMcweDpuSMqb2YeAld1L7mMan +vxEZgY8FiKh8s3x4tNgu20j6n4+0GRS9a0yBG3kLES2Az2RaxtRPvJEqr189BOF 6ezgBU6ft1xPAf5vw0BRslpYFiNGTkytzpi8eBgqtnLOy8/9A3CiERRYFbF72YDF QK4hsPqPg3yj4YRXD6fXWQDOPJyVPIIbWJp2hbk6bmut0pd9VXbrpJW0CrtmLgnR ZjnD3jItm16E5YdfhQzWGGYDfKcpCVAb1emjVRw9k65wjMcn4t2oKPlNP8Wv8O9l ZyNQWGJjfMJOaZc74a+fp/KkjDAHpYhkpnBcKGpTAAjAqrH5hrTMceEboHE12Y4i VI2m/kn81/YdNNe2VMF2JcR+05OJglTqBeJoS8NkaecTwznsEYdN3g7F7nzfFl2s 6PVq9VJDwbQW5fuXjVUd8M2c7G3CN1aeOWks8tKwwKv38vEkcaohtfPz+UM3KaTg Np3Qqcn8UUfPKWiIUTQtzW8ofVvxJ/KiBThBuLrq6UUrW37/NDc3vuU/Yy7kf47P sz8bPssJXqvoS+Kioc434k1JXZhp3hhmR/RoMuQQbbvy4Hl4 =HMqX -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Bug#838575: RFS: flask-compress/1.3.1-1 [ITP]
Control: reopen -1 Hi, >>I am looking for a sponsor for my package "flask-compress" > > >where did the package go? It went to "found a sponsor, had to change something, did not reupload because sponsor does not use mentors" ;). -nik
Bug#838566: RFS: mimerender/0.6.0-1 [ITP]
Hi Mattia, thanks for looking at the package! > so, this package is in DPMT, hence I'm looking only at the git repo. I removed it from mentors and, as you are not far from sponsoring it ;), did not re-upload the fixed version. In case the sponsorship will not work out, I will re-upload it to mentors for others. > > blocking things: > * this package doesn't seem to be using git-dpm, as mandate by DPMT. Sorry, I mistook a thread on debian-python as discouraging git-dpm. However, I fixed that now, and made the repo work with git-dpm. > > nice to have: > * properly sorted build-depends. `wrap-and-sort -ast` might help here > * the last debhelper compat level is 10 > * in Debian the standard MIT license is called Expat, see DEP-5. Done (all three). I verified the package still builds and is lintian clean. Cheers, Nik signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#838575: RFS: flask-compress/1.3.1-1 [ITP]
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "flask-compress" * Package name: flask-compress Version : 1.3.1-1 Upstream Author : William Fagan * URL : https://github.com/libwilliam/flask-compress * License : MIT Section : python It builds those binary packages: python-flask-compress - Compress responses in a Flask app with gzip (Python 2) python3-flask-compress - Compress responses in a Flask app with gzip (Python 3) To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/flask-compress Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/f/flask-compress/flask-compress_1.3.1-1.dsc Flask-Compress is an extension for the popular Flask micro-framework for web applications. Regards, Dominik George -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQJhBAEBCABLBQJX4/Q2MRpodHRwczovL3d3dy5kb21pbmlrLWdlb3JnZS5kZS9n cGctcG9saWN5LnR4dC5hc2MSHG5pa0BuYXR1cmFsbmV0LmRlAAoJELeaPBagxPKW EHQP/RlBk46ylNURHGc+Q9S1GznIsFC60YH+sEq1Kb0jZ+go2sDRCO6zoQBG06OH 19OQxa+u/KVdlw23J78sckeFC9Q/Z5vmGKG9f73SfEBSwkwJT1jJLJCr66OyXu1j RYvD1yebcHMGDuvVkK8NOHN+Trd4TA9EA9OG3DGMLRlj5jbkmEoayH1VP4J/kSZd 3Cn3RqwKifACCTOzRuQzUik5rE5rQ+5pBHFdkZM8zRkjwHxWDOmKcGp6+2uYx2ep Qu9GH2nZsuQF/+Quw9etiU1f9K3Dj872SpOU78zCHtjsxlYEmOlsmi1vCK89JDDp kobKTwc9mXiG/aTevKhJBPmaT4JTmKSNXk1gJUxiTaHPnDK+W3J2MSUODJAf4Yzd +kaz5lLAh3iLeiFloowVSZ78QhZAboaaRpoZrJ4DlDahMupkflHpj9q72f0RvFIq NLR4sm44D2xegYLOjJdYVYMXxANoSQM9nYGU/vgNBUiihE+z7tR143zyJT2Lya9m pJWlbaGLMyIVm0UmGJnNFom+vcuElrlEo6m9Gx5sJCi8bjbPfeL4OIhmQW1KNFd4 3duqOAYDQUzlvrdSOIzsuuWqAV8xvmgFIRJcLREE4QVj9TyDwayXDUdu+TGkI7Ib yA0XIvXulNrs3VZ4pfhv2dzG/JuJI2CjrTni+7i+Zjf71LWH =jWru -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Bug#838576: RFS: osmalchemy/0.1.post1-1 [ITP]
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "osmalchemy" * Package name: osmalchemy Version : 0.1.post1-1 Upstream Author : Dominik George * URL : https://github.com/Veripeditus/OSMAlchemy * License : MIT Section : python It builds those binary packages: python3-osmalchemy - OpenStreetMap to SQLAlchemy bridge To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/osmalchemy Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/o/osmalchemy/osmalchemy_0.1.post1-1.dsc Regards, Dominik George -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQJhBAEBCABLBQJX4/UNMRpodHRwczovL3d3dy5kb21pbmlrLWdlb3JnZS5kZS9n cGctcG9saWN5LnR4dC5hc2MSHG5pa0BuYXR1cmFsbmV0LmRlAAoJELeaPBagxPKW kpIP/0g1QFaADFn6TSzlrz/EJbLxBXcSwQJXEz9gLIk6jApvd8rCmOh+/YGc0Vsc VGVCjFV/V4Ok05EY02dhRrhq+4mWo556OYczM91z6ueY4ZrVKEdrNssAem8z3bJT yuHmFVPIVFIOEq2z1qfn8RdTypI2kr73obqd2ZQNbJA7PZBx3ymcl9iI00c0pn6J 8z3nGQqeJLZtR7clEwCoERX9U+pw5yhyedrZFHX0iDiY70rjxLGIqR7GD4SeNZcp PtMBf49EGiO/fzBRAQ7dC0hd/+ZHtfLvwv+TKe3uYmaaQIqPnDU4TLeC6bvfeuPc PRAONJ7kXui+++3Jb3KStz5WsfkG8xFH28LGIZ8mgTQkMbmvTwjRXl2PcnKH8N+B rjNutKfl0YXjcyQsYtNfsRGvEen8Dka+vSe9/NOPciwufZ3OMfcHA4nB3fU5+FoV Yh0Y0T/FOt41Gu9j14vF4n8jkS4osBRY10xuIApG/MDgfX1ajiKpunvkgRps1Mss vZ6Dtl0piBleBfKdvLGUr0y8vg5eW0Zfurh/cUn3NEHOIXXFhPvWcYNuvT8rz9mA 6CAftH7ZdV7d8TLKdtGyU2VnyCaCLxyJgBPgxZc/e08BJYP/jeKPzMtVpYIF79oC P3Llk4C3Lrvf4jQOgpL/x6oW5dB+hioR5RP9dMBrzY9D+cW7 =1HcA -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Bug#838566: RFS: mimerender/0.6.0-1 [ITP]
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "mimerender" * Package name: mimerender Version : 0.6.0-1 Upstream Author : Martin Blech * URL : https://github.com/martinblech/mimerender * License : MIT Section : python It builds those binary packages: python-mimerender - RESTful HTTP Content Negotiation for web frameworks (Python 2) python3-mimerender - RESTful HTTP Content Negotiation for web frameworks (Python 3) To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/mimerender Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/mimerender/mimerender_0.6.0-1.dsc The package is a dependency of the soon to be added flask-restless package. Regards, Dominik George -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQJhBAEBCABLBQJX49MdMRpodHRwczovL3d3dy5kb21pbmlrLWdlb3JnZS5kZS9n cGctcG9saWN5LnR4dC5hc2MSHG5pa0BuYXR1cmFsbmV0LmRlAAoJELeaPBagxPKW 5VcP/2d2QeKrmW4BjHgi/f47zf6sPuyaCI/J+K5LkIEo1giM09XGyXGj+qmJQgE1 o+PtW+Mgmzb2y+4SP8Oil39Rzs3w7DQd/2V8xV/MvrbWnnymQh2aqmv4r5aW4GKS N4TLMfKm0yPkEljg6e6tByG7RtFaIwwYD26j3qq6E8yn5FYVbQJZLQee222AeLVA U6L1JJvk+dwDW52HvS8yHjKexj5RxE34fRpJ3NFS82bHzUCRTY/mtB3SEqOHWBqf X23+LIjx0YcSM4/6Phe5ZZ1YhSPby5wtdHAvPBVLKo/SAvbrSzX02zeAzcrwm/vO AqNjAlReydi6p2WOrkWGj9yCQbTf/xMe/0RPY9HL+SuAOXjh5Fkwixj3WI/BXAUs mbGBPOfI9Kn9g88sVreVtnyaJmIJBGt++VjRCHlp3AOjkR+0rUTJFjrjTyNJEtIM CVrayIKxpOe8ozAWZRZPP7e/KoQDux3FPK643lQEf+f/n3tHTLmVoumTkspc5cWo nTCSdpBhL+SiOvI7o7IwyKFcr9CZMwSVY81cVpbhOipcQLVLbYrIvyJsoXDJHMOd Cu1Tj/PybMfcSeMxs+4cj3JWRmh1oDxpKjVSGZjumc0qlBr+sftGHfSQBSfJLJck /zLyIJpmxCjdMiUtElQsROBRusKD5ypnpIbWH6vZ780/4hqx =fkb9 -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: Valve games for Debian Developers
>That's belittled out non DM/DD people that are contributing too (and >probably >at the same level...) ;) Then, obviously, they should apply for DM. Seriously, I think we should stop begging for more. Valve's (subsidiary's) offer is a very kind move and I'd not abuse that community attitude. JM2C, Nik (written as non-DM/DD) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/a9bf328d-938f-46af-8a39-a603fb1b5...@email.android.com
Bug#732138: RFS: libjs-forge/0.2.22+dfsg-1 [ITP]
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libjs-forge" * Package name: libjs-forge Version : 0.2.22+dfsg-1 Upstream Author : Digital Bazaar, Inc. * URL : http://digitalbazaar.com/forge/ * License : BSD or GPL-2 Section : devel It builds those binary packages: libjs-forge - JavaScript Security and Cryptography To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/libjs-forge Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libj/libjs-forge/libjs-forge_0.2.22+dfsg-1.dsc The package is an important core dependency for Geierlein, which is needed by German small businesses to communicate with fiscal authorities. I am working on getting Geierlein into Debian to get rid of one more point in the average companz's workflow ehere they still depend on Windows. I have worked together on the package with Helmut Grohne, who did a first review. I would not mind managing the package as co-maintainer under the pkg-javascript umbrella if that is desired, though. Regards, Dominik George - -- System Information: Debian Release: jessie/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 3.11-2-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/mksh -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.15 (GNU/Linux) iQJOBAEBCAA4BQJSrIgsMRpodHRwczovL3d3dy5kb21pbmlrLWdlb3JnZS5kZS9n cGctcG9saWN5LnR4dC5hc2MACgkQt5o8FqDE8pY64w//dtqWSuTGD6Dyumgdgk6I TYchgagHTehAWxMYPfoueqUVKwUg6+M4ZOkiVIHLv2/VebyEeaMAhzAYswYYTbFp NoT4zGvBQWefTRTIKk9Ifr9QMw/MCvZrMKhaygUZU9lti3rtYrUdXuk2YZzTDYVS 4jJ/HcSUcoCmF0nAjLYAeiYDzHPJebiT0nTPcDWREXzOtmouIUhbl05i8Rt/ALgH TO/17ENIqIl3lMUhlfWKZ9j4x7rlhdoyfshFfpi5Wg1U4ZRjF+Fh1gdt8aqDe7Ae GTkTV/U+33rckT6PjFNTFziLLPaCgU+WdOYJD7YZESmSGOdQhmqLqhiy0/VKvdh6 bJuTvuMqh/PxDVJWP32/sIVmnyi6fTHmkDxHdJbhZE9o5PaadMp1V7R97bL9Sh4+ hPr3QAEVQYR/DaCulek9lQWGd4WlKy5BqFz0YlKq6i1+mP/AHdr93rCrCsYqdCMd PlsF9zjrx7GxuDtZpZsxieX2KX0UtBoM3And1MIJ2WljFPHqsdSZqSegKwMRx7rl TF5wxLhGHaL/UM84z8IpxfD9wRIVxHhrq2U4a9/a4jF/89+kK+7ci9mFRVnm2r7V fb0IeHDrWfSxPV/6lZn1CbZLrIH6rFN6mSgFP53RzSiQyN2+c5nkFYqWtZndaNs9 9zPs80ACsDv/cfnC4aWIQ+A= =AkcT -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20131214163244.25111.54492.report...@keks.lan.naturalnet.de
Re: Correcting a version number
>[2] http://qa.debian.org/cgi-bin/watch?pkg=vpcs_0.5b0-1 In that special case, I'd even say your versioning "mistake" is good because upstream's ~ notation is a mess. That char is reserved for Debian ;) (yes, that's false and not so humble ;))! Why not keep your version numbering as it is and use version mangling in the watch file instead to match.upstream? -nik -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/f297d82e-184e-4ea3-83ef-d39ddd599...@email.android.com
Re: Correcting a version number
Hi, >I have realised that in an earlier package upload, I made a blunder >with regards the version of the package. Where is that package now? On mentors, or in Debian? -nik -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5b5cf785-3895-4d4b-9ed2-66f07fe50...@email.android.com
Re: Upstream tarballs with varying line endings
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Felix Natter schrieb: >hello, > >my problem is that Freeplane's git is configured such that native line >endings (LF on UNIX, CRLF on Windows) are used in checkouts and thus >the >Upstream tarballs are either CR or CRLF, depending on on whose computer >the release(-tarball) was generated. In any case, you should go and slap upstream for that very hard, but how is it an issue for packaging, assuming the build runs fine in both cases? Cheers, Nik -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: APG v1.0.9 iQFNBAEBCgA3BQJSi7TTMBxEb21pbmlrIEdlb3JnZSAobW9iaWxlIGtleSkgPG5p a0BuYXR1cmFsbmV0LmRlPgAKCRAvLbGk0zMOJYXpB/9lEmvBn4817tIvF2QSfgAG 2Oe/TpgYCSbHERJ7JKBwz0EBMQABlGLAo6fifJvmHYPd9UgPMdotXeef+bhuDY58 lm3nWT1BZz4He/sU8cFrpwIXOhsPjsw/fEsE0fG03aB5iChuCFHuJXTb3dfmBnhb Nox3ZGEpodjq8uXhQ/+r+B7I3HYV1Z9TPJjDmamaeJU0frTOJYFN0U6PYYck626U hx5lcEyMQu2jxaTsgv0C5GILsQlTie/OYGT5omU/SrSG0xhMAXzh6lMzSeLiE6/L omdKU8I0E1eYNtpyTWUCC4TjG59pin3Rya3ewebEH6oT8m24Gs5aaFC9gdwvoGR9 =PaWd -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/6a0e24d3-6cc9-4cdc-9d20-28f0c27d3...@email.android.com
Bug#729601: RFS: vokoscreen/1.8.1-1 [ITP] -- easy to use screencast creator
Hi, to the maintainer and any sponsor: ** Please do a very, very careful license review! ** We had a very long discussion about this software at debianforum.de [0][1][2] because the upstream author wanted us to test the software, but was reluctant to grant us a view at the code all through the thread until we finally forced them. So any review that was be done is incomplete, and upstream's attitude justifies a very careful review of whether the code was now really fully opened or not. -nik [0]: http://debianforum.de/forum/viewtopic.php?f=28&t=135539 [1]: http://debianforum.de/forum/viewtopic.php?f=28&t=136658 [2]: http://debianforum.de/forum/viewtopic.php?f=28&t=136755 -- Auf welchem Server liegt das denn jetzt…? Wenn es nicht übers Netz kommt bei Hetzner, wenn es nicht gelesen wird bei STRATO, wenn es klappt bei manitu. PGP-Fingerprint: 3C9D 54A4 7575 C026 FB17 FD26 B79A 3C16 A0C4 F296 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Cannot create regular file under /usr/share/man/man1
> I took a look at the good build, which is glimpse-4.18.5, and I see:
>
> for d in glimpse.1 glimpseindex.1 glimpseserver.1 ; do \
> /usr/bin/install -c -m 444 $d /export/build/glimpse/bld/
> glimpse-4.18.5/debian/tmp/usr/share/man/man1 ; \
> done
Do you know what /export/build/glimpse/bld/glimpse-4.18.5/debian/tmp/ is?
Tadaa ... it is ${DESTDIR}. Which leads us to the conclusion that, as
stated in my initial reply, that the lack thereof is the culprit ;).
-nik
--
Wer den Grünkohl nicht ehrt, ist der Mettwurst nicht wert!
PGP-Fingerprint: 3C9D 54A4 7575 C026 FB17 FD26 B79A 3C16 A0C4 F296
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Re: Cannot create regular file under /usr/share/man/man1
Hi,
> for d in glimpse.1 glimpseindex.1 glimpseserver.1 ; do \
> /usr/bin/install -c -m 444 $d /usr/share/man/man1 ; \
> done
Obviously, that should be ${DESTDIR}/usr/share/man/man1 .
Cheers,
Nik
--
* concerning Mozilla code leaking assertion failures to tty without D-BUS *
That means, D-BUS is a tool that makes software look better
than it actually is.
PGP-Fingerprint: 3C9D 54A4 7575 C026 FB17 FD26 B79A 3C16 A0C4 F296
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/2013162110.gc15...@keks.naturalnet.de
Bug#728300: RFS: dh-make/0.62+nmu1 [NMU] [RC] -- fix RC bug #726653
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "dh-make", to fix RC bug #726653.
* Package name: dh-make
Version : 0.62+nmu1
Upstream Author : Craig Small
* License : GPL-3+
Section : devel
It builds those binary packages:
dh-make- tool that converts source archives into Debian package source
To access further information about this package, please visit the following
URL:
http://mentors.debian.net/package/dh-make
Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:
dget -x
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/dh-make/dh-make_0.62+nmu1.dsc
Changes since the last upload:
dh-make (0.62+nmu1) unstable; urgency=low
* Non-maintainer upload.
* Use File::Cwd insetad of $ENV{"PWD"}. (Closes: #726653)
-- Dominik George Wed, 30 Oct 2013 12:57:10 +0100
Regards,
Dominik George
- -- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
Kernel: Linux 3.11-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/mksh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.15 (GNU/Linux)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=d5/z
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/20131030121101.8887.2620.report...@keks.lan.naturalnet.de
Bug#727733: RFS: rssdrop/0.2-1 [ITP]
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "rssdrop" * Package name: rssdrop Version : 0.2-1 Upstream Author : Alan Grow * URL : http://search.cpan.org/~acg/rssdrop-0.2/rssdrop * License : GPL-1+ or Artistic Section : mail It builds those binary packages: rssdrop- deliver rss feeds to Maildirs To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/rssdrop Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/rssdrop/rssdrop_0.2-1.dsc Changes since the last upload: rssdrop (0.2-1) unstable; urgency=low * Initial Release. (Closes: #727727) -- Dominik George Fri, 25 Oct 2013 23:23:05 +0200 Regards, Dominik George -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.15 (GNU/Linux) iQJOBAEBCAA4BQJSauOAMRpodHRwczovL3d3dy5kb21pbmlrLWdlb3JnZS5kZS9n cGctcG9saWN5LnR4dC5hc2MACgkQt5o8FqDE8pZ8uQ//RHdWThQ2jWzzOK8imKtH DYoKXZFbjGnCvBFdF36tzuyXXMFt4N8wa4Qdv2uMKLfhaXP9O5tWW7PaLDh18ykg t5uVFBowsiIdVQRRKzJZmVzVO6MTJ881pMGgeTQvouB4pdO93ioFOHSbHTnyAzaO HvXH/6+NzTxVKrCeobBRkiSQ/F86RFDlbuXs/M/r3ZXrkWeBOznbMsUEW03F+7wJ J1/9NU9amnayx2D9AD67uIp7FASc3/JTw8ytecnRpsDUKhGDMFvkKq33SlnvLP8R fIQNJtdaEwF3il7roSRpUzuhh94LI6gaZqRjefz0GE74vPYU9dnAWbKznxIYV0kQ toO01HYuLm6PYxHmc2CQp8jJ47dXr/kQ3kB4AEgl5bsU+1U8Tuv/dKsK7vd+JVIg Ayh+hD7mozTu26cns9XbQNlHCvBQIlRVF/UjHeoUIRzty42FxED48cqFpwGEuxEq rlPcum/P1EIfaXReeJ1gls0Y+xbDdCBjPklXzukErEU+NWX/MqpsRvdKK1H7ML+a 17Rj5VrVdPWxLSyLCjAgKqy57UYNSD2nYArSEwjqivOF7v4pqk9OXD+WjYv2X5KP XQZEDxGNKaQs+EyLaUfUBJIpOKKNNLjkUBIaNbIHdXe1aU9enNNt/E45ddaYClaT PyQEp0ahgVaSLMpZs5FJYCA= =7YZb -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20131025213248.10733.2960.report...@keks.lan.naturalnet.de
Re: possible-gpl-code-linked-with-openssl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Russ Allbery schrieb: >Dominik George writes: > >> That said, I my personal opinion is that doing the above is plain >> nonsense from a FOSS point of view, and if upstream's intention is to >> produce open software, they have to respond to the license issue. > >Unfortunately, upstreams don't necessarily see it that way. I've seen >upstreams just refuse to add the license exception on the grounds that >they think Debian's concern is silly and they refuse to cater to it. >*sigh* Hmm, then their stance on open source and licensing is silly and wie cannot distribute the code. Sad but true, what can you do :). FOSS needs careful licensing, not caring does not help the community. - -nik -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: APG v1.0.8-fdroid iQFNBAEBCgA3BQJSXrqRMBxEb21pbmlrIEdlb3JnZSAobW9iaWxlIGtleSkgPG5p a0BuYXR1cmFsbmV0LmRlPgAKCRAvLbGk0zMOJZ+SCACuI7lElxMairQbd8zHABln OngcpsaM7ncN4CMn/e5AKlSNchrIqrH8j2tLLfSCFxHbxIIDBVci7aaTGhzRVLXV 8srV7jbJ8dpuz5Xn88AvLUgez9zaPlAgx19FVkwMjfryq2EHMZeJ0gHIW2q+PGBf GAVcTTnjqhpvaMfrSFzyv0b9CVaeMgMDsCR+E+7WM5i4veVGnxyhH9n8/eKskCC0 mGIjp3pKjWO7+Oq/bejFSIMS6roiYsH2qra6NJ8bg7RLuG5EhUTXDhf02mpdMf2O b7BZBZZNVpXuwf+COxN8jQUFxzqxTPKV00oXzhW3DA9FAE29YtBI/I0Y/I3xY4DK =F7Ft -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/0d8a9378-6052-4a89-ae45-6946965c7...@email.android.com
Re: possible-gpl-code-linked-with-openssl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Gert Wollny schrieb: >The real issue is, who linked the binary that gets distributed, and >therefore, who has to comply with the GPL, and this is not the upstream >author. To rephrase Dominik's comment: "Upstream did not link openssl >against the binary that will get distributed, the package maintainer >does that." Thanks, that's exactly what I was intending to say :)! Sorry if my wording was unclear. The point is that the GPL does not, or better, cannot, limit the original author's rights, and so it would be perfectly OK if they distributed their own binaries they linked against OpenSSL while still noone else is allowed to do so. That said, I my personal opinion is that doing the above is plain nonsense from a FOSS point of view, and if upstream's intention is to produce open software, they have to respond to the license issue. To make the other part clear: You must not distribute GPL code linked against OpenSSL if the exception is missing, so it cannot enter Debian, neither main nor one of the other suites. Cheers, Nik -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: APG v1.0.8-fdroid iQFNBAEBCgA3BQJSXrXDMBxEb21pbmlrIEdlb3JnZSAobW9iaWxlIGtleSkgPG5p a0BuYXR1cmFsbmV0LmRlPgAKCRAvLbGk0zMOJfgDCACsPiAQ6oUx2mtA6JGfcyqD 9XmoXQQTxuQn7M6i5xcKVjS0ebPThDu/L7UFa2/M1aQQRMzKPEhG/t4WZT/dfYHZ eWHAfBxE2zpo8sg+I/9ryIj2BTDDQJDDE8a7dlCE1sviBC0vuMYFNgIt03NfpBl2 p9pBIRaeLVitFqPMcRduaVNQIkIJG+XVexs+QFl/R2ymxOU2gYePxP7sdHxawDEr 6Q2nDUATB8DBJE4CAvkPeX55ExZxJMlqIk+yYHLUWYTcjmOin9dR88fJOq5zCjPw 8WoSI+arSzLjvc7AmDpViht8T8PL/XCJJsTBWZSCPuqsblTN/O1JgrAiN87Ei7g3 =eLIW -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/52ff2758-054c-446d-b129-6dc893070...@email.android.com
Re: possible-gpl-code-linked-with-openssl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Richi Lists schrieb: >Or can I add the excpetion myself, assuming since the author chose to >link agains openssl, he is ok with it? Definitely not. Upstream did not link against it - you do that. - -nik -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: APG v1.0.8-fdroid iQFNBAEBCgA3BQJSXqDrMBxEb21pbmlrIEdlb3JnZSAobW9iaWxlIGtleSkgPG5p a0BuYXR1cmFsbmV0LmRlPgAKCRAvLbGk0zMOJUyBB/4nF2MtEQPAJ9fqaFqVUsjB qCAUap2K0PAUcp06o7xrWGfH1xFIXEnYawCblq1uCl41Mzg9b3gjlPS6SxmvKDQR 7X7fwsCTUHQIC5XqEI2ibqdM6ytCv63fvdC8KzsU9BP4LOk4kTk29bz5CgYFUT2E 8rgZZ2VIlVM30Rjp0HRBYsWLcFcg6Qu4ISzGnz0LjICOntsWMvUqxT6M0MaGZd0G UdVz5vUbVQImX4YuLnFz0A5uwW5OVUyVYtuQsbLx8jSIVxcQ/LPqfpU1t4LMLtgE 0qWSMwgR/Xsyl6mDJZ17G0V2ALu3gTAd2q3kRbfnmXggF9gSGgypqboy/alIu21G =F1a7 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/8489add1-8d30-427e-85bd-33535b5f4...@email.android.com
Bug#724881: RFS: xloadimage/4.1-22 [ITA] -- assume maintainership for Orphaned xloadimage
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "xloadimage" * Package name: xloadimage Version : 4.1-22 License : BSD-like Section : graphics It builds those binary packages: xloadimage - Graphics file viewer under X11 To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/xloadimage Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xloadimage/xloadimage_4.1-22.dsc Changes since the last upload: xloadimage (4.1-22) unstable; urgency=low * Changed maintainer to myself (closes: #527575). * Changed libtiff dependency to libtiff5 and tested. + Using TIFFHeaderClassic instead of TIFFHeader + BigTIFF support might be possible now and will be implemented soon. * Re-licensed d/r under GPL-2+ as per the custom license given by the original author. * Fixed build log checks. + Made build system respect all hardening flags. + Fixed implicit declaration * Do not resize images smaller than the screen with -shrink (David Frey, closes: #381382). * Fix -fullscreen behaviour for special gemoetry cases (Anton Khirnov, closes: #506343). * Replaced hyphens by correct minus signs for options and others in *.man. -- Dominik George Sun, 29 Sep 2013 10:38:24 +0200 Regards, Dominik George -- * concerning Mozilla code leaking assertion failures to tty without D-BUS * That means, D-BUS is a tool that makes software look better than it actually is. PGP-Fingerprint: 3C9D 54A4 7575 C026 FB17 FD26 B79A 3C16 A0C4 F296 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Bug#724807: RFS: yt/2013.09.28-1 [ITP]
Dear mentors, I have worked closely together with Javier on fixing issues with his youtube-cli (formerly yt) package. It appears to be of good quality now, and I found Javier to be a good teamplayer and accepting and reacting to criticism really well, so I'd consider him fit for maintainership of the package. I'd really love to see youtube-cli in Debian. Cheers, Nik -- * mirabilos is handling my post-1990 smartphone * Aaah, it vibrates! Wherefore art thou, demonic device?? PGP-Fingerprint: 3C9D 54A4 7575 C026 FB17 FD26 B79A 3C16 A0C4 F296 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Upgrading the Debian Policy
Niels Thykier schrieb: >On 2013-09-24 16:42, Dominik George wrote: >> >> >> Andrew Shadura schrieb: >>> Hello, >>> >>> On 24 September 2013 14:48, Dominik George >wrote: >>> >>>>> lintian --color=always -I -E -i --pedantic >>>> lintian -vIiE --pedantic --color=auto >>> >>> Properly reads as -Evil :) >> >> Hi, >> >> please fix your font and/or try not to be funny when you might >confuse newbies. >> >> -nik >> >> > >I think Andrew was refering to the mnemonic "Evil and pedantic"[1]. > >~Niels > >[1] >http://nthykier.wordpress.com/2012/02/23/some-sponsors-are-evil-and-pedantic/ ... which makes sense, but yet I was proposing -I, neither -l nor -L. -nik -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/243a19fe-d4a6-4561-a96b-5884986af...@email.android.com
Re: Upgrading the Debian Policy
Andrew Shadura schrieb: >Hello, > >On 24 September 2013 14:48, Dominik George wrote: > >>> lintian --color=always -I -E -i --pedantic >> lintian -vIiE --pedantic --color=auto > >Properly reads as -Evil :) Hi, please fix your font and/or try not to be funny when you might confuse newbies. -nik -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/ef920a79-d497-4aa8-8b50-b7f800338...@email.android.com
Re: Upgrading the Debian Policy
> Lintian does not "down-scale" its checks based on the S-V field; so you > will get (almost) the same result regardless of what value you put in > the field. The obvious exception is checks that actually cares about > the content of the S-V field (which is something like 5 tags or so). Yes, and yet not bumping the field will not fix the issue. -nik -- * mirabilos is handling my post-1990 smartphone * Aaah, it vibrates! Wherefore art thou, demonic device?? PGP-Fingerprint: 3C9D 54A4 7575 C026 FB17 FD26 B79A 3C16 A0C4 F296 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Upgrading the Debian Policy
Hi, > "The package should be updated to follow the last version of Debian > Policy (Standards-Version 3.9.4 instead of 3.8.3)". This is at first nothing more than the Standards-Version field in debian/control. > I never knew the details of Debian Policy before […] Sorry to disapoint you, but you should read *all of* DPM before passing a apckage for upload to a sponsor or to mentors. > but did try to read the policy from 3.8.4 to 3.9.4, and find it a > rather long list with no further details. At first, I was trying to > find a wiki/blog dedicated to upgrading the Debian Policy, failing to > find that, now I'm thinking, Just update the Standards-Version field, try to build the package, and (as you propose below) give it to lintian for lunch. Yet again, read the Policy, by any means! It will save both you and your mentor/sponsor a hell of a lot of time later. > If I can fix all lintian reported issues, it'll be safe to say that I've > bring the package to the last version of Debian Policy, right? No. It is safe to say that if, and only if, you bump the Standards-Version field to 3.9.4 and *then* have lintian be silent. > PS. the lintian proposed to me before is: > > lintian --color=always -I -E -i --pedantic lintian -vIiE --pedantic --color=auto -nik -- Ein Jabber-Account, sie alle zu finden; ins Dunkel zu treiben und ewig zu binden; im NaturalNet, wo die Schatten droh'n ;)! PGP-Fingerprint: 3C9D 54A4 7575 C026 FB17 FD26 B79A 3C16 A0C4 F296 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Upload modified package to mentors
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 > I think the current compatibility level is 8, not 9. Forget it. - -nik - -- Auf welchem Server liegt das denn jetzt…? Wenn es nicht übers Netz kommt bei Hetzner, wenn es nicht gelesen wird bei STRATO, wenn es klappt bei manitu. PGP-Fingerprint: 3C9D 54A4 7575 C026 FB17 FD26 B79A 3C16 A0C4 F296 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (GNU/Linux) iQJOBAEBCAA4BQJSOHQQMRpodHRwczovL3d3dy5kb21pbmlrLWdlb3JnZS5kZS9n cGctcG9saWN5LnR4dC5hc2MACgkQt5o8FqDE8pYf0A/+Ng6zWq+IEEununYN9eg7 tDe9ymi3FrWi1Iv1w33N/N9rJ4p6RzT9QvQigPX0pwht1hl7SBEk1d8LsJRwKOS6 hTTg4OZgLm0I7KpHeVfKh301InB53Q5eEQJkzwGlb9zYEdDnASagoS7IWbGT8rLg gYoBLeBuLz8LHPEwstVV1C75izEASoiehW1xh4JWFcGMvq3ew+oE1lNYrSSISJeZ 3/VYt6hrvi2S4Z2CUOsCrukwVsGz43/KtSHc6jQCk7KGDBnIwmsNQ7h30wPdGYoO Okvk8kO8+/8ehjfxr/o4uFKWGJzmfHLGxpNnygk/OYXoS1h4Imvx9nDlf2lvrGQI RzA1YHDLRy0utiiX3kD0UnMAdrFl8mzrW5din0igu/0RGhWdrHES9KtI7S5VxI4p XwJ1WrQ7+LOgSuV2034puT+EG9MyaZOMX/mCP0wnXpHjssI/ZHbAAIUW4xus5jck EP+nkfc6hcHGJ7i3GmrBPJ7pRojV4+UHDEkdi6Et7I2gCUhc8DvZSQAP6AeWEBFo ylLHvj4eKvLqa31ASmy7jacb6myZbYMrX1cce5lLDGliDnVAoYJGnnTlhdrSYaE6 SPXUkjYUtdrUlCjDWt0Oo5OR5DDvrnhbn/PY1r/voc+88mjpLhbhva3LYefMV+dI yL8p0JRjdcLduD9zWP1hdqg= =cDjV -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130917152400.gm6...@keks.naturalnet.de
Re: Upload modified package to mentors
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi, > I updated one of my packages on mentors earlier and wanted to clarify > whether each upload increment the build number? (For example 0.4b2-1 > would become 0.4b2-2) Yes, each upload should increase the Debian revision, and contain a changelog that hustifies the new revision. There are exceptions where the Debian revision is changed with some other pattern, e.g. non-maintainer uploads. However, the first upload of an upstream version to the Debian archive should reset the Debian revision to 1. > At the the moment, my second upload of the package has created a > strange error: > > "Buildsystem: Package uses debhelper with an old compatibility level > No compatibility level set!" > > I have checked the upload and compat is definitely present in both the > debian folder and debian.tar.gz > > The package in question is vpcs: https://mentors.debian.net/package/vpcs I think the current compatibility level is 8, not 9. - -nik - -- # apt-assassinate --help Usage: apt-assassinate [upstream|maintainer] PGP-Fingerprint: 3C9D 54A4 7575 C026 FB17 FD26 B79A 3C16 A0C4 F296 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (GNU/Linux) iQJOBAEBCAA4BQJSOHNYMRpodHRwczovL3d3dy5kb21pbmlrLWdlb3JnZS5kZS9n cGctcG9saWN5LnR4dC5hc2MACgkQt5o8FqDE8pY0pw/9FMZel5vDumGNW0LCxb1I ymhWGYUYsJBCfLr1BT/o3r9OP2T5O3ED+dnGsZghWFoxo4gi+KzazMlKmA0gJ1FE 3KuhSNu7+o16V7YAoB+jJ7KMuLW/KQQyYGb4q2pF+OgjRzYorkr/4cmvvB1Ehn8B dSyGmfGIPd1rUvhDmia+ITzEhrqvx0AUul3l5vT58IebfaZcKjMvvhppT+dQh2Ch Adf6wfhQAbHYRQBoN7OyBSXImK5BiYq8MgVUyYnjOhE1L2sbYUTdsyQ/GJYoM+bd erkThhtakY2p+sZFen3kcIII5Ll4UJSx6k83N2LrJz5y2PY5fbtyO8dPhcMomylv pwvAkCr5HMfznL+PTzFO20RbeVt1JLw0DYIAl5JtNGYY3V+ogP0uZr7Rjt6J4bxZ 6ARyp0Ltcvz+b8G9ncMagolZVw4RMxRts5ivRc0Xvhpsg1Rgpjz9d/1+tAugtsdY afguebfZoM4XgQhtvwv8em68DngahIZtQj28k47cPWVwd3ks7+mCGtRXqCGvKRtI GX8nMuSMdn+IAnN/FvQYSxa+wRQAzQUufUUQpJS968lJV9tRwES5AddDsSVFGe2R g31aBe3dShNFC2Ro7SHKn/DCLNI0Wq1IijugRbU08YNfP2tv41CP96WnAE/L7lAd 1oBzUHGMazhnPEGJA8MlCZg= =AxGZ -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130917152056.gl6...@keks.naturalnet.de
Re: skype4py, any sponsors?
Hi, I do not see why this should be supported by Debian. Skype is proprietary and, allegedly, malicious spyware that we should not encourage our users to use. IMHO you should go support Telepathy or some other framework that allow programming for less malicious software. -nik Gianfranco Costamagna schrieb: >Hi debian mentors, > >skype4py was removed on unstable because unmaintained and not so much >used. > >Anyway I think now that is actively maintained again would be nice to >get it into debian again, >http://packages.qa.debian.org/s/skype4py.html > >I made it available on mentors, I can package it and take care of it. >http://mentors.debian.net/package/skype4py > >with skype4py you can easily write python scripts for sending messages >around the world and do many other things that skype API allows you to > > >many thanks for your time > >Gianfranco > > > >-- >To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org >with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact >listmas...@lists.debian.org >Archive: >http://lists.debian.org/1378214608.44405.yahoomail...@web172701.mail.ir2.yahoo.com -- Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Mobiltelefon mit K-9 Mail gesendet.
Please review: geierlein - free Elster client for German tax declarations
Hi, following up on RFP #695204, I have started packaging the Geierlein client needed by German folks to send VAT declarations to the fiscal authorities. It is quite an important package as our authorities do not provide a Linux version of their official client. Geierlein is the successor of taxbird, which was incuded in Debian until it got abandonned. There are two issues I see with the package that I would like to get feedback on: - I had to remove test cases from upstream's build system as the module used for it, nodeunit, is not available in Debian as a build dependency. I think this is not a problem as testing is mainly upstream's and the maintainer's job and moreover, the package is JavaScript code that is not platform-dependant. So if xulrunner works on any architecture, it can be expected that Geierlein will as well. Build daemons thus will not face problems there. My person stance on that is: The package can be handled without unit testing for now, and for the future, I have filed an RFP for nodeunit (#711353). - Geierlein uses some JavaScript libraries that Debian does not (yet) include. The libraries, especially the versions that Geierlein is known to work with, are included in the upstream tarball and are installed in a package-private location that will not interfere with others. My personal stance on that is: The package can be handled with including the libraries now, maybe once the libraries get added to Debian this can be changed, but it is not a must. Please find the package on mentors.debian.net: https://mentors.debian.net/package/geierlein Cheers, Nik -- Auf welchem Server liegt das denn jetzt…? Wenn es nicht übers Netz kommt bei Hetzner, wenn es nicht gelesen wird bei STRATO, wenn es klappt bei manitu. PGP-Fingerprint: 3C9D 54A4 7575 C026 FB17 FD26 B79A 3C16 A0C4 F296 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#698853: RFS: gosa/2.7.4-4.1 [RC] [NMU] -- make package installable again
> Unfortunately the fix is not good enough. Two issues: > a/ the script uses set -e, this means it will it exit with an error if > a2enmod is missing No, why should it? That's the whole point of the test before the call of a2enmod. If it doesn't exist, it is never called. > b/ [[ (double brackets) is non-posix and not supported by all shells, so > you should avoid that in favour of [ ]. checkbashims can help detect > such errors. Granted. -nik signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#698853: RFS: gosa/2.7.4-4.1 [RC] [NMU] -- make package installable again
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Control: tags 698635 + patch pending Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my NMU of package "gosa". The upload would fix RC bug #698635. Package name: gosa Version : 2.7.4-4.1 Section : web It builds those binary packages: gosa - Web Based LDAP Administration Program gosa-desktop - Desktop integration for GOsa² gosa-dev - GOsa² development utilities gosa-help-de - German online help for GOsa² gosa-help-en - English online help for GOsa gosa-help-fr - French online help for GOsa² gosa-help-nl - Dutch online help for GOsa gosa-plugin-connectivity - connectivity plugin for GOsa² gosa-plugin-dhcp - dhcp plugin for GOsa² gosa-plugin-dhcp-schema - LDAP schema for GOsa² dhcp plugin gosa-plugin-dns - dns plugin for GOsa² gosa-plugin-dns-schema - LDAP schema for GOsa² dns plugin gosa-plugin-fai - fai plugin for GOsa² gosa-plugin-fai-schema - LDAP schema for GOsa² fai plugin gosa-plugin-gofax - gofax plugin for GOsa² gosa-plugin-gofon - gofon plugin for GOsa² gosa-plugin-goto - goto plugin for GOsa² gosa-plugin-kolab - kolab plugin for GOsa² gosa-plugin-kolab-schema - LDAP schema for GOsa² kolab plugin gosa-plugin-ldapmanager - ldapmanager plugin for GOsa² gosa-plugin-mail - base mail plugin for GOsa² gosa-plugin-mit-krb5 - mit-krb5 plugin for GOsa² gosa-plugin-mit-krb5-schema - LDAP schema for GOsa² mit-krb5 plugin gosa-plugin-nagios - nagios plugin for GOsa² gosa-plugin-nagios-schema - LDAP schema for GOsa² nagios plugin gosa-plugin-netatalk - netatalk plugin for GOsa² gosa-plugin-opengroupware - opengroupware plugin for GOsa² gosa-plugin-openxchange - openxchange plugin for GOsa² gosa-plugin-openxchange-schema - LDAP schema for GOsa² openxchange plugin gosa-plugin-opsi - opsi plugin for GOsa² gosa-plugin-phpgw - phpgw plugin for GOsa² gosa-plugin-phpgw-schema - LDAP schema for GOsa² phpgw plugin gosa-plugin-phpscheduleit - phpscheduleit plugin for GOsa² gosa-plugin-phpscheduleit-schema - LDAP schema for GOsa² phpscheduleit plugin gosa-plugin-pptp - pptp plugin for GOsa² gosa-plugin-pptp-schema - LDAP schema for GOsa² pptp plugin gosa-plugin-pureftpd - pureftpd plugin for GOsa² gosa-plugin-pureftpd-schema - LDAP schema for GOsa² pureftpd plugin gosa-plugin-rolemanagement - rolemanagement plugin for GOsa² gosa-plugin-rsyslog - rsyslog plugin for GOsa² gosa-plugin-samba - samba3 plugin for GOsa² gosa-plugin-scalix - scalix plugin for GOsa² gosa-plugin-squid - squid plugin for GOsa² gosa-plugin-ssh - ssh plugin for GOsa² gosa-plugin-ssh-schema - LDAP schema for GOsa² ssh plugin gosa-plugin-sudo - sudo plugin for GOsa² gosa-plugin-sudo-schema - LDAP schema for GOsa² sudo plugin gosa-plugin-systems - systems plugin for GOsa² gosa-plugin-uw-imap - uw-imap plugin for GOsa² gosa-plugin-webdav - webdav plugin for GOsa² gosa-schema - LDAP schema for GOsa To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/gosa Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gosa/gosa_2.7.4-4.1.dsc Changes since the last upload: see attached debdiff. Regards, Dominik George -- diff -Nru gosa-2.7.4/debian/changelog gosa-2.7.4/debian/changelog --- gosa-2.7.4/debian/changelog 2012-06-19 09:37:20.0 +0200 +++ gosa-2.7.4/debian/changelog 2013-01-24 15:53:57.0 +0100 @@ -1,3 +1,11 @@ +gosa (2.7.4-4.1) unstable; urgency=low + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Only call a2enmod in postinst if it is available +(Closes: #698635, thanks to Matthias Rampke). + + -- Dominik George Thu, 24 Jan 2013 15:52:09 +0100 + gosa (2.7.4-4) unstable; urgency=low * New smarty3 package fixes problems with template loading. This diff -Nru gosa-2.7.4/debian/gosa.postinst gosa-2.7.4/debian/gosa.postinst --- gosa-2.7.4/debian/gosa.postinst 2013-01-24 15:49:52.0 +0100 +++ gosa-2.7.4/debian/gosa.postinst 2013-01-24 15:50:52.0 +0100 @@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ fi # Add support for RequestHeader - a2enmod headers + [[ -x /usr/sbin/a2enmod ]] && a2enmod headers # Finally restart servers if [ -x /usr/sbin/invoke-rc.d ]; then signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#695986: RFS: mediawiki/1:1.15.5-2squeeze4.1 [NMU] [RC]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi, > Did you coordinate this upload with the Security Team? Did the team > authorize the upload? (See devref §5.8.5 [1] for details) I CC'ed debian-security on this bugreport. I am not fmailiar with uploads to squeeze-security and was hoping for support from the pkg-mediawiki team. Finally, I figured that an RFS with Cc to debian-security was better than doing nothing for getting the issues fixed. - -nik - -- * mirabilos is handling my post-1990 smartphone * Aaah, it vibrates! Wherefor art thou, daemonic device?? PGP fingerprint: 2086 9A4B E67D 1DCD FFF6 F6C1 59FC 8E1D 6F2A 8001 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iQFOBAEBCAA4BQJQzKhFMRpodHRwczovL3d3dy5kb21pbmlrLWdlb3JnZS5kZS9n cGctcG9saWN5LnR4dC5hc2MACgkQWfyOHW8qgAHWyQgAg0xKSLpeWEFkVzs20Jto T2tcrJ7bFA1KKEem0Ict+Uvn+uNLgwJx3Re/BMj7cDzUXCXm5YrXtS1Wy05Cldfj aGuBg27wL9NoXqa3oonOvCciXpGXfvYu3G332q4WapspYHyW8o+y8WR2gvV5tcBr 3nqF7VdWA1XT8TmtO9q2LSVc8F+yBXZrpoXQz/Zb3TcFluHp6XkPzVF/1UMVrseU SfAq2paDhaCe1vZAtN1AtGAxQNoJ3FFfeAqANSB9G3VsY59y/5n9IrGVoeTrFbaF gJIEbYkUmW9cdRXLeOvSsljnGzQuGkhJL5LtMCa42itIDBGM5NJtwtOWAlXHaZ1q jA== =hXHz -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/alpine.deb.2.02.1212151740020.8...@keks.naturalnet.de
Bug#695986: RFS: mediawiki/1:1.15.5-2squeeze4.1 [NMU] [RC]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my version 1:1.15.5-2squeeze4.1 of package "mediawiki". It is an upload for squeeze-security to fix the security issues in bug #694998. I ahve prepared a new upstream version for unstable which will migrate to testing shortly and I also backported the fixes to the version in squeeze. I have tested them in a clean squeeze chroot and they work fine. Unfortunately, no-one in the pkg-mediawiki team actually seems to care for squeeze as, while my mail concerning unstable were answered, I still haven't received any comment whatsoever on the squeeze-security update for several days. Package name: mediawiki Version : 1:1.15.5-2squeeze4.1 Section : web It builds those binary packages: mediawiki - website engine for collaborative work mediawiki-math - math rendering plugin for MediaWiki To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/mediawiki Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/mediawiki/mediawiki_1.15.5-2squeeze4.1.dsc Changes since the last upload: mediawiki (1:1.15.5-2squeeze4.1) squeeze-security; urgency=low * Non-maintainer upload. * Backported security fixes from upstream (Closes: #694998): + CVE-2012-5391, CVE-2012-5395 Prevent session fixation in Special:UserLogin + Prevent linker regex from exceeding backtrack limit I intentionally did not touch any lintian warning that were not introduced by these changes to make the changes to squeeze minimal and only security-related. Regards, Dominik George - -- * mirabilos is handling my post-1990 smartphone * Aaah, it vibrates! Wherefor art thou, daemonic device?? PGP fingerprint: 2086 9A4B E67D 1DCD FFF6 F6C1 59FC 8E1D 6F2A 8001 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iQFOBAEBCAA4BQJQzEBDMRpodHRwczovL3d3dy5kb21pbmlrLWdlb3JnZS5kZS9n cGctcG9saWN5LnR4dC5hc2MACgkQWfyOHW8qgAExrgf/V+WTlbGkAwFyUlbvwH5T YWi+Fgjv824ZtHiefKQTQXxur0+8cWkOG96LPUu2PqByJ1j3LykzWU70yV+KbMZz nTvB/pvPQGjpRZtJyi+d6QsujGpph+Ew06t39/eUcInGiuPGfimhyONIcZEwyRPr i2X2pc1s7ozhZGWSz3KKyOil4qUcOCbFK8HnALqlUpXUeLVXVAK5rfvSOf4SFN0E 18xmw6nNls020HWDIefSNrSMLILjvykxVfDGt+hTnFWq97S9d9pz5CB/ij1bujdZ YGsFgiJZ3lI4jbSRahnZAcx1aL8cL/SCB+8gpg8/0e1WWcKYe1vXusTmJLnigvNc aA== =SFAS -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/alpine.deb.2.02.1212151001220.11...@keks.naturalnet.de
Bug#695597: RFS: ldap2zone/0.2-3.1 [NMU][RC]
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my NMU version of package "ldap2zone". The upload would fix RC bug #690377. Package name: ldap2zone Version : 0.2-3.1 Section : utils It builds those binary packages: ldap2zone - Extract DNS zones from LDAP trees To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/ldap2zone Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/ldap2zone/ldap2zone_0.2-3.1.dsc Changes: ldap2zone (0.2-3.1) unstable; urgency=low * Non-maintainer upload. * Fix unbound variable in ldap2bind script (Closes: #690377). Regards, Dominik George -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/alpine.deb.2.02.1212101710230.6...@keks.naturalnet.de
Bug#695292: RFS: python-webob/1.1.1-1.1 [RC] [NMU] -- fix for RC bug #695050
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my NMU for package "python-webob". The upload would fix RC bug #695050. Package name: python-webob Version : 1.1.1-1.1 Section : python It builds those binary packages: python-webob - Python module providing WSGI request and response objects Please note that the package produces two lintian warnings, but those were already in the previous version and were not introduced with the bugfix. To ease the work for the release team (concerning the freeze exception to be made for the bugfix) and to not touch the maintainer's work more than necessary for the bugfix, I ignored these warnings. To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/python-webob Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/python-webob/python-webob_1.1.1-1.1.dsc Changes since the last upload: python-webob (1.1.1-1.1) unstable; urgency=low * Non-maintainer upload. * Fix response header bug reported by Mehdi Abaakouk (Closes: #695050). -- Dominik George Tue, 04 Dec 2012 00:09:48 +0100 I propose uploading to DELAYED/5 to give the maintainer some more time to respond to the bug report themselves, but to squash RC bugs I'd really love to see the upload happen so things can go on in a few days! Regards, Dominik George - -- * mirabilos is handling my post-1990 smartphone * Aaah, it vibrates! Wherefor art thou, daemonic device?? PGP fingerprint: 2086 9A4B E67D 1DCD FFF6 F6C1 59FC 8E1D 6F2A 8001 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iQFOBAEBCAA4BQJQwNonMRpodHRwczovL3d3dy5kb21pbmlrLWdlb3JnZS5kZS9n cGctcG9saWN5LnR4dC5hc2MACgkQWfyOHW8qgAEnvQf/a/PIhqXxFn1gTBRemmve 6bIefNma/4wwbtsyZfLWBerFrz+Bp19Q9Z9wAYr2a73UWVFn7nMwWpgqACW0l719 T9nv0FYqe9lLUUBo1PXu9ufigwbUaGmh5zYGWbY1Hve85rIds1jCZTRwOumYRkHE 21yu649PlDxKAgZPetZhB+hn1vJ6wrxz7Pr/p/EM80xzdzNd90/OltJCCSJkTUL0 lFY9nnKRB1YrSp5xHiRhgqUDRa2NEYOsyIdnxRexaD1xrJQ/lwYVfTQOCIiPpse0 9YOsjfc35MPf/p3tnivaYtJUDscKmr40rkAA7Tv+lmBEMznQOM02nIDD9ggH3m6u eQ== =tKKt -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/alpine.deb.2.02.1212061840450.10...@keks.naturalnet.de
Bug#694431: RFS: couchdb/1.2.0-2.1 [NMU] [RC]
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "couchdb". The upload would fix
RC bug #692295.
* Package name: couchdb
Version : 1.2.0-2.1
* URL : http://couchdb.apache.org/
* License : Apache-2.0
Section : misc
It builds those binary packages:
couchdb- RESTful document oriented database
To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:
http://mentors.debian.net/package/couchdb
Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this
command:
dget -x
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/couchdb/couchdb_1.2.0-2.1.dsc
Changes since the last upload:
couchdb (1.2.0-2.1) unstable; urgency=low
* Non-maintainer upload.
* Use SIGTERM instead of SIGHUP for graceful shutdown
(Closes: #692295) [varacanero]
-- Dominik George Mon, 26 Nov 2012 12:54:05 +0100
The debdiff is attached.
Regards,
Dominik George
diff -Nru couchdb-1.2.0/debian/changelog couchdb-1.2.0/debian/changelog
--- couchdb-1.2.0/debian/changelog 2012-07-19 20:35:03.0 +0200
+++ couchdb-1.2.0/debian/changelog 2012-11-26 12:55:21.0 +0100
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+couchdb (1.2.0-2.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Use SIGTERM instead of SIGHUP for graceful shutdown
+(Closes: #692295) [varacanero]
+
+ -- Dominik George Mon, 26 Nov 2012 12:54:05 +0100
+
couchdb (1.2.0-2) unstable; urgency=low
* Make couchdb user own its run directory (closes: #681549).
diff -Nru couchdb-1.2.0/debian/patches/couchdb_sighup.patch couchdb-1.2.0/debian/patches/couchdb_sighup.patch
--- couchdb-1.2.0/debian/patches/couchdb_sighup.patch 1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100
+++ couchdb-1.2.0/debian/patches/couchdb_sighup.patch 2012-11-26 12:57:45.0 +0100
@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
+Description: Use SIGTERM instead of SIGHUP for graceful shutdown
+ The SIGHUP couchdb uses by default for a graceful shutdown does not
+ work reliably in Debian as apt, when installing the package, SigIgn
+ masks SIGHUP for all its child processes. This is intentional and hard
+ to work around, and CouchDB does a graceful shutdown with SIGTERM as
+ well so there is no reason to use SIGHUP.
+Author: Dominik George
+Bug-Debian: http://bugs.debian.org/692295
+
+---
+
+--- couchdb-1.2.0.orig/bin/couchdb.tpl.in
couchdb-1.2.0/bin/couchdb.tpl.in
+@@ -272,7 +272,7 @@ stop_couchdb () {
+ echo > $PID_FILE
+ fi
+ if kill -0 $PID 2> /dev/null; then
+-if kill -1 $PID 2> /dev/null; then
++if kill -15 $PID 2> /dev/null; then
+ if test "$1" = "false"; then
+ echo "Apache CouchDB has been shutdown."
+ else
diff -Nru couchdb-1.2.0/debian/patches/series couchdb-1.2.0/debian/patches/series
--- couchdb-1.2.0/debian/patches/series 2012-07-19 20:46:55.0 +0200
+++ couchdb-1.2.0/debian/patches/series 2012-11-26 12:55:43.0 +0100
@@ -1,2 +1,3 @@
force-reload.patch
couchdb_own_rundir.patch
+couchdb_sighup.patch
Bug#694164: RFS: redmine/1.4.4+dfsg1-2 [NMU] [RC]
Hi Michael, I incorporated the changes you requested. Cheers, Nik -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/alpine.deb.2.02.1211251432480.2...@keks.naturalnet.de
Bug#694164: RFS: redmine/1.4.4+dfsg1-2 [NMU] [RC]
Hi, > Thank you all for this work - Dominik, would you work directly on > the git repository of the redmine package ? That would allow much > easier maintenance. Currently, I do not really plan on doing more work on the package, just RC bug fixing. Michael, please send follow-ups directly adressing the author of a bug report to the original author as well, not only to the BTS ... Cheers, Nik -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/alpine.deb.2.02.1211251405240.2...@keks.naturalnet.de
Bug#694164: Wrong version
retitle 694164 RFS: redmine/1.4.4+dfsg1-1.1 [NMU] [RC] kthxbye Sorry, I meant 1.1, not 2. -nik -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/alpine.deb.2.02.1211241626171.10...@keks.naturalnet.de
Bug#694164: RFS: redmine/1.4.4+dfsg1-2 [NMU] [RC]
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "redmine" * Package name: redmine Version : 1.4.4+dfsg1-1.1 * URL : http://www.redmine.org * License : many Section : web It builds those binary packages: redmine- flexible project management web application redmine-mysql - metapackage providing MySQL dependencies for Redmine redmine-pgsql - metapackage providing PostgreSQL dependencies for Redmine redmine-sqlite - metapackage providing sqlite dependencies for Redmine To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/redmine Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/redmine/redmine_1.4.4+dfsg1-1.1.dsc Changes since the last upload: * NMU to fix RC bugs. * debian/control: add dependency on rubygems or recent enough ruby (Closes: #693994). * debian/postinst: replace exit status -1 with 2 for shell compatibility (Closes: #687449). Regards, Dominik George -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/alpine.deb.2.02.1211241410520.10...@keks.naturalnet.de
Re: RFS: cr3
Hi, >> * changelog field says, that you want to upload your package to lucid, >> but you should change it to "unstable" or "experimental" (you are >> uploading to Debian, not directly yo Ubuntu) > apart from that, wouldn't lucid be just a bit outdated either ;) ? Cheers, Nik -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4d513fbe.1030...@naturalnik.de
Re: CHowning files - or not?
> Mmm, in this case by "local changes" we (at least I, but I assume > also KiBi and Paul Wise) mean "what the sysadmin has done by hand > after installing a previous version of the package", not > "what some parts of the package installation have done during > the installation itself". I know what local changes are. And I *want* any of these changes to be lost when a package is updated. As I mentioned in my very first mail, this is a repository of packages for *local* deployment, to systems *I* maintain, that are supposed to be *stock* installations with *no* modifications watsoever, and that are *never* touched by anyone except me. -nik -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/35af2cfef4b02f59cc2976c25890a...@naturalnet.de
Re: CHowning files - or not?
On Tue, 2 Mar 2010 12:37:25 +0200, Peter Pentchev wrote: > On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 12:23:25AM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: >> Dominik George (26/02/2010): >> > OK, as it is done in postinst, there does not seem to be a >> > difference to my current chown setup. dpkg-statoverride will make >> > sure that the permissions are set everytiem the file is >> > re-installed, but chown in postinst will as well ... >> >> And will nuke possible local changes? > > Erm, surely the script would check with dpkg-statoverride --list > before setting the permissions, as described in Policy 10.9.1 :) It is my very *intention* to kick local changes. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/0027a82f289c4cc94b8c1f399120b...@naturalnet.de
Re: CHowning files - or not?
I do wonder why some scripts have to be owned by a particular user instead of root, could you explain this? Although I don't see how this answers my question, it is intended to have the execution of these scripts limited to users within a group. Please read debian-policy 10.9 and 10.9.1: http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-files.html#s10.9 In short, use dpkg-statoverride in postinst. OK, as it is done in postinst, there does not seem to be a difference to my current chown setup. dpkg-statoverride will make sure that the permissions are set everytiem the file is re-installed, but chown in postinst will as well ... -nik -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4b8785d7.6000...@naturalnik.de
CHowning files - or not?
Hi, I am packaging some scripts (for local distribution), so I am both upstream and maintainer ;). The sources tree includes a Makefile providing the default targets for building and installing. The preinst script creates a system user, and this is the user the scripts should be owned by (they will be called from a somewhat more complicated environment, for now, it's easier if you trust me that this is the way it has to be ;)). Now, my problem is, how do I ensure that the scripts extracted from the package will be owned by this user? There are two ways I could think of: - Have the /usr/bin/isntall command in the source Makefile install the files with the correct uid/gid - Do a lot of chown in postinst The problem with the first is that it is run at build time, not at the "real" install time, an files in the Debian package will probably be fakeroot'ed (or something else that spoild my whol uid/gid stuff). The latter one doesn't really fit in with Debian Policy Manual - or if it does, the better this is ;). But it still looks "unclean" ... Can someone provide me with a somewhat comprehensive approach to this? Cheers, Nik -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4b877ad8.6050...@naturalnik.de
RFS: twittare
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "twittare". Of course, a check and constructive criticism beforehand would be great ;). * Package name: twittare Version : 0.7.42-1 Upstream Author : Tabaré Caorsi * URL : http://www.twittare.com * License : GPL-3+ Section : net It builds these binary packages: twittare - A twitter client for Linux written in Qt The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 528273 The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/t/twittare - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/t/twittare/twittare_0.7.42-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Dominik George signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Packaging without Makefile
> > > $ dh-make > $ cd debian/ > edit/copy in control, copyright, changelog and edit rules > remove unwanted files > $ cd ../ > $ dpkg-buildpackage > > Sounds easy - but how do I get it to copy my one single file? What Dmitry suggested does not quite work ...
Packaging without Makefile
Hello mentors, I am just packaging my Pidgin Last.fm Plugin for Debian and am wondering how to get a .changes file. The problem is that the plugin consists of a single perl script which is copied to /usr/lib/pidgin. What I already did is: - Create a fodler structure with the file system tree I want to merge - Added a DEBIAN folder - Created a control file - Added changelog, copyright notice and such to the usr/share/doc part of the tree - Ran dpkg -b in order to get a .deb package out of that - Checked that everything is lintian-clean But all I am left with is a .deb file - so nothing I could upload to mentors.debian.net or such. All guides I could find explain how to either build a source package or how to use dh_make - which needs a Makefile that compiles the sources. As I already mentioned, I don't have either of that. So what is the correct way to build the package? Best regards, Nik -- Hackerkey: v4sw3/4BCHJSUhw4+5ln3/4pr7OPck4ma2+3u7FLw3/4CTXm6+7l6+7DEGUi52ONetBeans/e2t5b7HOPen4+7a17s0MSr3p-1.75/-1.23g3AG (http://www.hackerkey.com) PGP-Key: 0xB5253284
