Re: symbols-File for Library
Hi Marc, Em qui., 11 de ago. de 2022 às 09:22, Marc Haber escreveu: > > Hi, > > my package gensio, which generates a library package, has recently > thrown a few lintian warnings regarding missing symbols files. I read > the wiki page and the manual page of dpkg-gensymbols and had > dpkg-gensymbols generate a debian/libgensio0.symbols file, added the > Build-Depends-Package line and did the mentioned conversions regarding > C++ libraries. > > Still, the build on i386 fails since the symbols file looks different on > i386 than it does on amd64. See > https://salsa.debian.org/debian/gensio/-/jobs/3093727 > > The repository can be inspected at > https://salsa.debian.org/debian/gensio/-/tree/master > > I guess this behavior is expected since you can have symbols file per > arch as debian/libgensio0.symbols.$ARCH. But how do I generate those? > > Do I really need to build on all arches and/or guess what's needed in > the arch-dependent symbol file from the logs of failed buildd runs? This > looks like an awful lot of work that has to be repeated for every > upstream update? I suggest uploading new upstream releases to experimental to know the behavior in each architecture. For MISSING lines, an easy fix is to exclude the fault architectures. E.g. to exclude i386 and x32: (arch=!i386 !x32)(c++)"gensios::gensio_cpp_vlog_handler(gensios::gensio_os_funcs*, gensios::gensio_log_levels, char const*, __va_list_tag*)@Base" Cheers, Eriberto
Re: CRLF in upstream source code
Em ter., 15 de mar. de 2022 às 13:29, escreveu: > > > > Why should it matter to anything, including Debian, unless there are > > > technical problems caused by that? > > > > So such as not compiling. Or another reason not yet shared with us. > > > > No problem with building the package. I just saw a comment on a bug and I was > in doubt [1]. > I decided to ask first. I'm a complete novice and I'm trying to make things > right. > Thank you Andrey and Geert. > > [1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=698359#10 Note that the current source code in Github dropped the CRLF in several files. To compare the old version with the current version via diff, in a separate directory, you could use dos2unix. In src/, the command "file *" will help to see all files using CRLF. This procedure is a workaround for 698359#10. Regards, Eriberto
Re: avoiding autoremoval for what seems like a spurious build error
I used a trivial jail with chroot. I can't reproduce the issue. Regards, Eriberto Em qui., 29 de abr. de 2021 às 18:30, Tobias Frost escreveu: > > On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 05:25:28PM +0200, Stephen Sinclair wrote: > > Hi Mentors, > > > > My package siconos currently has a bug filed [1] and has been marked > > for autoremoval from testing. > > > The problem is that I cannot reproduce it. The failure is on a test > > that depends on another package, so I am wondering if there was just a > > glitch here? I have replied to the bug report with working build > > logs, but there has been no further activity, so I am not sure what > > further action I can take to avoid that the package gets removed. > > > > Thanks for any help. > > Steve > > > > [1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=986515 > > I could also not reproduce it in a pbuilder chroot. Might indeed be a glitch > or some other dependency causing this… > I'd either downgrade it to non RC and tag it unreproducible or close it with > the request to reopen if it pops up again. > > -- > tobi >
Re: [d/watch] Need to modify name of upstream tar ball
Em sex., 29 de jan. de 2021 às 07:44, Hilmar Preuße escreveu: > > Unfortunately when looking at the tracker page [1], it tells > > "uscan had problems while searching for a new upstream version: > In debian/watch no matching files for watch line >https://github.com/TeXworks/manual/releases archive/(\d\S+)\.tar\.gz" > > What it wrong? How can I check if the tracker would be able to use the > watch file too? Many thanks! For me it sounds like the tracker page updated the rule from the watch file but it didn't make a new scan yet. Regards, Eriberto
Re: [d/watch] Need to modify name of upstream tar ball
Em qui., 28 de jan. de 2021 às 16:35, Hilmar Preuße escreveu: > > Hi, > > short question for debian/watch. > > Our local version name of upstream tar ball is mmdd.tar.xz. In > upstream the naming is -mm-dd.tar.xz . I've built a watch file, > which correctly finds the new tar ball [1], but the comparison to > version in Debian determines that the version in Debian is more recent: > > uscan info: Filename (filenamemangled) for downloaded file: > manual-2020-03-29.tar.gz > uscan debug: line: cmp_versions() > uscan info: Newest version of texworks-manual on remote site is > 2020-03-29, local version is 20150506 > uscan info: => Only older package available from: > => > https://github.com/TeXworks/manual/archive/2020-03-29.tar.gz > > I have to remove the - from the file name. How do I do this? Hi Hilmar, My suggestion is always to use "releases" instead of "tags". Also, you should use uversionmangle instead of filenamemangle. version=4 opts=uversionmangle=s/-//g \ https://github.com/TeXworks/manual/releases archive/(\d\S+)\.tar\.gz Regards, Eriberto
Re: How to ignore some versions for watch file?
Em qui., 6 de ago. de 2020 às 14:35, Eriberto Mota escreveu: Note that the web browser plus webmail breaked the lines after "releases". The two last lines shown below in each rule must be put in a single line only. > version=4 > https://github.com/shadowsocks/v2ray-plugin/releases > .*/archive/v?(\d+\.\S+)\.tar\.(?:bz2|gz|xz) > > version=4 > opts=uversionmangle=s/2019/0.2019/ \ > https://github.com/shadowsocks/v2ray-plugin/releases > .*/archive/v?(\d\S+)\.tar\.(?:bz2|gz|xz) Eriberto
Re: How to ignore some versions for watch file?
Em qui., 6 de ago. de 2020 às 13:48, Roger Shimizu escreveu: > > I maintain a package that previously used vMMDD as version, but > now changed to v1.y.z > - https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/shadowsocks-v2ray-plugin > - https://github.com/shadowsocks/v2ray-plugin/tags > > So my question is how to ignore the old version vMMDD, and only > detect v1.y.z as latest version for d/watch file? > > BTW. I already read a few posts regarding on d/watch file [1][2], but > still didn't find a proper solution. > > [1] https://wiki.debian.org/debian/watch > [2] > http://eriberto.pro.br/blog/2013/10/07/how-to-write-a-good-debianwatch-easily/ Hi Roger, I cast a glance at your debian/watch file. You are using a rule provided by the original debian/watch template. Personally, I don't really like this format because I think it is very complex. You can watch directly the "releases" link from any GitHub project. I intend to help you with a light format. There are several possibilities. I will show you two solutions. The first solution is search for one or more digits (\d+), followed by a dot (\.), followed by any character except blank spaces (\S+). It is a Perl Regex. See below: version=4 https://github.com/shadowsocks/v2ray-plugin/releases .*/archive/v?(\d+\.\S+)\.tar\.(?:bz2|gz|xz) Note that "v" (from version) is optional (v?) and we will accept .tar.bz2, .tar.gz and .tar.xz extensions. Another way is downgrading all versions starting with 2019. In this case we can use any digit followed by any character except blank spaces (\d\S+). version=4 opts=uversionmangle=s/2019/0.2019/ \ https://github.com/shadowsocks/v2ray-plugin/releases .*/archive/v?(\d\S+)\.tar\.(?:bz2|gz|xz) There are several other solutions. In your original debian/watch (I don't like this format) you can combine the last solution. Regards, Eriberto
Re: gbp export-orig for multiple source tarballs
Thanks a lot Mattia. I will use 'pristine-tar list' and 'pristine-tar checkout'[1]. [1] https://salsa.debian.org/debian/airport-utils/-/blob/debian/master/debian/export-orig.sh Regards, Eriberto
gbp export-orig for multiple source tarballs
Dear mentors, The airport-utils[1] repository has several .orig.tar.gz files, all they committed in upstream and pristine-tar branches. When I run 'gbp export-orig', I got several error messages[2]. So, is clear for me that it is not the way to export all tarballs. Whats is the right way? [1] https://salsa.debian.org/debian/airport-utils [2]: gbp:info: Creating /PKGS/airport-utils-10/airport-utils_2.orig.tar.gz gbp:error: Error creating airport-utils_2.orig.tar.gz: Pristine-tar couldn't checkout "airport-utils_2.orig.tar.gz": fatal: ambiguous argument '119526f1d450e90c3a429b81bf6da0f5dabbad3c^{tree}': unknown revision or path not in the working tree. Use '--' to separate paths from revisions, like this: 'git [...] -- [...]' fatal: not a valid object name: 119526f1d450e90c3a429b81bf6da0f5dabbad3c^{tree} tar: This does not look like a tar archive tar: Exiting with failure status due to previous errors pristine-tar: command failed: git archive --format=tar 119526f1d450e90c3a429b81bf6da0f5dabbad3c\^\{tree\} | (cd '/tmp/pristine-tar.vzFVAF5yCg' && tar x) Thanks in advance. Regards, Eriberto
How to test interactive and GUI programs with autopkgtest?
Hi all, As the subject said, I would like to know how to test non-command line programs as sniffit, hexedit and gconjugue, using autopkgtest (debian/tests/* method). I think that an auxiliary program should be used to test these environments but I don't know one. Thanks in advance. Regards, Eriberto
Trigger to activate bash-completion
Hi, I am trying implement completion in dcfldd. I already have a debian/dcfldd.bash-completion and a debian/rules with 'dh $@ --with bash-completion'. My current problem is I need to execute 'exec bash' to completion work. Is there a trigger to activate completion after the package install? Any postinst action? Thanks in advance. Regards, Eriberto
Re: Best GPG practices before sending computer to maintenance.
2016-11-12 15:03 GMT-02:00 Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <h...@debian.org>: > On Sat, 12 Nov 2016, Eriberto Mota wrote: >> There is another point to be considered: the RAM memory. The data, > > Eriberto, would a full pass of memtest86 work as well? > > It is supposed to test the entire RAM in destructive mode, and it does > use a lot of very nasty bit-walking patterns to do it, even... Hum, a good catch. I never tested this procedure. But it is a interesting thing to try. You can test it and use lime-forensics (already packaged) + strings/grep commands to do a quick analysis. I will test it soon. But it seems a good idea too. Thanks! Eriberto
Re: debexpo bug on upload
2016-11-12 11:06 GMT-02:00 Scott Leggett: > Hi, > > I've run into a bug[0] with debexpo making it impossible to upload my > package. I suspect there's a partially uploaded package sitting in the > system somewhere.. does anyone on this list have admin access to > mentors.debian.net that could check this for me? > > Failing that, is there an alternative way to get the package reviewed? > > The package is "quagga". > > [0] https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/index.php?func=detail=315172 Hi, Confirmed. Two people whom I sponsor are having dificulties with some packages. There are packages that can be uploaded; other no. Thanks in advance. Regards, Eriberto
Re: Best GPG practices before sending computer to maintenance.
Hi Charles, I am a forensics teacher. There is another point to be considered: the RAM memory. The data, commonly, pass across RAM and is easy get the key from a memory dump (even if the computer was turned off). So, after take care of the SDD, you need to wipe the RAM. An 'apt-get install secure-delete' wil provide sdmem command, that will wipe the RAM. I suggest to use a live-CD or flash drive with Debian to boot in shell only mode and run sdmem. You can install Debian in a flash drive and use it. It is easy to do. Regards, Eriberto
Re: watch file - remove or only comments?
Thanks Daniel! Thanks Sascha! Cheers, Eriberto
Re: partimage/0.6.9-2 new upstream build partimage-0.6.9
Hi Andrew, Fine! Uploaded. Thanks for your work. Regards, Eriberto 2016-09-18 5:03 GMT-03:00 Andrew Worsley: > Ok Uploaded partimage-0.6.9-1 again... > On 18 September 2016 at 00:58, Eriberto wrote: >> Hi, >> >> 2016-09-17 11:38 GMT-03:00 Andrew Worsley : >>> On 17 September 2016 at 22:43, Eriberto wrote: Hi Andrew, >> >> However, the last revision (0.6.9-1) is not in Debian yet. Do you >> understand now? The Police tells about revisions already in Debian. >> >> >>> Should I do it again - or is it too late now? >> >> >> Not late! Send to mentors and I will help you. >> >> Regards, >> >> Eriberto > ok - just uploaded partimage-0.6.9-1 again... - hopefully that is what > you meant... -) > > Andrew
Statistics to choose a Debian package to help
Hi, Is available here[1] a daily report about source packages in Debian. I believe that this report will be useful to help to choose a package for QA, adoption, etc. [1] https://people.debian.org/~eriberto/help_a_package.html Enjoy! Regards, Eriberto
Bug#837408: RFS: partimage/0.6.9-1 new upstream build partimage-0.6.9
Contol: tag 837408 moreinfo Hi Andrew, I have some considerations: 1. d/changelog: - You are doing a QA upload. So, it must be in changelog. - You renamed the patch 03-ftbfs-zlib.patch to 01-ftbfs-zlib. Please, point it in changelog. 2. d/control: - Please, bump Standards-Version to 3.9.8. Thanks for your work. Regards, Eriberto 2016-09-11 8:33 GMT-03:00 Andrew Worsley: > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: normal [important for RC bugs, wishlist for new packages] > > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "partimage" > > * Package name: partimage >Version : 0.6.9-1 >Upstream Author : Orphaned package > * URL : http://www.partimage.org/ > * License : GPLv2 >Section : admin > > It builds these binary packages: > > partimage - backup partitions into a compressed image file > partimage-server - server to use partimage across a network > > To access further information about this package, please visit the > following URL: > > https://mentors.debian.net/package/partimage > > > Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: > > dget -x > https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/partimage/partimage_0.6.9-1.dsc > > More information about hello can be obtained from https://www.example.com. > > Changes since the last upload: > * New upstream release. > * Drop now redundant patches as now in new upstream release: > - 01-openssl.patch > - 02-format-security.patch > > new upstream release (from upstream's changelog): > 0.6.9) 2010-07-25: > applied modifications by Vadim S. (v...@slackware.ru) > applied patch nvieville_server_closenowait_clients_number.patch from > Nicolas Vieville > applied patch nvieville_filesel_NEWT_FLAG_SCROLL.patch from Nicolas Vieville > applied patch partimage-0.6.7-chown.patch from mandriva (on Makefile.am) > applied patch partimage-0.6.8-format-security.patch from mandriva > applied patches from Nicolas Vieville to fix compilation warnings with > gcc-4.4 / glibc-2.10 > applied patches from Nicolas Vieville to improve internationalisation > (mostly on partimaged) > applied patches from Nicolas Vieville to free ressources in netclient > (fixes memory leaks) > applied patches from Nicolas Vieville to fix issues with openssl-1.0.0 > allow different versions to connect as long as they use the same > protocol and ssl/login options > > I have created a vfat image (it still has the same slightly clunky X > windows / function key interface) and can read the image > > Regards, >Andrew Worsley >
Bug#836987: RFS: hoichess/0.19.0-2 [QA]
Hi, 2016-09-07 19:39 GMT-03:00 Jeremy Bicha: > On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 5:53 PM, Eriberto wrote: >> I did an upload for this package some hours ago and I can sponsor this >> package again. A question: will you really put this package in Collab >> Maint? > > Yes, the packaging is there now. The documentation says that when a > new repo is created on Alioth, it takes up to 6 hours before the web > view is live. Ok. > https://anonscm.debian.org/git/collab-maint/hoichess.git/ > > Sorry about the 2nd upload in the same day but this fixes a long-time > minor annoyance. :) No problem. Thanks a lot for you work. Uploaded. Regards, Eriberto
Bug#822990: RFS: hashcat/2.00-1 [ITP]
Hi Daniel, 2016-05-08 15:19 GMT-03:00 Daniel Echeverry: > Hi Eriberto! > > Really thank you very much for your help Your skill is very good and is very easy work with you. I am very glad to say that I uploaded this beatiful and useful package. Cheers, Eriberto
Bug#815444: RFS: lzd/0.8-1
Hi Daniel! How are you? Do you remember me? You alrealy were my sponsor in Forensics Team in the past. I can sponsor this package. Please, can you do the the following changes? 1. Please, add a d/watch file. 2. d/control: use https in Vcs-* fields. 3. d/rules: please, to improve the hardening[1], add this line to d/rules: export DEB_BUILD_MAINT_OPTIONS = hardening=+all [1] https://wiki.debian.org/HardeningWalkthrough#Selecting_security_hardening_options I am glad to help you. Cheers, Eriberto 2016-02-21 13:22 GMT-03:00 Daniel Baumann: > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: normal > > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "lzd". > > To access further information about this package, please visit the > following URL: > > http://mentors.debian.net/package/lzd > > Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: > > dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/lzd/lzd_0.8-1.dsc > > Changes since the last upload: > > * Updating vcs fields. > * Merging upstream version 0.8. > * Dropping dbg package in favour of dbgsym. > * Removing manual settings for xz compression. > * Updating years in copyright file. > > Regards, > Daniel >
Re: Help needed with symbols index in package
Hi Jonathan, Initially, your package doesn't build in a fresh jail because needs extra-cmake-modules, libkf5kdelibs4support-dev and pkg-config in Build-Depends field. Please, always use cowbuilder or pbuilder to test if your package builds. About the symbols, the problem is that dpkg-gensymbols is generating complementary symbols and those have a Debian revision. See below: dpkg-gensymbols: warning: debian/libkpmcore1/DEBIAN/symbols doesn't match completely debian/libkpmcore1.symbols --- debian/libkpmcore1.symbols (libkpmcore1_1.9.50-1_amd64) +++ dpkg-gensymbolsBiEPCo 2016-01-06 20:58:15.171645367 -0200 @@ -1195,3 +1195,23 @@ _ZZZNK27SetFileSystemLabelOperation8iconNameEvENKUlvE_clEvE15qstring_literal@Base 1.9.50 _ZZZNK29CreatePartitionTableOperation8iconNameEvENKUlvE_clEvE15qstring_literal@Base 1.9.50 _ZlsR11QTextStreamRK14PartitionTable@Base 1.9.50 +libpmdummybackendplugin.so libkpmcore1 #MINVER# + _ZTI17CoreBackendDevice@Base 1.9.50-1 + _ZTI20CoreBackendPartition@Base 1.9.50-1 + _ZTI25CoreBackendPartitionTable@Base 1.9.50-1 + _ZTS17CoreBackendDevice@Base 1.9.50-1 + _ZTS20CoreBackendPartition@Base 1.9.50-1 + _ZTS25CoreBackendPartitionTable@Base 1.9.50-1 + _ZTV17CoreBackendDevice@Base 1.9.50-1 + qt_plugin_instance@Base 1.9.50-1 + qt_plugin_query_metadata@Base 1.9.50-1 +libpmlibpartedbackendplugin.so libkpmcore1 #MINVER# + _ZTI17CoreBackendDevice@Base 1.9.50-1 + _ZTI20CoreBackendPartition@Base 1.9.50-1 + _ZTI25CoreBackendPartitionTable@Base 1.9.50-1 + _ZTS17CoreBackendDevice@Base 1.9.50-1 + _ZTS20CoreBackendPartition@Base 1.9.50-1 + _ZTS25CoreBackendPartitionTable@Base 1.9.50-1 + _ZTV17CoreBackendDevice@Base 1.9.50-1 + qt_plugin_instance@Base 1.9.50-1 + qt_plugin_query_metadata@Base 1.9.50-1 The dpkg-gensymbols is invoked by dh_makeshlibs. From dh_makeshlibs manpage: -- params Pass params to dpkg-gensymbols(1). >From dpkg-gensymbols manpage: -vversion Define the package version. Defaults to the version extracted from debian/changelog. Required if called outside of a source package tree. So, you can use '-- -v1.9.50' to avoid a version as 1.9.50-1. However, is better always to use the current version. To do it, you can use an override in debian/rules. An example: #!/usr/bin/make -f export PVER=$(shell dpkg-parsechangelog --show-field version | cut -d"-" -f1) %: dh $@ override_dh_makeshlibs: dh_makeshlibs -- -v$(PVER) --- Other datail is that is a good idea upload the first version to experimental to see how to the library will build. So you will able to can fix the issues (if necessary) and reupload to unstable. I hope this help. Regards, Eriberto 2016-01-06 11:13 GMT-02:00 Jonathan Carter: > Hi Debian Mentors > > I'm attempting to package kpmcore, a shared library for partitioning > tasks in KDE. I'm not sure if my dpkg symbols index for the shared > library file gets used because it doesn't contain a debian revision, yet > lintian says that it does on my binary package (inspecting the binary > package shows that it did get generated with a debian revision). > > Some guidance would be appreciated: > > http://mentors.debian.net/package/kpmcore > > -Jonathan >
Bug#797407: RFS: node-mocha-lcov-reporter/0.0.2-1 -- LCOV reporter for Mocha
Hi guys, As an extra tip, don't use 'extra' as 'priority' (d/control) if your package doesn't conflict with other[1]. I suggest 'optional'. [1] https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-archive.html#s-priorities I can see 2011 in 'LICENSES' and 2015 in last release on GitHub. So, I suggest 2011-2015 for upstream copyright years (d/copyright). Regards, Eriberto 2015-08-31 10:35 GMT-03:00 Gianfranco Costamagna: > Control: owner -1 ! > > Hi Julien, lets review. > > > > > 1) changelog, please set target to unstable and refresh the timestamp > 2) rules: please remove the newlines after the dh call (oh here we are > *really* nitpicking) > > well, the only issue is the changelog, please fix and I'll do some testing on > a built package :) > > cheers, > > G. >
Bug#792443: RFS: mirage/0.9.5.1-4 [QA]
tags 792443 moreinfo thanks Hi Lucas, I will try help you. My considerations: 1. I can see some changes not registered in d/changelog. An example of this is DH level change (from 7 to 9). I used the 'debdiff' command to see the changes. Other files: debian/mirage.postinst, debian/patches/remove_gimp_remote.patch, debian/pycompat 2. d/changelog: - I suggest you to organize better the ideas. Try to use a logical order. You can sort the itens by events (Added, Changed, Removed, Updated, etc) or by main events followed by files (debian/control, debian/copyright, etc). For the latter case, you can see an example here[1]. - Please, remove the unnecessary double spaces. - Use debian/file for all files inside the debian/ directory, as debian/watch ans debian/patches/desktop_entry_issue.patch. - Use '$ spell changelog | sort -u' and '$ spell control | sort -u' to search for spelling errors, as 'Dependeces'. [1] http://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/changelogs/main/l/lime-forensics/unstable_changelog 3. d/control: you found a new upstream homepage to use in d/watch. So, why you removed the Homepage field from d/control? 4. debian/copyright: - The updated notice in d/changelog is a bit generic because you did several modifications. - I found this text in upstream source code: mirage-Mirage is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify mirage-it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by mirage-the Free Software Foundation; either version 3 of the License, or mirage-(at your option) any later version. mirage.py-Mirage is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify mirage.py-it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by mirage.py-the Free Software Foundation; either version 3 of the License, or mirage.py-(at your option) any later version. So, the source code is GPL-3+, not GPL-3. You need to use the following command to check this situation: $ egrep -sriA25 '(copyright|public dom)' * - There are several authors in po/ directory. - You must to list all packagers in debian/* block. You can use the following command to search for all: $ egrep '(--|\[)' debian/changelog 5. d/watch: your configuration produces notices about invalid character in version number (two underscores). 6. You must always check the PTS[2] to search for bugs, tips etc. In bugs list I can see a relevant bug that you can close: #773997. [2] https://packages.qa.debian.org/m/mirage.html Thanks for your work. Regards, Eriberto 2015-07-14 17:09 GMT-03:00 Lucas Castro lucascastrobor...@gmail.com: Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package mirage This orphaned packages required some lintian corrections and I had done, it already has two P lintians, but it is its homepage fields and signature that I didn't found. * Package name: mirage Version : 0.9.5.1-4 Upstream Author : [fill in name and email of upstream] * URL : [fill in URL of upstreams web site] * License : [fill in] Section : graphics It builds those binary packages: mirage - fast and simple GTK+ image viewer To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/mirage Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/mirage/mirage_0.9.5.1-4.dsc More information about hello can be obtained from http://www.example.com. Changes since the last upload: * QA upload. * Updated watch * debian/control - Bumped Standards-Version to 3.9.6 - Homepage removed * debian/copyright updated * Added desktop_entry_issue.patch: Avoid desktop-entry-lacks-keywords-entry. * Build-Dependeces: added dh-python. -- System Information: Debian Release: 8.1 APT prefers stable-updates APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 3.16.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=pt_BR.utf8, LC_CTYPE=pt_BR.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150714200940.16904.7.reportbug@debian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/cap+dxjdo44ljzuukzzah_9fsmxdubqzatlm7ru-23r3isqx...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#781252: RFS: lift/2.0.0-1 [ITP #781189]
Uploaded. Thanks for your work. Cheers, Eriberto 2015-03-26 10:55 GMT-03:00 Nicolas Delvaux cont...@nicolas-delvaux.org: Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package lift * Package name: lift Version : 2.0.0-1 Upstream Author : Nicolas Delvaux cont...@nicolas-delvaux.org * URL : https://github.com/Malizor/lift * License : GPL-2+ Section : devel It builds this binary package: lift - Integration and functional testing framework To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/lift Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/lift/lift_2.0.0-1.dsc I maintain a PPA for Ubuntu if you want to have a look: https://launchpad.net/~malizor/+archive/ubuntu/lift Regards, Nicolas Delvaux -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/48306c4bbe177cb207296b27661e8...@malizor.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/cap+dxjccb_6y-gte9wfcu1j2ycsexqpvvkgjzjny+2wuhur...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#781523: RFS: task-spooler/0.7.5-1
tags 781523 moreinfo thanks Hi Alexander, Please: 1. d/control: - Use the new URL format for collab-maint in Vcs-Browser field (http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/task-spooler.git/). 2. d/copyright: - The upstream code is GPL-2, not GPL-2+. - The main.c and server.c files show that the 0.7.5 version is copyrighted as 2007-2013. - I think that is a bit weird use the copyright word twice in the same line. I suggest remove the extra word. - Note that the ts.1 file has a different license. - The web/ts-0.5.4.ebuild has a different author. 3. The PORTABILITY, PROTOCOL and README files are useless to final users. Please, consider remove these files from d/docs. 4. There is a typo in description of the cppflags.patch patch. 5. The 'blhc --all task-spooler_0.7.5-1_amd64.build' command shows lots of missing arguments to improve the hardening. You can fix this adding this line[1] to d/rules: export DEB_BUILD_MAINT_OPTIONS = hardening=+all [1] https://wiki.debian.org/HardeningWalkthrough#Selecting_security_hardening_options Cheers, Eriberto 2015-03-30 10:01 GMT-03:00 Alexander Inyukhin shur...@sectorb.msk.ru: Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package task-spooler * Package name: task-spooler Version : 0.7.5-1 Upstream Author : Lluís Batlle i Rossel vi...@viric.name * URL : http://vicerveza.homeunix.net/~viric/soft/ts/ * License : GPLv2+ Section : misc It builds those binary packages: task-spooler - personal job scheduler To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/task-spooler Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/t/task-spooler/task-spooler_0.7.5-1.dsc Changes since the last upload: * Imported Upstream version 0.7.5 * Bump Standards-Version to 3.9.6 (no changes) * Escape dots in watchfile regex Regards, Alexander Inyukhin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150330130119.ga23...@shurick.grid.su -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/cap+dxjeywbezwizhdhebnqyq5tpvtgi0fllqdalb23woqav...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#781523: RFS: task-spooler/0.7.5-1
I forgot to ask you to update the copyright years for packaging in d/copyright. Eriberto 2015-04-27 21:35 GMT-03:00 Eriberto Mota eribe...@debian.org: tags 781523 moreinfo thanks Hi Alexander, Please: 1. d/control: - Use the new URL format for collab-maint in Vcs-Browser field (http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/task-spooler.git/). 2. d/copyright: - The upstream code is GPL-2, not GPL-2+. - The main.c and server.c files show that the 0.7.5 version is copyrighted as 2007-2013. - I think that is a bit weird use the copyright word twice in the same line. I suggest remove the extra word. - Note that the ts.1 file has a different license. - The web/ts-0.5.4.ebuild has a different author. 3. The PORTABILITY, PROTOCOL and README files are useless to final users. Please, consider remove these files from d/docs. 4. There is a typo in description of the cppflags.patch patch. 5. The 'blhc --all task-spooler_0.7.5-1_amd64.build' command shows lots of missing arguments to improve the hardening. You can fix this adding this line[1] to d/rules: export DEB_BUILD_MAINT_OPTIONS = hardening=+all [1] https://wiki.debian.org/HardeningWalkthrough#Selecting_security_hardening_options Cheers, Eriberto 2015-03-30 10:01 GMT-03:00 Alexander Inyukhin shur...@sectorb.msk.ru: Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package task-spooler * Package name: task-spooler Version : 0.7.5-1 Upstream Author : Lluís Batlle i Rossel vi...@viric.name * URL : http://vicerveza.homeunix.net/~viric/soft/ts/ * License : GPLv2+ Section : misc It builds those binary packages: task-spooler - personal job scheduler To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/task-spooler Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/t/task-spooler/task-spooler_0.7.5-1.dsc Changes since the last upload: * Imported Upstream version 0.7.5 * Bump Standards-Version to 3.9.6 (no changes) * Escape dots in watchfile regex Regards, Alexander Inyukhin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150330130119.ga23...@shurick.grid.su -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CAP+dXJd2uuiCszEFn_-KJw8B3Wz5jc7JZXD696TSMetj=5m...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#781609: sponsorship-requests: RFS: noweb 2.11b-9 (Fixes #781099, unblock #781529)
Hi Hubert, I can upload. Can you sign this message? Cheers, Eriberto 2015-03-31 11:55 GMT-03:00 Hubert Chathi uho...@debian.org: Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist (Cc: TeX team, since noweb is somewhat TeX-related) I've updated noweb to fix bug #781099, which has already been unblocked by the release team (#781529), but I am unable to upload because I no longer have a key in the keyring, due to my 1024D being disabled and my 4096R not being connected enough. So I'm looking for someone to sponsor this upload. The package is in otherwise good shape, and will hopefully I will have my 4096R key enabled before another upload is needed. The diff is just a one-line change (not including changelog): diff -u noweb-2.11b/debian/changelog noweb-2.11b/debian/changelog --- noweb-2.11b/debian/changelog +++ noweb-2.11b/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +noweb (2.11b-9) unstable; urgency=low + + * debian/patches/99_touch.dpatch: Add src/shell/noweave to the list of touched +files. (Closes: #781099) + + -- Hubert Chathi uho...@debian.org Fri, 27 Mar 2015 22:06:25 -0400 + noweb (2.11b-8) unstable; urgency=low * debian/control: diff -u noweb-2.11b/debian/patches/99_touch.dpatch noweb-2.11b/debian/patches/99_touch.dpatch --- noweb-2.11b/debian/patches/99_touch.dpatch +++ noweb-2.11b/debian/patches/99_touch.dpatch @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ -patch) sleep 1 # so that we have at least a second difference in timestaps for x in src/shell/tmac.w \ + src/shell/noweave \ src/shell/noroff \ src/shell/toroff \ src/xdoc/notangle.1 \ Thanks, Hubert -- System Information: Debian Release: 7.2 APT prefers stable APT policy: (990, 'stable'), (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 3.17-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_CA.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_CA.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/87zj6tush1@desiato.home.uhoreg.ca -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CAP+dXJdMGx=twf2fc2yxdevpmcws1pq2t8xddbvkhq1rsqj...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Help with watch file needed
Hi Peter, My suggestion: version=3 opts=dversionmangle=s/\+dfsg// \ https://github.com/LibVNC/libvncserver/releases .*/archive/LibVNCServer-(\d\S+)\.tar\.gz Take care to use 'releases' instead 'tags' to allow the download. Cheers, Eriberto 2015-01-29 0:16 GMT-02:00 Peter Spiess-Knafl p...@autistici.org: Hello! Can someone help me with the watchfile for the current libvncserver sourcepackage? https://packages.debian.org/source/sid/libvncserver I am trying to package a new upstream version, but the current watchfile cannot download/extract the newest upstream version. I already spend some time trying to fix it, but honestly I am lost what the problem could be. I cloned the available git repository for this package at: git://anonscm.debian.org/collab-maint/libvncserver.git When I try a gbp import-orig --uscan, I get the following error output: gbp:info: Launching uscan... Could not read ..//LibVNC/libvncserver/archive/LibVNCServer-0.9.10.tar.gz: No such file or directory at /usr/bin/mk-origtargz line 316. uscan: error: mk-origtargz --package libvncserver --version 0.9.10 --compression gzip --directory .. --copyright-file debian/copyright ..//LibVNC/libvncserver/archive/LibVNCServer-0.9.10.tar.gz gave error exit status 2 gbp:error: Uscan failed - debug by running 'uscan --verbose' uscan --verbose gives this: -- Scanning for watchfiles in . -- Found watchfile in ./debian -- In debian/watch, processing watchfile line: opts=dversionmangle=s/\+dfsg//,filenamemangle=s/.+\/v?(\d\S*)\.tar\.gz/libvncserver-$1\.tar\.gz/ https://github.com/LibVNC/libvncserver/tags .*/LibVNCServer-(\d\S*)\.tar\.gz -- Found the following matching hrefs: /LibVNC/libvncserver/archive/LibVNCServer-0.9.10.tar.gz (0.9.10) /LibVNC/libvncserver/archive/LibVNCServer-0.9.9.tar.gz (0.9.9) /LibVNC/libvncserver/archive/LibVNCServer-0.9.8.2.tar.gz (0.9.8.2) /LibVNC/libvncserver/archive/LibVNCServer-0.9.8.1.tar.gz (0.9.8.1) /LibVNC/libvncserver/archive/LibVNCServer-0.9.8.tar.gz (0.9.8) Newest version on remote site is 0.9.10, local version is 0.9.9+dfsg (mangled local version number 0.9.9) = Newer version available from https://github.com/LibVNC/libvncserver/archive/LibVNCServer-0.9.10.tar.gz -- Downloading updated package /LibVNC/libvncserver/archive/LibVNCServer-0.9.10.tar.gz -- Checking for common possible upstream OpenPGP signatures Could not read ..//LibVNC/libvncserver/archive/LibVNCServer-0.9.10.tar.gz: No such file or directory at /usr/bin/mk-origtargz line 316. uscan: error: mk-origtargz --package libvncserver --version 0.9.10 --compression gzip --directory .. --copyright-file debian/copyright ..//LibVNC/libvncserver/archive/LibVNCServer-0.9.10.tar.gz gave error exit status 2 The current maintainer (cc) seems to be busy. He also filed a RFA bug @ wnpp. I intent to adopt this package and already made some progress, but I am lost on this. Thank you and greetings. Peter -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/54c997e4.90...@autistici.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CAP+dXJeuSLLq1Wqmo5Sv=uhtaognwuowvoy4_6gmgwacgf-...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#770239: RFS: digikam/4:2.6.0-1+deb7u1 [RC][NMU]
tags 769668 pending thanks Hi all, I uploaded the NMU for digikam, made by Jean-Michel, with 10-day delay. Thanks. Regards, Eriberto 2014-11-27 11:37 GMT-02:00 Jean-Michel Nirgal Vourgère jmv_...@nirgal.com: The fix has reached Jessie[1], and wheezy-pu is ok for the Release Team[2]. You can upload without restriction, straight or with a delayed/2.[3] This is a simple 2 line change, easy to re-re-review. Compilation time is above 30 minutes however. [1] https://packages.qa.debian.org/d/digikam/news/20141124T163915Z.html [2] https://bugs.debian.org/769668 [3] https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/pkgs.html#nmu-guidelines -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CAP+dXJcPypA_LMOict+dEUk1UJc3FPDT3rFdCypL=�xcx...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#769810: Bug#669841: phamm: transition towards Apache 2.4
tags 769810 pending thanks Hi, I uploaded the NMU made by Jean-Michel with 2-delay days. Regards, Eriberto 2014-11-18 20:58 GMT-02:00 Jean-Michel Nirgal Vourgère jmv_...@nirgal.com: Today, at 15:24, Alessandro De Zorzi wrote: Hi All, at this time I do not have enough time for Phamm's packaging. If someone want to propose a NMU, will be much appreciated. Upstream (me) released new Phamm the version0.6.3 this month (2014-11-12). I do propose a NMU, but I need a DD to sponsor it: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/phamm/phamm_0.6.2-1.1.dsc Your package will be removed from testing on December 3rd if no authorized person moves. -- Nirgal -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/cap+dxjez1owhn0fcn_x7rowadmh0vo8yehecotc1acto9uv...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#769639: RFS: xsoldier/1:1.8-3 [QA]
Hi Jean-Michel, Uploaded. Thanks a lot for your work. Cheers, Eriberto PS: a very interesting game! 2014-11-15 7:41 GMT-02:00 Jean-Michel Nirgal Vourgère jmv_...@nirgal.com: Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package xsoldier Package name: xsoldier Version : 1:1.8-3 Section : games It builds those binary packages: xsoldier - shoot 'em up game with the not shooting bonus To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/xsoldier Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xsoldier/xsoldier_1.8-3.dsc More information about hello can be obtained from http://www.example.com. Changes since the last upload: xsoldier (1:1.8-3) unstable; urgency=low * QA upload: - Change maintainer of orphaned package to Debian QA. * Added desktop file (Closes: #738084) * Bumped standards version to 3.9.6: No change required. -- Jean-Michel Nirgal Vourgère jmv_...@nirgal.com Fri, 14 Nov 2014 22:25:34 +0100 Regards, Jean-Michel Vourgère -- System Information: Debian Release: jessie/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 3.16.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_GB.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/cap+dxjeah08gfgt+dadqageuhnqpk_7zvrsrhyum6q7dgvr...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#766872: RFS: volumeicon/0.4.6-2.2 [NMU]
Hi Mateusz, Uploaded. Thanks a lot for your work. Cheers, Eriberto 2014-10-26 10:30 GMT-02:00 Mateusz mateus...@interia.pl: Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package volumeicon * Package name: volumeicon Version : 0.4.6-2.2 Upstream Author : 2010 Maato ma...@softwarebakery.com * URL : http://softwarebakery.com/maato/volumeicon.html * License : GPL-3 Section : sound It builds those binary packages: volumeicon-alsa - systray volume icon for alsa To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/volumeicon Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/v/volumeicon/volumeicon_0.4.6-2.2.dsc More information about hello can be obtained from http://www.example.com. Changes since the last upload: * Non-maintainer upload. * Add patch to replace x-terminal-emulator instead xterm - thanks to Luca Capello l...@pca.it for the patch. (Closes: #749324) * Typo in Depends: xfce4-nofityd = xfce4-notifyd. (Closes: #758494) * Add .desktop file. (Closes: #749324) * Bump Debian standards to 3.9.6. (no changes needed) * Use canoninal Vcs fields. * Bump debhelper version to 9. Regards, Mateusz Łukasik -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/544ce94d.1030...@interia.pl -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CAP+dXJdAA-t=yT=xuzr9ggo-pormtnfi4u0k6i9t6ycvw5p...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#758163: Subject: RFS: kcm-ufw/0.4.3-1 ITP
Hi Shawn, I uploaded your package to experimental, to honor the Jessie freeze policy[1]. Thanks for your work. Cheers, Eriberto [1] https://release.debian.org/jessie/freeze_policy.html 2014-11-07 23:14 GMT-02:00 Shawn Sörbom sh...@sorbom.com: Hi Eriberto, I found time to work on kcm-ufw this week. I manually rechecked (and documented) all the source tree files for copyrights and cross-checked against your previous e-mails. I also consulted here just to be extra safe: https://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/#file-syntax Copyright issues should be fixed. This upload also contains the fixed github links I contacted you about a few weeks ago. I hope everything is in order. Thanks, --Shawn On Sunday, October 12, 2014 22:19:30 Eriberto wrote: Hi Shawn, I am glad to know that your work over the package is going fine. I will wait for you. Cheers, Eriberto 2014-10-10 23:58 GMT-03:00 Shawn Sörbom sh...@sorbom.com: Eriberto, You are right. I did a horrible job on my last few uploads. I will attempt to prevent future mistakes of this kind by keeping more rigid personal documentation of what needs to be done before I upload. This time I am 100% sure that I fixed the Github links. One of the URLs I copied from the Github website was an SSH link. I did not realize at first (though it should have been obvious in retrospect) that these would only work with my private SSH key. When I realized this error, I fixed the offending link and tested it from a separate user account, so that the results would not be biased by any special configuration. I was successfully able to clone my Github repository. I have attached a text file with the terminal output and uploaded the changed control file to github. Regarding the copyright file, I'm going to keep records on every file I have checked so as not to forget any files in the source tree. I'm pushing the updated URLs to my Github repository, but I will wait to upload to Debian mentors until I have thoroughly rechecked the copyright file for any missing information or formatting errors. I'm sorry that I have caused you so much trouble. I will not let such mistakes happen again. On Tuesday, September 30, 2014 11:34:13 Eriberto wrote: Please, be carefull with your work. I'm wasting time by asking the same things always. You don't fixed the Vcs-Git yet. I already asked it for you several times. You pasted the information about copyright without check the files (dates, names, email addresses). You didn't use the right formatting when put the new information in d/copyright. I checked file by file for you (it is your obligation, not mine), searching the correct information about copyright and you dumped these information in d/copyright without any care. Eriberto 2014-09-30 4:52 GMT-03:00 Shawn Sörbom sh...@sorbom.com: Hi Eriberto, Sorry there had been a problem with my local git repo erlier this evening. As a result, the lintian-overrides file was from one of the previous uploads. I have fixed it now. Thanks, --Shawn On Monday, September 29, 2014 17:18:49 Eriberto wrote: Hi Shawn, In d/control, your Vcs-Git still pointing to an invalid address. In d/copyright: - helper/kcm_ufw_helper.py.cmake has copyright by Craig Drummond and Darwin M. Bautista. - helper/helper.h and helper/helper.cpp are licensed under GPL 2+. - po/es.po has '2011 Kubuntu-es.org' as author. (see the header and Last-Translator line) - po/lt.po: the copyright year is 2011 only. - add po/fr.po. 2011 Sergio Guibert and Kubuntu-fr.org. About the excessive lines at end of files, you removed the final LF/CR in all files. You must press ENTER one time in each final line. So, the cursor will appear under the first character of the each last line. These are the last changes to upload the package. I will wait for you. Cheers, Eriberto -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/cap+dxjcil02ambrfgw4m1pcwq8y4zr6mvfomijstmoad_sd...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#757966: RFS: lutris/0.3.4-1 [ITP]
Uploaded. Thanks for your work. Cheers, Eriberto 2014-11-07 10:33 GMT-02:00 Pierre Rudloff cont...@rudloff.pro: Hello, This is your first answer to my last email and I still need a sponsor for this package. Thanks for your time. Regards, On 07/11/2014 13:21, Eriberto wrote: Hi, I am lost in my time and my emails. So, I would like to know if I replied you before and if you needs a sponsor yet. Sorry for my delay. Cheers, Eriberto 2014-10-16 18:42 GMT-03:00 Pierre Rudloff cont...@rudloff.pro: Hello, Sorry for not answering before, I had quite a lot of work. I have upadated the package as you asked: http://mentors.debian.net/package/lutris Regards, Le 19/09/2014 12:42, Eriberto a écrit : Hi Pierre, You is very very near an upload. Note that file data/ui/about-dialog.ui is GPL-3+ (not GPL-3). So, you need to create a section for this file in d/copyright. Considering that you need to modify the copyright file, I will make a new request for you. Please, add a reference about you, Debian and free usage of the manpage. This is important because manpages are published in several sites (without the source code) and someone might want to contact you. You can see an example here[1]. (go to the end of page) [1] http://sources.debian.net/src/mac-robber/1.02-3/debian/man/mac-robber.1 Please, make these changes and I will upload the package. I will wait for you... Cheers, Eriberto 2014-09-19 4:31 GMT-03:00 Pierre Rudloff cont...@rudloff.pro: It is on mentors : https://mentors.debian.net/package/lutris Regards, 2014-09-19 1:40 GMT+02:00 Eriberto Mota eribe...@debian.org: Please, upload your package to mentors.d.n. It makes easier the review and, maybe final, tests. Thanks. Cheers, Eriberto Em quinta-feira, 18 de setembro de 2014, Pierre Rudloff cont...@rudloff.pro escreveu: Oh OK, I did not see there was some files by different auhtors in the tarball. I added them to the copyright file: https://github.com/Rudloff/lutris-debian/commit/aa24f3a5b4f865cf9eb00f6746ce199eca0f0147 Thanks again for your help! Regards, Le 18/09/2014 01:42, Eriberto a écrit : Hi, 2014-09-17 17:41 GMT-03:00 Pierre Rudloff cont...@rudloff.pro: 3. - I am not sure I understand. It does use the 1.0 format. - Where should I list the upstream authors? I don't see a field for this in the 1.0 format. You can consult any copyright in Debian packages to see an example. You can use these: http://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/changelogs/main/n/netmate/unstable_copyright http://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/changelogs/main/e/ext4magic/unstable_copyright I edited the copyright file. Is it OK now? The format is right now. However, you must to list all upstream authors and licenses in d/copyright. See the second example above (ext4magic). You can use this command to help you: 'grep -sriA25 copyright *'. 6. I have added a generic README.source about quilt. Is this OK? No. My idea was talk about the original debian directory removed from upstream code. I've added a sentence explaining this. Is this enough? (There is no special step needed, as dpkg-source -x takes care of replacing the debian folder.) Yes. Perfect. Cheers, Eriberto -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/54403bb9.60...@rudloff.pro -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/cap+dxjdkflh4sxdmdz-dhqknkkz5ygcg-nt9_6lqu3xk3nx...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#763029: RFS: cligh-0.2 console Github manipulation tool
Hi Dmitry. Please: 1. Read again my observation about d/changelog. Update the date too. Another example here[1]. [1] http://sources.debian.net/src/yowsup/0.0~git20140314.938cf1-1/debian/changelog/ 2. d/control: update the Standards-Version to 3.9.6 (Lintian will say about it when you update the date in d/changelog). 3. d/copyright: - You must to use debian/* instead of */debian. - I suggest you put the BSD-3-clause text in end of file, instead of start position in file. - I saw that you used 'public domain' in your manpage. You must put it in d/copyright or remove this license. So, your manpage will be GPL-3+. 4. d/rules: do you have a bargage from old 'override_dh_installman'. Please, remove the 'dh_installman: debian/cligh.1' line. 5. d/watch: this file doesn't work. Please, fix this. Thanks for your work. Cheers, Eriberto 2014-10-10 11:24 GMT-03:00 Dmitry Bogatov kact...@gnu.org: * Eriberto eribe...@eriberto.pro.br [2014-09-28 10:03:34-0300] No problem. I will wait for you. Please, take a look again. I belive I fixed everything. https://mentors.debian.net/package/cligh https://mentors.debian.net/package/pygithub -- Best regards, Dmitry Bogatov kact...@gnu.org, Free Software supporter, esperantisto and netiquette guardian. GPG: 54B7F00D -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/cap+dxjfovs4d3tb6+jt9zekmx+rttrvsqmdqxcw0wcs6zah...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#763029: RFS: cligh-0.2 console Github manipulation tool
2014-10-11 17:18 GMT-03:00 Dmitry Bogatov kact...@gnu.org: * Eriberto eribe...@eriberto.pro.br [2014-10-11 14:07:17-0300] 2014-10-11 13:53 GMT-03:00 Dmitry Bogatov kact...@gnu.org: 4. d/rules: do you have a bargage from old 'override_dh_installman'. Please, remove the 'dh_installman: debian/cligh.1' line. I do not agree. Manpage is generated on build time, and I can't drop this line. And I hate to keep in VCS generated files. So, I can drop the debian/cligh.1 and build the package, right? Yes, you can remove it. It will be rebuilt by 'debuild'. That is why I have `pandoc' in Build-Dependencies. Do you tried this? Try, please. Tell me the results. PS. English is not my native language. Sorry if I am not clear enough. Don't worry. I am Brazilian and my native language is Brazilian Portuguese. :-) Cheers, Eriberto -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/cap+dxjej1gxqg7wg227d+duarzpcaalkfnnza0w49tn9ttn...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#745721: Name collision between libpinyin and libzhuyin (Was: Bug#745721: [Pkg-ime-devel] Bug#745721: RFS: libzhuyin/0.9.93-1)
Uploaded. Thanks for your work. Cheers, Eriberto 2014-10-03 11:31 GMT-03:00 ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬) czc...@gmail.com: On Fri, Oct 03, 2014 at 09:38:15AM -0300, Eriberto wrote: New situation: we already have a new Lintian (since yesterday). Please, update the Standards-Version to 3.9.6. Just update the Standards-Version to 3.9.6. Looks like nothing need to change for 3.9.5 ~ 3.9.6. The package is in mentor [0], please help to review and sponsor, thanks. [0] https://mentors.debian.net/package/libzhuyin -- ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬) czc...@gmail.com http://czchen.info/ Key fingerprint = EC9F 905D 866D BE46 A896 C827 BE0C 9242 03F4 552D -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/cap+dxjfta7-6mh4crtqekqsmpmbqdmi2_kvfsvbnhj5xv5d...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#752116: RFS: drmips/1.2.2-1 [ITP]
Hi Bruno, Uploaded! Thanks for your work (as packager and as upstream). Cheers, Eriberto 2014-09-27 8:27 GMT-03:00 Bruno Nova brunomb.n...@gmail.com: Oops, you're right. I should list both there. I just uploaded a new package to Mentors. The issue should be fixed. 2014-09-27 12:05 GMT+01:00 Eriberto eribe...@eriberto.pro.br: Hi Bruno, We have a little issue yet. I d/copyright: Files: src/pc/DrMIPS/src/com/jtattoo/plaf/BaseInternalFrameTitlePane.java src/pc/DrMIPS/src/com/jtattoo/plaf/BaseTabbedPaneUI.java src/pc/DrMIPS/src/com/jtattoo/plaf/BaseTitlePane.java Copyright: 2003 Sun Microsystems, Inc. License: GPL-2.0+ You must list Sun and Software-Entwicklung too because both have copyright rights. Cheers, Eriberto 2014-09-26 16:42 GMT-03:00 Bruno Nova brunomb.n...@gmail.com: I just found and fixed a small error in the .desktop file, so I uploaded a new package. And the upstream changelog is indeed detected in Debian. But you still should check it. 2014-09-26 19:50 GMT+01:00 Bruno Nova brunomb.n...@gmail.com: I uploaded a new package to Mentors (also updated the source tarball). I think I fixed all issues/suggestions. src/pc/DrMIPS/src/com/jtattoo/* was copyrighted in 2002, not 2012. Please, use '2002 and later', not '2012+'. I suggest the original text '2002 and later by MH Software-Entwicklung'. Thank you! Don't know how I failed that. 5.d/links: I didn't understand your intend with this file. I added a patch to the package to install the PDF manuals to /usr/share/doc/drmips/manuals, and used the debian/links file to create a link from /usr/share/drmips/doc to /usr/share/doc/drmips/manuals (this is acceptable, right?). Ok, I understand your concern but it is unusual. All packages put their docs in /usr/share/doc/. I suggest to remove this link. But I won't impose this. I changed to source code of the simulator. Now, if the ./doc folder doesn't exist, it opens the folder where make install installs the manuals to (if it exists). So, debian/links and the patch were removed, and this issue is solved. (Should have done this earlier) Ok! You can remove the d/docs files because upstream changelog will be automaticaly detected by DebHelper. That's interesting. I compiled the package in Ubuntu, and the upstream changelog was not detected automatically. It seems dh_installchangelogs was changed in Ubuntu to not install the upstream changelog: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debhelper/+bug/637176 I still removed the debian/docs file. Please check if the upstream changelog is detected in Debian. I didn't have the time to test this in Debian yet. -- Bruno Nova -- Bruno Nova -- Bruno Nova -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/cap+dxjc1cvuqu18c0nnsoegsu+qiebifzqkk112v1ps5hem...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#758715: RFS: bgfinancas/2.0-1 [ITP]
Hi José, I think that is all right now. Uploaded to Debian. Thanks a lot for your work (as upstream and packager). Cheers, Eriberto 2014-09-24 16:01 GMT-03:00 José Robson Mariano Alves binarygr...@hotmail.com: Hi Eriberto, i finally found the error. Only happens on the first run of the program, and only if you choose a language contrary to standard. The tutorial helped a lot, thanks. The package is in: http://mentors.debian.net/package/bgfinancas DSC: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/b/bgfinancas/bgfinancas_2.0-1.dsc Thanks for all. Regards, José Robson Mariano Alves -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CAP+dXJco8=mvmj9h41xhygk5htr6i+k1t9sqtgjiqf6qxvj...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#752116: RFS: drmips/1.2.2-1 [ITP]
2014-09-23 11:52 GMT-03:00 Bruno Nova brunomb.n...@gmail.com: I forgot something about copyrights. JTattoo is multiple licensed, but only GPLv2 and v3 can be used for free, it's necessary to pay to use the other licenses. Do I list those licenses as well in debian/copyright? No. In this case you must put the used license. Most files in cmake/Modules/ contained only a pointer to the full copyright text, and asked to replace that by the full license in Copyright.txt if distributed outside of CMake, which I did in the upstream source code. However, I don't know what to do to the Copyright ... lines. Leave them intact (what I did), merge them with the Copyright lines from the Copyright.txt, or replace them? Leave the original copyright line. Here I understood that this file was made by an external author (from KDE) only. Cheers, Eriberto -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/cap+dxjcoyajn44zuj2ftfjsofhkkeuar4xesc31t8eiun_a...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#762464: RFS: fyba/4.1.1-1 [ITP]
tags 762464 moreinfo thanks Hi again Ruben, About your package, please: 1. d/control: - Change DH level from 9.0.0 to 9. 2. You have Lintian messages: I: libfyba0: no-symbols-control-file usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libfygm.so.0.0.0 I: libfyba0: no-symbols-control-file usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libfyut.so.0.0.0 I: libfyba0: no-symbols-control-file usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libfyba.so.0.0.0 After the debuild command you need generate symbols[1] using this command in upstream place: dpkg-gensymbols -v4.1.1 -plibfyba0 -Odebian/libfyba0.symbols [1] https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-sharedlibs.html#s-providing-symbols 3. The blhc command show some issues: blhc --all fyba_4.1.1-1_amd64.build To fix it, in d/rules, change from export DEB_LDFLAGS_MAINT_APPEND = -Wl,--as-needed to export DEB_BUILD_MAINT_OPTIONS = hardening=+all You can see details here[2]. [2] https://wiki.debian.org/Hardening#dpkg-buildflags Thanks a lot for your work. Cheers, Eriberto 2014-09-22 12:52 GMT-03:00 Ruben Undheim ruben.undh...@gmail.com: Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package fyba * Package name: fyba Version : 4.1.1-1 Upstream Author : Statens Kartverk * URL : https://github.com/kartverket/fyba * License : MIT Section : libs It builds those binary packages: libfyba-dev - Header files for FYBA library libfyba0 - FYBA library to read and write norwegian geodata standard format libfyba0-dbg - debug symbols for libfyba0 To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/fyba Alternatively, one can checkout the packaging repo from git using this command: git://anonscm.debian.org/pkg-grass/fyba.git or download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/f/fyba/fyba_4.1.1-1.dsc Changes since the last upload: Initial release (Closes: #760544) Regards, Ruben Undheim -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CA+ChNyXRGM4pTrXBH3x9388KkjnUiPM=x=ovfa2vxsmn7xq...@mail.gmail.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/cap+dxjetuy21z4p881wyjxvo9sw40eqhbz5qp_gspxssd7-...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#712787: ITP for Distkeys
Hi Martin, 2014-09-22 7:19 GMT-03:00 Martin Steigerwald m...@teamix.de: Am Mittwoch, 17. September 2014, 17:47:29 schrieb Eriberto: Hi Martin, Hello Eriberto, About your package, please: 1. Use DH 9 instead DH 8. You didn't make your package full compatible with DH9 yet. So, edit the d/compat file and change from 8 to 9. In d/control, change from 9.0.0 to 9. 3. d/copyright: - In header, the field 'Source' is wrong. - The 'AUTHORS' file says: 'Licensed unter GPL-2. See COPYING.'. So, the upstream code is GPL-2, not 2+. Note the word 'unter'. :-) - Your year as packager should be 2013. What do you mean by that? I already have Files: debian/* Copyright: 2013-2014 Martin Steigerwald m...@teamix.de License: GPL-3+ Anything else needed? Sorry for my mistake. As the package in new in Debian, the packaging year must be 2014. 4. d/rules: please, remove all comments (from '# -*- makefile' up to 'verbose mode'). Please, do it. 5. You will need update the Homepage address. Can your current homepage allow scans from d/watch file? Did those and re-uploaded. Please, in d/watch, change from 'tags' to 'releases'. It will allow that uscan command can make download of the new releases. Found my mistake with previous upload, I misordered arguments to dput like in dput -f mentors distkeys_1.0-1_amd64.changes and this uploaded to ftp- master. I asked ftp masters to discard this. Might be good if dput catches this argument misordering, I think I will file a wishlist bug about it. Not needed. You can upload anything to Debian queue. If your package is not signed by a DD or DM GPG key, it will be automatically dropped. Cheers, Eriberto -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/cap+dxjdkbry-yuim8fgui97cbj7ifxzkilywmvfkpznxzrn...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#759557: RFS: asic0x/1.0.1-1 [ITP] -- iBurst USB modem driver in DKMS format
Hi Graham, Uploaded. Thanks a lot for your (very good) work. Cheers, Eriberto 2014-09-21 7:04 GMT-03:00 Graham Inggs gra...@nerve.org.za: Hi Eriberto Thanks for taking the time to review my package. On 21 September 2014 06:11, Eriberto Mota eribe...@debian.org wrote: 1. d/control: in asic0x-dkms (binary), add dkms as dependency. This is already taken care of by substvars: misc:Depends=dkms (= 2.1.0.0) 2. d/copyright: use the GPL-2+ license text provided by Debian templates. You can find it here: /usr/share/debhelper/dh_make/licenses/gpl2. Updated, thanks. 3. d/rules: remove the comment line started with 'Uncomment...'. I removed this line and the 'export DH_VERBOSE=1' line. 4. Please, upload your final package to mentors.debian.net. Uploaded: http://mentors.debian.net/package/asic0x Regards Graham -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/cap+dxjfodbzjxy4dkzhbuhid0jbk2oqfqu5ju0tgujz6twi...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#752116: RFS: drmips/1.2.2-1 [ITP]
Hi Bruno, 2014-09-21 7:35 GMT-03:00 Bruno Nova brunomb.n...@gmail.com: Hmm, this is an interesting point. The education section was added by the FTP Masters back in 2012, and grep-dctrl -FSection education seems to show me at least 128 binary packages matching that (e.g. gcompris, kanadic, scratch, etc). See the list of sections in Debian Policy 2.4; it seems that the webpage needs to be updated. I also thought 'education' was a valid section: lintian doesn't complain, Synaptic shows a friendly name translated to my language for that section, vim doesn't mark it in red, and Ubuntu has some packages in that section. And the Debian Policy mentions that section indeed. Should I leave it in 'education', or should I change it? Maybe to 'java', or 'electronics' which is also a good choice. It's probably better to change. Ok. I will let you decide. However, see the cons: - Your package won't be showed in unstable list[1]. - If your package is rejected, maybe we won't have time to reupload before the Jessie freezy. [1] https://packages.debian.org/unstable I think that more important that the section is the word 'education' in long description. 3. d/copyright: - You must list all authors and licenses in thos file. Use the command 'egrep -sriA25 '(public domain|copyright)' *' to help you. I was missing the copyrights for the files in cmake/Modules/, and I think that's all. I don't remember but I will recheck when you upload to mentors. By authors you mean the names/emails of the people/companies that appear in the copyright notices of the source files, right? Yes. The copyright of cmake/Modules/UseLATEX.cmake caused me some confusion, though. But I found a package in Ubuntu (feel++) that uses that file, so it should be ok. My suggestion: Files: cmake/Modules/UseLATEX.cmake Copyright: 2004 Sandia Corporation, by Kenneth Moreland kmo...@sandia.gov Comment: version 1.10.4 License: Contract_DE-AC04-94AL85000 License: Contract_DE-AC04-94AL85000 Under the terms of Contract DE-AC04-94AL85000, there is a non-exclusive license for use of this work by or on behalf of the U.S. Government. . Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without modification, are permitted provided that this Notice and any statement of authorship are reproduced on all copies. - From Debian policy[2]: Packages distributed under the Apache license (version 2.0), the Artistic license, the GNU GPL (versions 1, 2, or 3), the GNU LGPL (versions 2, 2.1, or 3), and the GNU FDL (versions 1.2 or 1.3) should refer to the corresponding files under /usr/share/common-licenses,[ 119] rather than quoting them in the copyright file. - I suggest you to use the conventional license texts provided by Debian, when applicable. These text are available at /usr/share/debhelper/dh_make/licenses/. But the template texts there for those licenses also include a short summary of the licenses, before the pointer to the full text. Should I remove that and put only the pointer? No. The point is use the conventional texts. As an example, see the differences between /usr/share/debhelper/dh_make/licenses/gpl2 and your text. 5.d/links: I didn't understand your intend with this file. The package installs some PDF manuals to /usr/share/drmips/doc/, and the program searches for them in that place (using a relative path). The link is just so the manuals are also accessible from /usr/share/doc/, the usual place in Linux for documentation. Should I remove the link? It is a bit strange. I suggest change the source code as upstream or make a patch for CMakeLists.txt to search in standard place. Some additional questions: * Should the Priority in debian/control be 'optional' or 'extra'? Optional. From Debian Policy: extra: This contains all packages that conflict with others with required, important, standard or optional priorities, or are only likely to be useful if you already know what they are or have specialized requirements (such as packages containing only detached debugging symbols). * Should the urgency in debian/changelog be 'low' or 'medium'? (the default was changed recently, I think) For the first upload (new package) use low. Cheers, Eriberto -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/cap+dxjc-x6zyag4cfvm1md9vy3-szbw7uhaxx0f-u5e+e08...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#749096: RFS: karlyriceditor/1.11-1 [ITP]
Hi Martin! Thanks for changes. Uploaded. Cheers, Eriberto 2014-09-20 8:58 GMT-03:00 Martin Steghöfer mar...@steghoefer.eu: Hi Eriberto, Thank you for your time and attention! I've uploaded a new version to git and mentors that incorporates your suggested changes: * https://github.com/martin-steghoefer/debian-karlyriceditor * http://mentors.debian.net/package/karlyriceditor Eriberto Mota wrote: 1. Update the package to use DH 9, instead DH 8. Done in https://github.com/martin-steghoefer/debian-karlyriceditor/commit/e2aa0ed5 2. d/control: - Change priority from extra to optional. Done in https://github.com/martin-steghoefer/debian-karlyriceditor/commit/296f209d - Break the Build-Depends in some lines to make visualization easier. Done in https://github.com/martin-steghoefer/debian-karlyriceditor/commit/b0949627 4. d/rules: - Remove the initial useless comments [...]. Done in https://github.com/martin-steghoefer/debian-karlyriceditor/commit/9416a63c - Change the four export lines (CPPFLAGS, CFLAGS, CXXFLAGS and LDFLAGS) to 'export DEB_BUILD_MAINT_OPTIONS = hardening=+all'. You can check the results using the command 'blhc --all karlyriceditor_1.11-1_amd64.build' Nice trick, thanks! Not only did this make the debian/rules file more readable, but it also added some extra hardening flags that were not included before. I hadn't checked the hardening with blhc before, only with lintian - and it seems that lintian only checks for some basic hardening flags (probably because it is designed to only check the pure package, but not the build log that may not always be available). Done in https://github.com/martin-steghoefer/debian-karlyriceditor/commit/4fdf9268 Thank you for your review! Anything else I can do to accelerate the sponsor search? Cheers, Martin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CAP+dXJd0y19XwTjNeT-4C_NiqTnuPDpwTsK+COVisewj=ng...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#759557: RFS: asic0x/1.0.1-1 [ITP] -- iBurst USB modem driver in DKMS format
tags 759557 moreinfo thanks Hi Graham, Please: 1. d/control: in asic0x-dkms (binary), add dkms as dependency. 2. d/copyright: use the GPL-2+ license text provided by Debian templates. You can find it here: /usr/share/debhelper/dh_make/licenses/gpl2. 3. d/rules: remove the comment line started with 'Uncomment...'. 4. Please, upload your final package to mentors.debian.net. Thanks for your work. Cheers, Eriberto 2014-08-28 10:22 GMT-03:00 Graham Inggs gra...@nerve.org.za: Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors I am looking for a sponsor for my package asic0x: * Package name: asic0x Version : 1.0.1 Upstream Author : Lourens Steyn lourensst...@hotmail.com * URL : https://github.com/lourenssteyn/asic0x * License : GPL-2+ Section : kernel It builds the following binary package: asic0x-dkms - iBurst USB modem driver in DKMS format My packaging attempt is available here: http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/asic0x.git/ The driver itself cannot be tested without access to a Kyocera iBurst modem, but after installing the package, the kernel module should build without error and should appear in /lib/modules/kernel version/updates/dkms/ as asic0x.ko. Regards Graham -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/53ff2d32.8080...@nerve.org.za -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CAP+dXJdOcK1ivLG1vhhWaTt5iuFD2Dx2hSZ1CH=tfrnviwg...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#748878: RFS: mwc/1.7.2-1 ITP
Hi Jörg, Thanks a lot for your work. Uploaded. Cheers, Eriberto 2014-09-19 4:53 GMT-03:00 Jörg Frings-Fürst deb...@jff-webhosting.net: Hola Eriberto, first many thanks for your review. Am Donnerstag, den 18.09.2014, 15:52 -0300 schrieb Eriberto: Hi Jörg, Thanks for all adjustments. Please: - d/changelog: change urgency from medium to low. done. - d/control: - Add a VCS to control your package. - I suggest to add the name 'MailWebsiteChanges' in long description. - Put a dot in end of the first phrase in long description. - Remove ${shlibs:Depends} because interpreted languages doesn't use it. - Why you have dh-systemd as build dependency? Both removed. - d/copyright: - The upstream code is GPL-2+, not GPL-2. - Where you saw that upstream site is GPL-2? My error. I'm looking for at your opinion instead of at your option in the LICENSE. And found them not. Change to GPL-2+. Do you have permission to add this content in your package? I suggest to list the site in d/README.Debian, not include the site. I think you mean the debian/docs. I have got the docu from the upstream author with a entry in d/copyright. Removed and I put a short reference into d/README.Debian. - d/mwc.1: add a reference about you, Debian and free usage of the manpage. This is important because manpages are published in several sites (without the source code) and someone might want to contact you. You can see an example here[1]. (go to the end of page) [1] http://sources.debian.net/src/mac-robber/1.02-3/debian/man/mac-robber.1 Done. - d/mwc.cron.hourly: I think that isn't a good idea this file, because you are forcing the user machine to connect the Internet without a express permission. Ok, a NTP client do it. However, I think that the situation is different. Other point is that, initially, will not exist an user configuration and the mwc will try connect even so. I have moved them from etc/cron.hourly into examples with a tip in d/README.Debian. d/rules: remove all comments. done. d/watch: githubredir is deprecated. Please, see here[2] how to make a d/watch. [2] http://eriberto.pro.br/blog/?p=1459 Also done. And uploaded again to mentors[1] Thanks for your work. Cheers, Eriberto [...] CU Jörg [1] http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/mwc/mwc_1.7.2-1.dsc -- pgp Fingerprint: 7D13 3C60 0A10 DBE1 51F8 EBCB 422B 44B0 BE58 1B6E pgp Key: BE581B6E CAcert Key S/N: 0E:D4:56 Jörg Frings-Fürst D-54526 Niederkail Threema: SYR8SJXB IRC: j_...@freenode.net j_...@oftc.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/cap+dxjfpn8ctb4jymna1c447rcdc+mvfzib-rdukvd9yjk_...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#752116: RFS: drmips/1.2.2-1 [ITP]
tags 752116 moreinfo thanks Hi Bruno, Please: 1. Change the DH level from 8 to 9. 2. d/control: - Debian no have a section 'education'. Please, choose a section here[1]. Use the contract name of the section. As example, for miscellaneous, use misc. How to know this? Click over the section and use the name showed in head. - I think that Vsc-Git should be 'https://bitbucket.org/brunonova/drmips -n debian'. Could you provide a Vcs-Browser field? - Remove ${shlibs:Depends} because interpreted languages don't use it. - In long description, put a dot between the first and second paragraphs. - In long description, what is FEUP? Where (country) is FEUP? [1] https://packages.debian.org/unstable/ 3. d/copyright: - You must list all authors and licenses in thos file. Use the command 'egrep -sriA25 '(public domain|copyright)' *' to help you. - From Debian policy[2]: Packages distributed under the Apache license (version 2.0), the Artistic license, the GNU GPL (versions 1, 2, or 3), the GNU LGPL (versions 2, 2.1, or 3), and the GNU FDL (versions 1.2 or 1.3) should refer to the corresponding files under /usr/share/common-licenses,[119] rather than quoting them in the copyright file. - I suggest you to use the conventional license texts provided by Debian, when applicable. These text are available at /usr/share/debhelper/dh_make/licenses/. [2] https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-docs.html#s-copyrightfile 4. d/drmips.1: you are the upstream. Why you don't include the manpage in source tarball? idem to drmips.desktop, drmips.pt.1 and drmips.xpm. 5.d/links: I didn't understand your intend with this file. 6. d/rules: please, remove the trash (from '# -*- makefile' to 'verbose mode'). 7. After build we have some Lintian messages that you can solve (as packager and as upstream): a. Maybe you can solve: P: drmips source: source-contains-prebuilt-java-object src/android/DrMIPS/libs/android-support-v4.jar P: drmips source: source-contains-prebuilt-java-object src/pc/DrMIPS/lib/JTattoo.jar P: drmips source: source-contains-prebuilt-java-object src/pc/DrMIPS/lib/autocomplete.jar P: drmips source: source-contains-prebuilt-java-object src/pc/DrMIPS/lib/rsyntaxtextarea.jar b. You can solve: P: drmips source: debian-watch-may-check-gpg-signature P: drmips: no-upstream-changelog PS: I would like to suggest you to add a GPG signature for your upstream code. To see more details, '$ man uscan' (search for pgpsigurlmangle). To sign your tarball, you can use 'gpg -ab tarball_name'. c. You should use a Lintian override (first line must be a comment about the issue): I: drmips source: ored-build-depends-on-obsolete-package build-depends: openjdk-6-jdk I: drmips: ored-depends-on-obsolete-package depends: openjdk-6-jre 8. Your package doesn't build twice. To fix it, you must create an override to dh_clean in d/rules (man dh) to remove these files and directories: src/android/DrMIPS/libs/DrMIPSSimulator.jar src/pc/DrMIPS/lib/DrMIPSSimulator.jar src/android/DrMIPS/res/raw/ src/pc/DrMIPS/cpu/ Thanks for your work. Cheers, Eriberto 2014-06-19 15:22 GMT-03:00 Bruno Nova brunomb.n...@gmail.com: Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package drmips * Package name: drmips Version : 1.2.2-1 Upstream Author : Bruno Nova brunomb.n...@gmail.com * URL : https://bitbucket.org/brunonova/drmips/ * License : GPL Section : education It builds those binary packages: drmips - Educational MIPS simulator - DrMIPS To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/drmips Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/drmips/drmips_1.2.2-1.dsc Regards, Bruno Nova -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/cap+dxjebcx2gg4avza95osfsl1qourpyj2wts9rcshlaxpy...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#712787: ITP for Distkeys
Hi Martin, 2014-09-17 19:01 GMT-03:00 Martin Steigerwald m...@teamix.de: Changed to github already in a re-uploaded distkeys package (dput -f). Your package in mentors.d.n is old yet. Do you uploaded the newer version? Don't worry. I will wait you as long as needed. Cheers, Eriberto -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/cap+dxjc2snwn3sv8uxujefdzyrm065u_xay0bvmgqmvg5pb...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#712787: ITP for Distkeys
2014-09-18 9:25 GMT-03:00 Martin Steigerwald mar...@lichtvoll.de: I think I did. Maybe I missed something. Will check when I am back at work. Thanks for your patience. You're welcome. Bye! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/cap+dxjeuydjfljmzgoj1xuenhrgyl-p4_k2jmsktygpjpzu...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#749096: RFS: karlyriceditor/1.11-1 [ITP]
tags 749096 moreinfo thanks Hi Martin, I will try help you. Please: 1. Update the package to use DH 9, instead DH 8. 2. d/control: - Change priority from extra to optional. - Break the Build-Depends in some lines to make visualization easier. You can see these different examples: http://sources.debian.net/src/ext4magic/0.3.2-1/debian/control/ http://sources.debian.net/src/xombrero/2:1.6.3-1/debian/control/ 3. d/copyright: a very good copyright file. My congratulations. 4. d/rules: - Remove the initial useless comments (from '# -*- makefile' to 'verbose mode'). - Change the four export lines (CPPFLAGS, CFLAGS, CXXFLAGS and LDFLAGS) to 'export DEB_BUILD_MAINT_OPTIONS = hardening=+all'. You can check the results using the command 'blhc --all karlyriceditor_1.11-1_amd64.build' Thanks for you work. Cheers, Eriberto 2014-05-23 22:03 GMT-03:00 Martin Steghöfer mar...@steghoefer.eu: Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package karlyriceditor * Package name: karlyriceditor Version : 1.11-1 Upstream Author : George Yunaevsupp...@ulduzsoft.com * URL :http://www.ulduzsoft.com/linux/karaoke-lyrics-editor/ * License : GPL-3+ Section : video It builds those binary packages: karlyriceditor - Karaoke lyrics editor To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/karlyriceditor Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -xhttp://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/k/karlyriceditor/karlyriceditor_1.11-1.dsc Or download the source package from the git VCS and build it using git-buildpackage: gbp-clone https://github.com/martin-steghoefer/debian-karlyriceditor.git cd debian-karlyriceditor/ git-buildpackage You can also have a look at the package in your browser: https://github.com/martin-steghoefer/debian-karlyriceditor The package has been reviewed once by the pkg-multimedia-maintainers list and the raised problems have been dealt with. Best regards, Martin Steghöfer -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/537fefd7.3050...@steghoefer.eu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/cap+dxjc2l+m2zarexrptngwjam2koskwhw1x7zmksolzv47...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#757966: RFS: lutris/0.3.4-1 [ITP]
Please, upload your package to mentors.d.n. It makes easier the review and, maybe final, tests. Thanks. Cheers, Eriberto Em quinta-feira, 18 de setembro de 2014, Pierre Rudloff cont...@rudloff.pro escreveu: Oh OK, I did not see there was some files by different auhtors in the tarball. I added them to the copyright file: https://github.com/Rudloff/ lutris-debian/commit/aa24f3a5b4f865cf9eb00f6746ce199eca0f0147 Thanks again for your help! Regards, Le 18/09/2014 01:42, Eriberto a écrit : Hi, 2014-09-17 17:41 GMT-03:00 Pierre Rudloff cont...@rudloff.pro: 3. - I am not sure I understand. It does use the 1.0 format. - Where should I list the upstream authors? I don't see a field for this in the 1.0 format. You can consult any copyright in Debian packages to see an example. You can use these: http://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/changelogs/main/n/ netmate/unstable_copyright http://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/changelogs/main/e/ ext4magic/unstable_copyright I edited the copyright file. Is it OK now? The format is right now. However, you must to list all upstream authors and licenses in d/copyright. See the second example above (ext4magic). You can use this command to help you: 'grep -sriA25 copyright *'. 6. I have added a generic README.source about quilt. Is this OK? No. My idea was talk about the original debian directory removed from upstream code. I've added a sentence explaining this. Is this enough? (There is no special step needed, as dpkg-source -x takes care of replacing the debian folder.) Yes. Perfect. Cheers, Eriberto
Bug#748878: RFS: mwc/1.7.2-1 ITP
tags 748878 moreinfo thanks Hi again Jörg, I am ready to review your package. Can you update the package to make easier my review? Cheers, Eriberto 2014-05-21 15:29 GMT-03:00 Jörg Frings-Fürst deb...@jff-webhosting.net: Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package mwc * Package name: mwc Version : 1.7.2-1 Upstream Author : Michael Till Beck debiang...@gmx.de * URL : https://github.com/Debianguru/MailWebsiteChanges * License : GPL-2.0+, GPL-3.0+ Section : utils It builds those binary packages: mwc - Powerful website-tracking tool To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/mwc Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/mwc/mwc_1.7.2-1.dsc Changes since the last upload: * Initial release Regards, Jörg Frings-Fürst -- pgp Fingerprint: 7D13 3C60 0A10 DBE1 51F8 EBCB 422B 44B0 BE58 1B6E pgp Key: BE581B6E CAcert Key S/N: 0E:D4:56 Jörg Frings-Fürst D-54526 Niederkail IRC: j_...@freenode.net j_...@oftc.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CAP+dXJc3d4hcjC=OguqxEaw5qEB�8sSB9uB4A=ntxhxw4...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#747169: RFS: socksjs-twisted/1.2.1-1 [ITP]
Hi Alexandre, Sorry for my delay. I was traveling. 2014-09-11 18:09 GMT-03:00 Alexandre Rossi alexandre.ro...@gmail.com: Thanks for your time. - Please, create a VCS to control your debian/ versions. You can use github or other. So, add the Vcs-Browser and Vcs-{Git|Svn|Cvs} to d/control. You can see an example here[1]. Done. You need use 'git://' to Vcs-Git, intead of 'https://'. That's not what recommended by github and https:// works as a git clone url. I'm not against changing this though. Ok. I didn't know it. I tested, using a clone procedure, and it worked. Thank you for showing me. 2. d/copyright: Please, I found new names as Ariel Flesler and The Dojo Foundation (from your patch). Okay, I added those names. But doesn't the header of the file give the license? All relevant license notices must to be put in d/copyright. How you concluded that txsockjs/websockets.py is under MIT license? Do you checked this information at this site[1]? [1] http://twistedmatrix.com/trac/browser/branches/websocket-4173-2?rev=29073 Yes. If yes, the license must be put inside the source code. From MIT license: The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in all copies or substantial portions of the Software.. So, if no have references in source code (about the license and origin), the upstream didn't can distribute this code without break the licensing rules. I am very concerned because I think that the upstream source code has several files or extracts of codes from other upstreams without licenses. If yes, the socksjs-twisted upstream needs to fix this issue. You are right. But as upstream does not seem responsive, I cannot do much more than patching the files to fix those issues. The problem, IMHO, is that the software is hurting copyright rights and can't be distributed. So, I think the upstream must fix it. Other alternative is you to fork the project and fix all issues. But it is a bit hard to life. 3. What makes your patch? My impression is that you are injecting a third-part code in upstream. Is this? If yes, you must add it as an dependency of the package. If not packaged, you need package it. The patch adds the missing source for minified js files. See https://lintian.debian.org/tags/source-is-missing.html Ok. But the lintian says: add it to debian/missing-sources directory. And as I said, this code must be referenced in d/copyright. My idea was to have a patch ready for inclusion by upstream, easier than picking up the pieces in debian/missing-sources. Ok, but it is an third-party code injected yet. The better procedure is put it as a dependency. What is the origin of this code? (you must add it to the patch header) This code was taken from the history of jquery. There is this code packaged in Debian? Yes but not the same version as the minified source. Do you tested to see if works? For me, this inclusion, in a first view, is undesirable. I will baulk to accept it... This files are not even part of the binary package, the idea is just to fix the source package. Ok, I understood it. But consider my previous opinion. 6. Do you see these lintian messages? P: sockjs-twisted source: source-contains-prebuilt-javascript-object qunit/html/static/jquery.min.js P: sockjs-twisted source: source-contains-prebuilt-javascript-object qunit/html/static/qunit.min.js Those are fixed by the patch and are false positives, see above and a lintian bug : https://bugs.debian.org/744972 I can be wrong. But the pointed site is about missing sources. Please see it[2]. [2] https://lintian.debian.org/tags/source-contains-prebuilt-javascript-object.html From some other discussion, I had understood that including the missing source was enough. What is your advice here : should I add a Makefile to regenerate those files that don't even get in the binary package? Should I repack the source to get rid of those (which would be a pity : the archived source package would be stripped of its test suite) ? Alex Well, Paul Wise answered. Other solution is a fork project. I think that is important say you that I want help. However, the source code is very strange because the upstream is ignoring the basic rules. Cheers, Eriberto -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CAP+dXJeqs=4n7F6VBQmTcLeMq4=jDc=ocso7c1g3tbo4esj...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#753487: RFS: stda/1.3.1-1 -- new upstream release (package already in Debian)
Perfect! Thanks a lot for your work (as packager and as upstream). Cheers, Eriberto 2014-09-14 11:45 GMT-03:00 Dimitar Ivanov drim...@freeshell.de: Hi Eriberto, may be my last message was not very clear or visually well-formated with the statment that the pakcage can be downloaded also from mentors.d.n (it should be there since Fri Sep 5). And I just tested successfully :-) fetching it by: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/stda/stda_1.3.1-2.dsc Cheers, Dimitar On Sun, 14 Sep 2014, Eriberto wrote: Hi Dimitar, A good work. However, the VCS is for your control. Please, upload your package to mentors.d.n to make easier my work. As a tip for you, all packages needing review must be put in mentors.d.n. I will wait for you. Cheers, Eriberto A new package is uploaded: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/stda/stda_1.3.1-2.dsc Hi Eriberto, I finished now with the Git-integration of my package. The new repository is published under the collab-maint project on Alioth: http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/stda.git All previous issues with the package should be fixed in the current version. Also the corresponding 'Vcs-Browser' and 'Vcs-Git' fields in the d/control file are defined respectively. Thanks a lot for you continuous support! Cheers, Dimitar -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/cap+dxjczlbpy-attbjqeq8qdiftgp_f98hyaksz4hmuozzd...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#747032: RFS: libjs-zxcvbn/1.0+dfsg.1-1
Thanks Helmut. Eriberto 2014-09-12 5:27 GMT-03:00 Helmut Grohne hel...@subdivi.de: On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 08:54:09AM -0300, Eriberto Mota wrote: Jackub, do you have conviction that buildd has Internet access? Nevertheless, the download when building is undesirable. Jakub was meaning to say that even though policy does not allow interacting with the internet during build, many of the currently running buildds do not enforce this. So at the moment you could likely upload a (policy violating) package that downloads stuff during build and have it successfully built on most buildds. That said, this topic is not uncontroversial as some folks would like to be able to use apt-get source during build as a means for avoiding more binary packages postfixed -source. Helmut -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140912082707.ga19...@alf.mars -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CAP+dXJcDAh4QmqiR+-8GJrXnM=e8oHQ02sGkjV=f2kcfeqv...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#747032: RFS: libjs-zxcvbn/1.0+dfsg.1-1
Hum... Yesterday, in #debian-mentors (IRC), bremner confirmed that buildd block the Internet access. [15:27] eriberto Hi! A package in main can't download files when building. But in Debian Policy the §2.2.1 doesn't is clear about it. Can I use the §2.2.1 to this case? [15:29] bremner eriberto: no amount of policy-lawyering will magically give you network access on the buildd [15:31] eriberto bremmer, ok. So, to confirm, the buildd doesn't have Internet access, right? [15:31] bremner correct. [15:31] bremner in any case, it makes no sense for a source package to download things. How could the ftp-masters possibly check such a thing? [15:32] eriberto Yeap. [15:32] eriberto I think that is a DFSG violation too. [15:33] bremner I guess. It seems kindof hypothetical. [15:34] eriberto A discrimination against persons that no have Internet access. These person can't build the package. [15:35] bremner ok, but aside from a Debian themed trivia quiz, why is it important to decide? [15:35] geofft what are you actually trying to do? [15:36] geofft (there's some discussion on debian-devel that access to the Debian archive itself is a special case) [15:36] geofft (but chances are your package is not a special case, which is why Im asking :) ) [15:38] eriberto I am replying about a package that needs sponsor. [15:39] eriberto But is all right. Thanks guys! [15:39] bremner In that case I'd restrict yourself to the non-philosophical point that package will just be rejected by ftp-masters, and if it isn't, it will ftbfs everywhere [15:40] eriberto Yes. I am writing about why the package can't be put in Debian. Jackub, do you have conviction that buildd has Internet access? Nevertheless, the download when building is undesirable. Cheers, Eriberto 2014-09-11 8:07 GMT-03:00 Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org: I completely agree that downloading anything at build-time is a no-no, but... * Eriberto Mota eribe...@debian.org, 2014-09-10, 15:45: 3. The buildd system, that builds packages in Debian, don't have access to the Internet. This is a common misconception. Buildds do not block Internet access. (Although hopefully they will do this in the future!) -- Jakub Wilk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CAP+dXJf64AvBac6gtz0JoArXLpLRJytT++=ewdkmyq_o2p9...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#747484: RFS: python-kmodpy/0.1.10-1 [ITP]
Hi Chrysostomos, Thanks for all fixes and for your work (as packager and upstream too). Uploaded. Cheers, Eriberto 2014-09-11 8:21 GMT-03:00 Chrysostomos Nanakos nana...@wired-net.gr: Hi Eriberto, On 2014-09-10 19:34, Eriberto Mota wrote: tags 747484 moreinfo thanks Hi Nanakos. Please: 1. Use DH 9, instead DH 7. Fixed. 2. d/control: - Please, create a VCS to control your debian/ versions. You can use github or other. So, add the Vcs-Browser and Vcs-{Git|Svn|Cvs} to d/control. You can see an example here[1]. [1] http://sources.debian.net/src/yowsup/0.0~git20140314.938cf1-1/debian/control/ Added. - Use a conventional text to describe your package. Remove the underlined title. Explain what is the libkmod. Remove example. You can put your example in a manpage or in d/README.Debian or in /usr/share/doc/python-kmodpy/examples. Added a d/README.Debian - The upstream source code name is 'kmodpy'. So, your 'Source' field must have 'kmodpy' instead 'python-kmodpy'. The tarball name must be kmodpy_0.1.10.orig.tar.gz. Fixed. 3. d/copyright: note that here you used 'kmodpy' as 'Upstream-Name' and it is right. Please, in the packaging license (under GPL-2+), add your email address. Fixed. 4. When building, I can see: pyversions: missing X(S)-Python-Version in control file, fall back to debian/pyversions pyversions: missing debian/pyversions file, fall back to supported versions Fixed. You can find the new package in mentors [1] Cheers, Chrysostomos. [1]: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/k/kmodpy/kmodpy_0.1.10-1.dsc -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CAP+dXJcbMV=UYbZ1OK=BoUW5a=hmntpaqswkgxpk1vael-h...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#747169: RFS: socksjs-twisted/1.2.1-1 [ITP]
Hi Alexandre, 2014-09-11 9:27 GMT-03:00 Alexandre Rossi alexandre.ro...@gmail.com: - Please, create a VCS to control your debian/ versions. You can use github or other. So, add the Vcs-Browser and Vcs-{Git|Svn|Cvs} to d/control. You can see an example here[1]. Done. You need use 'git://' to Vcs-Git, intead of 'https://'. 2. d/copyright: - Use the verbatim license from upstream code (LICENSE file). As an example, the upstream says Neither the name of the Christopher Gamble nor the names of its, while the d/copyright says Neither the name of Oracle nor the names of its. Fixed. - I found this: qunit/html/static/qunit.css: * Copyright (c) 2011 John Resig, Jörn Zaefferer qunit/html/static/qunit.css- * Dual licensed under the MIT (MIT-LICENSE.txt) qunit/html/static/qunit.css- * or GPL (GPL-LICENSE.txt) licenses. Please, check each file and its licenses. I suggest 'grep -sriA25 copyright *' to help you. I fixed it and other stuff. Please, I found new names as Ariel Flesler and The Dojo Foundation (from your patch). How you concluded that txsockjs/websockets.py is under MIT license? Do you checked this information at this site[1]? [1] http://twistedmatrix.com/trac/browser/branches/websocket-4173-2?rev=29073 If yes, the license must be put inside the source code. From MIT license: The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in all copies or substantial portions of the Software.. So, if no have references in source code (about the license and origin), the upstream didn't can distribute this code without break the licensing rules. I am very concerned because I think that the upstream source code has several files or extracts of codes from other upstreams without licenses. If yes, the socksjs-twisted upstream needs to fix this issue. 3. What makes your patch? My impression is that you are injecting a third-part code in upstream. Is this? If yes, you must add it as an dependency of the package. If not packaged, you need package it. The patch adds the missing source for minified js files. See https://lintian.debian.org/tags/source-is-missing.html Ok. But the lintian says: add it to debian/missing-sources directory. And as I said, this code must be referenced in d/copyright. What is the origin of this code? (you must add it to the patch header) There is this code packaged in Debian? 6. Do you see these lintian messages? P: sockjs-twisted source: source-contains-prebuilt-javascript-object qunit/html/static/jquery.min.js P: sockjs-twisted source: source-contains-prebuilt-javascript-object qunit/html/static/qunit.min.js Those are fixed by the patch and are false positives, see above and a lintian bug : https://bugs.debian.org/744972 I can be wrong. But the pointed site is about missing sources. Please see it[2]. [2] https://lintian.debian.org/tags/source-contains-prebuilt-javascript-object.html Alexandre, I am unconfortable with this package. I need your attention to explain/fix the issues. Cheers, Eriberto -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CAP+dXJcDwtu85DuWZP|mtjugv2gyc5+4riydcnnvxv8bj...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#712787: ITP for Distkeys
tags 712787 moreinfo thanks Hi Martin, You didn't put the ITP number in d/changelog. To make easier the review, please, upload your package to mentors.debian.net. Thanks, Eriberto 2014-04-22 5:28 GMT-03:00 Martin Steigerwald m...@teamix.de: ITP finally went through after Don added some additional stripping to the mail parsing. ITP: distkeys -- Distkeys - upload SSH keys to servers and more http://bugs.debian.org/745478 Thanks, -- Martin Steigerwald Consultant / Trainer teamix GmbH Südwestpark 43 90449 Nürnberg fon: +49 911 30999 55 fax: +49 911 30999 99 mail: martin.steigerw...@teamix.de web: http://www.teamix.de blog: http://blog.teamix.de Amtsgericht Nürnberg, HRB 18320 Geschäftsführer: Oliver Kügow, Richard Müller ** Wissenstag Spezial „Datacenter Networking“ – 21.05.2014 ** http://www.teamix.de/spezial -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/4141474.rQYKiFAbix@mango -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CAP+dXJevN4t7Kxfygq9Opc5-AtUAB-k+-T+H+0q=6r0ue1t...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#747484: RFS: python-kmodpy/0.1.10-1 [ITP]
tags 747484 moreinfo thanks Hi Nanakos. Please: 1. Use DH 9, instead DH 7. 2. d/control: - Please, create a VCS to control your debian/ versions. You can use github or other. So, add the Vcs-Browser and Vcs-{Git|Svn|Cvs} to d/control. You can see an example here[1]. [1] http://sources.debian.net/src/yowsup/0.0~git20140314.938cf1-1/debian/control/ - Use a conventional text to describe your package. Remove the underlined title. Explain what is the libkmod. Remove example. You can put your example in a manpage or in d/README.Debian or in /usr/share/doc/python-kmodpy/examples. - The upstream source code name is 'kmodpy'. So, your 'Source' field must have 'kmodpy' instead 'python-kmodpy'. The tarball name must be kmodpy_0.1.10.orig.tar.gz. 3. d/copyright: note that here you used 'kmodpy' as 'Upstream-Name' and it is right. Please, in the packaging license (under GPL-2+), add your email address. 4. When building, I can see: pyversions: missing X(S)-Python-Version in control file, fall back to debian/pyversions pyversions: missing debian/pyversions file, fall back to supported versions You can read more about it here[2]. [2] https://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/python-policy/ch-module_packages.html#s-specifying_versions Thanks a lot for your work. Cheers, Eriberto 2014-05-09 6:08 GMT-03:00 Nanakos Chrysostomos nana...@wired-net.gr: Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal [important for RC bugs, wishlist for new packages] Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package python-kmodpy * Package name: python-kmodpy Version : 0.1.10-1 Upstream Author : Chrysostoos Nanakos ch...@include.gr * URL : https://github.com/cnanakos/kmodpy/ * License : GPL-3+ Section : python It builds those binary packages: python-kmodpy - Python binding for kmod To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/python-kmodpy Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/python-kmodpy/python-kmodpy_0.1.10-1.dsc Changes since the last upload: * Initial release (Closes: Bug#747480) Regards, Nanakos Chrysostomos -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/4d706260de7e10179ca49f92eeacf...@mail.wired-net.gr -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/cap+dxjfiiptvmf10j2eppk4baovhpgwffdswp7bz3xn20ad...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#747032: RFS: libjs-zxcvbn/1.0+dfsg.1-1
Hi again. I did new tests and the package, when building, downloads lots of files from http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Wiktionary. The download files at build time is discouraged because: 1. The package can be afected by a worm or can act as a spyware. 2. The package can't be built offline. Maybe it will make the package non-free, because now we can have discrimination against persons that no have Internet access (see DFSG[1]). The Debian Policy §2.2.1 says: 2.2.1 The main archive area The main archive area comprises the Debian distribution. Only the packages in this area are considered part of the distribution. None of the packages in the main archive area require software outside of that area to function. [...] In addition, the packages in main: - must not require or recommend a package outside of main for compilation or execution [...]. 3. The buildd system, that builds packages in Debian, don't have access to the Internet. 4. The injected files can violate the original license of the upstream source code. Cheers, Eriberto 2014-09-10 12:50 GMT-03:00 Eriberto eribe...@eriberto.pro.br: Please, ignore it: 1. d/changelog: remove the word 'bug'. Cheers, Eriberto -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CAP+dXJdy+r1oE+-RiESv4PfuPBJq_-Z7jAL1w5ghFfd_r�n...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#761074: RFS: cputool/0.0.7-1 [ITP]
Hi Nigel, Perfect!!! Congratulations from a perfectionist. You are unbeatable! Cheers, Eriberto 2014-09-10 12:03 GMT-03:00 Nigel Kukard nkuk...@lbsd.net: Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package cputool * Package name: cputool Version : 0.0.7-1 Upstream Author : Nigel Kukard nkuk...@lbsd.net * URL : http://gitlab.devlabs.linuxassist.net/cputool/cputool * License : GPL-3+ Section : utils It builds those binary packages: cputool- Utility which manages CPU usage and system load To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/cputool Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/cputool/cputool_0.0.7-1.dsc Changes since the last upload: * Initial release. (Closes: #761065) Regards, Nigel Kukard -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/sig.1330e5c406.54106851.5080...@lbsd.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/cap+dxjfjyqrtfe7opgkz1xmda+r2sqyf_ysfeu8g0rgmkkh...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#747169: RFS: socksjs-twisted/1.2.1-1 [ITP]
tags 747169 moreinfo thanks 2014-09-10 12:52 GMT-03:00 Alexandre Rossi alexandre.ro...@gmail.com: About your package, the upstream name is 'sockjs-twisted' but your package is named as 'socksjs-twisted'. Can you check this? The half-an-hour-lost typo. Sorry. A fixed package has been uploaded to debian mentors. Ha ha ha. The life is hard. I will try help you with this package. 1. d/control: - Sorry, but your long description is strange. My impression is that you tried to transform a paragraph in a list, without basic modifications. Please, can you adjust it? Use semicolons instead commas in the list at end of line. - Please, create a VCS to control your debian/ versions. You can use github or other. So, add the Vcs-Browser and Vcs-{Git|Svn|Cvs} to d/control. You can see an example here[1]. [1] http://sources.debian.net/src/yowsup/0.0~git20140314.938cf1-1/debian/control/ 2. d/copyright: - Use the verbatim license from upstream code (LICENSE file). As an example, the upstream says Neither the name of the Christopher Gamble nor the names of its, while the d/copyright says Neither the name of Oracle nor the names of its. - I found this: qunit/html/static/qunit.css: * Copyright (c) 2011 John Resig, Jörn Zaefferer qunit/html/static/qunit.css- * Dual licensed under the MIT (MIT-LICENSE.txt) qunit/html/static/qunit.css- * or GPL (GPL-LICENSE.txt) licenses. Please, check each file and its licenses. I suggest 'grep -sriA25 copyright *' to help you. - I suggest (you can drop it) that you put the license texts as end of file. You can see an example here[2]. It will make easier to visualize the files. [2] http://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/changelogs/main/e/ext4magic/unstable_copyright 3. What makes your patch? My impression is that you are injecting a third-part code in upstream. Is this? If yes, you mus add it as an dependency of the package. If not packaged, you need package it. 4. d/watch: githubredir is deprecated and GitHub accepts scan. Please, read this[3]. [3] http://eriberto.pro.br/blog/?p=1459 5. When building, we have a message: dpkg-gencontrol: warning: Breaks field of package python-twisted-sockjs: unknown substitution variable ${python:Breaks} 6. Do you saw these lintian messages? P: sockjs-twisted source: source-contains-prebuilt-javascript-object qunit/html/static/jquery.min.js P: sockjs-twisted source: source-contains-prebuilt-javascript-object qunit/html/static/qunit.min.js Thanks for your work. I will wait your reply. Cheers, Eriberto -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/cap+dxjexk0zm9j8zn+its4ekxe+mjmi5168o1x1qmkogzu7...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#747032: RFS: libjs-zxcvbn/1.0+dfsg.1-1
tags 747032 pending thanks Hi Ben, About your package, please: 1. d/changelog: remove the word 'bug'. 2. d/control: in short description there is an 'indent' signal. Please, change to a simple dash. Do the same in d/copyright. 3. d/copyright: there are files licensing to other authors that not Dropbox. Please, review carefully all files. As help, use 'grep -sriA25 copyright *'. 4. Your package doesn't build in my machine. It stops showing '( cd scripts python build_frequency_lists.py )' in screen. Thanks for your work. Cheers, Eriberto 2014-05-04 18:32 GMT-03:00 Ben Finney ben+deb...@benfinney.id.au: Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Control: tags 726171 + pending Control: block 726171 by -1 I am looking for a sponsor for my package ‘libjs-zxcvbn’: Package name: libjs-zxcvbn Version : 1.0+dfsg.1-1 Upstream Author : Dan Wheeler d...@dropbox.com URL : https://tech.dropbox.com/2012/04/zxcvbn-realistic-password-strength-estimation/ License : Expat Section : web It builds these binary packages: libjs-zxcvbn - realistic password strength estimation — JavaScript library You can get the package with ‘dget’: $ dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libjs-zxcvbn/libjs-zxcvbn_1.0+dfsg.1-1.dsc More information about ‘zxcvbn’ can be obtained from URL:https://mentors.debian.net/package/libjs-zxcvbn and in the ITP bug report URL:http://bugs.debian.org/726171. -- \“Spam will be a thing of the past in two years' time.” —Bill | `\ Gates, 2004-01-24 | _o__) | Ben Finney b...@benfinney.id.au -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CAP+dXJcJHpE32ucdq-3kLrWJVpvdgo-3BEJE0S7jQp3Q=1o...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#760065: RFS: kildclient/3.0.0-1 [new upstream version of package already in Debian]
Uploaded. Thanks for your work. Cheers, Eriberto 2014-09-06 8:12 GMT-03:00 Eduardo M KALINOWSKI edua...@kalinowski.com.br: tags 760065 - moreinfo thanks On 08/31/2014 11:02 PM, Eriberto Mota wrote: 1. d/changelog: add ACK for NMU. See details here[1]. 2. d/rules: please, update to new (reduced) format. Ask me if you have doubts. An example is here[2]. For details, see the 'dh' manpage. 3. d/rules: add 'export DEB_LDFLAGS_MAINT_APPEND = -Wl,--as-needed' to solve these warnings: I believe I have addressed all these issues, the update package remains at the same address: http://mentors.debian.net/package/kildclient or dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/k/kildclient/kildclient_3.0.0-1.dsc -- Due to a shortage of devoted followers, the production of great leaders has been discontinued. Eduardo M KALINOWSKI edua...@kalinowski.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/540aec26.5090...@kalinowski.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/cap+dxjde9joxetthg1ehb3t8jfvh1dhbkv+dhqrpjqlrf_3...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#751609: RFS: dmaths/3.5.2.5+dfsg1-1 (new version of a package that is already in Debian)
2014-09-06 14:34 GMT-03:00 Innocent De Marchi tangram.pe...@gmail.com: Hi Eriberto, Hi Innocent, 2. d/control: - Explain me why the package depends of writer and draw to work. Has no sense to install the package without these two programs. I don't know if I understand the question... You put in long description It also allows you to use your favorite drawing software and include graphs of functions into a document. So, why install draw compulsorily as dependency? I am trying understand the package. If using writer, will you need of the draw? - Please, create a VCS to control your debian/ versions. You can use github or other. So, add the Vcs-Browser and Vcs-{Git|Svn|Cvs} to d/control. I want to do this with all my packages, but now I have no time. I don't practice with Git and will need some time for me to update. You can use SVN or CVS (or GIT). Sorry but it is an essential condition for me. GitHub is simple and has several tutorials and videos on Internet. 5. After the build, there are two wrong independent license files in the package: usr/lib/libreoffice/share/extensions/DmathsAddon/Fichiers/licence.odt usr/lib/libreoffice/share/extensions/DmathsAddon/Fichiers/license.txt You must add an override_dh_install to d/rules to remove these files ($ man dh): override_dh_install: dh_install rm -f $(CURDIR)/debian/libreoffice-dmaths/usr/lib/libreoffice/share/extensions/DmathsAddon/Fichiers/licence.odt rm -f $(CURDIR)/debian/libreoffice-dmaths/usr/lib/libreoffice/share/extensions/DmathsAddon/Fichiers/license.txt The dmaths has a menu with an option to see the file DmathsAddon/Fichiers/licence.odt If it is deleted, an error occurs when accessing the file. I've added a line to delete the file license.txt to repackage the sources (see README.source) Ok. Please, add comments line in libreoffice-dmaths.lintian-overrides to explain each issue. I think you will need two lines. 6. Now, remove the 'extra-license' lines from Lintian override file. OK. Only the line for DmathsAddon/Fichiers/license.txt Ok! I saw several Lintian messages in your last upload. A new Lintian was uploaded today to unstable. May it can help you too: http://eriberto.pro.br/blog/?p=1289 Thanks for your work. Cheers, Eriberto -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/cap+dxjcymqbnhh+h8fcrhfq1_-c3iujvea1vwtw4bzsno6a...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#751009: RFS: ppp-gatekeeper/0.1.0-201406111015-1 [ITP]
tags 751009 moreinfo thanks Hi Nigel, Please: 1. d/changelog: you didn't put an ITP reference. Please, read it[1] to you see how to make an initial changelog. [1] https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/maint-guide/dreq.en.html#changelog 2. d/copyright: - You need to add the section 'Files: debian/*' because you can wish make a Debian revision without an upstream revision. - The information in d/copyright is different from upstream code. There is a license file saying GPL-2. However, ppp-gatekeeper file says 2008-2014 GPL-3+. 3. d/ppp-gatekeeper.dirs: remove etc/modprobe.d because d/ppp-gatekeeper.install will create it. 4. d/ppp-gatekeeper.install: you are installing a file inside /etc/shorewall. However, shorewall is a suggestion, not a dependency. So, you must put contrib/start.shorewall in usr/share/docs/ppp-gatekeeper/examples and write a d/README.Debian to explain about how to use this file. 5. d/rules: - override_dh_installdocs: don't install AUTHORS as docs. This information should be provided by d/copyright. I suggest to use d/ppp-gatekeeper.docs ($ man dh_installdocs). - override_dh_clean: I suggest to use d/clean ($ man dh_clean). - You are creating/deleting a manpage.1 but the correct level is 8. 6. You have Lintian messages to solve: W: ppp-gatekeeper: new-package-should-close-itp-bug E: ppp-gatekeeper: description-is-pkg-name PPP Gatekeeper I: ppp-gatekeeper: extended-description-is-probably-too-short Thanks for your work. Cheers, Eriberto 2014-09-04 5:07 GMT-03:00 Nigel Kukard nkuk...@lbsd.net: Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package ppp-gatekeeper Package name: ppp-gatekeeper Version : 0.1.0-201406111015-1 Upstream Author : Nigel Kukard nkuk...@lbsd.net URL : http://gitlab.devlabs.linuxassist.net/ppp-gatekeeper/ppp-gatekeeper License : GPL-3+ Section : net It builds this noarch package: ppp-gatekeeper - PPP Gatekeeper manages balancing, redundant and failover PPP link To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/ppp-gatekeeper Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/ppp-gatekeeper/ppp-gatekeeper_0.1.0-201406111015-1.dsc Changes since the last upload: * Correctly use d-clean * Fix description length * Removed authors todo files from install * Only 1 item in changelog now * Fixed format of changelog * Remove log files on purge Regards, Nigel Kukar -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/sig.1324cfc6c2.54081ddb@lbsd.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/cap+dxjcxteqtkbtak3dgaamrm6w5qn40m9snpkns8v-f3k3...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#741648: RFS: cbootimage/1.2-2
2014-09-04 18:15 GMT-03:00 Marc Dietrich marvi...@gmx.de: Hi Eriberto, Hi Marc, 3. d/control: you need a VCS to control your packaging. I think that already told you about it. Ask me if you have doubt. Yes, I original got it wrong thinking it must be the upstream repo. Since I have no repo for the debian stuff (and I really don't like to create one) I just dropped it because it is neither mandatory nor recommended. Not mandatory or recommended by policy. However, a good practice commonly requested by all sponsors to allow the control of the code by you or any external people. You must implement it. 4. d/copyright: you need remake this file. A short example is that you didn't told about build/* directory. Please, read (really) about 'copyright' here[1]. As a tip, if your main upstream is Nvidia, you can use a general reference to it. An example (not real for years range): Ah, I forgot to update it to the new paths. In fact, the files are copyrighted by different people from different companies, so I like to keep the current style of one copyright line per company. The NVIDIA copyright mostly comes from the buildsystem and their own boards. You must review each file. Use 'grep -sriA25 copyright *' to help you. I checked each file and FTP Master will do it too. I found several issues. Some examples: - There are several files copyrighted as 2012-2013, or 2012, or 2013 for CompuLab Ltd. You wrote 2012 only. - I didn't saw copyrights for Toradex in your file. - 2011-2013 for Avionic Design GmbH. You wrote 2013 only. - Other issues. Please, change tegra*/compulab/* for two blocks: tegra20/compulab/* and tegra30/compulab/*: Files: tegra20/compulab/* Copyright: xyz License: abc Files: tegra30/compulab/* Copyright: xyz License: abc Do the same to tegra*/toradex/* and tegra*/avionic-design/*. It will avoid confusion and make easier a future upgrade. The 'Files: tegra*/nvidia/* build/*' must be 'Files: *'. Finally, please, INSPECT all files. It will make my work easier. 5. d/docs: you is installing ALL files as documents. No! There is one document only: README.txt. The other files are your program. These files are not really required for cbootimage to run. They are more like examples on how to write a configuration. They even have their own buildsystem so the user needs to copy them to his own directory to actually use them. As the whole package only contains examples, they can go directly into docs (without docs/example) [2]. The user feeds the path to the generated config file to the cbootimage program. You can see it as a configuration compiler. [2] https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-docs.html#s12.6 Ok. I understood now. But your d/control don't explain about it. So you must adapt the long description. You are putting files as build.sh and Makefile. They aren't examples. So, you must remove these files or put all files in /usr/share/[...] (it is usual in Debian). In this case, you can write an d/README.Debian to explain about the files in /usr/share. Note that the current package is generating this Lintian message: X: cbootimage-configs: duplicate-files usr/share/doc/cbootimage-configs/tegra114/nvidia/dalmore/build.sh usr/share/doc/cbootimage-configs/tegra124/nvidia/jetson-tk1/build.sh usr/share/doc/cbootimage-configs/tegra124/nvidia/venice2/build.sh usr/share/doc/cbootimage-configs/tegra20/avionic-design/medcom-wide/build.sh usr/share/doc/cbootimage-configs/tegra20/avionic-design/plutux/build.sh usr/share/doc/cbootimage-configs/tegra20/avionic-design/tec/build.sh usr/share/doc/cbootimage-configs/tegra20/compulab/trimslice/build.sh usr/share/doc/cbootimage-configs/tegra20/nvidia/harmony/build.sh usr/share/doc/cbootimage-configs/tegra20/nvidia/seaboard/build.sh usr/share/doc/cbootimage-configs/tegra20/nvidia/ventana/build.sh usr/share/doc/cbootimage-configs/tegra20/nvidia/whistler/build.sh usr/share/doc/cbootimage-configs/tegra20/toradex/colibri-t20/build.sh usr/share/doc/cbootimage-configs/tegra30/avionic-design/tec-ng/build.sh usr/share/doc/cbootimage-configs/tegra30/nvidia/beaver/build.sh usr/share/doc/cbootimage-configs/tegra30/nvidia/cardhu/build.sh usr/share/doc/cbootimage-configs/tegra30/toradex/colibri_t30/build.sh If you use the /usr/share/cbootimage-configs, the message will stop. I read quickly the README.txt and I saw that cbootimage will need of extracted files from NVidia hardware, right? If yes, I think that NVidia hardware content isn't free. So, if confirmed, cbootimage must be put in 'contrib'.[1] [1] https://www.debian.org/distrib/packages#note 6. d/rules: your rules has useless comments and is wrong. But your package is building documents only. So, I can't comment about d/rules yet. You need read about the upstream program (where put it). I think that you need all cfg files in /usr/share/cbootimage-configs to make a link from cbootimage. see above. You needn't of the 'export DH_OPTIONS'. Please, reply to all (I and the
Bug#756034: Bug#747700: ircii
Denis, you must use the #760198 (RFS) bug to ask, not #747700 (New upstream version 20131230). Denis, do you saw the message from Vincent Cheng saying about not use NMU in this package? I didn't found any new ircii package in mentors.d.o. Eriberto 2014-09-05 8:28 GMT-03:00 Denis Rodrigues Ferreira denis...@gmail.com: Hi, Eriberto! I uploaded the package as NMU. Is the correct or should I make any changes in the package ircII? Thank you very much! -- Denis Rodrigues Ferreira PGP key: 2048R/E41BD2D0 C879 5E41 1ED7 EE80 0F2E 7D0C DBDD 4D96 E41B D2D0 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/cap+dxjdtkdty0uc+mzl6scm66kxee_y-qxca+cprb-7bcv6...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#752487: RFS: gcc-doc-defaults/5:10
Hi Guo! I uploaded your package now. Thanks a lot for your work. Cheers, Eriberto 2014-09-03 14:43 GMT-03:00 Guo Yixuan culu@gmail.com: Hi, On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 8:52 AM, Eriberto Mota eribe...@debian.org wrote: Hi! Thanks for your reply. 2014-09-03 2:23 GMT-03:00 Guo Yixuan culu@gmail.com: 2. If you are a DM, why you don't upload the package? Because there's a new binary package, gccgo-doc, it needs to go through new queue, so my upload is not allowed by ftp masters. Sure. I didn't see this new package before. I will wait for you. Cheers, Eriberto I've made some addition to debian/copyright and re-uploaded it. http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/contrib/g/gcc-doc-defaults/gcc-doc-defaults_10.dsc The two new commits are: http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/users/yixuan-guest/gcc-doc-defaults.git/commit/?id=467470dd023aac5f05516806adbfe8691205550c and http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/users/yixuan-guest/gcc-doc-defaults.git/commit/?id=9ece1183abbd9318f7df5c4a67e4971a9ef0968c Cheers, Yixuan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/cap+dxjcobganluqxrteuzbyouar+tbxf4m0ray8hjd_wnzp...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#752487: RFS: gcc-doc-defaults/5:10
Hi! Thanks for your reply. 2014-09-03 2:23 GMT-03:00 Guo Yixuan culu@gmail.com: 2. If you are a DM, why you don't upload the package? Because there's a new binary package, gccgo-doc, it needs to go through new queue, so my upload is not allowed by ftp masters. Sure. I didn't see this new package before. I will wait for you. Cheers, Eriberto -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CAP+dXJcettM=zmktpgpxtzshkouqde9va-xmsmt-th2awz-...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#760257: RFS: plowshare4/1.0.5-1 -- file sharing tools
Hi Carl, I review your package. There are several Lintian messages 'executable-not-elf-or-script'. I will need that you fix it. Please, confirm that you want the upload before the 1.0.4 version arrives to unstable. Cheers, Eriberto 2014-09-02 0:54 GMT-03:00 Carl Suster c...@contraflo.ws: Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package plowshare4 Package name: plowshare4 Version : 1.0.5-1 Upstream Author : Matthieu Crapet mcra...@gmail.com URL : https://code.google.com/p/plowshare/ License : GPL-3+ Section : web It builds those binary packages: plowshare4 - Download and upload files from file sharing websites To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/plowshare4 Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/plowshare4/plowshare4_1.0.5-1.dsc Changes since the last upload: plowshare4 (1.0.5-1) unstable; urgency=medium * New upstream release. * fix-man-page-typos.patch now fixed in upstream. * Drop Replaces: plowshare since it was never in the archive. * Drop Conflicts: plowshare3 since it was never in the archive. * Add Recommends: sxiv as an alternative X image viewer. * Add Suggests: fbi as a framebuffer viewer. -- Carl Suster c...@contraflo.ws Sun, 31 Aug 2014 18:53:00 +1000 Note that my package for the previous upstream release is sitting in NEW: https://ftp-master.debian.org/new/plowshare4_1.0.4-1.html I'm not sure if it's best to wait until that is accepted before attempting to upload this new release? If the package got bumped to the end of the queue then it probably won't have a chance of making it into testing before the jessie freeze, so it would be nice to avoid that. Cheers, Carl -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/54053f7b.4090...@contraflo.ws -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/cap+dxjf-virjqbhu7w+qhf_hgtiuddzzfryb1c3u1_ajfnp...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#741648: RFS: cbootimage/1.2-2
Hi Marc, how are you? We need begin anew. So, I will analyse the packages from zero. In a first moment, we will work over cbootimage-configs only. Please: 1. The g GIT commit was on 2014-08-06. So, the version must be 0.0+20140806~git18e531f (I prefer git instead 'g'). 2. d/changelog: you need an ITP number. 3. d/control: you need a VCS to control your packaging. I think that already told you about it. Ask me if you have doubt. 4. d/copyright: you need remake this file. A short example is that you didn't told about build/* directory. Please, read (really) about 'copyright' here[1]. As a tip, if your main upstream is Nvidia, you can use a general reference to it. An example (not real for years range): Files: * Copyright: 2010-2014 NVIDIA CORPORATION i...@nvidia.com License: ZLIB After this, you must create new sections to exceptions only. This work must be precise.I and FTP Master will check each detail. [1] http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep5/#fields 5. d/docs: you is installing ALL files as documents. No! There is one document only: README.txt. The other files are your program. 6. d/rules: your rules has useless comments and is wrong. But your package is building documents only. So, I can't comment about d/rules yet. You need read about the upstream program (where put it). I think that you need all cfg files in /usr/share/cbootimage-configs to make a link from cbootimage. 7. d/watch is ok. Cheers, Eriberto 2014-09-03 8:09 GMT-03:00 Marc Dietrich marvi...@gmx.de: Hi Eriberto, Am Mittwoch 27 August 2014, 15:23:45 schrieb Eriberto: Hi Marc, 2014-08-26 9:32 GMT-03:00 Marc Dietrich marvi...@gmx.de: I think you didn't undertand my words. You must create a VCS to control your packaging (debian directory). Not create a VCS to point to upstream code. The Vcs-Git field must use git:// instead https://. Your mistake was put the Vcs-* in binaries instead in source block (after Homepage field). This and the problems below are a result of how I package the source. Let me explain it at bit more: cbootimage is used to flash the bootloader on tegra devices. To do this, it needs some machine specific config files. These config files are not part of the cbootimage repository, instead they live under their own one. To avoid creating two source packages, I decided to include the config tree in the program tree. This is possible according to https://wiki.debian.org/Projects/DebSrc3.0 (How to use multiple upstream tarball in 3.0 (quilt) format?). So I have two tarballs now: cbootimage_1.4.orig.tar.gz and cbootimage_1.4.orig-configs.tar.gz which create a binary and an platform independend package. So both packages need their own copyright (before cbootimage-1.0 didn't contain the config files). Ok. Thanks for your explanation. It is new for me. I read the texts and I tested all procedures. However, cbootimage-configs-1.4 doesn't exist in GitHub. So, you must use 0.0, the commit date and Git commit as version (or other similar format). An example for your case: 0.0~git20140806.18e531. To see more examples: $ dpkg -l | grep -i git. I don't see a motive to join the upstream codes. IMHO, it is undesirable in this case, because the upstream source codes are being updated in different times. Thus, I think you must package each code separatelly and make cbootimage dependent of the cbootimage-configs. I have similar sittuation in my life. See my packages (phpwebcounter, phpwebcounter-extra) and (album, album-extra). So, I intent to sponsor your work if you use two packages. ok, I splitted the packages in two (cbootimage + cbootimage-configs) and uploaded them again to mentors. ... mmh, I'm about to install a jessie system in a vm to get a current lintian. I guess I can ignore the pedantic warnings for now? No. All Lintian messages must be fixed wherever possible. because cbootimage-configs has no version, I added the watch file with some comment that is makes no sense for this package (no releases) as described in the debian handbook. Hopefully, that's all ... Please take a (-nother) look at it again. Thanks! Marc -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/cap+dxjd3yrt1dpjpvur0panjjekoewbyrvjxb2+ed6nz_6h...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#760257: RFS: plowshare4/1.0.5-1 -- file sharing tools
tags 760257 moreinfo thanks Hi Carl, 2014-09-02 0:54 GMT-03:00 Carl Suster c...@contraflo.ws: I'm not sure if it's best to wait until that is accepted before attempting to upload this new release? If the package got bumped to the end of the queue then it probably won't have a chance of making it into testing before the jessie freeze, so it would be nice to avoid that. Yes, we need wait your package arrives in testing. Don't worry, we have time (two months). So, I need you notify me when in testing and I will solve this bug quickly for you. Have a nice day!!! Cheers, Eriberto -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/cap+dxjexvmk3jarsvnf+piihmtx3vupr+kft+a1rt3+zhra...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#760241: RFS: winetricks/0.0+20140818+svn1202-1 (ITA)
Hi Joseph. Please: 1. d/changelog: - Change from 'Add Joseph Bisch as maintainer (Closes: #735288)' to 'New maintainer (Closes: #735288)'. 2. Remove all garbage: d/changelog.{BACKUP.21866, BASE.21866, LOCAL.21866, REMOTE.21866}. These files are trash or references to Ubuntu d/changelog. 3. d/control: - Why the package recommends zenity | kdebase-bin? I am afraid because kdebase-bin is a monster (a detail: I use KDE). I need you invetigate this dependency. - Do you have access to collab-maint? If not, you must create an external VCS and import all data. - The long description appears a mix between long description and README. Please, move this content to README.Debian (you can create a new section below the Jari Aalto and put a footer with your name): About pckages in Recommends header: to use GUI progress bar, install package zenity. To read manuals, install package xdg-utils. If you need to cache any *.iso files with the -k option, install package sudo or sudo GUI gksu. . NOTE: This package suggests installing package libwine. Some, but not all package downloads depend on restarting the wineserver which is included in libwine. . NOTE: In case you have compiled wine from sources and installed it out of dpkg(1)'s control, winetricks' depends wouldn't know about it. In that case create a dummy wine package to satisfy depends by using tools in equivs package before installing winetricks. An example: . git clone g...@github.com:jaalto/project--debian-wine-dummy.git cd project--debian-wine-dummy make dpkg -i wine*.deb apt-get install winetricks I suggest review and rewrite the original text. d/copyright: you need update the upstream name list and years in 'Files: *'. you can use 'grep -sri copyright * | grep -v debian'. d/rules: I suggest move the winetricks.svg install to d/install. it will avoid two points of installation. d/watch: doesn't show the last version. d/clean: currently, this file hasn't a function. Thanks for your work. Cheers, Eriberto 2014-09-01 21:40 GMT-03:00 Joseph Bisch joseph.bi...@gmail.com: Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal [important for RC bugs, wishlist for new packages] Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package winetricks Winetricks was orphaned, and I am adopting it. * Package name: winetricks Version : 0.0+20140818+svn1202-1 Upstream Author : Dan Kegel d...@kegel.com * URL : https://code.google.com/p/winetricks/ * License : LGPL-2.1 Section : otherosfs It builds those binary packages: winetricks - package manager for WINE to install software easily To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/winetricks Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/contrib/w/winetricks/winetricks_0.0+20140818+svn1202-1.dsc Regards, Joseph Bisch -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CAP+dXJeUn=AGo=wtus_+-vt5tun3cbyym4odzbnbs9p3ss0...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#751609: RFS: dmaths/3.5.2.5+dfsg1-1 (new version of a package that is already in Debian)
tags -1 moreinfo thanks Hi Innocent. Please, 1. d/compat: change to 9. 2. d/control: - Explain me why the package depends of writer and draw to work. - Please, create a VCS to control your debian/ versions. You can use github or other. So, add the Vcs-Browser and Vcs-{Git|Svn|Cvs} to d/control. - Why your package is extra? It conflicts with other? If not, please, change to 'optional'. 3. d/copyright: I didn't see any reference to Alain Hague here. 4. d/watch: dmaths isn't versioned in its site. So, you haven't how o make a d/watch that works. Please, remove the content of the file and add a explanation about it. 5. After the build, there are two wrong independent license files in the package: usr/lib/libreoffice/share/extensions/DmathsAddon/Fichiers/licence.odt usr/lib/libreoffice/share/extensions/DmathsAddon/Fichiers/license.txt You must add an override_dh_install to d/rules to remove these files ($ man dh): override_dh_install: dh_install rm -f $(CURDIR)/debian/libreoffice-dmaths/usr/lib/libreoffice/share/extensions/DmathsAddon/Fichiers/licence.odt rm -f $(CURDIR)/debian/libreoffice-dmaths/usr/lib/libreoffice/share/extensions/DmathsAddon/Fichiers/license.txt 6. Now, remove the 'extra-license' lines from Lintian override file. Thanks for your work. I will wait your package. Cheers, Eriberto 2014-06-14 15:00 GMT-03:00 Innocent De Marchi tangram.pe...@gmail.com: Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package dmaths. I have already tried to upgrade this package repeatedly[0][1] There is a community of users of this package in Debian[2] and there are users (on Ubuntu) impatiently awaiting the update[3]. To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/dmaths Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/dmaths/dmaths_3.5.2.5+dfsg1-1.dsc Regards, Innocent De Marchi [0] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=728136 [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2013/05/msg00341.html [2] http://qa.debian.org/popcon.php?package=dmaths [3] https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-motu/2014-May/007657.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/cap+dxjejrehkzccrevd5cfkfwvbztngrkkjzethax4wlzzq...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#752487: RFS: gcc-doc-defaults/5:10
tags 752487 moreinfo thanks Hi Guo. I would like to sponsor your package. I found a issue only. I didn't see your name and the upstream updated dates in d/copyright. Please, fix it. I have two questions: 1. What is the exact link to download the tarball? 2. If you are a DM, why you don't upload the package? Thanks for your work. Cheers, Eriberto 2014-06-23 22:45 GMT-03:00 GUO Yixuan culu@gmail.com: Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package gcc-doc-defaults * Package name: gcc-doc-defaults Version : 5:10 * License : GNU-meta-license Section : doc The main change is adding gccgo-doc, which provides manpage and info links to the document of the default version of gccgo. It builds those binary packages: cpp-doc- documentation for the GNU C preprocessor (cpp) gcc-doc- documentation for the GNU compilers (gcc, gobjc, g++) gcc-doc-base - several GNU manual pages gccgo-doc - documentation for the GNU Go compiler (gccgo) gcj-doc- documentation for the GNU Java tools (gcj, gij) gfortran-doc - documentation for the GNU Fortran Compiler (gfortran) gnat-doc - documentation for the GNU Ada Compiler (gnat) To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/gcc-doc-defaults Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/contrib/g/gcc-doc-defaults/gcc-doc-defaults_10.dsc More information about hello can be obtained from http://www.example.com. Regards, GUO Yixuan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140624014547.ga19...@gmail.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CAP+dXJcw+BMsOqs7XBQD-Z65+7zGaGUCGj57fwBboFSLm8=d...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#760241: RFS: winetricks/0.0+20140818+svn1202-1 (ITA)
2014-09-02 16:45 GMT-03:00 Joseph Bisch joseph.bi...@gmail.com: Hi Eriberto, Thanks for reviewing my package. I reuploaded it to mentors.d.n. I also uploaded to a private git repository, because I don't have access to collab-maint. See my notes below on your points. You're welcome. On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 10:25:06AM -0300, Eriberto Mota wrote: 3. d/control: - Why the package recommends zenity | kdebase-bin? I am afraid because kdebase-bin is a monster (a detail: I use KDE). I need you invetigate this dependency. - Do you have access to collab-maint? If not, you must create an external VCS and import all data. - The long description appears a mix between long description and README. Please, move this content to README.Debian (you can create a new section below the Jari Aalto and put a footer with your name): I moved all the stuff to README.Debian. Please, remove: 'From d/control:'. I don't have access to collab-maint, so I changed the Vcs fields to a private repo. Ok. I think the package recommends zenity | kdebase-bin because of Kdialog which can be used as an alternative to zenity. What do you think I should do about it? I agree. d/copyright: you need update the upstream name list and years in 'Files: *'. you can use 'grep -sri copyright * | grep -v debian'. Done A Lintian message: W: winetricks source: missing-license-paragraph-in-dep5-copyright lgpl-2.1 d/watch: doesn't show the last version. What do you suggest I do? The watch file is setup for the actual releases, but the previous maintainer has been packaging the version directly from svn. I guess I can figure out a way to get the watch file working with Google Code source browser. My suggestion. It won't allow downloads but you will know if have a new version (commit): version=3 opts=dversionmangle=s/.*svn// \ http://code.google.com/p/winetricks/source/list detail\?r=(\d+) Another option is package the version available at http://winetricks.org/download/releases/. Cheers, Eriberto -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CAP+dXJdAt-92=ehzq+dhvc7ypyhqmhr7eiipbwobzjqqz33...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#760241: RFS: winetricks/0.0+20140818+svn1202-1 (ITA)
Hi! I uploaded to Debian now. Thanks a lot for your work. Cheers, Eriberto 2014-09-02 18:46 GMT-03:00 Joseph Bisch joseph.bi...@gmail.com: Hi Eriberto, I made your changes. Is there anything else I should do? Thanks, Joseph -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CAP+dXJdQeFiGzq9vs+S5FQLsM2AB8=yotw82humbgb7zskg...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#760198: Sponsorship-request
I agree with Stuart. Sorry but if you want be helped, please, allow be helped and make an effort to follow the comments sent for you. You won't be helped if you ignore everyone. Regards, Eriberto 2014-09-01 22:47 GMT-03:00 Stuart Prescott stu...@debian.org: Hi Denis, Please don't open a new sponsorship request each time you post to the list about this package. Until you actually get the package uploaded, you can just send a follow-up mail to the bug (just email 760...@bugs.debian.org). In reply to your previous requests for sponsorship, people have made comments about the version number and the authorship of the work -- these items are still incorrect in your latest upload and request for sponsorship: Upstream Author : Bernhard R. Link brl...@debian.org This is incorrect as has already been pointed out. http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/i/ircii/ircii_20131230-1.dsc There is a newer version than this released. * Non-maintainer upload. This is also not correct as has already been pointed out -- you are seeking to be the maintainer and you are uploading it. It's not a non-maintainer upload. If you don't understand the comments that have been made, please ask for further explanation. Don't just ignore the comments. Stuart -- Stuart Prescotthttp://www.nanonanonano.net/ stu...@nanonanonano.net Debian Developer http://www.debian.org/ stu...@debian.org GPG fingerprint90E2 D2C1 AD14 6A1B 7EBB 891D BBC1 7EBB 1396 F2F7 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/540521cb.c50a.1f13.5...@mx.google.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/cap+dxjd_1odusg06ixvns9mtd+o85s_vna-qxop7gj-yiyf...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#760065: RFS: kildclient/3.0.0-1 [new upstream version of package already in Debian]
tags 760065 moreinfo thanks Hi Eduardo, greetings from Brazil! Please: 1. d/changelog: add ACK for NMU. See details here[1]. 2. d/rules: please, update to new (reduced) format. Ask me if you have doubts. An example is here[2]. For details, see the 'dh' manpage. [1] https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/pkgs.html#nmu-maintainer [2] http://sources.debian.net/src/pcapfix/1.1.0-1/debian/rules/ 3. d/rules: add 'export DEB_LDFLAGS_MAINT_APPEND = -Wl,--as-needed' to solve these warnings: dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: package could avoid a useless dependency if debian/kildclient/usr/games/kildclient was not linked against libdl.so.2 (it uses none of the library's symbols) dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: package could avoid a useless dependency if debian/kildclient/usr/games/kildclient was not linked against libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0 (it uses none of the library's symbols) dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: package could avoid a useless dependency if debian/kildclient/usr/games/kildclient was not linked against libcrypt.so.1 (it uses none of the library's symbols) dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: package could avoid a useless dependency if debian/kildclient/usr/games/kildclient was not linked against libatk-1.0.so.0 (it uses none of the library's symbols) dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: package could avoid a useless dependency if debian/kildclient/usr/games/kildclient was not linked against libenchant.so.1 (it uses none of the library's symbols) dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: package could avoid a useless dependency if debian/kildclient/usr/games/kildclient was not linked against libcairo-gobject.so.2 (it uses none of the library's symbols) dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: package could avoid a useless dependency if debian/kildclient/usr/games/kildclient was not linked against libgio-2.0.so.0 (it uses none of the library's symbols) dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: package could avoid a useless dependency if debian/kildclient/usr/games/kildclient was not linked against libpangocairo-1.0.so.0 (it uses none of the library's symbols) dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: package could avoid a useless dependency if debian/kildclient/usr/games/kildclient was not linked against libgthread-2.0.so.0 (it uses none of the library's symbols) dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: package could avoid a useless dependency if debian/kildclient/usr/games/kildclient was not linked against libcairo.so.2 (it uses none of the library's symbols) Thanks for your work. Cheers, Eriberto 2014-08-31 9:24 GMT-03:00 Eduardo M KALINOWSKI edua...@kalinowski.com.br: Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package kildclient * Package name: kildclient Version : 3.0.0-1 Upstream Author : Eduardo Kalinowski edua...@kalinowski.com.br * URL : http://www.kildclient.org * License : GPL-2+ Section : games It builds those binary packages: kildclient - powerful MUD client with a built-in Perl interpreter kildclient-doc - powerful MUD client with a built-in Perl interpreter - manual To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/kildclient Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/k/kildclient/kildclient_3.0.0-1.dsc Changes since the last upload: * New upstream version: 3.0.0. * control: Updated VCS urls. * control: Reintroduced Homepage field that was lost and made it point to the new URL. * copyright: Point to new homepage. * control: New dependency: libjson-perl * control: glib = 2.32.0, gtk+3 = 3.10.0 and gtkspell3 are now required. gtk3-perl is suggested instead of gtk2-perl. * control: Use debhelper 9. * control: Mentioned HTTP proxies in description. * control: Updated Vcs fields to point to new git repository. * control: Updated policy compliance to 3.9.5; no changes were necessary. * rules: Added hardening flags. * control, rules: dh-autoreconf is now used instead of autotools-dev. * copyright: Change URL of Format: line to point to Version 1.0 of the machine-readable format. * copyright: util_cursor.h is no longer used, so it has been removed. -- It is impossible to travel faster than light, and certainly not desirable, as one's hat keeps blowing off. -- Woody Allen Eduardo M KALINOWSKI edua...@kalinowski.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/540313e9.6020...@kalinowski.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CAP+dXJccwuPTtLdBCh=Z71r8YB=ysjnpezwenvtbkeo48qv...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#759479: RFS: profanity/0.4.4-1 [ITP]
2014-08-29 5:46 GMT-03:00 Dariusz Dwornikowski dariusz.dwornikow...@cs.put.poznan.pl: 2. d/copyight: - Put the license 'GPL-3+ with OpenSSL exception' only one time in your file. You can see an example here[2]. - The files have this append (not in License.txt): * You must obey the GNU General Public License in all respects for all of the * code used other than OpenSSL. If you modify file(s) with this exception, you * may extend this exception to your version of the file(s), but you are not * obligated to do so. If you do not wish to do so, delete this exception * statement from your version. If you delete this exception statement from all * source files in the program, then also delete it here. - Please, use the license from a file. - To public license, insert a period (.) at the end of sentence. - To public license, use the years found in src/tools/p_sha1.c (it will be equal to .h) yeah I did that but do not know if this is what you meant. No... Please, see the attached example. Thanks for all adjustments. Cheers, Eriberto copyright Description: Binary data
Bug#759296: RFS: psensor/1.0.4-1
tags 759296 moreinfo thanks Dariusz and Daniel, THANKS A LOT for initial help. You're welcome. Hi Jean-Philippe. I would like to say that I liked your packaging. You will need some adjustments. Please: 1. d/control: I will leave you decide it. But, can you remove the isolated dot at end of each long description? I will accept a no. ;-) 2. d/copyright: please, convert this file to 1.0 format. It is easy and you can use this example[1]. Please, use the exact text of the example for the license. [1] http://sources.debian.net/src/iwatch/0.2.2-3/debian/copyright/ 3. d/control: please, remove all useless comments: # -*- makefile -*- # Sample debian/rules that uses debhelper. # This file was originally written by Joey Hess and Craig Small. # As a special exception, when this file is copied by dh-make into a # dh-make output file, you may use that output file without restriction. # This special exception was added by Craig Small in version 0.37 of dh-make. # Uncomment this to turn on verbose mode. Thanks for you work! Cheers, Eriberto 2014-08-25 19:28 GMT-03:00 jeanfi jea...@gmail.com: Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package psensor * Package name: psensor Version : 1.0.4-1 Upstream Author : Jean-Philippe Orsini jea...@gmail.com * URL : http://wpitchoune.net/psensor * License : GPL v2 Section : utils It builds those binary packages: psensor- display graphs for monitoring hardware temperature psensor-common - common files for Psensor and Psensor server psensor-server - Psensor server for monitoring hardware sensors remotely To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/psensor Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/psensor/psensor_1.0.4-1.dsc More information about psensor can be obtained from http://wpitchoune.net/psensor. Changes since the last upload: * New upstream release. + fixed psensor does not start: Attempt to unlock mutex that was not locked during startup with glib 2.41.2. (LP: #1346299) + fixed FTBFS with clang instead of gcc. (Closes: #753061) * debian/control + added build dep to libappindicator3-dev. Regards, Jean-Philippe Orsini -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/cap+dxjf6xp6y00tuzy6bxv2h7ziyydgpdhc+oe2d-g5lzka...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#759479: RFS: profanity/0.4.4-1 [ITP]
tags 759479 moreinfo thanks Riley, THANKS A LOT for your revision. This makes my job easier. Hi again Dariusz. Please: 1. d/control: reorganize your long description using topics. You can see an example here[1]. As suggestion to increase the chance of the users find your package, add the words 'Jabber', 'instant messenger (IM)' and 'network'. [1] http://sources.debian.net/src/bittwist/2.0-4/debian/control/ 2. d/copyight: - Put the license 'GPL-3+ with OpenSSL exception' only one time in your file. You can see an example here[2]. - The files have this append (not in License.txt): * You must obey the GNU General Public License in all respects for all of the * code used other than OpenSSL. If you modify file(s) with this exception, you * may extend this exception to your version of the file(s), but you are not * obligated to do so. If you do not wish to do so, delete this exception * statement from your version. If you delete this exception statement from all * source files in the program, then also delete it here. - Please, use the license from a file. - To public license, insert a period (.) at the end of sentence. - To public license, use the years found in src/tools/p_sha1.c (it will be equal to .h) [2] http://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/changelogs/main/n/netmate/unstable_copyright 3. To test, I need libstrophe-dev. Thanks for your work. Very good. Cheers, Eriberto 2014-08-27 11:32 GMT-03:00 Dariusz Dwornikowski dariusz.dwornikow...@cs.put.poznan.pl: Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist I am looking for a sponsor for profanity. I managed to convince upstream (fortunately one copyright holder) to add OpenSSL exception. Mind that profanity depends on libstrophe-dev, which is in NEW now. * Package name: profanity Version : 0.4.4-1 Upstream Author : James Booth boot...@gmail.com * URL : http://www.profanity.im/ * License : GPL-3+ with OpenSSL exception Section : net It builds those binary packages: profanity - Console based XMPP client Profanity is a console based XMPP client written in C, inspired by Irssi. It Supports: . XMPP chat services, including GoogleTalk and Facebook. OTR message encryption Roster management Desktop notifications Flexible resource and priority settings To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/profanity Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/profanity/profanity_0.4.4-1.dsc Alternatively, you can access my alioth git repo here: http://anonscm.debian.org/?p=collab-maint/profanity.git;a=summary More information about *profanity* can be obtained from http://www.profanity.im Changes since the last upload: * Initial release (Closes: #745872) Regards, - -- Dariusz Dwornikowski, Institute of Computing Science, Poznań University of Technology www.cs.put.poznan.pl/ddwornikowski/ room 2.7.2 BTiCW | tel. +48 61 665 29 41 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140827143228.gb29...@blackstar.cs.put.poznan.pl -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CAP+dXJf=jb3f0nyhsgp0qm5b7sgnxueqvargoechtpamhao...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#755410: RFS: python-xmp-toolkit/2.0.1-1 [ITA] -- Python library for XMP
tags 755410 moreinfo thanks Hi Daniel. Please: 1. d/copyright says that upstream copyright years are 2008-2009. However, the upstream changelog has newer dates. Please, update the years. 2. Remove the useless file d/source/options. 3. A problem: after the build of the binary python-libxmp-doc, the new files usr/share/doc/python-libxmp-doc/html/_static/{basic,default}.css have this header: * Sphinx stylesheet -- default theme. * * :copyright: Copyright 2007-2014 by the Sphinx team, see AUTHORS. * :license: BSD, see LICENSE for details. It is an inedit situation for me, but the license must be placed at d/copyright. So, I suggest put it in d/copyright and add a field 'comment'[1] to explain about this. [1] http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep5/#fields 4. Note that your package has new binaries (.deb) and will be NEW. Thanks for your work. Your packaging is very good. Cheers, Eriberto 2014-07-20 10:23 GMT-03:00 Daniel Stender deb...@danielstender.com: Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Hi, I'm looking for a sponsor of my package of the Python-xmp-toolkit: https://packages.qa.debian.org/p/python-xmp-toolkit.html The Debian patch is community maintained: http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/python-modules/packages/python-xmp-toolkit/trunk/ Plus, I've uploaded the my package to mentors: http://mentors.debian.net/package/python-xmp-toolkit http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/python-xmp-toolkit/python-xmp-toolkit_2.0.1-1.dsc My buildlog: http://www.danielstender.com/buildlogs/python-xmp-toolkit_2.0.1-1_amd64.build Changelog: * New upstream release: updated hardcode-library-name.diff, removed fix-deprecated-unittest-methods.diff (applied upstream). * Changed to build with setuptools: + Removed patches/no-setuptools.diff, added b-ds on python(3)-setuptools. * deb/control: + Change of maintainer (Closes: #708545). + Bumped debhelper level to 9 (also in debian/compat). + B-ds: dropped python-support, added python3-all, python(3)-mock, python(3)-tz (needed by test suite), and dh-python. + Bumped standards to 3.9.5 (no changes needed). + Changed Homepage URL (Google Code became obsolete). + Added X-Python(3)-Versions. + Added description for Python3 bindings package. * deb/copyright: + Updated Format URI [Jakub Wilk]. + Straightened, removed trailing commas, updated. * deb/rules: + Added DH_VERBOSE, DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS and PYBUILD_NAME export lines. + Reduced to build with dh sequencer. * deb/watch: changed from Google Code (obsolete) to Pypi. * Upstream ships with Sphinx documentation: + Removed deb/get-orig.source.sh (not needed anymore to create dfsg). + deb/control: added b-d for python-sphinx. + deb/rules: overrides for building docs and removal of docs/_build. + deb/rules: generation of symbolic links for jquery.js and underscore.js. + Added deb/python(3)-libxmp.docs and deb/python(3)-libxmp.doc-base. * deb/source: added extend-diff-ignore for \.egg-info. * Wrapped and sorted. Thank you very much, Daniel Stender -- http://www.danielstender.com/blog/ PGP key: 2048R/E41BD2D0 C879 5E41 1ED7 EE80 0F2E 7D0C DBDD 4D96 E41B D2D0 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/53cbc2e2.5010...@danielstender.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CAP+dXJf_-iPag4GpWnxe=zvys_5wyxghcyq5gsbybrp1ozw...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#745721: Name collision between libpinyin and libzhuyin (Was: Bug#745721: [Pkg-ime-devel] Bug#745721: RFS: libzhuyin/0.9.93-1)
Yesterday I made a mistake. 2014-08-26 10:01 GMT-03:00 Eriberto eribe...@eriberto.pro.br: 2. Make symlinks in /usr/bin and /usr/share/man. Example: zhuyin_gen_binary_files. No... In this case, you will need change the command name inside the manpage. Sorry for my mistake. Cheers, Eriberto -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CAP+dXJeCk_f-EiXGXp95TqCoZQ0j=idgtu0eo0_fjbx1cfq...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#758918: Made working watch file!
Hi, The problem is you added an inexistent git commit number as upstream version. The commit 7810c7afd8 was registered on 2014-06-17. Cheers, Eriberto 2014-08-25 5:25 GMT-03:00 Riley Baird bm-2cvqnduybau5do2dfjtrn7zbaj246s4...@bitmessage.ch: I just found out how to make a watch file that works with python3-pyelliptic. As it turns out, the maintainer uploads releases to PyPI, so a watch file can be generated. I've had to change the version number of the .orig.tar.gz, as I'm using one made from a git snapshot. (I can't use the given tarball because the OpenSSL exception was not yet granted in that.) I've uploaded the version with the watch file to mentors. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CAP+dXJdM4TjkVEcXrDATBup+3t--4_xAKpjPNi=fchpw_xt...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#745721: [Pkg-ime-devel] Bug#745721: RFS: libzhuyin/0.9.93-1
Hi ChangZhuo. Sorry, but in my last check I found two issues: 1. You didn't install the binaries and manpages. Why? 2. The installer is creating the directory usr/include/libzhuyin-0.9.99.[CURRENT DATE]. Example: usr/include/libzhuyin-0.9.99.20140824. Please, solve this issue. Feel free to ask me if needed. Thanks, Eriberto 2014-08-24 6:44 GMT-03:00 ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬) czc...@gmail.com: On Sat, Aug 23, 2014 at 09:09:17PM -0300, Eriberto Mota wrote: Hi ChangZhuo, The new upstream version has new dates. So, you must update the d/copyright file. Your sintax is wrong, because you put the upstreams names before the years. Another point is that the packaging copyright, usually, is an maintainer name. I suggest this sintax: Thank for the review, I uploaded a new version in mentors in [0], please help to review and sponsor it, thanks. [0] http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libz/libzhuyin/libzhuyin_0.9.99.20140718-1.dsc -- ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬) czc...@gmail.com http://czchen.info/ Key fingerprint = EC9F 905D 866D BE46 A896 C827 BE0C 9242 03F4 552D -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/cap+dxjcyruh2+qhk1fh4eqwcbcc1ch7ss+bjbsdtmmreuzv...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#758646: RFS: ryu/3.12-1 [ITP]
tags 758646 moreinfo thanks Hi Dariusz, how are you? Please: 1. d/clean: you package doesn't build twice because the d/clean removes files only (not directories - man dh_clean). :-P I saw you are using an override in d/rules to remove files. Why you need a d/clean? 2. d/control: in short descriptions, remove the program name and put each designation between brackets. My suggestion: Description: defined networking framework (Python libs) Description: defined networking framework (ryu binary) Description: defined networking framework (docs) You can change it. 3. d/copyright: - debin? :-D - Please, review all source code carefully. I didn't see the 'Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation' in your d/copyright. 4. d/docs: I think that this file is a mistake because you created the python-ryu-doc.docs. Am I wrong? 5. d/ryu-bin.ryu.init: please, remove all useless lines as Add code here, if necessary, 6. d/ryu.conf: I think it is confused. Can you add comments to help the user? Please, adopt a format to commented lines (# with spaces or # without spaces). Thanks for your work. Cheers, Eriberto 2014-08-19 12:17 GMT-03:00 Dariusz Dwornikowski dariusz.dwornikow...@cs.put.poznan.pl: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal [wishlist] Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package ryu * Package name: ryu Version : 3.12-1 Upstream Author : Ryu Project Team ryu-de...@lists.sourceforge.net * URL : http://osrg.github.io/ryu/ * License : Apache 2.0 Section : python It builds those binary packages: python-ryu - Ryu is a software defined networking framework -- Python libs python-ryu-doc - Ryu is a software defined networking framework -- ryu docs ryu-bin- Ryu is a software defined networking framework -- ryu binary To access further information about *ryu* , please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/ryu Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/ryu/ryu_3.12-1.dsc Or you can directly see my alioth repo: http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/ryu.git More information about ryu can be obtained from http://osrg.github.io/ryu/ Changes since the last upload: * Initial release (Closes: #758509) Regards, - -- Dariusz Dwornikowski, Institute of Computing Science, Poznań University of Technology www.cs.put.poznan.pl/ddwornikowski/ room 2.7.2 BTiCW | tel. +48 61 665 29 41 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJT82pzAAoJECEac8aaew/H2VEQAI44tnm3PdTH0rg/6ukWs9j7 fODUnQmB4dzwoUHBy0mJwVZJfTjYlMWa+UJPsZ4ZuG0UuKTVfkW9aUa86K8N809A R6x3qVAdMEOsMZAKky28/EBLKZ2uZfQKypPqrKoSYnHa8F5S2ZUBz5Wl1yrdmMKo IEHbW9LAw8xBl7uCo72kr7NF+2XhRy2hUzk3KC8vL2nohMufc3PJeOZnTarr6kUg hNXjBajlw11KL565YxJUNhIXxW9dGdtR9sqeh/ejO+P30BZZKnnLq9rUanwQdOvv jnIkZKbNWKdyYo6mK5u1hSOQ3Uaxcv4XiiTWvCx7Wp1rD27g8b1wzq9GfIyMB/Es 2tRsYpxWIRfZi4asksqIG+P5+gzWvz8wdjHN9xSo4CrT7XlLjYwbGlYDJPpp69fD jr+O7fQBwUpt5SNamsCPjHOnMOldJ+gune8kY/K0wFUG+BLXqIZq6NZRB17U9vpl 7eumPDn6iiy33z3bcj/jEVRuvcjFU7FL+NHJEaoC7PE1Qk0PFhhAB2gaYMvMhtAj KZs7qgOoDVATNa0XNLE4ZNHzLARGm8dYrmkDo0AjRc77H7R3UtmKdP3AFBM8+5hX tm52hVmJ5Qq6acOrBTILpgSw5jv5+Tdla+Bb9wMvCqTgKogwShKti3eVtMf4wHRc CaRayHCLjelJnwwj3luM =jtgg -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/53f36a73.5000...@cs.put.poznan.pl -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/cap+dxjcqab+2_d1-xxe9hsyeebmehhotes8m2r8ymyf490y...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#744823: RFS: gnuais/0.3.0-1 [ITP]
tags 744823 moreinfo thanks Hi Ruben, I will try help you. Ross, thanks for your comments. Feel free to continue helping. Ruben, please: 1. d/changelog: you must have an entry only. This entry must have your ITP number. You can see an explanation here[1]. An example: yowsup (0.0~git20140314.938cf1-1) unstable; urgency=low * Initial release (Closes: #752201) -- Joao Eriberto Mota Filho eribe...@debian.org Fri, 20 Jun 2014 16:51:58 -0300 [1] https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/maint-guide/dreq.en.html#changelog 2. d/control: - In Build-Depends, break the line before the column 80. You can see two different examples here[2][3]. - Create a VCS to control your debian/ versions. You can use github or other. So, add the Vcs-Browser and Vcs-{Git|Svn|Cvs} to d/control. [2] http://sources.debian.net/src/core-network/4.7-1/debian/control/ [3] http://sources.debian.net/src/ext4magic/0.3.1-4/debian/control/ 3. d/copyright: - There are several improperties here. First, the correct general copyright are: Tomi 2001-2004, Heikki 2008 and Ruben 2008-2013. - The file src/splay.c has references to David Brower, not listed in d/copyright. - In src/ directory there are several files with copyright notices not listed in d/copyright. Three examples: src/filter-i386.h, src/gui/osm-gps-map-ais.c and src/gui/private.h. You must put all copyright notices in d/copyright. - The copyright year for debian/* must be 2014. - I suggest you to put all licenses separately. You can see two examples here[4][5]. [4] http://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/changelogs/main/s/sentinella/unstable_copyright [5] http://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/changelogs/main/v/volatility/unstable_copyright 4. d/gnuais.docs: - The NEWS file is useless to final user. I suggest remove it. - The gnuais.conf-example is an example and must be installed by d/gnuais.examples file. 5. d/gnuaisgui.docs: - Idem to NEWS. - In src/gui/README there is a reference to OpenStreetMap. However, I didn't see this software in any Depends field in d/control. PS: I suggest you write a d/README.Debian to guide the final user how to use the software. So, you can remove some files from d/*.docs. 6. d/*.menu: I suggest add an icon to these menus. 7. d/patches: empty. Remove. 8. d/rules: there are lots of useless comments. Please, remove from second line to '# Uncomment this to...' line. You can remove the '.PHONY' line too. 9. d/watch: the githubredir.debian.net is deprecated and the most usual d/watch for your case is: version=3 https://github.com/rubund/gnuais/releases /rubund/gnuais/archive/(\d\S+)\.tar\.(?:bz2|gz|xz) To understand the last line, you can read it[6]. [6] http://eriberto.pro.br/blog/?p=1459 10. After the build, there are three lintian notices: (1) P: gnuais source: debian-watch-may-check-gpg-signature (2) I: gnuais: hardening-no-fortify-functions usr/bin/gnuais (3) I: gnuaisgui: hardening-no-fortify-functions usr/bin/gnuaisgui To solve (1) you can read the uscan manpage. To solve (2) and (3) you can read it[7]. [7] https://wiki.debian.org/Hardening#Notes_for_packages_using_CMake 11. There are several dpkg-shlibdeps messages: dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: package could avoid a useless dependency if debian/gnuaisgui/usr/bin/gnuaisgui was not linked against libpango-1.0.so.0 (it uses none of the library's symbols) dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: package could avoid a useless dependency if debian/gnuaisgui/usr/bin/gnuaisgui was not linked against libcairo-gobject.so.2 (it uses none of the library's symbols) dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: package could avoid a useless dependency if debian/gnuaisgui/usr/bin/gnuaisgui was not linked against libpangocairo-1.0.so.0 (it uses none of the library's symbols) dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: package could avoid a useless dependency if debian/gnuaisgui/usr/bin/gnuaisgui was not linked against libgio-2.0.so.0 (it uses none of the library's symbols) dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: package could avoid a useless dependency if debian/gnuaisgui/usr/bin/gnuaisgui was not linked against libsoup-2.4.so.1 (it uses none of the library's symbols) dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: package could avoid a useless dependency if debian/gnuaisgui/usr/bin/gnuaisgui was not linked against libgthread-2.0.so.0 (it uses none of the library's symbols) dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: package could avoid a useless dependency if debian/gnuaisgui/usr/bin/gnuaisgui was not linked against libatk-1.0.so.0 (it uses none of the library's symbols) To fix, add to d/rules: export DEB_LDFLAGS_MAINT_APPEND = -Wl,--as-needed 12. After the build, I didn't see any library. So, why you have the gnuais-dbg and gnuaisgui-dbg? Thanks for your work. Regards, Eriberto -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CAP+dXJdryLRN6Dd92mau5eHw=ecmev+x8rfrxdkf5horykx...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#744823: RFS: gnuais/0.3.0-1 [ITP]
2014-08-22 18:55 GMT-03:00 Ruben Undheim ruben.undh...@gmail.com: Do you think this is the main reason for no feedback on mentors.debian.net since I uploaded in April, or are there other things that I'm doing wrong? Hi Ruben, The sponsors do a voluntary work. To review a package, much time is used. So, when a sponsor see lots of messages and warnings, he can drop this package in favor of other in better conditions. Cheers, Eriberto -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/cap+dxje8unwxd_tn-3a2_0x3svgncg4g1-dwp+ofa4j8maa...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#745721: [Pkg-ime-devel] Bug#745721: RFS: libzhuyin/0.9.93-1
Hi ChangZhuo, The new upstream version has new dates. So, you must update the d/copyright file. Your sintax is wrong, because you put the upstreams names before the years. Another point is that the packaging copyright, usually, is an maintainer name. I suggest this sintax: Files: * Copyright: 2002-2006 James Su su...@tsinghua.edu.cn 2006-2013 Peng Wu alexep...@gmail.com License: GPL-2+ Files: debian/* Copyright: 2014 ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬) czc...@gmail.com License: GPL-2+ Cheers, Eriberto 2014-08-22 22:14 GMT-03:00 ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬) czc...@gmail.com: Hi, Since upstream has new version 0.9.99.20140718, I will pack this new version, with the following fix. 1. d/control: - What is '...' in long descriptions? It means etc, and so on. I will change to use etc if ... causes confused. - I didn't understand what is the '-data' package. What is this? Can you improve the long description? Okay I will do that. 2. d/copyright: - I didn't find Peng Huang and BYVoid in upstream code. Can you point me where you found them? - The upstream code haven't a cmake directory. What is this? These are for 0.9.93, not 0.9.99.20140425. I forgot to remove them when upgrading to new version, sorry. - The upstream code is GPL-2+, not GPL-2. 3. d/docs: points to NEWS (empty) and README (useless to final user). Please, remove it. 4. d/rules: remove these comments: # -*- makefile -*- # Uncomment this to turn on verbose mode. Thanks for the review, I will update them. -- ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬) czc...@gmail.com http://czchen.info/ Key fingerprint = EC9F 905D 866D BE46 A896 C827 BE0C 9242 03F4 552D -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CAP+dXJenr1_5=VJPxH89gaRKySzzxC+b=H4h3LCe2t0MnLVU=w...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#758966: RFS: confget/1.05-1 (new upstream release)
tags 758966 moreinfo thanks Hi Peter. Please, 1. d/copyright: I suggest you contract all data about upstream to be less confused[1]. Example: Files: * Copyright: 2008-2013 Peter Pentchev r...@ringlet.net License: BSD-2-clause Files: makedep.sh t/t1.ini t/t2.ini Copyright: ? License: public-domain This file is hereby placed in the public domain. Files: debian/* Copyright: 2008-2014 Peter Pentchev r...@ringlet.net License: BSD-2-clause Note that I changed the copyright field in second block and added your email address to other blocks. Please, remove the field 'License' from header. [1] https://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/#fields 2. d/rules: remove the second line. Why you used many options in rules? I think that your rules can be cleaned. It will work: #!/usr/bin/make -f %: dh $@ --parallel override_dh_auto_install: dh_auto_install -- DESTDIR=${CURDIR}/debian/confget PREFIX=/usr \ MANDIR=/usr/share/man/man BINGRP=root MANGRP=root \ EXAMPLESDIR=/usr/share/doc/confget/examples Thanks for your work. Cheers, Eriberto 2014-08-23 7:09 GMT-03:00 Peter Pentchev r...@ringlet.net: Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package confget * Package name: confget Version : 1.05-1 Upstream Author : Peter Pentchev r...@ringlet.net * URL : http://devel.ringlet.net/textproc/confget/ * License : BSD Section : text It builds a single binary package, tested with sbuild, lintian and adequate: confget- read variables from INI-style configuration files To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/confget Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/confget/confget_1.05-1.dsc More information about confget can be obtained from http://devel.ringlet.net/textproc/confget/ Changes since the last upload: confget (1.05-1) unstable; urgency=medium * Update the copyright file: - convert it to the 1.0 format - separate lists of copyrighted files with whitespace, not commas - bump the year of my copyright notice - fix the upstream homepage location * Bump Standards-Version to 3.9.5 with no changes. * Bump the debhelper compatibility level to 9 with no changes. * Get the hardening options directly from debhelper: - remove the build dependency on hardening-includes - no longer include the hardening Makefile snippet into the rules file - explicitly enable all the hardening features; they may be disabled in the future if confget should fail to build anywhere - use DEB_CFLAGS_MAINT_APPEND to, well, append to CFLAGS * Enable parallel building - not that it matters a lot in this case :) * New upstream release: - honors CPPFLAGS now, so the hardening flags may be passed as-is - autodetects getline(3) support, so no need for CFLAGS_CONF - renames PCRE_CFLAGS to PCRE_CPPFLAGS, so follow suit - update the copyright years in the copyright file - follow upstream and switch from -ansi to -std=c99 * Remove the obsolete DM-Upload-Allowed field. * Drop the source compression options; dpkg-dev's defaults are good enough. * Update the watch file after the devel.ringlet.net website change. * Let uscan verify upstream's signature against my own key. -- Peter Pentchev r...@ringlet.net Sat, 23 Aug 2014 12:07:22 +0300 Thanks in advance for your time! G'luck, Peter -- Peter Pentchev r...@ringlet.net r...@freebsd.org p.penc...@storpool.com PGP key:http://people.FreeBSD.org/~roam/roam.key.asc Key fingerprint 2EE7 A7A5 17FC 124C F115 C354 651E EFB0 2527 DF13 -- System Information: Debian Release: jessie/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 3.14-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=bg_BG.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=bg_BG.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/cap+dxjdkpjsxejuzndtf1dbm0kkpev-gq59nktf7yr9du4w...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#753487: RFS: stda/1.3.1-1 -- new upstream release (package already in Debian)
2014-08-22 12:00 GMT-03:00 Dimitar Ivanov drim...@freeshell.de: Hello Eriberto, Hi! I implemented most of the changes you requested. 1. d/compat: change to 9. Done. Not done. I can see 7. 2. d/control: - Set 9 to debhelper. - Consider change the priority to optional. Please, read it[1]. - Create a VCS to control your debian/ versions. You can use github or other. So, add the Vcs-Browser and Vcs-{Git|Svn|Cvs} to d/control. - Add a punctuation in each item in long description. [1] https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-archive.html#s-priorities Done, except the VCS stuff.. Because I'm not sure what kind of a VCS-entiries should I define in d/control, I'll write you a separate mail related to what exactly and how it should be version-controlled. May be presently you can review the new package which don't include VCS-entries, and later I can produce a new debian-release where Vcs-Browser and Vcs-{Git|Svn|Cvs} are defined in d/control. Sorry, but when I said punctuation, I meant to put a dot in end of each line. Example: * maphimbu - histogram builder for 1-d numerical and text data. * mintegrate - evaluate average/sum/integral/derivative of 1-d numerical data. You really need a VCS. It is very important to keep the package control across the versions. I suggest to use GitHub (easy). Please, put 'github tutorial' in Google. You need put, at least, the debian/ directory under the VCS control. In d/control you need add Vcs-Browser and Vcs-Git fields. You can see an example here: http://sources.debian.net/src/mac-robber/1.02-3/debian/control/ You need to learn about (git) clone, add, rm, commit and tag. 4. d/rules: please, update to new (reduced) format. Your package is very simple and it will work. Ask me if you have doubts. An example: http://sources.debian.net/src/pcapfix/1.0.2-3/debian/rules/ Done. You used a 'clean' target in your d/rules. The correct is use 'override_dh_auto_clean'. Please, 'man dh' and search by 'override'. However, is easier use d/clean file (man dh_clean). But I think this clean step in your package is unnecessary. Please, remove and test. 5. d/watch: add escapes before tarball dot (\.tar\.gz). Your watch is showing the version 1.3.1. I already read about it in previous messages. I need the final program in your site to check the integrity. Well, since '.tar.gz' is at the end of the string, and since I'm not going to create on my web-page some other package-related files with funny filenames ending with some chartarsome_chargz, I think that .tar.gz without escapes is ok - it is not 100% exact but it is more readable and 'uscan --verbose' works perfectly. But if you mind, I can change it as requested. Nop. It is a grep (dot == any character except newline). Your d/watch can work but the correct is escape the dots. Please, read it[1] if you need know more about the watch file. [1] http://eriberto.pro.br/blog/?p=1459 You can download the package source by: wget http://gnu.mirendom.net/download.cgi/gnu/stda/stda-1.3.1.tar.gz I think it was a mistake. Sorry. I saw that your package depends of help2man to build. Please, add it in d/control (Build-Depends). Thanks Dimitar. Cheers, Eriberto -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CAP+dXJfyUPWscwCM5QgER92jM7_2wrG=k3wzucdyntrwa7b...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#745721: [Pkg-ime-devel] Bug#745721: RFS: libzhuyin/0.9.93-1
tags 745721 moreinfo thanks Hi ChangZhuo. Please: 1. d/control: - What is '...' in long descriptions? - I didn't understand what is the '-data' package. What is this? Can you improve the long description? 2. d/copyright: - I didn't find Peng Huang and BYVoid in upstream code. Can you point me where you found them? - The upstream code haven't a cmake directory. What is this? - The upstream code is GPL-2+, not GPL-2. 3. d/docs: points to NEWS (empty) and README (useless to final user). Please, remove it. 4. d/rules: remove these comments: # -*- makefile -*- # Uncomment this to turn on verbose mode. Thanks for your work. Cheers, Eriberto 2014-04-26 1:56 GMT-03:00 ChangZhuo Chen czc...@gmail.com: On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 11:10:56PM +0800, Kan-Ru Chen wrote: Thanks for packaging this library! I'm reviewing this package. Upstream has new version 0.9.99.20140425, so I just repack it with latest version. http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libz/libzhuyin/libzhuyin_0.9.99.20140425-1.dsc -- ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬) czc...@gmail.com http://czchen.info/ Key fingerprint = EC9F 905D 866D BE46 A896 C827 BE0C 9242 03F4 552D -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CAP+dXJejQc7OPLu_huWL2cP+P4X=snnt0lt8cpmom2kznkf...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#758815: RFS: libircclient/1.8-1 [ITA]
tags 758815 moreinfo thanks Hi Dariusz. Please: 1. d/changelog: add an explanation about why your removed the -dfsg. Please, see the field 'Source' in d/copyright header. 2. d/control: in 'Package: libircclient-dev', remove 'Pre-Depends: ${misc:Pre-Depends}'. 3. d/copyright: - Fix the 'Source' field in header. - See it[1] and put the correct range of the years for each Debian maintainer. - Update the upstream copyright years (2004-2013). - Search with 'grep -sri copyright * | grep -v Georg' for other authors. [1] https://packages.qa.debian.org/libi/libircclient.html 4. libircclient-dev.install: remove .a. From Maintainers Guide[2]: Shared libraries are distributed as *.so files. (Neither *.a files nor *.la files) [2] https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/maint-guide/advanced.en.html[2] 5. Remove useless file README.source. 6. Please, tell me why you make a patch. Your package is installing libircclient.h only. The original program is installing libirc_options.h, libircclient.h, libirc_errors.h, libirc_rfcnumeric.h and libirc_events.h. 7. The upstream site has lot[3] of instructions about the library. I suggest you create a README.Debian with notice about it. [3] http://www.ulduzsoft.com/libircclient Thanks for your work. Cheers, Eriberto 2014-08-21 13:07 GMT-03:00 Dariusz Dwornikowski dariusz.dwornikow...@cs.put.poznan.pl: Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package libircclient * Package name: libircclient Version : 1.8-1 Upstream Author : George Yunaev gyun...@ulduzsoft.com * URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/libircclient/ * License : LGPL-3+ Section : libdevel It builds those binary packages: libircclient-dev - development files for libircclient libircclient1 - C library to create IRC clients To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/libircclient Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libi/libircclient/libircclient_1.8-1.dsc More information about libircclient can be obtained from http://sourceforge.net/projects/libircclient/. Changes since the last upload: * Imported Upstream version 1.8 * Bump standards to 3.9.5, no changes needed * New maintainer (Closes: #674882) * Build-Dep in d/control changed to debhelper=9 * Added myself to d/copyright * d/compat changed to 9 * Deleted 00_fix_missing_headers patch, not needed * Added dh-autoreconf to Build-Deps * Switched to multiarch (Thanks Andreas Rönnquist) * patch/proper-lib-building.patch - removed old build system - uses autoconf and libtool - allows using legacy --enable system Regards, -- Dariusz Dwornikowski, Institute of Computing Science, Poznań University of Technology www.cs.put.poznan.pl/ddwornikowski/ room 2.7.2 BTiCW | tel. +48 61 665 29 41 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CAP+dXJcxhh67uHaa+m-AUAzmuxinn6Qp-2jXVtHepbxT=xo...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#758815: RFS: libircclient/1.8-1 [ITA]
2014-08-21 16:37 GMT-03:00 Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org: * Eriberto Mota eribe...@debian.org, 2014-08-21, 16:16: 4. libircclient-dev.install: remove .a. From Maintainers Guide[2]: Shared libraries are distributed as *.so files. (Neither *.a files nor *.la files) Policy §8.3 permits shipping static libraries in the -dev package: “The static library (libraryname.a) is usually provided in addition to the shared version. It is placed into the development package […].” -- Jakub Wilk Hum... This is confusing... We have two official references conflicting. And I saw a few time ago it (and you too): https://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2014/04/msg00057.html Well, what to do? Thanks in advance Jakub. Eriberto -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/cap+dxjehehssjxvkhypv4nq6hvpfxqhg3ctl8aifm5nzpfw...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#748591: RFS: gtkspellmm/3.0.3+dfsg-1 [ITP] (was: Re: Bug#748613: RFS: gimagereader/2.93-1 [ITP])
Please, in my text: So, remove all .a and .la references. Remove the .so and make a synlink to .so created by libgtkspellmm-3.0-0.install (create a d/libgtkspellmm-3.0-dev.links file). (NEWS: after a debuild, I saw that the Makefile created the symlink - check if is ok) Ignore: Remove the .so and make a synlink to .so created by libgtkspellmm-3.0-0.install (create a d/libgtkspellmm-3.0-dev.links file). (NEWS: after a debuild, I saw that the Makefile created the symlink - check if is ok) Thanks. Eriberto 2014-08-20 18:13 GMT-03:00 Eriberto Mota eribe...@debian.org: tags 748591 moreinfo thanks Hi again Philip. Please, 1. d/copyright: remove build/ltmain.sh. This file needn't be put (read the license). 2. d/libgtkspellmm-3.0-dev.install From Maintainers Guide[1]: Shared libraries are distributed as *.so files. (Neither *.a files nor *.la files) [1] https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/maint-guide/advanced.en.html So, remove all .a and .la references. Remove the .so and make a synlink to .so created by libgtkspellmm-3.0-0.install (create a d/libgtkspellmm-3.0-dev.links file). (NEWS: after a debuild, I saw that the Makefile created the symlink - check if is ok) 3. d/rules: - Remove the dh_install override. - Why you used '--enable-static'? Is possible remove it? I think you can remove all override_dh_auto_configure. 4. d/libgtkspellmm-3.0-0.shlibs: what is the function of this file? I think you can remove it. In body: 2014-08-20 13:50 GMT-03:00 Philip Rinn ri...@inventati.org: I tried to address all remaining problems. There are still three Lintian messages left: P: gtkspellmm source: debian-watch-may-check-gpg-signature Upstream doesn't provide a gpg signature Ignore it. I: libgtkspellmm-3.0-0: no-symbols-control-file [...] I tried to generate one but I'm really not sure how useful this is as I'm not very experienced with libraries. (And even Russ Allbery gave up on C++ symbol files[1].) Ok. You must run 'debuild' and, after this, in the upstream code place, you use: # dpkg-gensymbols -plibgtkspellmm-3.0-0 -Odebian/libgtkspellmm-3.0-0.symbols After this, edit the generated file and remove all Debian revisions (-1). [1] http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/journal/2012-02/001.html X: libgtkspellmm-3.0-doc: duplicate-files [...] That's a Doxygen issue and I guess it's better to fix that in Doxygen and not introducing ugly workarounds in all packages using it. Hum... These files have the same hash... Is possible delete one of each double? If not, you can delete one and add a synlink or... Put an override with a line explaining the problem. I uploaded the package to m.d.n: http://mentors.debian.net/package/gtkspellmm Thanks for your work! Thanks!!! Cheers, Eriberto -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/cap+dxjcnrmqsxc5u2vnjdwb0mh8ztekho_5lsc2z0_jtygw...@mail.gmail.com