Bug#1002295: Uploaded the files
Hi, On Thu, 2022-07-28 at 14:49 +, Scorpion2185 wrote: > I updated the watch file. Is it correct now? You can always try $ uscan --verbose --no-download This can also help greatly with debugging issues with the name mangling. -- Cheers, Evangelos PGP: B938 6554 B7DD 266B CB8E 29A9 90F0 C9B1 8A6B 4A19 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#1003853: RFS: sofia-sip/1.12.11+20110422.1-2.2 [NMU] [RC] -- Sofia SIP library
Hi, I forgot: If I understand the [Policy] correctly, this should be a DELAYED/0, right? [Policy] https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/pkgs.html#nmu On Sun, 2022-01-16 at 23:43 +0100, Evangelos Ribeiro Tzaras wrote: > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: important > > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "sofia-sip": > > * Package name : sofia-sip > Version : 1.12.11+20110422.1-2.2 > Upstream Author : Pekka Pessi, Martti Mela, Kai Vehmanen > * URL : http://sofia-sip.sourceforge.net/ > * License : LGPL-2.1 > * Vcs : > http://git.debian.org/?p=users/ron/sofia-sip.git;a=summary > Section : net > > It builds those binary packages: > > sofia-sip-bin - Sofia-SIP library utilities > libsofia-sip-ua0 - Sofia-SIP library runtime > libsofia-sip-ua-dev - Sofia-SIP library development files > libsofia-sip-ua-glib3 - Sofia-SIP library glib/gobject interfaces > runtime > libsofia-sip-ua-glib-dev - Sofia-SIP library glib/gobject interface > development files > sofia-sip-doc - Sofia-SIP library documentation > > To access further information about this package, please visit the > following URL: > > https://mentors.debian.net/package/sofia-sip/ > > Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this > command: > > dget -x > https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/sofia-sip/sofia-sip_1.12.11+20110422.1-2.2.dsc > > I have uploaded the package on salsa under > https://salsa.debian.org/devrtz/sofia-sip/-/tree/minimal-nmu > Judging by debdiff (as mentioned in #965829) there is basically only > some > changes in the -doc package which I believe are due to a newer > doxygen being used. > > I've also tested with one rdep (gnome-calls of which I'm the > maintainer) that > it still builds and runs fine. > > Changes since the last upload: > > sofia-sip (1.12.11+20110422.1-2.2) unstable; urgency=medium > . > * Non-maintainer upload. > * Bump dh-compat to 13 (Closes: #965829) > > Regards,
Bug#1003853: RFS: sofia-sip/1.12.11+20110422.1-2.2 [NMU] [RC] -- Sofia SIP library
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "sofia-sip": * Package name: sofia-sip Version : 1.12.11+20110422.1-2.2 Upstream Author : Pekka Pessi, Martti Mela, Kai Vehmanen * URL : http://sofia-sip.sourceforge.net/ * License : LGPL-2.1 * Vcs : http://git.debian.org/?p=users/ron/sofia-sip.git;a=summary Section : net It builds those binary packages: sofia-sip-bin - Sofia-SIP library utilities libsofia-sip-ua0 - Sofia-SIP library runtime libsofia-sip-ua-dev - Sofia-SIP library development files libsofia-sip-ua-glib3 - Sofia-SIP library glib/gobject interfaces runtime libsofia-sip-ua-glib-dev - Sofia-SIP library glib/gobject interface development files sofia-sip-doc - Sofia-SIP library documentation To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/sofia-sip/ Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/sofia-sip/sofia-sip_1.12.11+20110422.1-2.2.dsc I have uploaded the package on salsa under https://salsa.debian.org/devrtz/sofia-sip/-/tree/minimal-nmu Judging by debdiff (as mentioned in #965829) there is basically only some changes in the -doc package which I believe are due to a newer doxygen being used. I've also tested with one rdep (gnome-calls of which I'm the maintainer) that it still builds and runs fine. Changes since the last upload: sofia-sip (1.12.11+20110422.1-2.2) unstable; urgency=medium . * Non-maintainer upload. * Bump dh-compat to 13 (Closes: #965829) Regards, -- Evangelos Ribeiro Tzaras
Bug#964087: RFS: TomboyReborn/1.0-1 - Drop in replacement of deprecated Gnome Tomboy
Hi, I originally got started with [1], however you should probably consult the new version [2]. This should hopefully help you figure things out. [1] https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/maint-guide/index.html [2] https://www.debian.org/doc/devel-manuals#debmake-doc On 7/1/20 9:20 PM, Joan Moreau wrote: > Hi > > I am really sorry to bother you, but I am a bit lost. > > I created a .deb file (see > https://github.com/grosjo/tomboy-reborn/tree/master/packages ) so I should now > create a deb-src package, right ? > > The wiki page you mentioned does not really explain how to do so. Is there a > simple, step-by-step, process described somewhere ? > > THank you so much > > > > > > On 2020-07-01 18:46, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > >> On Wed, Jul 01, 2020 at 05:35:21PM +0100, Joan Moreau wrote: >>> This is not a "source package" as the source is in Pascal (using Lazarus >>> compiler package). Should I include the Pascal source also ? >> You need to create a Debian source package that can be built to produce a >> Debian binary package. >> It doesn't really matter what language is used or what should be contained >> in the binary package. The workflow is the same. >> https://wiki.debian.org/Packaging/SourcePackage --- Evangelos Ribeiro Tzaras
