Re: Replace cron with systemd timer unit?

2017-08-03 Thread Herminio Hernandez, Jr. 
The Arch Wiki

shows how you can integrate email notifications with .timer

On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 11:00 AM, Paul Wise  wrote:

> On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 1:20 PM, Ricardo Fraile wrote:
>
> > I like some aspects of the .timer, but I don't know if the change is a
> good
> > idea or not at this moment? There are any other package that has changed
> > from cron to .timer? What is the official recomendation?
>
> One significant difference between the two is that all cron output is
> sent via email, while output from systemd timers is not sent via
> email. There is no official recommendation here, but other packages
> have migrated from cron to systemd timers, with fallback to cron when
> systemd is not running. You can see the apt package for an example and
> there is also systemd-cron, which can be used to generate systemd
> timers from cron jobs, the results are placed in the
> /run/systemd/generator directory at boot time.
>
> --
> bye,
> pabs
>
> https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
>
>

Re: packaging question regarding the watch file

2016-12-11 Thread Herminio Hernandez Jr. 
Like I said I am probably over thinking.  

Sent from my iPhone

> On Dec 11, 2016, at 4:00 AM, Andrey Rahmatullin <w...@debian.org> wrote:
> 
> On Sun, Dec 11, 2016 at 01:24:26AM -0700, Herminio Hernandez Jr wrote:
>>>> Let me try to clarify. Did my package use the code from upstream or the
>>>> code from the watch file to build.
>>> 
>>> Please read how gbp works.
>>> gbp uses the version from d/changelog to find the upstream tag which it
>>> then uses to recreate the orig tarball.
>> 
>> 
>> I have been reading the documentation 
>> here:http://honk.sigxcpu.org/projects/git-buildpackage/manual-html/gbp.import.html#GBP.IMPORT.UPSTREAM.GIT.NOTARBALL[1]
>>  
> That says the same thing as I did: "version will be replaced with the
> upstream version number as determined from debian/changelog".
> 
> 
> -- 
> WBR, wRAR

Re: packaging question regarding the watch file

2016-12-11 Thread Herminio Hernandez Jr 
On Sunday, December 11, 2016 1:20:05 PM MST Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 11, 2016 at 01:16:21AM -0700, Herminio Hernandez Jr wrote:
> > Let me try to clarify. Did my package use the code from upstream or the
> > code from the watch file to build.
> 
> Please read how gbp works.
> gbp uses the version from d/changelog to find the upstream tag which it
> then uses to recreate the orig tarball.


I have been reading the documentation 
here:http://honk.sigxcpu.org/projects/git-buildpackage/manual-html/gbp.import.html#GBP.IMPORT.UPSTREAM.GIT.NOTARBALL[1]
 

Just what I saw threw me off I am probably reading too much into it.



[1] http://honk.sigxcpu.org/projects/git-buildpackage/manual-html/
gbp.import.html#GBP.IMPORT.UPSTREAM.GIT.NOTARBALL


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: packaging question regarding the watch file

2016-12-11 Thread Herminio Hernandez Jr 
On Sunday, December 11, 2016 12:57:40 PM MST Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 10, 2016 at 11:04:30PM -0700, Herminio Hernandez Jr wrote:
> > I have a question regarding packaging using git and the watch file in the
> > Debian directory. There is an open bug 794438 for the KDE Partition
> > Manager. The current package is broken in Sid. In the thread it was
> > mentioned that the KDE Neon has a working package. When I pulled the git
> > repo it was only the Debian directory. So what I was following [1]the
> > git-buildpackage manual  I cloned the partition manager git repo added
> > the debian directory and was able to build a working package. However
> > after looking closely I begun to wonder if I understood what I was doing.
> > So the upstream repro appears to be on version 2.9.90 and preparing to go
> > to version 3.0. However the version that I built was 1.0.3. I did not
> > understand how this could have happened. Then looking in the Debian
> > directory I saw that the watch file is referencing a Source Forge repo
> > with the v1.0.3 tar ball. So my question is when I built the package did
> > I need to pull code from the upstream repo? Did the build tools just pull
> > the tar file down from sf and used it instead? Any help understanding
> > will be appreciated[2]
> I didn't fully understand what are you asking but if you are asking why
> did your package use the 1.0.3 version it's because the package version in
> debian/changelog is 1.0.3.

Let me try to clarify. Did my package use the code from upstream or the code 
from the watch file to build.


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

packaging question regarding the watch file

2016-12-10 Thread Herminio Hernandez Jr 
Dear Mentors,

I have a question regarding packaging using git and the watch file in the 
Debian directory. There is an open bug 794438 for the KDE Partition Manager. 
The current package is broken in Sid. In the thread it was mentioned that the 
KDE Neon has a working package. When I pulled the git repo it was only the 
Debian directory. So what I was following [1]the git-buildpackage manual  I 
cloned the partition manager git repo added the debian directory and was able 
to build a working package. However after looking closely I begun to wonder if 
I understood what I was doing. So the upstream repro appears to be on version 
2.9.90 and preparing to go to version 3.0. However the version that I built was 
1.0.3. I did not understand how this could have happened. Then looking in the 
Debian directory I saw that the watch file is referencing a Source Forge repo 
with the v1.0.3 tar ball. So my question is when I built the package did I need 
to pull code from the upstream repo? Did the build tools just pull the tar file 
down from sf and used it instead? Any help understanding will be appreciated[2]

Thanks   
Herminio


[1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=794438
[2] 
http://honk.sigxcpu.org/projects/git-buildpackage/manual-html/gbp.import.html#GBP.IMPORT.UPSTREAM-GIT


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: status in luakit

2016-10-13 Thread Herminio Hernandez, Jr. 
He is not willing to make an official release, but I have tested on my
MacBook Pro running sid and it works.

On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 4:13 PM, Sean Whitton <spwhit...@spwhitton.name> wrote:
> Dear Herminio,
>
> On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 03:21:02PM -0700, Herminio Hernandez, Jr. wrote:
>> I am trying to adopt the browser luakit. I have been keeping track of
>> upstream to see if there is a new release coming. There has not been
>> one in a few years and it is still using webkitgtk-1.0. So far there
>> has been no move to upgrade the browser. There is a developer who has
>> forked the project and has ported it to webkit2gtk but he is not
>> interested in producing a stable release. I really would like to see
>> the browser stay, but I just do not think there is going to be a
>> change soon. I wondering should I just move on?
>
> When you say that the developer isn't interesting in producing stable
> releases, do you mean that he's not willing to actually make official
> releases, but the code is otherwise sufficiently stable?  If so, it
> could still be uploaded to Debian.
>
> --
> Sean Whitton

status in luakit

2016-10-13 Thread Herminio Hernandez, Jr. 
Dear mentors

I am trying to adopt the browser luakit. I have been keeping track of
upstream to see if there is a new release coming. There has not been
one in a few years and it is still using webkitgtk-1.0. So far there
has been no move to upgrade the browser. There is a developer who has
forked the project and has ported it to webkit2gtk but he is not
interested in producing a stable release. I really would like to see
the browser stay, but I just do not think there is going to be a
change soon. I wondering should I just move on?

Any advice would be appreciated
Herminio

Bug#829520: RFS: mbpfan/1.9.1-1 ITP

2016-09-18 Thread Herminio Hernandez Jr 
On 08/31, Herminio Hernandez, Jr. wrote:
Mentors,

I am trying to convert my package using git. I am running into the lintian error

gbp:error: Can't determine upstream version from changelog

Mentors,

I am trying to convert my package using git. I am running into the lintian error

gbp:error: Can't determine upstream version from changelog

Mentors,

I am trying to convert my package using git. I am running into the lintian error

gbp:error: Can't determine upstream version from changelog

Mentors,

I am trying to convert my package using git. I am running into the lintian error

gbp:error: Can't determine upstream version from changelog

Mentors,

I am trying to convert my package using git. I am running into the lintian error

gbp:error: Can't determine upstream version from changelog

Mentors,

I am trying to convert my package using git. I am running into the lintian error

W: mbpfan source: source-nmu-has-incorrect-version-number 1.9.1-1

Based on what I read here: 
https://lintian.debian.org/tags/source-nmu-has-incorrect-version-number.html I 
tried to change the version to -0.1 in the changelog. Now I am getting this 
error

gbp:error: upstream/0 is not a valid treeish

If can point into the right direction I would appreciate it.

Thanks!

Herminio
Aug 31, 2016 at 2:43 PM, Sean Whitton <spwhit...@spwhitton.name>
> wrote:
> 
> > Dear Herminio,
> >
> > [please CC the RFS so that your e-mail gets recorded and others can
> > provide feedback as well as me -- use reply-to-all]
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 10:23:09PM -0700, Herminio Hernandez, Jr. wrote:
> > > I have combined the patches using combinediff. I know you want me to
> > convert to
> > > git. Can you recommend good documentation to convert my package? Thanks!
> >
> > One easy way is to do this:
> >
> > apt-get install git-buildpackage
> > gbp import-dsc mbpfan_1.9.1-1.dsc
> >
> > --
> > Sean Whitton
> >


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Bug#829520: RFS: mbpfan/1.9.1-1 ITP

2016-08-31 Thread Herminio Hernandez, Jr. 
will do apologies

On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 2:43 PM, Sean Whitton <spwhit...@spwhitton.name>
wrote:

> Dear Herminio,
>
> [please CC the RFS so that your e-mail gets recorded and others can
> provide feedback as well as me -- use reply-to-all]
>
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 10:23:09PM -0700, Herminio Hernandez, Jr. wrote:
> > I have combined the patches using combinediff. I know you want me to
> convert to
> > git. Can you recommend good documentation to convert my package? Thanks!
>
> One easy way is to do this:
>
> apt-get install git-buildpackage
> gbp import-dsc mbpfan_1.9.1-1.dsc
>
> --
> Sean Whitton
>

Re: Blocked bugs

2016-07-04 Thread Herminio Hernandez Jr. 
Thanks!

Sent from my iPhone

> On Jul 4, 2016, at 12:25 PM, Christian Seiler <christ...@iwakd.de> wrote:
> 
>> On 07/04/2016 09:13 PM, Herminio Hernandez Jr.  wrote:
>> I placed an ITP for a package call mbpfan. I then made sure my
>> package had lintian errors and updated the change log noting that
>> packaged fixes the ITP bug and uploaded to the debian-mentors site. I
>> then placed an RFS bug for the package. This morning I received a
>> notice that my ITP bug is blocked by my RFS bug. Did I forget
>> something?
> 
> No, that's perfectly fine. Bug A blocks bug B just means that bug
> B can't be fixed without bug A being fixed first. In case of RFS
> bugs, they are fixed when the upload occurs, while the bugs that
> the package itself fixes are fixed once the package gets accepted
> (after the upload).
> 
> So the RFS bug blocking the ITP is actually correct. In your case,
> someone was so nice to add the information that the RFS bug blocks
> the ITP bug for you.
> 
> Hence: everything is fine, you don't need to do anything further
> until someone gets a chance to review your package.
> 
> Regards,
> Christian

Blocked bugs

2016-07-04 Thread Herminio Hernandez Jr. 
Mentors,

I placed an ITP for a package call mbpfan. I then made sure my package had 
lintian errors and updated the change log noting that packaged fixes the ITP 
bug and uploaded to the debian-mentors site. I then placed an RFS bug for the 
package. This morning I received a notice that my ITP bug is blocked by my RFS 
bug. Did I forget something? 

Thanks
Herminio

Sent from my iPhone

managing patches

2016-07-03 Thread Herminio Hernandez Jr 
Hello mentors

I have a question regarding managing patches. I am wondering is there a way to 
merge multiple patches into one or is there way to rollback from a patch? As I 
am working I am see that making mulitple diffs after I make a change, then 
another if the previous one did not work. I searched online and really could 
not find anything helpful. I am sure I am missing something pretty obvious. Any 
suggestions?

Regards,
Herminio


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Bug#829520: RFS: mbpfan/1.9.1-1 ITP

2016-07-03 Thread Herminio Hernandez Jr 
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal [important for RC bugs, wishlist for new packages]

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "mbpfan"

 Package name: mbpfan
 Version : 1.9.1-1
 Upstream Author : Daniel Graziotin 
 URL : https://github.com/dgraziotin/mbpfan
 License : GPL-3

It builds those binary packages:

  mbpfan - Fan-Control-Daemon for MacBook Pro

To access further information about this package, please visit the following 
URL:

https://mentors.debian.net/package/mbpfan


Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

 dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/mbpfan/mbpfan_1.9.1-1.dsc

More information about mbpfan can be obtained from 
https://github.com/dgraziotin/mbpfan.

Regards,
Herminio


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Bug#827623: RFS: luakit/2012.09.13-r1-9 ITA -- fast and small web browser extensible by Lua

2016-06-30 Thread Herminio Hernandez Jr 
On 06/18, James Cowgill wrote:
> Control: tags -1 moreinfo
> 
> Hi,
> 
> On Sat, 2016-06-18 at 13:28 -0700, Herminio Hernandez, Jr. wrote:
> > Package: sponsorship-requests
> > Severity: normal
> > 
> >  Dear mentors,
> > 
> >  I am looking for a sponsor for my package "luakit"
> 
> It seems the only change you've made to the package is to set the
> Maintainer field to yourself. I doubt you will get sponsorship for this
> because you haven't actually improved anything.
> 
> There are bug reports here you could look at:
> https://bugs.debian.org/luakit
> 
> This bug might be an issue for the stretch release:
> https://bugs.debian.org/790207
> 
I am working on bug 790207 for the past few days. Moving from webkit-1.0 to 
wenkit2gtk requires that I build against gtk3. These past few days I have been 
wokring resolving all the errors I am getting during compile. I think I have 
them all resovled (I still get warnings which I may got back and try to fix).

Right now I am dealing with the errors that are coming from the change to 
webkit2gtk. There was a lot of changes that require updating the code. Just 
wanted to give an update.

Thanks!
Herminio 
> Also the lintian errors here:
> https://lintian.debian.org/maintainer/packa...@qa.debian.org.html#luakit
> 
> I see from this bug that luakit has been recently revived using the
> contents of a fork:
> https://github.com/luakit/luakit/issues/299
> 
> You should try and get them to make an official release which you could
> then package.
> 
> Thanks,
> James




signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Bug#827623: RFS: luakit/2012.09.13-r1-9 ITA -- fast and small web browser extensible by Lua

2016-06-23 Thread Herminio Hernandez, Jr. 
I am also trying to update the tags as well. I registered for an Alioth
account but I am having issues verifying it.

On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 2:37 PM, Herminio Hernandez, Jr. <
herminio.hernande...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I also believe that my package also fixes the buildd log warnings as well.
> If someone can verify and let me know that would be great.
>
> On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 9:03 PM, Herminio Hernandez, Jr. <
> herminio.hernande...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I have ran lintian against my .deb package and no warnings or errors were
>> displayed. I have uploaded it *here
>> <https://mentors.debian.net/package/luakit>. *Please review and give
>> feedback.
>>
>> Thanks again
>> Herminio
>>
>> On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 9:50 AM, Herminio Hernandez, Jr. <
>> herminio.hernande...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I just want to give an update. I eliminated the on error that lintain
>>> was reporting and got the warnings down to 4. Once I clear all of them I
>>> will reload that package for review.
>>>
>>> rican-linux@debian-ppc:~/src$ lintian -c
>>> luakit_2012.09.13-r1-9_powerpc.deb
>>> W: luakit: hardening-no-relro usr/bin/luakit
>>> W: luakit: manpage-has-useless-whatis-entry
>>> usr/share/man/man1/luakit.1.gz
>>> W: luakit: script-not-executable usr/share/luakit/lib/markdown.lua
>>> W: luakit: executable-not-elf-or-script usr/share/pixmaps/luakit.xpm
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks again for all the imput
>>> Herminio
>>>
>>> On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 9:52 PM, Herminio Hernandez Jr. <
>>> herminio.hernande...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Thanks again for the info.
>>>>
>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>
>>>> > On Jun 18, 2016, at 10:57 PM, Paul Wise <p...@debian.org> wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> >> On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 5:28 AM, Herminio Hernandez, Jr. wrote:
>>>> >>
>>>> >> I was recommeded to that in IRC since there was not a new release of
>>>> the
>>>> >> package yet.
>>>> >
>>>> > There are other things you could be doing while waiting for the new
>>>> release.
>>>> >
>>>> > James pointed you to some and there is also a summary at the URL I
>>>> > pointed you to:
>>>> >
>>>> > https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/luakit
>>>> >
>>>> > In addition to what James pointed out:
>>>> >
>>>> > There are warnings from the build log checks:
>>>> >
>>>> > http://qa.debian.org/bls/packages/l/luakit.html
>>>> >
>>>> > The package does not build in a bit-for-bit identical way if you build
>>>> > it twice in a row on some architectures. The issue appears to be
>>>> > something to do with linking order if you take a look at the diff of
>>>> > the two build logs:
>>>> >
>>>> > https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/luakit.html
>>>> >
>>>> https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/logdiffs/unstable/i386/luakit_2012.09.13-r1-8.diff.gz
>>>> >
>>>> > There are 4 bugs filed in Ubuntu that may apply to Debian. If you fix
>>>> > them, use "(LP: #123456, #123425)" in debian/changelog and they will
>>>> > be automatically closed when luakit is automatically synced to Ubuntu.
>>>> >
>>>> > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/luakit
>>>> >
>>>> > There are some suggestions on the debtags page for luakit:
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> https://debtags.debian.org/rep/todo/maint/packa...@qa.debian.org#luakit
>>>> >
>>>> > There is only one screenshot for luakit on Debian, it might be useful
>>>> > to add more for other parts of the UI or to show its extensibility.
>>>> >
>>>> > https://screenshots.debian.net/package/luakit
>>>> >
>>>> > You may want to run check-all-the-things from the luakit source tree.
>>>> >
>>>> > https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/check-all-the-things.git
>>>> >
>>>> > You may want to run `whohas luakit` and forward any bugs/patches you
>>>> > find in other Linux distros to upstream.
>>>> >
>>>> > https://packages.debian.org/sid/whohas
>>>> >
>>>> > The build dependencies for luakit are not built on some architectures:
>>>> >
>>>> > https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=luakit
>>>> >
>>>> > --
>>>> > bye,
>>>> > pabs
>>>> >
>>>> > https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>

Bug#827623: RFS: luakit/2012.09.13-r1-9 ITA -- fast and small web browser extensible by Lua

2016-06-23 Thread Herminio Hernandez, Jr. 
I also believe that my package also fixes the buildd log warnings as well.
If someone can verify and let me know that would be great.

On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 9:03 PM, Herminio Hernandez, Jr. <
herminio.hernande...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I have ran lintian against my .deb package and no warnings or errors were
> displayed. I have uploaded it *here
> <https://mentors.debian.net/package/luakit>. *Please review and give
> feedback.
>
> Thanks again
> Herminio
>
> On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 9:50 AM, Herminio Hernandez, Jr. <
> herminio.hernande...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I just want to give an update. I eliminated the on error that lintain was
>> reporting and got the warnings down to 4. Once I clear all of them I will
>> reload that package for review.
>>
>> rican-linux@debian-ppc:~/src$ lintian -c
>> luakit_2012.09.13-r1-9_powerpc.deb
>> W: luakit: hardening-no-relro usr/bin/luakit
>> W: luakit: manpage-has-useless-whatis-entry usr/share/man/man1/luakit.1.gz
>> W: luakit: script-not-executable usr/share/luakit/lib/markdown.lua
>> W: luakit: executable-not-elf-or-script usr/share/pixmaps/luakit.xpm
>>
>>
>> Thanks again for all the imput
>> Herminio
>>
>> On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 9:52 PM, Herminio Hernandez Jr. <
>> herminio.hernande...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks again for the info.
>>>
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>
>>> > On Jun 18, 2016, at 10:57 PM, Paul Wise <p...@debian.org> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 5:28 AM, Herminio Hernandez, Jr. wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> I was recommeded to that in IRC since there was not a new release of
>>> the
>>> >> package yet.
>>> >
>>> > There are other things you could be doing while waiting for the new
>>> release.
>>> >
>>> > James pointed you to some and there is also a summary at the URL I
>>> > pointed you to:
>>> >
>>> > https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/luakit
>>> >
>>> > In addition to what James pointed out:
>>> >
>>> > There are warnings from the build log checks:
>>> >
>>> > http://qa.debian.org/bls/packages/l/luakit.html
>>> >
>>> > The package does not build in a bit-for-bit identical way if you build
>>> > it twice in a row on some architectures. The issue appears to be
>>> > something to do with linking order if you take a look at the diff of
>>> > the two build logs:
>>> >
>>> > https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/luakit.html
>>> >
>>> https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/logdiffs/unstable/i386/luakit_2012.09.13-r1-8.diff.gz
>>> >
>>> > There are 4 bugs filed in Ubuntu that may apply to Debian. If you fix
>>> > them, use "(LP: #123456, #123425)" in debian/changelog and they will
>>> > be automatically closed when luakit is automatically synced to Ubuntu.
>>> >
>>> > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/luakit
>>> >
>>> > There are some suggestions on the debtags page for luakit:
>>> >
>>> >
>>> https://debtags.debian.org/rep/todo/maint/packa...@qa.debian.org#luakit
>>> >
>>> > There is only one screenshot for luakit on Debian, it might be useful
>>> > to add more for other parts of the UI or to show its extensibility.
>>> >
>>> > https://screenshots.debian.net/package/luakit
>>> >
>>> > You may want to run check-all-the-things from the luakit source tree.
>>> >
>>> > https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/check-all-the-things.git
>>> >
>>> > You may want to run `whohas luakit` and forward any bugs/patches you
>>> > find in other Linux distros to upstream.
>>> >
>>> > https://packages.debian.org/sid/whohas
>>> >
>>> > The build dependencies for luakit are not built on some architectures:
>>> >
>>> > https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=luakit
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > bye,
>>> > pabs
>>> >
>>> > https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
>>>
>>
>>
>

Bug#827623: RFS: luakit/2012.09.13-r1-9 ITA -- fast and small web browser extensible by Lua

2016-06-19 Thread Herminio Hernandez, Jr. 
I have ran lintian against my .deb package and no warnings or errors were
displayed. I have uploaded it *here
<https://mentors.debian.net/package/luakit>. *Please review and give
feedback.

Thanks again
Herminio

On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 9:50 AM, Herminio Hernandez, Jr. <
herminio.hernande...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I just want to give an update. I eliminated the on error that lintain was
> reporting and got the warnings down to 4. Once I clear all of them I will
> reload that package for review.
>
> rican-linux@debian-ppc:~/src$ lintian -c
> luakit_2012.09.13-r1-9_powerpc.deb
> W: luakit: hardening-no-relro usr/bin/luakit
> W: luakit: manpage-has-useless-whatis-entry usr/share/man/man1/luakit.1.gz
> W: luakit: script-not-executable usr/share/luakit/lib/markdown.lua
> W: luakit: executable-not-elf-or-script usr/share/pixmaps/luakit.xpm
>
>
> Thanks again for all the imput
> Herminio
>
> On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 9:52 PM, Herminio Hernandez Jr. <
> herminio.hernande...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Thanks again for the info.
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> > On Jun 18, 2016, at 10:57 PM, Paul Wise <p...@debian.org> wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 5:28 AM, Herminio Hernandez, Jr. wrote:
>> >>
>> >> I was recommeded to that in IRC since there was not a new release of
>> the
>> >> package yet.
>> >
>> > There are other things you could be doing while waiting for the new
>> release.
>> >
>> > James pointed you to some and there is also a summary at the URL I
>> > pointed you to:
>> >
>> > https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/luakit
>> >
>> > In addition to what James pointed out:
>> >
>> > There are warnings from the build log checks:
>> >
>> > http://qa.debian.org/bls/packages/l/luakit.html
>> >
>> > The package does not build in a bit-for-bit identical way if you build
>> > it twice in a row on some architectures. The issue appears to be
>> > something to do with linking order if you take a look at the diff of
>> > the two build logs:
>> >
>> > https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/luakit.html
>> >
>> https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/logdiffs/unstable/i386/luakit_2012.09.13-r1-8.diff.gz
>> >
>> > There are 4 bugs filed in Ubuntu that may apply to Debian. If you fix
>> > them, use "(LP: #123456, #123425)" in debian/changelog and they will
>> > be automatically closed when luakit is automatically synced to Ubuntu.
>> >
>> > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/luakit
>> >
>> > There are some suggestions on the debtags page for luakit:
>> >
>> > https://debtags.debian.org/rep/todo/maint/packa...@qa.debian.org#luakit
>> >
>> > There is only one screenshot for luakit on Debian, it might be useful
>> > to add more for other parts of the UI or to show its extensibility.
>> >
>> > https://screenshots.debian.net/package/luakit
>> >
>> > You may want to run check-all-the-things from the luakit source tree.
>> >
>> > https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/check-all-the-things.git
>> >
>> > You may want to run `whohas luakit` and forward any bugs/patches you
>> > find in other Linux distros to upstream.
>> >
>> > https://packages.debian.org/sid/whohas
>> >
>> > The build dependencies for luakit are not built on some architectures:
>> >
>> > https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=luakit
>> >
>> > --
>> > bye,
>> > pabs
>> >
>> > https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
>>
>
>

Bug#827623: RFS: luakit/2012.09.13-r1-9 ITA -- fast and small web browser extensible by Lua

2016-06-19 Thread Herminio Hernandez, Jr. 
I just want to give an update. I eliminated the on error that lintain was
reporting and got the warnings down to 4. Once I clear all of them I will
reload that package for review.

rican-linux@debian-ppc:~/src$ lintian -c luakit_2012.09.13-r1-9_powerpc.deb
W: luakit: hardening-no-relro usr/bin/luakit
W: luakit: manpage-has-useless-whatis-entry usr/share/man/man1/luakit.1.gz
W: luakit: script-not-executable usr/share/luakit/lib/markdown.lua
W: luakit: executable-not-elf-or-script usr/share/pixmaps/luakit.xpm


Thanks again for all the imput
Herminio

On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 9:52 PM, Herminio Hernandez Jr. <
herminio.hernande...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks again for the info.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On Jun 18, 2016, at 10:57 PM, Paul Wise <p...@debian.org> wrote:
> >
> >> On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 5:28 AM, Herminio Hernandez, Jr. wrote:
> >>
> >> I was recommeded to that in IRC since there was not a new release of the
> >> package yet.
> >
> > There are other things you could be doing while waiting for the new
> release.
> >
> > James pointed you to some and there is also a summary at the URL I
> > pointed you to:
> >
> > https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/luakit
> >
> > In addition to what James pointed out:
> >
> > There are warnings from the build log checks:
> >
> > http://qa.debian.org/bls/packages/l/luakit.html
> >
> > The package does not build in a bit-for-bit identical way if you build
> > it twice in a row on some architectures. The issue appears to be
> > something to do with linking order if you take a look at the diff of
> > the two build logs:
> >
> > https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/luakit.html
> >
> https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/logdiffs/unstable/i386/luakit_2012.09.13-r1-8.diff.gz
> >
> > There are 4 bugs filed in Ubuntu that may apply to Debian. If you fix
> > them, use "(LP: #123456, #123425)" in debian/changelog and they will
> > be automatically closed when luakit is automatically synced to Ubuntu.
> >
> > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/luakit
> >
> > There are some suggestions on the debtags page for luakit:
> >
> > https://debtags.debian.org/rep/todo/maint/packa...@qa.debian.org#luakit
> >
> > There is only one screenshot for luakit on Debian, it might be useful
> > to add more for other parts of the UI or to show its extensibility.
> >
> > https://screenshots.debian.net/package/luakit
> >
> > You may want to run check-all-the-things from the luakit source tree.
> >
> > https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/check-all-the-things.git
> >
> > You may want to run `whohas luakit` and forward any bugs/patches you
> > find in other Linux distros to upstream.
> >
> > https://packages.debian.org/sid/whohas
> >
> > The build dependencies for luakit are not built on some architectures:
> >
> > https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=luakit
> >
> > --
> > bye,
> > pabs
> >
> > https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
>

Bug#827623: RFS: luakit/2012.09.13-r1-9 ITA -- fast and small web browser extensible by Lua

2016-06-18 Thread Herminio Hernandez Jr. 
Thanks again for the info. 

Sent from my iPhone

> On Jun 18, 2016, at 10:57 PM, Paul Wise <p...@debian.org> wrote:
> 
>> On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 5:28 AM, Herminio Hernandez, Jr. wrote:
>> 
>> I was recommeded to that in IRC since there was not a new release of the
>> package yet.
> 
> There are other things you could be doing while waiting for the new release.
> 
> James pointed you to some and there is also a summary at the URL I
> pointed you to:
> 
> https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/luakit
> 
> In addition to what James pointed out:
> 
> There are warnings from the build log checks:
> 
> http://qa.debian.org/bls/packages/l/luakit.html
> 
> The package does not build in a bit-for-bit identical way if you build
> it twice in a row on some architectures. The issue appears to be
> something to do with linking order if you take a look at the diff of
> the two build logs:
> 
> https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/luakit.html
> https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/logdiffs/unstable/i386/luakit_2012.09.13-r1-8.diff.gz
> 
> There are 4 bugs filed in Ubuntu that may apply to Debian. If you fix
> them, use "(LP: #123456, #123425)" in debian/changelog and they will
> be automatically closed when luakit is automatically synced to Ubuntu.
> 
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/luakit
> 
> There are some suggestions on the debtags page for luakit:
> 
> https://debtags.debian.org/rep/todo/maint/packa...@qa.debian.org#luakit
> 
> There is only one screenshot for luakit on Debian, it might be useful
> to add more for other parts of the UI or to show its extensibility.
> 
> https://screenshots.debian.net/package/luakit
> 
> You may want to run check-all-the-things from the luakit source tree.
> 
> https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/check-all-the-things.git
> 
> You may want to run `whohas luakit` and forward any bugs/patches you
> find in other Linux distros to upstream.
> 
> https://packages.debian.org/sid/whohas
> 
> The build dependencies for luakit are not built on some architectures:
> 
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=luakit
> 
> -- 
> bye,
> pabs
> 
> https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise

Bug#827623: RFS: luakit/2012.09.13-r1-9 ITA -- fast and small web browser extensible by Lua

2016-06-18 Thread Herminio Hernandez Jr. 
I am working on trying to get the lintian errors resolved. 

Sent from my iPhone

> On Jun 18, 2016, at 10:57 PM, Paul Wise <p...@debian.org> wrote:
> 
>> On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 5:28 AM, Herminio Hernandez, Jr. wrote:
>> 
>> I was recommeded to that in IRC since there was not a new release of the
>> package yet.
> 
> There are other things you could be doing while waiting for the new release.
> 
> James pointed you to some and there is also a summary at the URL I
> pointed you to:
> 
> https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/luakit
> 
> In addition to what James pointed out:
> 
> There are warnings from the build log checks:
> 
> http://qa.debian.org/bls/packages/l/luakit.html
> 
> The package does not build in a bit-for-bit identical way if you build
> it twice in a row on some architectures. The issue appears to be
> something to do with linking order if you take a look at the diff of
> the two build logs:
> 
> https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/luakit.html
> https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/logdiffs/unstable/i386/luakit_2012.09.13-r1-8.diff.gz
> 
> There are 4 bugs filed in Ubuntu that may apply to Debian. If you fix
> them, use "(LP: #123456, #123425)" in debian/changelog and they will
> be automatically closed when luakit is automatically synced to Ubuntu.
> 
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/luakit
> 
> There are some suggestions on the debtags page for luakit:
> 
> https://debtags.debian.org/rep/todo/maint/packa...@qa.debian.org#luakit
> 
> There is only one screenshot for luakit on Debian, it might be useful
> to add more for other parts of the UI or to show its extensibility.
> 
> https://screenshots.debian.net/package/luakit
> 
> You may want to run check-all-the-things from the luakit source tree.
> 
> https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/check-all-the-things.git
> 
> You may want to run `whohas luakit` and forward any bugs/patches you
> find in other Linux distros to upstream.
> 
> https://packages.debian.org/sid/whohas
> 
> The build dependencies for luakit are not built on some architectures:
> 
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=luakit
> 
> -- 
> bye,
> pabs
> 
> https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise

Bug#827623: RFS: luakit/2012.09.13-r1-9 ITA -- fast and small web browser extensible by Lua

2016-06-18 Thread Herminio Hernandez, Jr. 
On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 2:10 PM, James Cowgill <jcowg...@debian.org> wrote:

> Control: tags -1 moreinfo
>
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, 2016-06-18 at 13:28 -0700, Herminio Hernandez, Jr. wrote:
> > Package: sponsorship-requests
> > Severity: normal
> >
> >  Dear mentors,
> >
> >  I am looking for a sponsor for my package "luakit"
>
> It seems the only change you've made to the package is to set the
> Maintainer field to yourself. I doubt you will get sponsorship for this
> because you haven't actually improved anything.
>
> I was recommeded to that in IRC since there was not a new release of the
package yet.


> There are bug reports here you could look at:
> https://bugs.debian.org/luakit
>
> This bug might be an issue for the stretch release:
> https://bugs.debian.org/790207
>
> Also the lintian errors here:
> https://lintian.debian.org/maintainer/packa...@qa.debian.org.html#luakit
>
> I see from this bug that luakit has been recently revived using the
> contents of a fork:
> https://github.com/luakit/luakit/issues/299
>
> You should try and get them to make an official release which you could
> then package.
>
> Thanks for the info will definately take a look!

> Thanks,
> James

Bug#827624: luakit/2012.09.13-r1-9 ITA

2016-06-18 Thread Herminio Hernandez, Jr. 
Control: merge 827624 827623

Thus was a duplicate of the other.

Thanks
Herminio

Bug#827624: RFS: luakit/2012.09.13-r1-9 ITA

2016-06-18 Thread Herminio Hernandez, Jr. 
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

  Dear mentors,

  I am looking for a sponsor for my package "luakit"

  Package name: luakit
  Version : 2012.09.13-r1-9
  Upstream Author : Mason Larobina 
  URL : https://github.com/luakit/luakit
  License : GPLv3
  Section : web

  It builds those binary packages:

luakit - fast and small web browser extensible by Lua

  To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:

  https://mentors.debian.net/package/luakit


  Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

dget -x
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/luakit/luakit_2012.09.13-r1-9.dsc

  More information about hello can be obtained from https://www.example.com.

  Changes since the last upload:

* Updated Maintainer field in debian/control



  Regards,

Bug#827623: RFS: luakit/2012.09.13-r1-9 ITA -- fast and small web browser extensible by Lua

2016-06-18 Thread Herminio Hernandez, Jr. 
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

 Dear mentors,

 I am looking for a sponsor for my package "luakit"

  Package name: luakit
  Version : 2012.09.13-r1-9
  Upstream Author : Mason Larobina <mason.larob...@gmail.com>
  URL : https://github.com/luakit/luakit
  License : GPLv3
  Section : web

  It builds those binary packages:

luakit - fast and small web browser extensible by Lua

  To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:

  https://mentors.debian.net/package/luakit


  Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

dget -x
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/luakit/luakit_2012.09.13-r1-9.dsc

  More information about hello can be obtained from https://www.example.com.

  Changes since the last upload:

  [your most recent changelog entry]


  Regards,
   Herminio Hernandez Jr