Bug#722224: RFS: kqoauth/0.98-1 [ITP]

2013-09-09 Thread Ho Wan Chan
Package: sponsorship-requests

Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

  I am looking for a sponsor for my package "kqoauth"

 * Package name: kqoauth
   Version : 0.98-1
   Upstream Author : Johan Paul 
 * URL : https://github.com/kypeli/kQOAuth
 * License : LGPL-2.1+
   Section : libs

  It builds those binary packages:

 libkqoauth-dbg - Library for OAuth 1.0 authentication -- debugging symbols
 libkqoauth-dev - Library for OAuth 1.0 authentication -- development files
 libkqoauth0 - Library for OAuth 1.0 authentication

  To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:

  http://mentors.debian.net/package/kqoauth


  Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

dget -x 
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/k/kqoauth/kqoauth_0.98-1.dsc

  More information about kqoauth can be obtained from
https://github.com/kypeli/kQOAuth


  Changes since the last upload:

  kqoauth (0.98-1) unstable; urgency=low

* Initial release (Closes: #722219)

   -- Howard Chan   Sat, 07 Sep 2013 23:59:21 +0800



  Regards,
   Howard Chan


Bug#721152: RFS: libsass/1.0-1 [ITP] -- C implementation of a sass compiler

2013-09-04 Thread Ho Wan Chan
Hello Vincent,

I'm seeing the FTP Master NEW queue, and it seems that you have uploaded a
wrong version with the wrong build-dependencies. Can you re-upload with the
newest version in Mentors?

Regards,
Howard Chan (smartboyhw)


2013/9/4 Vincent Bernat 

>  ❦  3 septembre 2013 11:17 CEST, Ho Wan Chan  :
>
> > I have re-uploaded the package with the simplified debian/rules. Please
> > review.
>
> Looks great. I have uploaded it.
> --
> Debian package sponsoring guidelines:
>  http://vincent.bernat.im/en/debian-package-sponsoring.html
>


Bug#721219: RFS: light-locker [ITP] -- simple session locker

2013-09-04 Thread Ho Wan Chan
Hello Stephen,

I have re-uploaded the package with the fixed build-dependencies, please
check.

Regards,
Howard Chan (smartboyhw)
Ubuntu Member


2013/8/29 Ho Wan Chan 

> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: wishlist
>
>   Dear mentors,
>
>   I am looking for a sponsor for my package "light-locker"
>
>  * Package name: light-locker
>Version : 1.0.0-1
>Upstream Author : Simon Steinbeiß 
>  * URL : https://github.com/the-cavalry/light-locker
>  * License : GPL-2+
>Section : utils
>
>   It builds those binary packages:
>
> light-locker - Simple session locker
>
>   To access further information about this package, please visit the
> following URL:
>
>   http://mentors.debian.net/package/light-locker
>
>
>   Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:
>
> dget -x
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/light-locker/light-locker_1.0.0-1.dsc
>
>   More information about light-locker can be obtained from
> https://github.com/the-cavalry/light-locker.
>
>   Changes since the last upload:
>
>   light-locker (1.0.0-1) unstable; urgency=low
>
>   * Initial release (Closes: #721163)
>
>  -- Howard Chan   Thu, 29 Aug 2013 15:42:06 +0800
>
>
>   Regards,
>Howard Chan
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
> listmas...@lists.debian.org
> Archive:
> http://lists.debian.org/CA+2XN5+8w+WAêswwojxwdsszdk2_d8dmajfqhgnxzr8...@mail.gmail.com<http://lists.debian.org/ca+2xn5+8w+wa%c3%aaswwojxwdsszdk2_d8dmajfqhgnxzr8...@mail.gmail.com>
>
>


Bug#721152: RFS: libsass/1.0-1 [ITP] -- C implementation of a sass compiler

2013-09-03 Thread Ho Wan Chan
Hello Vincent,

I have re-uploaded the package with the simplified debian/rules. Please
review.

Regards,
Howard Chan (smartboyhw)
Ubuntu Member


2013/9/3 Vincent Bernat 

>  ❦  2 septembre 2013 13:53 CEST, Ho Wan Chan  :
>
> > I have re-uploaded my package to Debian Mentors.
>
> I am unsure if the symbols file will work with other architectures. But
> we'll see when the package will be built for other architectures.
>
> I think you are thinking too much for debian/rules. I have simplified it
> to just:
>
> %:
> dh $@  --with autotools-dev
>
> The .la file is not installed because it is not listed in
> *.install, so no need to remove it. dh_auto_configure already calls
> configure with the appropriate arguments for multiarch.
> --
> Debian package sponsoring guidelines:
>  http://vincent.bernat.im/en/debian-package-sponsoring.html
>


Bug#721152: RFS: libsass/1.0-1 [ITP] -- C implementation of a sass compiler

2013-09-02 Thread Ho Wan Chan
Hello Vincent,

I have re-uploaded my package to Debian Mentors.

Please, review the package.

Regards,
Howard Chan (smartboyhw)
Kubuntu Member


2013/9/1 Ho Wan Chan 

> Hello Vincent,
>
> First of all, thank you for reviewing my package:)
>
>
> 2013/9/1 Vincent Bernat 
>
>>  ❦ 28 août 2013 16:34 CEST, Ho Wan Chan  :
>>
>> >   Dear mentors,
>> >
>> >   I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libsass"
>> >
>> >  * Package name: libsass
>> >Version : 1.0-1
>> >Upstream Author : Hampton Catlin 
>> >  * URL : https://github.com/hcatlin/libsass
>> >  * License : Expat
>> >Section : libs
>> >
>> >   It builds those binary packages:
>> >
>> > libsass-dev - C implementation of a sass compiler -- development
>> files
>> >  libsass0   - C implementation of a sass compiler
>>
>> Hi Chan!
>>
>> The priority in debian/control should be "extra" (option does not exist
>> and optional is for more essential software).
>>
>
> This one is my most skeptical part. Some say that "optional" is actually
> the most commonly used (and that's from a Debian Developer). Anyways, I
> will act accordingly.
>
>>
>> In debian/rules, you define DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH variable but don't use
>> it. You also override dh_auto_configure to reinvoke it as is.
>>
> I just can't understand how Multiarch works, even with the documentation.
> Thank you.
>
>>
>> Try to provide a symbol file, except if it is not possible to unmangle
>> all names. In this case, add a lintian override mentioning that.
>>
> Oh no, I normally do remember to do symbols files. Sorry...
>
>>
>> The library does not seem to be hardened despite the fact that you use
>> debhelper 9 and the appropriate flags being passed to the compiler and
>> the linker. hardening-check finds 5 functions that should be
>> hardened. Let's ignore that for now.
>> --
>> Debian package sponsoring guidelines:
>>  http://vincent.bernat.im/en/debian-package-sponsoring.html
>
>
> I will soon upload a fixed package.
>
> Regards,
> Howard Chan (smartboyhw)
> Kubuntu Member
>


Bug#721152: RFS: libsass/1.0-1 [ITP] -- C implementation of a sass compiler

2013-09-01 Thread Ho Wan Chan
Hello Vincent,

First of all, thank you for reviewing my package:)


2013/9/1 Vincent Bernat 

>  ❦ 28 août 2013 16:34 CEST, Ho Wan Chan  :
>
> >   Dear mentors,
> >
> >   I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libsass"
> >
> >  * Package name: libsass
> >Version : 1.0-1
> >Upstream Author : Hampton Catlin 
> >  * URL : https://github.com/hcatlin/libsass
> >  * License : Expat
> >Section : libs
> >
> >   It builds those binary packages:
> >
> > libsass-dev - C implementation of a sass compiler -- development
> files
> >  libsass0   - C implementation of a sass compiler
>
> Hi Chan!
>
> The priority in debian/control should be "extra" (option does not exist
> and optional is for more essential software).
>

This one is my most skeptical part. Some say that "optional" is actually
the most commonly used (and that's from a Debian Developer). Anyways, I
will act accordingly.

>
> In debian/rules, you define DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH variable but don't use
> it. You also override dh_auto_configure to reinvoke it as is.
>
I just can't understand how Multiarch works, even with the documentation.
Thank you.

>
> Try to provide a symbol file, except if it is not possible to unmangle
> all names. In this case, add a lintian override mentioning that.
>
Oh no, I normally do remember to do symbols files. Sorry...

>
> The library does not seem to be hardened despite the fact that you use
> debhelper 9 and the appropriate flags being passed to the compiler and
> the linker. hardening-check finds 5 functions that should be
> hardened. Let's ignore that for now.
> --
> Debian package sponsoring guidelines:
>  http://vincent.bernat.im/en/debian-package-sponsoring.html


I will soon upload a fixed package.

Regards,
Howard Chan (smartboyhw)
Kubuntu Member


Bug#721219: RFS: light-locker [ITP] -- simple session locker

2013-08-29 Thread Ho Wan Chan
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist

  Dear mentors,

  I am looking for a sponsor for my package "light-locker"

 * Package name: light-locker
   Version : 1.0.0-1
   Upstream Author : Simon Steinbeiß 
 * URL : https://github.com/the-cavalry/light-locker
 * License : GPL-2+
   Section : utils

  It builds those binary packages:

light-locker - Simple session locker

  To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:

  http://mentors.debian.net/package/light-locker


  Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

dget -x 
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/light-locker/light-locker_1.0.0-1.dsc

  More information about light-locker can be obtained from
https://github.com/the-cavalry/light-locker.

  Changes since the last upload:

  light-locker (1.0.0-1) unstable; urgency=low

  * Initial release (Closes: #721163)

 -- Howard Chan   Thu, 29 Aug 2013 15:42:06 +0800


  Regards,
   Howard Chan


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/CA+2XN5+8=w+WA=êswwojxwdsszdk2_d8dmajfqhgnxzr8...@mail.gmail.com



Bug#721152: RFS: libsass/1.0-1 [ITP] -- C implementation of a sass compiler

2013-08-28 Thread Ho Wan Chan
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist

  Dear mentors,

  I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libsass"

 * Package name: libsass
   Version : 1.0-1
   Upstream Author : Hampton Catlin 
 * URL : https://github.com/hcatlin/libsass
 * License : Expat
   Section : libs

  It builds those binary packages:

libsass-dev - C implementation of a sass compiler -- development files
 libsass0   - C implementation of a sass compiler

  To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:

  http://mentors.debian.net/package/libsass


  Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

dget -x 
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libs/libsass/libsass_1.0-1.dsc

  More information about libsass can be obtained from
https://github.com/hcatlin/libsass


  Changes since the last upload:

  libsass (1.0-1) unstable; urgency=low

* Initial release (Closes: #694730)

   -- Howard Chan   Wed, 28 Aug 2013 11:10:19 +0800



  Regards,
   Howard Chan


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/ca+2xn5jybcverbojropzcs5hqpneelw+cfgnvdc1omw3+ij...@mail.gmail.com



Bug#721011: zbackup 1.2-1 sponsoring

2013-08-27 Thread Ho Wan Chan
Hello Laszlo,

I'm uploading a fixed version of this into Debian mentors.

Regards,
Howard Chan (smartboyhw)

2013/8/28 László Böszörményi (GCS) :
> Hi Ho Wan,
>
>  Wanted to package zbackup myself. Thus I'm open to sponsor this
> package for you. Basically it looks fine. However when I tried to
> build it:
> -- cut --
> -- Found PROTOBUF: /usr/lib/libprotobuf.so
> CMake Error at CMakeLists.txt:27 (MESSAGE):
>   Could not find protobuf compiler.  Make sure protobuf-compiler package is
>   installed.
>
>
> -- Configuring incomplete, errors occurred!
> dh_auto_configure: cmake .. -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=/usr
> -DCMAKE_VERBOSE_MAKEFILE=ON -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=RelWithDebInfo returned
> exit code 1
> make: *** [build] Error 2
> dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2
> debuild: fatal error at line 1361:
> dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -D -us -uc failed
> -- cut --
>
> Please make it buildable first.
> Regards,
> Laszlo/GCS


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/ca+2xn5j1gwnd6onmp+most6ctximhknzpzdu2hk9y5i03gh...@mail.gmail.com



Bug#721011: RFS: zbackup/1.2-1 [ITP] - Versatile deduplicating backup tool

2013-08-27 Thread Ho Wan Chan
Package: sponsorship-requests

Severity: wishlist

  Dear mentors,

  I am looking for a sponsor for my package "zbackup"

 * Package name: zbackup
   Version : 1.2-1
   Upstream Author : Konstantin Isakov 
 * URL : http://zbackup.org
 * License : GPL-2+ (with OpenSSL exception)
   Section : admin

  It builds those binary packages:

zbackup- Versatile deduplicating backup tool

  To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:

  http://mentors.debian.net/package/zbackup


  Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

dget -x 
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/z/zbackup/zbackup_1.2-1.dsc

  More information about zbackup can be obtained from http://zbackup.org.

  Changes since the last upload:

  zbackup (1.2-1) unstable; urgency=low

   * Initial release (Closes: #717443)

   -- Howard Chan   Tue, 27 Aug 2013 12:38:22 +0800



  Regards,
   Howard Chan


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/ca+2xn5jl4jbqzubtttscnrpbhb0z-bcj0bgn8ru-yswe6jg...@mail.gmail.com



Bug#702158: RFS: vmodsynth/1.0-4 [ITP]

2013-03-03 Thread Ho Wan Chan
Thanks.


smartboyhw (Howard Chan)


2013/3/4 Aditya Vaidya 

> Hello,
>
> I'm kinda jumping in here, but I think "This is a" should be removed from
> the package's short description.
>
> Sincerely,
> kroq-gar78
> I will implement those for 1.0-5. Sorry since I'm a new guy for Debian
> (not for Ubuntu).
>
>
> 2013/3/3 Paul Wise 
>
>> On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 6:30 PM, Ho Wan Chan wrote:
>>
>> > More information about hello can be obtained from
>> http://www.example.com.
>>
>> That doesn't make sense, your package is vmodsynth and that is not its
>> website.
>>
>  My fault for not changing the template:P
>
>>
>> > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "vmodsynth"
>>
>> I don't intend to sponsor this package, but here is a review:
>>
>> If you contact upstream, please tell them about our upstream guide:
>>
>> http://wiki.debian.org/UpstreamGuide
>>
>> debian/source/include-binaries looks very wrong, debian/changelog
>> should be the only location for the Debian changelog to be stored in
>> the source package.
>>
>  That's because I don't know how to fix
> http://lintian.debian.org/tags/no-upstream-changelog.html
>
>>
>> Here is a better watch file for this package:
>>
>> version=3
>> https://launchpad.net/vmodsynth/+download
>> .*/vmodsynth-(\d[\d\.+)\.(?:zip|tgz|tbz|txz|(?:tar\.(?:gz|bz2|xz)))
>>
>  Well I shall implement it, however Launchpad downloads are a headache:)
>
>>
>> Please get the manual page included upstream.
>>
>
>   I would like to say that there is no manpage upstream.
>
>>
>> None of the comments in debian/rules are needed, please remove them.
>>
>  Forgotten to.
>
>>
>> Please add --parallel to the arguments of dh in debian/rules.
>>
>  OK
>
>>
>> debian/README.source is not needed, it duplicates debian/rules,
>> debian/control Build-Depends and the upstream README.
>>
>> No need to distribute the upstream README in the binary package, since
>> it is mainly build instructions. Best just remove debian/docs
>> altogether.
>>
>  OK.
>
>>
>> The Vcs-* fields are for the Debian packaging, not for upstream.
>>
>  Sorry.
>
>>
>> Does the package really need such a new gcc?
>>
>
>  We need to since that it is written in C++ 11 (for specific reasons, see
> the .pdf), which is starting to get supported in gcc 4.7
>
>
>>
>> You should never manually depend on libraries, always use the
>> automatic depends created by ${shlibs:Depends} instead.
>>
>  Oops sorry.
>
>>
>> Please run wrap-and-sort -sa to wrap and sort various files.
>>
>> I would suggest using debhelper compat 9 and dh-autoreconf instead of
>> autotools-dev.
>>
>  OK.
>
>>
>> Please read the devref section on debian/changelog best practices:
>>
>>
>> http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/best-pkging-practices.html#bpp-debian-changelog
>>
>> doc/vmodsynth_doc.pdf is a generated file, please ensure that it is
>> regenerated at build time, you will need to build-depend on pdfTeX to
>> do that.
>>
>> It would be a good idea to distribute doc/vmodsynth_doc.pdf in a
>> binary package, either vmodsynth itself or vmodsynth-doc.
>>
>   Thanks for your tip.
>
>>
>> Automatic checks:
>>
>> https://wiki.debian.org/HowToPackageForDebian#Check_points_for_any_package
>>
>> dpkg-shlibdeps:
>>
>> Lots of warnings, but thats a GTK+ bug.
>>
>> lintian (debian/compat 9 fixes the first two):
>>
>> W: vmodsynth: hardening-no-relro usr/bin/vmodsynth
>> W: vmodsynth: hardening-no-fortify-functions usr/bin/vmodsynth
>> P: vmodsynth: no-upstream-changelog
>>
>>   OK I shall use ver. 9 then.  For no-upstream-changelog I don't know how
> to fix.
>
>> bfbtester:
>>
>> When I ran vmodsynth under bfbtester, I got hundreds of megabytes of
>> core files due to segfaults. Please investigate and fix this issue.
>>
>> cppcheck (looks like the same issue as bfbtester):
>>
>> [src/main.cpp:40]: (error) Buffer overrun possible for long command
>> line arguments.
>>
>   Hmm let me see if I can contact upstream developer.
>
>>
>> blhc (use debian/compat 9 to fix):
>>
>> CXXFLAGS missing
>> CPPFLAGS missing
>> LDFLAGS missing
>>
>  Compat 9 then:)
>
>>
>> similarity-tester:
>>
>> Seems to be quite

Bug#702158: RFS: vmodsynth/1.0-4 [ITP]

2013-03-03 Thread Ho Wan Chan
I will implement those for 1.0-5. Sorry since I'm a new guy for Debian (not
for Ubuntu).


2013/3/3 Paul Wise 

> On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 6:30 PM, Ho Wan Chan wrote:
>
> > More information about hello can be obtained from http://www.example.com
> .
>
> That doesn't make sense, your package is vmodsynth and that is not its
> website.
>
 My fault for not changing the template:P

>
> > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "vmodsynth"
>
> I don't intend to sponsor this package, but here is a review:
>
> If you contact upstream, please tell them about our upstream guide:
>
> http://wiki.debian.org/UpstreamGuide
>
> debian/source/include-binaries looks very wrong, debian/changelog
> should be the only location for the Debian changelog to be stored in
> the source package.
>
 That's because I don't know how to fix
http://lintian.debian.org/tags/no-upstream-changelog.html

>
> Here is a better watch file for this package:
>
> version=3
> https://launchpad.net/vmodsynth/+download
> .*/vmodsynth-(\d[\d\.+)\.(?:zip|tgz|tbz|txz|(?:tar\.(?:gz|bz2|xz)))
>
 Well I shall implement it, however Launchpad downloads are a headache:)

>
> Please get the manual page included upstream.
>

  I would like to say that there is no manpage upstream.

>
> None of the comments in debian/rules are needed, please remove them.
>
 Forgotten to.

>
> Please add --parallel to the arguments of dh in debian/rules.
>
 OK

>
> debian/README.source is not needed, it duplicates debian/rules,
> debian/control Build-Depends and the upstream README.
>
> No need to distribute the upstream README in the binary package, since
> it is mainly build instructions. Best just remove debian/docs
> altogether.
>
 OK.

>
> The Vcs-* fields are for the Debian packaging, not for upstream.
>
 Sorry.

>
> Does the package really need such a new gcc?
>

 We need to since that it is written in C++ 11 (for specific reasons, see
the .pdf), which is starting to get supported in gcc 4.7


>
> You should never manually depend on libraries, always use the
> automatic depends created by ${shlibs:Depends} instead.
>
 Oops sorry.

>
> Please run wrap-and-sort -sa to wrap and sort various files.
>
> I would suggest using debhelper compat 9 and dh-autoreconf instead of
> autotools-dev.
>
 OK.

>
> Please read the devref section on debian/changelog best practices:
>
>
> http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/best-pkging-practices.html#bpp-debian-changelog
>
> doc/vmodsynth_doc.pdf is a generated file, please ensure that it is
> regenerated at build time, you will need to build-depend on pdfTeX to
> do that.
>
> It would be a good idea to distribute doc/vmodsynth_doc.pdf in a
> binary package, either vmodsynth itself or vmodsynth-doc.
>
  Thanks for your tip.

>
> Automatic checks:
>
> https://wiki.debian.org/HowToPackageForDebian#Check_points_for_any_package
>
> dpkg-shlibdeps:
>
> Lots of warnings, but thats a GTK+ bug.
>
> lintian (debian/compat 9 fixes the first two):
>
> W: vmodsynth: hardening-no-relro usr/bin/vmodsynth
> W: vmodsynth: hardening-no-fortify-functions usr/bin/vmodsynth
> P: vmodsynth: no-upstream-changelog
>
>   OK I shall use ver. 9 then.  For no-upstream-changelog I don't know how
to fix.

> bfbtester:
>
> When I ran vmodsynth under bfbtester, I got hundreds of megabytes of
> core files due to segfaults. Please investigate and fix this issue.
>
> cppcheck (looks like the same issue as bfbtester):
>
> [src/main.cpp:40]: (error) Buffer overrun possible for long command
> line arguments.
>
  Hmm let me see if I can contact upstream developer.

>
> blhc (use debian/compat 9 to fix):
>
> CXXFLAGS missing
> CPPFLAGS missing
> LDFLAGS missing
>
 Compat 9 then:)

>
> similarity-tester:
>
> Seems to be quite a lot of code duplication going on:
>
> ./src/AlsaDriver.hconsists  for  75   %  of
> ./src/AlsaDriver.cppmaterial
> ./src/modules/v702.cppconsists  for  76   %  of
> ./src/modules/v701.cpp  material
> ./src/modules/v701.cppconsists  for  77   %  of
> ./src/modules/v702.cpp  material
> ./src/ModuleList.hconsists  for  79   %  of
> ./src/ModuleList.cppmaterial
> ./src/Inlet.h consists  for  80   %  of
> ./src/Outlet.h  material
> ./src/Outlet.hconsists  for  81   %  of  ./src/Inlet.h
>   material
> ./src/modules/v300.h  consists  for  84   %  of
> ./src/modules/v203.hmaterial
> ./src/modules/algorithms.hconsists  for  89   %  of
> ./src/modules/v1005.h   material
> ./src/modules/algorithms.cpp  consist

Bug#702158: RFS: vmodsynth/1.0-4 [ITP]

2013-03-03 Thread Ho Wan Chan
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "vmodsynth"

* Package name: vmodsynth
  Version : 1.0-4
  Upstream Author : Rafal Cieślak 
* URL : https://launchpad.net/vmodsynth
* License : GNU GPL v3
  Section : sound

It builds those binary packages:

  vmodsynth  - This is a modular software synthesizer

To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:
http://mentors.debian.net/package/vmodsynth


Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

  dget -x 
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/v/vmodsynth/vmodsynth_1.0-4.dsc

More information about hello can be obtained from http://www.example.com.

Changes since the last upload:

vmodsynth (1.0-4) unstable; urgency=low

  * Tried new option to includ changelog.Debian.gz in docs
  * Fixes (closes: #702149)

 -- Howard Chan   Sun, 03 Mar 2013 18:11:36 +0800

vmodsynth (1.0-3) unstable; urgency=low

  * Edited docs to include changelog.Debian.gz
  * Edited copyright to fix actual year
  * Edited README.source to include the README

 -- Howard Chan   Sun, 03 Mar 2013 18:05:09 +0800

vmodsynth (1.0-2) unstable; urgency=low

  * Fixed watch file to enable actual scanning.
  * Added upstream changelog

 -- Howard Chan   Sun, 03 Mar 2013 17:57:14 +0800

vmodsynth (1.0-1) unstable; urgency=low

  * Initial release

 -- Howard Chan   Sun, 03 Mar 2013 16:15:30 +0800


Regards,
 Howard Chan