Bug#830788: RFS: ifstat/1.1-9
On 08/08/16 12:09, Paul Wise wrote: On Mon, 2016-08-08 at 11:45 +0200, Laurent Bigonville wrote: TBH I don't want to use alternatives if the two tools are not using the same flags, for example, arping has two implementation in debian using alternatives (or being installed in two different paths, not sure anymore) but they are not providing the same flags/options, network-manager is using this tool but only works with one of the implementation. Why isn't there a Breaks from the right arping to network-manager? FTR, other distributions (RHEL/Fedora at least) are using the iproute implementation. Probably that is the best way to go then. Mhh, on Fedora the two implementations are available actually (but not on RHEL) and the iproute one is being installed by default.
Bug#830788: RFS: ifstat/1.1-9
Le 08/08/16 à 11:18, Paul Wise a écrit : On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 5:06 PM, Christian Seiler wrote: Maybe the best idea would then be to have iproute2 ship the ifstat utility as iproute2-ifstat (or similar), keep ifstat as the name for the ifstat package, and if a Linux admin wants to have ifstat be the iproute2 thing, they can easily set an alias in their shell. (Maybe add instructions to a README.Debian file.) Sounds like a case for alternatives, are the two implementations command-line compatible? TBH I don't want to use alternatives if the two tools are not using the same flags, for example, arping has two implementation in debian using alternatives (or being installed in two different paths, not sure anymore) but they are not providing the same flags/options, network-manager is using this tool but only works with one of the implementation. FTR, other distributions (RHEL/Fedora at least) are using the iproute implementation.
Bug#830788: RFS: ifstat/1.1-9
On Mon, 11 Jul 2016 15:44:39 +0200 Goswin von Brederlow <goswin-...@web.de> wrote: > Dear mentors, > Hi, > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ifstat" I have a question, is the ifstat package really still needed? It seems to be dead upstream (last release is from 2004). The iproute2 package (which is still maintained upstream) also has a ifstat binary, I've added that binary by mistake in the last upload I've made. So I see two solutions here, either I'm removing that binary from the iproute2 package (and we are back to the situation before my boggus upload) or we are removing the ifstat package from debian. Note iproute2 is linux only though. Any thoughts about this? Regards, Laurent Bigonville
Bug#765924: RFS: libgom/0.2.1-1
Le Mon, 17 Nov 2014 06:33:41 -0800, Joseph Herlant herla...@gmail.com a écrit : Hi Laurent, On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 6:16 AM, Laurent Bigonville bi...@debian.org wrote: Are you still looking for a sponsor? Yes I am. Would you agree to but your package under the GNOME team maintenance? GOM will become an official module starting with the GNOME 3.16 release and having coordinated uploads might be important for us. Actually that's what I wanted to do in the 1st place. I made an Alioth request to be part of the Gnome team and sent 2 mails to the debian-gtk-gnome list back in mid october but didn't got any answer. That's why I pushed it to collab-maint. We are planning to switch to git for the maintenance of our packages anyway, moving the repository afterwards would be trivial. If you want to put the package under the team maintenance you can add Debian GNOME Maintainers pkg-gnome-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org as maintainer and add you to the uploaders (or the opposite if you prefer). For alioth membership, I guess the best is to pass on IRC (#debian-gnome on the OFTC network) Also I think you should also enable the introspection support to allow other language that C to be able to use the library. This would require adding a new gir1.2-gom-1.0 package. The API documentation might also be interesting for some people, I guess it could be added to the -dev package. No problem. I'll do that this week-end (changed my computer so I have to reinstall some tools before. Thanks! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141118120514.640ba...@soldur.bigon.be
Bug#765924: RFS: libgom/0.2.1-1
On Sun, 19 Oct 2014 11:25:28 +0200 Joseph Herlant herla...@gmail.com wrote: Dear mentors, Hello Joseph, I am looking for a sponsor for my package libgom Are you still looking for a sponsor? I could do the upload for you if you want, but maybe some remarks first. Would you agree to but your package under the GNOME team maintenance? GOM will become an official module starting with the GNOME 3.16 release and having coordinated uploads might be important for us. It builds those binary packages: libgom-1.0-0 - Object mapper from GObjects to SQLite libgom-1.0-0-dbg - Object mapper from GObjects to SQLite libgom-1.0-common - Object mapper from GObjects to SQLite libgom-1.0-dev - Object mapper from GObjects to SQLite Enable API Reference...: no Enable Introspection...: no Also I think you should also enable the introspection support to allow other language that C to be able to use the library. This would require adding a new gir1.2-gom-1.0 package. The API documentation might also be interesting for some people, I guess it could be added to the -dev package. Tell me what you think about this. Cheers, Laurent Bigonville -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141117151609.6992f...@soldur.bigon.be
RFS: gnome-nds-thumbnailer
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package gnome-nds-thumbnailer. * Package name: gnome-nds-thumbnailer Version : 1.0.2-1 Upstream Author : Bastien Nocera [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thomas Köckerbauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] * URL : http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/sources/gnome-nds-thumbnailer * License : GPL Section : gnome It builds these binary packages: gnome-nds-thumbnailer - Nintendo DS roms thumbnailer for GNOME The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 445534 The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gnome-nds-thumbnailer - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gnome-nds-thumbnailer/gnome-nds-thumbnailer_1.0.2-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Laurent Bigonville pgpZzSEShj3Jh.pgp Description: PGP signature
RFS: vim-syntax-gtk -- new upstream version
Hi, please could someone review and upload vim-syntax-gtk vim-syntax-gtk (20070925-1) unstable; urgency=low * New upstream release - Fix debian/vim-syntax-gtk.yaml and debian/c.vim -- Laurent Bigonville [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue, 25 Sep 2007 20:36:14 +0200 http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/v/vim-syntax-gtk/vim-syntax-gtk_20070925-1.dsc Best regards Laurent Bigonville pgpvBN2rT48YO.pgp Description: PGP signature
RFS: libonig NMU for a RC bug
Hi, Could someone review and upload libonig 5.9.0 http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libonig/libonig_5.9.0-0.1.dsc This upload fix a RC bug, see http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=426355 Regards Laurent Bigonville pgp3taUhkxHoM.pgp Description: PGP signature
RFS: acr38 - 1.7.9-3 (minor update)
Hi,
Could someone review and upload acr38 1.7.9-3
This is a minor update
* debian/control:
- Add XS-Vcs informations.
- Add Homepage field.
- Use ${binary:Version} for versionized dependencies
(Thanks to Lior Kaplan [EMAIL PROTECTED]) (Closes: #430475)
Regards
Laurent Bigonville
pgpelZE8eaXRd.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Re: RFS: acr38 - 1.7.9-3 (minor update)
Oups forgot the url:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/acr38/acr38_1.7.9-3.dsc
On Mon, 30 Jul 2007 19:01:49 +0200
Laurent Bigonville [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Could someone review and upload acr38 1.7.9-3
This is a minor update
* debian/control:
- Add XS-Vcs informations.
- Add Homepage field.
- Use ${binary:Version} for versionized dependencies
(Thanks to Lior Kaplan [EMAIL PROTECTED]) (Closes: #430475)
Regards
Laurent Bigonville
pgpRzNN8xuLgT.pgp
Description: PGP signature
RFS: libssh 0.2+svn20070321-4 (minor update)
Hi,
Could someone review and upload libssh libssh 0.2+svn20070321-4
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libssh/libssh_0.2+svn20070321-4.dsc
Changes:
libssh (0.2+svn20070321-4) unstable; urgency=low
.
* debian/control:
- Add XS-Vcs-Svn and XS-Vcs-Browser fields.
- Change to ${binary:Version} for versionized dependencies.
* Add debian/README.Debian to disambiguate the package name
Regards
Laurent Bigonville
pgplRnGq7w2vv.pgp
Description: PGP signature
RFS: NMU for gidentd
Hi, Could some one review and upload my NMU for gidentd. Packages available at: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gidentd/gidentd_0.4.5+dfsg1-0.1.dsc Regards Laurent Bigonville pgpw7awovT3Mb.pgp Description: PGP signature
RFS: gtk-vim-syntax (new package)
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package gtk-vim-syntax. * Package name: gtk-vim-syntax Version : 20061121-1 Upstream Author : David Necas [EMAIL PROTECTED] * URL : http://www.vim.org/scripts/script.php?script_id=1000 * License : public domain Section : editors It builds these binary packages: gtk-vim-syntax - Syntax files to highlight gtk+ keywords in vim The package is lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 416380 The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gtk-vim-syntax - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gtk-vim-syntax/gtk-vim-syntax_20061121-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Laurent Bigonville pgpIutOeMm1OA.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: RFS: acr38 (updated package)
Nobody? :'( This upload should fix a RC bug reported on the ubuntu launchpad[1], bug that apply to debian as well. My previous sponsor was Wouter Verhelst, but I think he is busy ATM. So if someone could proceed :) Thanks Laurent [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/acr38/+bug/88648 On Wed, 28 Feb 2007 16:20:31 +0100 Laurent Bigonville [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.7.9-2 of my package acr38. It builds these binary packages: libacr38u - PC/SC driver for the ACR38U smart card reader libacr38ucontrol-dev - Library for operational mode for ACR38U smartcard reader dev file libacr38ucontrol0 - Library for operational mode for ACR38U smartcard reader The package is lintian clean. The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/acr38 - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/acr38/acr38_1.7.9-2.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Laurent Bigonville -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RFS: acr38 (updated package)
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.7.9-2 of my package acr38. It builds these binary packages: libacr38u - PC/SC driver for the ACR38U smart card reader libacr38ucontrol-dev - Library for operational mode for ACR38U smartcard reader dev file libacr38ucontrol0 - Library for operational mode for ACR38U smartcard reader The package is lintian clean. The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/acr38 - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/acr38/acr38_1.7.9-2.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Laurent Bigonville pgpcMP62hoqN5.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: RFS: pam-keyring (updated package)
Daniel Baumann wrote: Laurent Bigonville wrote: I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.0.8-3 of my package pam-keyring. You don't need to look for a new sponsor for each new revision. It's common to use the same sponsor for the same package (or for all packages) again, unless you are not unconfident with him. As I sponsored one of the previous uploads, and I don't think you are unconfident with me, I uploaded also this one here. If you want me to upload further a further package/packages for you, use private mail. Saves time for everyone. I must really quit posting messages after 4am :o Sorry for the noise, and thanks for the upload :) Laurent Bigonville -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RFS: NMU for mrd6 package
Hi, If you know the maintainer is MIA, maybe you should ask -qa to orphan his packages, then do a qa-upload of this, instead of an NMU. As it stands, given that your bug is of mormal priority, I don't think an NMU is warranted. I have sent an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I wait for an answer. The bug has a normal severity because nobody reviews it. I think that the bug severity could be raised to important since it's broke partially the plug-in system. Regards Laurent Bigonville pgp9eL2lmPuSu.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: RFS: NMU for mrd6 package
Hi (again), Nobody wants to review my package? Laurent On Tue, 30 Jan 2007 17:23:33 +0100 Laurent Bigonville [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I've opened bug #394590 for about 100 days now and got no answer from the maintainer (Anand Kumria [EMAIL PROTECTED]). The maintainer is known to be MIA. I have sent him an email today to explain my intent to do a NMU. Upstream has already applied the patch in his svn. There is actually no patch system in this package so I applied the patch directly in the sources. Could someone review and upload it in the delayed queue? http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/mrd6/mrd6_0.9.5-release-1.1.dsc The debdiff of the package is included in this email Regards Laurent Bigonville pgp9Awf7ZghqT.pgp Description: PGP signature
Required package in build-deps?
Hi, My package (pam-keyring) FTBFS on some buildd[1] because 'kill' is missing. /bin/kill is part of the procps package which has a required priority. I thought that packages with such priority should not be added to build-deps... Sould I add procps package to the build-deps or is this a problem with buildd? Regards Laurent Bigonville [1] http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?pkg=pam-keyring pgpi0vjorKMfN.pgp Description: PGP signature
RFS: pam-keyring (Was Re: Required package in build-deps?)
Hi, I've added procps as a build-dep (easiest thing to do). Could someone upload the new package for me? http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/pam-keyring/pam-keyring_0.0.8-2.dsc Regards Laurent Bigonville pgpmuKw9tLHaW.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: RFS: pam-keyring -- PAM module that unlock gnome-keyring at login (new package)
On Thu, 28 Dec 2006 20:34:42 +0100 Daniel Baumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] the rest is fine. if you fix above things, i'm happy to sponsor it. Thanks for your review :) The updated package can be found at: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/pam-keyring/pam-keyring_0.0.8-1.dsc Regards Laurent Bigonville pgpPOoJlvCrQZ.pgp Description: PGP signature
RFS: pam-keyring -- PAM module that unlock gnome-keyring at login (new package)
Hi, I'm looking for a sponsor for this new package. It's a PAM module that unlock the gnome-keyring at login. Useful with network-manager for example. I'm not sure where pam-keyring-tool must go (/bin or /usr/bin) since it is needed by the pam library. Full informations on the BTS: http://bugs.debian.org/402500 http://bigon.be/vrac/pam-keyring/pam-keyring_0.0.8-1.dsc Regards Laurent pgpt9YGS9Pe20.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: RFS: pam-keyring -- PAM module that unlock gnome-keyring at login (new package)
On Fri, 22 Dec 2006 20:50:14 -0600 Richard Laager [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, 2006-12-23 at 02:29 +0100, Laurent Bigonville wrote: It's a PAM module that unlock the gnome-keyring at login. Useful with network-manager for example. I'm not sure where pam-keyring-tool must go (/bin or /usr/bin) since it is needed by the pam library. Full informations on the BTS: http://bugs.debian.org/402500 Are you sure this is the latest version of pam-keyring? (Or, did you patch it? I didn't check.) I looked at packaging it before, but the latest version required pam = 0.99, so I filed an RFE for that with Ubuntu. Here's the relevant Debian bug: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=360460 Well on the webpage it says: Requirements: gnome-keyring = 0.4.8 gnome-session = 2.10 pam = 0.77 Upstream seems to have added compatibility code for older version of pam. Compile fine on both my feisty and my sid. Laurent pgpZ8nBY94gH5.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: RFS: libssh -- SSH and SCP library (new package)
Hi, The name of the binary packages have been changed to avoid conflict with an other library (libssh2 != libssh). The new packages are at the same URL. (http://bigon.be/vrac/libssh/) A direct link to the .dsc file as requested: http://bigon.be/vrac/libssh/libssh_0.2~rc1-1.dsc Regards :) Laurent pgpy4IVZHcrzy.pgp Description: PGP signature
RFS: libssh -- SSH and SCP library (new package)
Hi, Could someone sponsor this package? Please see bug #316872 Packages are available at http://bigon.be/vrac/libssh/ Thanks Laurent Bigonville pgpW9p82a0APa.pgp Description: PGP signature
