Re: RFS: gsoap (updated package)

2010-02-27 Thread Marco Nenciarini
Stefano Canepa ha scritto:
 Il giorno lun, 22/02/2010 alle 17.52 +0100, Steffen Moeller ha scritto:
 Hi Stefano,

 Stefano Canepa wrote:

 I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 2.7.15-1
 of my package gsoap.

 It builds these binary packages:
 gsoap  - SOAP stub and skeleton compiler for C and C++

 The package appears to be lintian clean.

 The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
 - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gsoap
 - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main 
 contrib non-free
 - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gsoap/gsoap_2.7.15-1.dsc

 I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
 the diff.gz has many *.cpp files in, and there are both Makefile.in and
 Makefile, configure and configure.in. I have not looked at it in more
 detail, but could there be a way that you reduce the length of the diff.gz
 to something one can oversee with the eye? The current version has 37522
 lines, which given all the *.cpp files in are just too tough for a sponsor
 to check through.
 
 I checked the diff.gz, this is the result of the need to cut out all
 apache_13 module code. I tried to convince upstream author to drop this
 code in next release but I did not succeded. We agree to delete all
 files lintian complains about.
 If you would like to write to upstream author to convice him to delete
 useless code in future release please do and I'll be gratefull to you
 for your favour. Tomorrow I'll ask again Mandriva gsoap maintainer (a
 collegue of mine) to ask for the same thing even if he told me that
 inclusion of old apache code is not a problem in his package.
 

I've just looked at gsoap source package. I think it is worth to
repackage it as more than half of its size is composed of binary
executables, repeated code, windows/macosx/symbian/* stuff, logs and
other kinds of useless (and sometime non DFSG compliant) files.

Kind regards,
Marco

-- 
-
|Marco Nenciarini| Debian/GNU Linux Developer - Plug Member |
| mnen...@prato.linux.it | http://www.prato.linux.it/~mnencia   |
-
Key fingerprint = FED9 69C7 9E67 21F5 7D95  5270 6864 730D F095 E5E4




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: RFS: wbox

2009-12-15 Thread Marco Nenciarini
Alberto Furia - straluna ha scritto:
 Hello Marco
 
 I've just redone the upload on mentors correcting the little bug
 upstream-side I was telling you. 

Uploaded.

Kind regards,
Marco

-- 
-
|Marco Nenciarini| Debian/GNU Linux Developer - Plug Member |
| mnen...@prato.linux.it | http://www.prato.linux.it/~mnencia   |
-
Key fingerprint = FED9 69C7 9E67 21F5 7D95  5270 6864 730D F095 E5E4




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: RFS: wbox

2009-12-14 Thread Marco Nenciarini
Alberto Furia - straluna ha scritto:
 Dear mentors,
 
 I am looking for a sponsor for my package wbox.

The package looks OK for me, but I can't verify the orig tarball because
http://www.hping.org/wbox/wbox-5.tar.gz looks like an empty file.

I'm ready to upload it but before I'd like to check the upstream tarball.

Kind regards,
Marco Nenciarini

-- 
-
|Marco Nenciarini| Debian/GNU Linux Developer - Plug Member |
| mnen...@prato.linux.it | http://www.prato.linux.it/~mnencia   |
-
Key fingerprint = FED9 69C7 9E67 21F5 7D95  5270 6864 730D F095 E5E4




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: pbuilder problem

2006-11-24 Thread Marco Nenciarini
On Thu, Nov 23, 2006 at 11:18:29PM +0100, Luca Bedogni wrote:
 Hi mentors
   made my first libpackage and the program is the following.
 When i launch pbuilder on another package that uses my library-package i got 
 that he can't use the include. I use the package from a local repository.
 

I use the following hook to do that automatically:

File: D01local-packages
88888888888---
#!/bin/bash

PKGDIR=/home/mnencia/deb/pbuilder-local-packages

cd $PKGDIR
/usr/bin/dpkg-scanpackages . /dev/null  Packages
/bin/gzip --best -c Packages  Packages.gz

echo deb file:$PKGDIR ./  /etc/apt/sources.list

apt-get update
88888888888---

To use it you need to change PKGDIR definition and mount the hooks and
$PKGDDIR directories in your pbuilder chroot via --bindmounts option.

With this hook you can make a package visible to apt inside pbuilder
putting it in $PKGDIR directory.

Bye

-- 
-
|Marco Nenciarini| Debian/GNU Linux Developer - Plug Member |
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.prato.linux.it/~mnencia   |
-
Key fingerprint = FED9 69C7 9E67 21F5 7D95  5270 6864 730D F095 E5E4



signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: Bug#351951: ITP: wengophone -- A free SIP softphone

2006-02-22 Thread Marco Nenciarini
On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 03:15:34AM +1100, Anand Kumria wrote:
 Hi Macro,
 
 On Wed, Feb 22, 2006 at 04:32:54PM +0100, Marco Nenciarini wrote:
  On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 02:19:57AM +1100, Anand Kumria wrote:
   On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 08:21:42PM +0100, Marco Nenciarini wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Marco Nenciarini [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Package name: wengophone
  Version : 0.99+svn4179
   
   why not openwengo as the package name btw?
  
  Because upstream use this name.
 
 Perhaps it is worthwhile also updating your apt URIs too, then?
 
deb http://www.prato.linux.it/~mnencia/debian openwengo/
deb-src http://www.prato.linux.it/~mnencia/debian openwengo/
 
 because I found that somewhat odd.
 

I used that URIs because I plan to package also wengophone-ng e
firefox-wengphone (when they will stable enough).

   You seem to be building with all the shipped libraries rather than
   linking to the ones Debian provides.  Any particular reason (they've
   forked them and done some changes?) for this?
  
  Yes, all libraries (other than ffmpeg, that I have removed from source
  tarball) was modified by upstream.
 
 Well I did a quick check on samplerate and I couldn't see any
 modifications at all. I'm sure both the maintainer (me) and upstream
 would love to know about them so we can make both your and openwengo's
 lives easier.
 
 Actually, they might also be worthwhile finding out the changes done and
 seeing if they can be incorporated into the Debian version of the
 library.  It may be a bit of work upfront, but it should make things
 simpler in the long run.
 

I think you are confused. I packaged wengophone, not wengophone-ng
(because upstream told me to wait until it is more stable). And
wengophone does not use libsamplerate

Regards

-- 
-
|Marco Nenciarini| Debian/GNU Linux Developer - Plug Member |
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.prato.linux.it/~mnencia   |
-
Key fingerprint = FED9 69C7 9E67 21F5 7D95  5270 6864 730D F095 E5E4



signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: ITP: wengophone -- A free SIP softphone

2006-02-09 Thread Marco Nenciarini
On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 09:21:08AM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote:
 
 If there's one thing people are good at here in d-mentors, it's editing long
 descriptions to improve them.
 

Ok, i need comments about this description:

Description: A free SIP-based VoIP softphone with Video and Chat features.
 WengoPhone is a Voice over IP application based on standard protocols
 like SIP and RTP. It enables voice, video and text chat between two
 clients.  Features include a contact list with presence and status,
 call history and NAT traversal capability. Combined with commercial
 service, WengoPhone can be used to call regular PSTN lines and/or
 send SMS messages to cell phones.

tnx

-- 
-
|Marco Nenciarini| Debian/GNU Linux Developer - Plug Member |
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.prato.linux.it/~mnencia   |
-
Key fingerprint = FED9 69C7 9E67 21F5 7D95  5270 6864 730D F095 E5E4



signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: ITP: wengophone -- A free SIP softphone

2006-02-09 Thread Marco Nenciarini
On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 11:44:19AM +, Stuart Yeates wrote:
 Marcus Better wrote:
  Marco Nenciarini wrote:
  
 Description: A free SIP-based VoIP softphone with Video and Chat features.
  
  
  No need to say that it's free, this is Debian after all :-) Perhaps the
  short description should be something like:
  
Description: softphone with video and chat features
 
 Since most users will not know what a softphone is maybe:
 
Description: software telephone with video and chat features
 

What's about this description?

Description: SIP-based software telephone with video and chat features
 WengoPhone is a Voice over IP application based on standard protocols
 like SIP and RTP. It enables voice, video and text chat between two
 clients.  Features include a contact list with presence and status,
 call history and NAT traversal capability. Combined with commercial
 service, WengoPhone can be used to call regular PSTN lines and/or
 send SMS messages to cell phones.

Ciao

-- 
-
|Marco Nenciarini| Debian/GNU Linux Developer - Plug Member |
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.prato.linux.it/~mnencia   |
-
Key fingerprint = FED9 69C7 9E67 21F5 7D95  5270 6864 730D F095 E5E4



signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


ITP: wengophone -- A free SIP softphone

2006-02-08 Thread Marco Nenciarini
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Marco Nenciarini [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Package name: wengophone
  Version : 0.99+svn4179
  Upstream Author : Wengo SAS wengophone-devel@lists.openwengo.com
* URL : http://dev.openwengo.com/
* License : GPL with exception for ssl linking
  Description : A free SIP softphone

 WengoPhone Classic is a Voice and Video Over IP application based on
 standard protocols like SIP and RTP.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.15-1-686-smp
Locale: LANG=it_IT.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=it_IT.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Sorry for the little long description, i asked upstream for a better.

You can found preliminary package (untested and probably broken) at

deb http://www.prato.linux.it/~mnencia/debian openwengo/
deb-src http://www.prato.linux.it/~mnencia/debian openwengo/

Ciao

-- 
-
|Marco Nenciarini| Debian/GNU Linux Developer - Plug Member |
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.prato.linux.it/~mnencia   |
-
Key fingerprint = FED9 69C7 9E67 21F5 7D95  5270 6864 730D F095 E5E4



signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: ITP: wengophone -- A free SIP softphone

2006-02-08 Thread Marco Nenciarini
On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 02:25:29PM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
 On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 08:21:42PM +0100, Marco Nenciarini wrote:
  Package: wnpp
  Severity: wishlist
  Owner: Marco Nenciarini [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  * Package name: wengophone
Version : 0.99+svn4179
Upstream Author : Wengo SAS wengophone-devel@lists.openwengo.com
  * URL : http://dev.openwengo.com/
  * License : GPL with exception for ssl linking
Description : A free SIP softphone
  
   WengoPhone Classic is a Voice and Video Over IP application based on
   standard protocols like SIP and RTP.
  
  Sorry for the little long description, i asked upstream for a better.
 You're allowed, indeed, encouraged, to supply your own description of
 the package.

Yes, but my english is not so fluent to make a good description.

Ciao

-- 
-
|Marco Nenciarini| Debian/GNU Linux Developer - Plug Member |
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.prato.linux.it/~mnencia   |
-
Key fingerprint = FED9 69C7 9E67 21F5 7D95  5270 6864 730D F095 E5E4



signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: Need help with Bug#217974: ttt_1.7-1(ia64/unstable): FTBFS: config.guess out of date (at least)

2003-11-04 Thread Marco Nenciarini
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 07:41:31AM +0100, Thomas Scheffczyk wrote:
 Hello,
 
 as a new (unexperienced) maintainer I need help with this error of the 
 ttt package:
 
 creating cache ./config.cache
 checking host system type... Invalid configuration `ia64-linux': machine 
 `ia64' not recognized
 
 checking target system type... Invalid configuration `ia64-linux': machine 
 `ia64' not recognized
 
 checking build system type... Invalid configuration `ia64-linux': machine 
 `ia64' not recognized
 
 
 I checked the file 'config.guess'. 'ia64' is defined and should be 
 recognized. Without access to a computer of this architecture I don't 
 know how to handle this error. Perhaps anybody of you can give me a clue.
 

Add to your debian/rules file this target, and add a dipendency to autotools
to clean target.
Don't forget to add autotools to PHONY, and add debscripts and autotools-dev
to build deps.

# The autotools target adds forced build-time dependencies on
# autotools-dev (for /usr/share/misc/config.*) and debscripts (for dch)
# It's also a .PHONY make target.
autotools:
OLDDATESUB=`./config.sub -t | tr -d -` ;\
OLDDATEGUESS=`./config.guess -t | tr -d -` ;\
NEWDATESUB=`/usr/share/misc/config.sub -t | tr -d -` ;\
NEWDATEGUESS=`/usr/share/misc/config.guess -t | tr -d -` ;\
if [ $$OLDDATESUB -lt $$NEWDATESUB -o \
 $$OLDDATEGUESS -lt $$NEWDATEGUESS ]; then \
   dch -a -p GNU config automated update: config.sub\
 ($$OLDDATESUB to $$NEWDATESUB), config.guess\
 ($$OLDDATEGUESS to $$NEWDATEGUESS) ;\
   cp -f /usr/share/misc/config.sub config.sub ;\
   cp -f /usr/share/misc/config.guess config.guess ;\
   echo WARNING: GNU config scripts updated from master copies 12 ;\
fi


Bye

-- 
-
|Marco Nenciarini| Debian/GNU Linux Developer - Plug Member |
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.prato.linux.it/~mnencia   |
-
Key fingerprint = FED9 69C7 9E67 21F5 7D95  5270 6864 730D F095 E5E4



pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Need help with Bug#217974: ttt_1.7-1(ia64/unstable): FTBFS: config.guess out of date (at least)

2003-11-04 Thread Marco Nenciarini
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 07:41:31AM +0100, Thomas Scheffczyk wrote:
 Hello,
 
 as a new (unexperienced) maintainer I need help with this error of the 
 ttt package:
 
 creating cache ./config.cache
 checking host system type... Invalid configuration `ia64-linux': machine 
 `ia64' not recognized
 
 checking target system type... Invalid configuration `ia64-linux': machine 
 `ia64' not recognized
 
 checking build system type... Invalid configuration `ia64-linux': machine 
 `ia64' not recognized
 
 
 I checked the file 'config.guess'. 'ia64' is defined and should be 
 recognized. Without access to a computer of this architecture I don't 
 know how to handle this error. Perhaps anybody of you can give me a clue.
 

Add to your debian/rules file this target, and add a dipendency to autotools
to clean target.
Don't forget to add autotools to PHONY, and add debscripts and autotools-dev
to build deps.

# The autotools target adds forced build-time dependencies on
# autotools-dev (for /usr/share/misc/config.*) and debscripts (for dch)
# It's also a .PHONY make target.
autotools:
OLDDATESUB=`./config.sub -t | tr -d -` ;\
OLDDATEGUESS=`./config.guess -t | tr -d -` ;\
NEWDATESUB=`/usr/share/misc/config.sub -t | tr -d -` ;\
NEWDATEGUESS=`/usr/share/misc/config.guess -t | tr -d -` ;\
if [ $$OLDDATESUB -lt $$NEWDATESUB -o \
 $$OLDDATEGUESS -lt $$NEWDATEGUESS ]; then \
   dch -a -p GNU config automated update: config.sub\
 ($$OLDDATESUB to $$NEWDATESUB), config.guess\
 ($$OLDDATEGUESS to $$NEWDATEGUESS) ;\
   cp -f /usr/share/misc/config.sub config.sub ;\
   cp -f /usr/share/misc/config.guess config.guess ;\
   echo WARNING: GNU config scripts updated from master copies 12 ;\
fi


Bye

-- 
-
|Marco Nenciarini| Debian/GNU Linux Developer - Plug Member |
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.prato.linux.it/~mnencia   |
-
Key fingerprint = FED9 69C7 9E67 21F5 7D95  5270 6864 730D F095 E5E4



pgpN0ZWCfaIes.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: developping of deb and clean dpkg database

2001-03-31 Thread Marco Nenciarini

On Sat, Mar 31, 2001 at 12:09:11PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
 During the development of a new deb package, my dpkg database is going
 to increase its dirty-level.
 Packages that are being developped got installed and deinstalled, change
 names, change sections and so on...
 The result ? My dpkg database contains info about many packages that
 does not exists or that does not belong to the right section.
 
 Is there a clean way to remove info related to some packages ?
 Currently my solution is to manually edit /var/lib/dpkg/* files, but I
 wonder about the existence of some cleaner way to do it.
 

From dpkg manual:

   dpkg --clear-avail
  Erase  the existing information about what packages
  are available.

Best Regards

-- 

| Marco Nenciarini | Debian/GNU Linux User - Plug Member   |
|  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  | http://www.prato.linux.it/~mnencia|

Key fingerprint = FED9 69C7 9E67 21F5 7D95  5270 6864 730D F095 E5E4


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: developping of deb and clean dpkg database

2001-03-31 Thread Marco Nenciarini
On Sat, Mar 31, 2001 at 12:09:11PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
 During the development of a new deb package, my dpkg database is going
 to increase its dirty-level.
 Packages that are being developped got installed and deinstalled, change
 names, change sections and so on...
 The result ? My dpkg database contains info about many packages that
 does not exists or that does not belong to the right section.
 
 Is there a clean way to remove info related to some packages ?
 Currently my solution is to manually edit /var/lib/dpkg/* files, but I
 wonder about the existence of some cleaner way to do it.
 

From dpkg manual:

   dpkg --clear-avail
  Erase  the existing information about what packages
  are available.

Best Regards

-- 

| Marco Nenciarini | Debian/GNU Linux User - Plug Member   |
|  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  | http://www.prato.linux.it/~mnencia|

Key fingerprint = FED9 69C7 9E67 21F5 7D95  5270 6864 730D F095 E5E4



Re: Looking for Sponsor (was Re: Looking for Advocate)

2001-03-27 Thread Marco Nenciarini
Adrian Bunk wrote:
 
 On Wed, 14 Mar 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 I can sponsor and advocate you when you:
 - raise the Standards-Version of the package to at least 3.1.0
   (you have to include build dependencies for this)
 - send an ITP and close it in the changelog
 

Thank you for your interest.

I have done these tasks, and I have added the package of htcheck.

the files are available at: http://www.prato.linux.it/~mnencia/debian

thanks again

-- 

| Marco Nenciarini | Debian/GNU Linux User - Plug Member   |
|  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  | http://www.prato.linux.it/~mnencia|

Key fingerprint = FED9 69C7 9E67 21F5 7D95  5270 6864 730D F095 E5E4