Bug#922965: RFS: arduino-package/1.0 [ITP] --friendly greeter
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "arduino-package" * Package name: arduino-package Version : 1.0 Upstream Author : Philipp Meisberger * URL : https://github.com/philippmeisberger/arduino-package.git * License : D-FSL Section : shells It builds those binary packages: arduino-package - Utility for creating Arduino Debian packages To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/arduino-package Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/arduino-package/arduino-package_1.0.dsc More information about arduino-package can be obtained from https://github.com/philippmeisberger/arduino-package. Regards, Philipp Meisberger signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#922964: RFS: python-fingerprint/1.5 [ITP]
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "python-fingerprint" * Package name: python-fingerprint Version : 1.5 Upstream Author : Bastian Raschke * URL : https://github.com/bastianraschke/pyfingerprint * License : D-FSL Section : python It builds those binary packages: python-fingerprint - Python 2 written library for using ZhianTec fingerprint sensors python3-fingerprint - Python 3 written library for using ZhianTec fingerprint sensors To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/python-fingerprint Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/python-fingerprint/python-fingerprint_1.5.dsc More information about python-fingerprint can be obtained from https://github.com/bastianraschke/pyfingerprint. Changes since the last upload: Added support for Python 3 (still compatible with Python 2) Regards, Philipp Meisberger signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#922963: RFS: gamewake/3.5.1 [ITP] -- friendly greeter
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gamewake" * Package name: gamewake Version : 3.5.1 Upstream Author : Philipp Meisberger * URL : https://github.com/philippmeisberger/gamewake.git * License : D-FSL Section : utils It builds those binary packages: gamewake - Alarm clock application To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/gamewake Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gamewake/gamewake_3.5.1.dsc More information about gamewake can be obtained from https://www.pm-codeworks.de/gamewake-en.html. Regards, Philipp Meisberger signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#922966: RFS: eclipse-package/1.0 [ITP]
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "eclipse-package" * Package name: eclipse-package Version : 1.0 Upstream Author : Philipp Meisberger * URL : https://github.com/philippmeisberger/eclipse-package.git * License : D-FSL Section : shells It builds those binary packages: eclipse-package - Utility for creating Eclipse Debian packages To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/eclipse-package Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/e/eclipse-package/eclipse-package_1.0.dsc More information about eclipse-package can be obtained from https://www.pm-codeworks.de/eclipse-package-en.html. Regards, Philipp Meisberger signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#923157: RFS: libpam-fingerprint/1.5 [ITP]
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libpam-fingerprint" * Package name: libpam-fingerprint Version : 1.5 Upstream Author : Philipp Meisberger * URL : https://github.com/philippmeisberger/pam-fingerprint.git * License : D-FSL Section : admin It builds those binary packages: libpam-fingerprint - Pluggable Authentication Module for fingerprint authentication To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/libpam-fingerprint Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libp/libpam-fingerprint/libpam-fingerprint_1.5.dsc More information about libpam-fingerprint can be obtained from https://github.com/philippmeisberger/pam-fingerprint. Changes since the last upload: * Added --check-user option to pamfingerprint-conf * Removed pamfingerprint-check * Ensure system user exists before adding Regards, Philipp Meisberger signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#923158: RFS: libpam-rfid/1.4 [ITP] -- friendly greeter
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libpam-rfid" * Package name: libpam-rfid Version : 1.4 Upstream Author : Philipp Meisberger * URL : https://github.com/philippmeisberger/pam-rfid.git * License : D-FSL Section : admin It builds those binary packages: libpam-rfid - Pluggable Authentication Module for hardware authentication via RFID To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/libpam-rfid Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libp/libpam-rfid/libpam-rfid_1.4.dsc More information about libpam-rfid can be obtained from https://github.com/philippmeisberger/pam-rfid. Changes since the last upload: * Added --check-user option to pamrfid-conf * Removed pamrfid-check * Ensure system user exists before adding Regards, Philipp Meisberger signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#923162: RFS: python-rfid/1.2 [ITP] -- friendly greeter
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "python-rfid" * Package name: python-rfid Version : 1.2 Upstream Author : Philipp Meisberger * URL : https://github.com/philippmeisberger/pyrfid.git * License : D-FSL Section : python It builds those binary packages: python-rfid - Python 2 written library for an 125kHz RFID reader python3-rfid - Python 3 written library for an 125kHz RFID reader To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/python-rfid Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/python-rfid/python-rfid_1.2.dsc More information about python-rfid can be obtained from https://github.com/philippmeisberger/pyrfid. Changes since the last upload: * Added support for Python3 (still compatible with Python 2) Regards, Philipp Meisberger signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#923162: RFS: python-rfid/1.2 [ITP] -- friendly greeter
Hi Andrius, thanks for your remarks, especially "pybuild". Really simple now. Sure, removing files from "/usr/local/" was a fix for an ancient previous version. I removed it. I also tried to fix all Lintian warnings. I am not very familiar with all RFID protocols. So I cannot say EM4100 is popular or not. I agree, that "python-em4100" would be a better package name, but I maintain the project since 2014. So if the name changes there must be at least the virtual package "python-rfid". I also heard, that Python 2 will be superseded completely by Python 3 this year. What is your opinion about the Python 2 package? Is it still necessary? Best regards, Philipp Am 26.02.19 um 16:26 schrieb Andrius Merkys: > Hi Philipp, > > On Sun, 24 Feb 2019 17:16:16 +0100 Philipp Meisberger > wrote: >> To access further information about this package, please visit the >> following URL: >> >> https://mentors.debian.net/package/python-rfid > > I gave your package a look and wrote some comments on the mentors.d.n > (not sure if you are subscribed to notifications there, thus a ping). > While the package seemingly builds and installs fine, there are some > things that need to be fixed to make your package acceptable in Debian. > > Best wishes, > Andrius > signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#922965: Bug#923220: DFSG compliance concerns
Hi, it is correct that the package just builds a .deb file which contains full functional Arduino IDE. Simple and clean. What about the java-package and DFSG? It is very similar to my package and also does not build a .deb from source but is contained in Debian. Regards, Philipp Am 03.03.19 um 13:07 schrieb Rock Storm: > Hi all, > > @Carsten, as was pointed out `arduino-builder` and this package are > completely different, though the name of course might be misleading. > > @Philipp, I looked at your script. It effectively builds a '.deb' file > which can be installed. However you are not building the Arduino IDE, > your package simply contains the very binaries provided by upstream. > That is not the way Debian works. The binaries shipped in a Debian > package must be built from source. We must make sure the building is > reproducible and achievable on all supported architectures. > > Therefore this software somehow promotes practices that I'd say are > against the DFSG. > > Regards, > signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#923162: RFS: python-rfid/1.2 [ITP] -- friendly greeter
Hi, the doc/RDM6300_doc.pdf is just a datasheet taken from https://elty.pl/upload/download/RFID/RDM630-Spec.pdf. Should I remove it since I do not have a build script? Nevertheless the PDF is excluded from Debian package. I prefer having just one repo. But if it is necessary I upload it on salsa. Regards, Philipp Am 28.02.19 um 17:35 schrieb Andrey Rahmatullin: > On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 06:24:43PM +0200, Andrius Merkys wrote: >> 1. Please separate the packaging of your project (the src/debian/ >> directory) and place it in a packaging repository on salsa.debian.org. >> This is the usual practice now. > I can't call this "the usual practice". The usual practice is publishing a > repo that allows building a Debian package but we don't require that. The > usual practice is publishing it on salsa but we don't require that either. > As for the repo contents, the usual practice is a branch with upstream > sources merged into a branch with upstream sources + debian. And when you > publish a packaging repo it should be an useful packaging repo and not > just something on salsa. > >> 5. Is doc/RDM6300_doc.pdf your own creation, or taken from somewhere >> else? In the latter case, please take into consideration possible >> licensing restrictions on its usage. > The bigger problem is that the package must also ship the PDF sources and > build scripts. > signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
