Bug#842520: RFS: glances/2.7.1.1-1
On Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 11:47:15PM (-0500), Daniel Echeverry wrote: > Could you check it out again? > https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/glances.git > > Really, thank you very much! Hello Daniel, Gianfranco, Sorry Daniel for the delay on this one :-/ Just fixed a lintian warning, switched to debhelper 10, and changed my Debian email :) Thanks for the fix and licences changes! @Gianfranco, you want to sponsor/upload this package? Or I'll manage this? Thanks! Seb signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#814597: RFS: glances/2.5.1-1 [ITA] -- Curses-based monitoring tool
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "glances" * Package name: glances Version : 2.5.1-1 Upstream Author : Nicolas Hennion * URL : http://nicolargo.github.com/glances/ * License : LGPL Section : utils It builds those binary packages: glances - Curses-based monitoring tool To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/glances Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/glances/glances_2.5.1-1.dsc More information about glances can be obtained from here: https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/glances.git https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/glances Regards, Sebastien -- Sebastien Badia signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#807627: RFS: taskd/1.1.0+dfsg-1 [ITP]
On Sun, Dec 27, 2015 at 10:23:47AM (+0100), Tobias Frost wrote: > Package's fine, only two smalls things to fix: > -> d/copyright The comment for Files-Excluded should use the Comment: > Tag > -> please run dch -r "" to update d/changelog dates. (It has you name > in it -- Refer to Policy §4.4; dch -r "" should make sure, though) Hi! Thanks Tobias! Just fixed, Seb signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#807627: RFS: taskd/1.1.0+dfsg-1 [ITP]
On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 07:19:47PM (+0100), Tobias Frost wrote: > Patches: > - Please forward the patches to upstream more aggresively. > For example, /tmp/taskd.pid is a BUG, because pid files are supposed to > be in run (or var/run as legacy path) > - Reproducible builds should not be only for Debian, forward them to > make them aware of the importance of reproducible builds. > - There is one patch that has not an "Forwarded" indication. > - Some patches have been applied upstream, please add a "Applied- > Upstream" Header (bonis: with a reference to be commit, if easily > found.) > > - get-orig-source.sh seems to remove some files, however they > should be also mentioned in d/copyright Files-Excluded and also > explain why they are removed and who it would be dfsg-non-free > otherwise. (README.source) > Looking at the script, it seems that you are not repacking because of > DFSG problems, but just to stip unneeded files. If you do that, "dfsg" > would be wrong, use "ds" or "repack" instead. > > - postinst seems to fiddle with the config file, which is installed by > the package. This is discouraged, as this will lead in subsequent > installations to a prompt asking the user what to be done > (The conf file has been modified ) This is actually a RC bug > (Policy 10.7.3 -- must not ask uneccessary questions) > I recommend either install a file already populated with (sane) > defaults OR not to ship the (empty) conffile at all but to create it > during install. (Note, when not shipping the conffile,you also have to > handle purges in postrm manually) > > Nitpicks: > - trailing whitespaces in README.Debian > - TODO.Debian mentions the init.d script as not yet present. > - d/control: dh-systemd does not need a versioned dep. > - d/copyright: the comment for the debian section is not needed > - prefer using d/clean instead of override_dh_autoclean > - d/taskd.dirs is not needed. > > > The conffile thing is a show stopper, otherwise the package seems > ready. > > I did not perform copyright review yet. Hi here, Many thanks Tobias for this review! Just fixed all the issues/comments, if you want to re-take a look, it would be super cool! About repack, I just queried to upstream about src/tls/* (GNUTLS examples, but apparently unused: https://bug.tasktools.org/browse/TD-110), we could maybe wait an answer, generally Paul answer quickly. And for config file I finally decided to ship a generated config file in order to avoid init questions, let me know what do you think about. Thanks! Seb signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#807627: RFS: taskd/1.1.0+dfsg-1 [ITP]
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "taskd" * Package name: taskd Version : 1.1.0+dfsg-1 Upstream Author : Paul Beckingham * URL : http://taskwarrior.org * License : MIT Section : utils It builds those binary packages: taskd - Synchronisation server for taskwarrior To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/taskd Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/t/taskd/taskd_1.1.0+dfsg-1.dsc Note: This is the first upload of taskd package (ITP). Thanks in advance, cheers, Seb signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#807626: RFS: taskwarrior/2.5.0+dfsg-1
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "taskwarrior" * Package name: taskwarrior Version : 2.5.0+dfsg-1 Upstream Author : Paul Beckingham * URL : http://taskwarrior.org * License : MIT Section : utils It builds those binary packages: task - feature-rich console based todo list manager To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/task Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/t/task/task_2.5.0+dfsg-1.dsc Note: This upload introduce the new upstream version 2.5.0. Thanks in advance, cheers, Seb signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#802536: RFS: python-ncclient/0.4.5-1
On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 11:18:08AM (+0200), Thomas Goirand wrote: > Hi Seb, > > A quick review then. > > Both Ubuntu LTS and Debian Stable have version >= 3.3.1 of python-lxml, > so you don't need to specify the version in debian/control. > > Same remark for paramiko. > > Your package doesn't run any of the upstream tests. Why? > > Both -lxml and -paramiko could be in build-depends-indep. > > In the doc's conf.py, there's "sphinx.ext.intersphinx". This is to be > patched out, so that the package doesn't do network access during build. Hi! Thanks zigo for the review, Just fixed the package according your valuable comments, if you have a bit of time in order to re-take a look it would be cool :-) Thanks in advance! https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/python-ncclient http://mentors.debian.net/package/python-ncclient http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/python-ncclient/python-ncclient_0.4.5-1.dsc Seb signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#802536: RFS: python-ncclient/0.4.5-1
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "python-ncclient" * Package name: python-ncclient Version : 0.4.5-1 Upstream Author : Leonidas Poulopoulos * URL : http://ncclient.org/ * License : Apache-2 Section : python It builds those binary packages: python-ncclient - Python library for NETCONF clients To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/python-ncclient Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/python-ncclient/python-ncclient_0.4.5-1.dsc Note: This upload introduce the new upstream version 0.4.5 (pre python3.x). Thanks in advance, cheers, Seb -- Sebastien Badia signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#778728: RFS: task/2.4.1-1 [ITA] -- feature-rich console based todo list manager
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 08:52:35PM (+0100), Tobias Frost wrote: Ok, continuing... -> please document every change in d/changelog. For example, the change in the patch no-task-rel.patch is not documented (there are more, non mentioned changes on the patches) -> (for clarifaction of above: with cleanup patches I mean delete old patches no longer needed.) -> the upstream tarball is not identical with yours. The original upstream tarball does not include taskwarrior test-suite, for this reason, we use GIT source tree. -> You say "tasksh is now a separate project and no longer included in this package" -- does this need a NEWS.Debian file (refer to Developer Reference 6.3.4) You are right, I've just fixed that. -> do you really need tar-ignore in debian/source/options? When building with debuild, the build hangs after while: (However, in pbuilder it builds) Yes! It's because I've not included python and git in BD (requirement for the test suite…) Michel also provide a patch in order to fix the generated binary locations (in the build env). It's now fixed, the package builds correctly in a sid clean schroot: $ curl http://pub.sebian.fr/pub/task_2.4.1%2Bdfsg-1_amd64-20150301-2253.build (...) [ 98%] make[4]: Entering directory '/home/tobi/workspace/deb/mentors/task/task-2.4.1/obj' make[4]: Nothing to be done for 'test/CMakeFiles/eval.t.dir/build'. make[4]: Leaving directory '/home/tobi/workspace/deb/mentors/task/task-2.4.1/obj' /usr/bin/cmake -E cmake_progress_report /home/tobi/workspace/deb/mentors/task/task-2.4.1/obj/CMakeFiles 42 Built target variant_xor.t [100%] Built target eval.t /usr/bin/make -f test/CMakeFiles/test.dir/build.make test/CMakeFiles/test.dir/depend make[4]: Entering directory '/home/tobi/workspace/deb/mentors/task/task-2.4.1/obj' cd /home/tobi/workspace/deb/mentors/task/task-2.4.1/obj && /usr/bin/cmake -E cmake_depends "Unix Makefiles" /home/tobi/workspace/deb/mentors/task/task-2.4.1 /home/tobi/workspace/deb/mentors/task/task-2.4.1/test /home/tobi/workspace/deb/mentors/task/task-2.4.1/obj /home/tobi/workspace/deb/mentors/task/task-2.4.1/obj/test /home/tobi/workspace/deb/mentors/task/task-2.4.1/obj/test/CMakeFiles/test.dir/DependInfo.cmake --color= Scanning dependencies of target test make[4]: Leaving directory '/home/tobi/workspace/deb/mentors/task/task-2.4.1/obj' /usr/bin/make -f test/CMakeFiles/test.dir/build.make test/CMakeFiles/test.dir/build make[4]: Entering directory '/home/tobi/workspace/deb/mentors/task/task-2.4.1/obj' cd /home/tobi/workspace/deb/mentors/task/task-2.4.1/obj/test && ./run_all --verbose # /home/tobi/workspace/deb/mentors/task/task-2.4.1/test/abbreviation.t Bottom line it does not look bad. However, please use this opportunity to create a state-of-the-art package and especially look at the DFSG change. The DFSG change seems legit, according Jakub bug (737478) Let me know what you think about the points. I completely agree with your points, I've just fixed the package according your remarks and uploaded on mentors: http://mentors.debian.net/package/task http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/t/task/task_2.4.1+dfsg-1.dsc Or through the living GIT repository on collab-maint: https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/task.git Thanks again for your reviews! Let me know if other things are not OK. Seb -- Sebastien Badia signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#778728: RFS: task/2.4.1-1 [ITA] -- feature-rich console based todo list manager
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 10:04:28AM (+0100), Tobias Frost wrote: Hi Sebastien, Thanks for adopting the package. I will sponsor your upload. (However, I cannot do it now, but I will do a througouh review tonight or tomorrow) Hi Tobias, Sorry for the delay, and many thanks for the review and valuable comments! Some first remarks: -> I recommend to avoid uploading a new upstream version to sid during the freeze. Use experimental. You are right, I've just fixed that. -> please integrate get-orig-source.sh into d/rules if it is still required (is the new source now DFSG compliant? If so, document that in the changelog!) The upstream tgz is still not DFSG compliant, we still remove pdf doc files (#737478). -> please update d/rules to short debhelper format It's more cleaner now \o/ I think it's ok now. -> please upgrade to debhelper compat level 9 -> please cleanup d/patches for patches applied upstream and check if not-forwarded patches should be forwarded Fixed, also suffixed by .patch extension and prefixed by a number id. -> you can drop the B-D version constraint on dpkg-dev -- even oldstable fulfilles it A relic of the past :-) -> can you please check if the override for conflicts-with-version is valid? (I did not check the details, so this could be wrong; it just smells like you want to have Replaces: and Breaks: here, see Policy 7.6.1) If you do a change here, be sure to properly test this. Just checked, and according Policy §7.6.1 I've replaced Conflicts by Breaks, It seems working. Thanks again for the help! Seb -- Sebastien Badia signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#778728: RFS: task/2.4.1-1 [ITA] -- feature-rich console based todo list manager
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "task" * Package name: task Version : 2.4.1-1 Upstream Author : Paul Beckingham Federico Hernandez * URL : http://taskwarrior.org * License : MIT Section : utils It builds those binary packages: task - feature-rich console based todo list manager - transitional packa taskwarrior - feature-rich console based todo list manager To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/task Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/t/task/task_2.4.1-1.dsc More information about hello can be obtained from http://taskwarrior.org. Changes since the last upload: [ Gordon Ball ] * Refresh patchs according new upstream release * tests-fail.diff (fixed upstream, TW-1296) * tests-for-released-version.diff (fixed upstream) * tests-count-eom.diff (fixed upstream, TW-1295) * fix-task-sync-man-url.diff (fixed upstream) * Enable GnuTLS support (closes: #741625, LP: #1344560) * tasksh is now a separate project and no longer included in this package [ Sebastien Badia ] * New upstream release: 2.4.1 (LP: #1286939) * New maintainer (co-maint. with Gordon) (closes: #762130) * Convert debian/copyright to dep5 format * Update standard-version (no changes) * Get package lintian clean * fix quilt-patch-missing-description * fix manpage-has-errors-from-man * fix hyphen-used-as-minus-sign Thanks in advance! Regards, Seb -- Sebastien Badia signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#733578: hwinfo/21.0-1 needs updates / FTBFS of libx86emu
On Mon, Feb 03, 2014 at 05:53:41PM (+0100), Tomasz Buchert wrote: […] > I pushed the restricted version of libx86emu to the git repository. > > Both libx86emu and hwinfo build lintian-clean in my jessie pbuilder (well, > excepting debian-watch-may-check-gpg-signature, to be fair). Hwinfo > debian/control > must be updated if you agree what I said above. Hi, I completely agree with you Tomasz! I've just uploaded a new version of libx86emu on mentors. It build fine in sid: $ curl http://pub.sebian.fr/pub/libx86emu_1.4-2_amd64-20140316-1301.build @Johann or @Vincent, if you agree, can you sponsor this upload ? Thanks in advance! Seb -- Sebastien Badia -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140316122241.ga23...@sebian.fr
Bug#733578: hwinfo/21.0-1 needs updates / FTBFS of libx86emu
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 02:46:33AM (+0100), Johann Felix Soden wrote: > Hi Sebastien, hi Tomasz, > > I have not yet completely reviewed hwinfo 21.0-1, but > there is at least one thing which needs to be fixed: Hi Johann, Thanks for your time and this review! > - debian/libhd21.symbols is incomplete on i386. A fixed version is >attached. > > And I found trailing whitespaces in old debian/changelog entries and > debian/libhd-doc.doc-base. The master branch is up-to-date according your comments, thanks ! > Since related, here some comments about libx86emu: > > At the moment, it FTBFS on some architectures [mips, mipsel, > powerpc, ...] because of missing sys/io.h. > As the new hwinfo depends on it, this restricts the architectures where > it will be available. So this should be fixed before hwinfo is uploaded > - for example by fixing libx86emu itself or by reducing the dependency > to the architectures where it is really available. Hum, and it's not a missing dependency to libc6-dev ? (I'm maybe wrong) > Actually, the libx86 package contains a copy of libx86emu > and has therefore similar problems [1,2]. Please contact Anibal Monsalve > Salazar (ani...@debian.org) who maintains it. Especially for the > security team, it would be nice, if it could use the new libx86emu > package instead of including its own copy. Contacted :-) Thanks a lot, Seb -- Sebastien Badia -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20140129013446.gb29...@grimoire.sebian.fr
Bug#736989: RFS: r10k/1.1.3-1 [ITP]
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "r10k" * Package name: r10k Version : 1.1.3-1 Upstream Author : Adrien Thebo * URL : https://github.com/adrienthebo/r10k * License : Apache-2.0 Section : ruby It builds those binary packages: r10k - Puppet environment and module deployment To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/r10k Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/r10k/r10k_1.1.3-1.dsc More information about r10k can be obtained from: https://github.com/adrienthebo/r10k/blob/master/README.markdown Thanks in advance, Regards, -- Sebastien Badia -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20140129005127.gb24...@grimoire.sebian.fr
Bug#736671: RFS: asused/3.72-11 [ITA]
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 10:38:43PM (+0100), Rodolfo García Peñas wrote: > Sebastien, some comments. Your package seems to be fine, good job, but some > changes are welcome. Hi Rodolfo, Thanks a lot! > I will upload the package after these changes. I've just uploaded a new version on mentors according your comments. Thank you ! Seb -- Sebastien Badia -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20140128224135.ga11...@grimoire.sebian.fr
Bug#736671: RFS: asused/3.72-11 [ITA]
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 07:42:59AM (+0800), Paul Wise wrote: > On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 5:12 AM, Rodolfo García Peñas (kix) wrote: > > > asused was removed because now the Local Internet Registers can download > > their information using a web API. > > > > This package should be removed, without replacement. > > If you actually need the package for something it would be interesting > to find out our use-case. Hi Paul, Rodolfo, I've not misunderstood your suggestion, but as said Rodolfo asused (and web-asused too) was removed (since 11/19/2012¹) and replaced by IP-analyser². The problem is that IP-analyser require a RIPE-NCC account attached to a LIR whereas asused not (because it uses directly whois query). And IP-analyser API³ require also a authentication token… But this use-case is shared only by ±30⁴ other persons :-) Therefore we do anything with this package? RoQA anyway? Thanks, Seb ¹https://www.ripe.net/data-tools/web-asused ²https://lirportal.ripe.net/ipanalyser/ ³http://www.ripe.net/data-tools/developer-documentation/the-lir-portal-ip-analyser-api ⁴http://qa.debian.org/popcon.php?package=asused -- Sebastien Badia -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20140127004410.ga24...@grimoire.sebian.fr
Bug#736671: RFS: asused/3.72-11 [ITA]
On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 08:06:21AM (+0800), Paul Wise wrote: > On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 6:35 AM, Sebastien Badia wrote: > > > * URL : http://www.ripe.net/tools/ > > According to the upstream FTP site, asused has been 'decommissioned'. > I wonder if the package should be replaced in Debian by whatever > replaces it upstream? > > ftp://ftp.ripe.net/tools/OLD/ Hi Paul, Indeed, you're right. I've just uploaded a new version on mentors, according your comments. http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/asused/asused_3.72-11.dsc Thanks ! Seb -- Sebastien Badia Xmpp/mail: -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20140126111314.ga25...@grimoire.sebian.fr
Bug#736671: RFS: asused/3.72-11 [ITA]
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "asused" * Package name: asused Version : 3.72-11 * URL : http://www.ripe.net/tools/ * License : MIT Section : utils It builds those binary packages: asused - This is a tool used for checking various aspects of IP To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/asused Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/asused/asused_3.72-11.dsc Changes since the last upload: asused (3.72-11) unstable; urgency=low * New maintainer (closes: #612901) * Bump Standards-Version to 3.9.5 * Migrate to collab-maint (GIT) * Fixes all lintian warning/errors -- Sebastien Badia Sat, 25 Jan 2014 22:41:34 +0100 Regards, Sebastien Badia -- Sebastien Badia Xmpp/mail: -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20140125223535.gc9...@grimoire.sebian.fr
Bug#733579: RFS: libx86emu/1.4-1 [ITP]
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 05:34:08PM (-0800), Vincent Cheng wrote: > On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 5:26 PM, Johann Felix Soden wrote: > > > I plan also to look at your RFS for hwinfo, but it seems that > > you already have people who can sponsor it... > > That was my line of thinking for libx86emu as well, heh. :) > > Feel free to review and sponsor hwinfo at the same time as libx86emu. > That'll leave me a bit more time to take a stab at some other packages > stuck in the sponsorship-requests backlog right now... Hi, Héhé, the dream of all new involved people in Debian → Too much sponsor \o/ :-p I've just updated and uploaded libx86emu on mentors. Thank you very much to both ! Seb -- Sebastien Badia Xmpp/mail: -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20140123225901.ga20...@grimoire.sebian.fr
Bug#733578: RFS: hwinfo/20.1-1 [ITA] -- Hardware identification system
On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 12:17:34PM (-0200), Eriberto wrote: > You can read more at https://wiki.debian.org/Hardening. Hi, Yes! Thanks Eriberto, @Vincent, thanks for your comments, I've just fixed this, packages are now lintian clean \o/ (libx86emu also) Thanks ! Seb -- Sebastien Badia -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20140119144122.gc15...@grimoire.sebian.fr
Bug#733578: RFS: hwinfo/20.1-1 [ITA] -- Hardware identification system
Hi Vincent, Thank you very much ! According your comments, I've just fixed and uploaded a new version on mentors. If you have any time to re-review this package, I really appreciate. https://mentors.debian.net/package/hwinfo I still have a lintian warning about « hardening-no-relro », but I don't known how to fix it :-/ Thanks ! Best regards, Sebastien -- Sebastien Badia -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20140119114750.gb15...@grimoire.sebian.fr
Bug#733579: RFS: libx86emu/1.4-1 [ITP]
> [Needs work] Johann Felix Soden at 2014-01-04 20:40:10.849740 > > Hi Sebastien, > > I had a look at your package. The most things are well-done, but I found the > following things which you should fix: > > - put the header file and the .so link in a separate -dev package. The idea > of this is, that multiple versions of the library package with different > SONAME can be installed at the same time. See > http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-sharedlibs.html > Do not forget to remove the lintian override. > > - complete debian/copyright: >Include all copyright holders and the full license text (see e.g. the > header of decode.c) > > - enable hardening: > DEB_BUILD_HARDENING=1 works only with hardening-wrapper (which is not in > the build-deps). > Use instead in debian/rules > DPKG_EXPORT_BUILDFLAGS = 1 > include /usr/share/dpkg/buildflags.mk > and add $(LDFLAGS) to the final linking for the "-Wl,-z,relro" flag > see https://wiki.debian.org/Hardening > > - remove line 3-7 of debian/rules - this comment is not necessary > > - remove trailing whitespaces in debian/copyright > > I did not yet look at everything, so there might be more to fix. > > Best regards, > Johann Felix Soden Hi Johann, Thank you very much ! According your comments, I've just fixed and uploaded a new version on mentors. If you have any time to re-review this package, I really appreciate. https://mentors.debian.net/package/libx86emu I still have a lintian warning about « hardening-no-relro », but I don't known how to fix it :-/ Thanks ! Best regards, Sebastien -- Sebastien Badia Xmpp/mail: -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20140119114446.ga15...@grimoire.sebian.fr
Bug#733579: RFS: libx86emu/1.4-1 [ITP] -- x86 emulation library
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libx86emu" * Package name: libx86emu Version : 1.4-1 Upstream Author : Steffen Winterfeldt * URL : https://github.com/wfeldt/libx86emu * License : BSD Section : libs It builds those binary packages: libx86emu1 - x86 emulation library To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/libx86emu Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libx/libx86emu/libx86emu_1.4-1.dsc More information about libx86emu can be obtained from : http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/libx86emu.git Note: libx86emu1 is needed by hwinfo 20.1-1 package. Regards, Seb -- Sebastien Badia Xmpp/mail: signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#733578: RFS: hwinfo/20.1-1 [ITA] -- Hardware identification system
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "hwinfo" * Package name: hwinfo Version : 20.1-1 Upstream Author : Steffen Winterfeldt * URL : https://github.com/openSUSE/hwinfo * License : GPL-2 Section : admin It builds those binary packages: hwinfo - Hardware identification system libhd-dev - Hardware identification system library and headers libhd-doc - Hardware identification system library documentation libhd20- Hardware identification system library To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/hwinfo Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/h/hwinfo/hwinfo_20.1-1.dsc More information about hwinfo can be obtained from: http://packages.qa.debian.org/h/hwinfo.html http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/hwinfo.git Note: hwinfo (20.1-1) require lix86emu (1.4-1) http://mentors.debian.net/package/libx86emu http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libx/libx86emu/libx86emu_1.4-1.dsc Regards, Seb -- Sebastien Badia Xmpp/mail: signature.asc Description: Digital signature
