Re: uscan/watch and savannah

2014-10-01 Thread Simon Paillard
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 06:10:39PM +0200, Andreas Rönnquist wrote:
 Does anybody maintain a package which uses Savannah as host for the
 upstream, and uses the savannah file area for its file releases?

sources.debian.net allows you to perform such a search:
http://codesearch.debian.net/search?q=download.savannah+path%3Adebian%2Fwatch

-- 
Simon Paillard


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141001225609.gb7...@mraw.org



Re: Fw: Bug#756654: ITP: rohc -- RObust Header Compression (ROHC) library

2014-08-19 Thread Simon Paillard
Hi,

On Tue, Aug 05, 2014 at 03:07:44PM +0200, Simon Paillard wrote:
 rohc is my first library package, I'd welcome a review.

I'd be glad if someone can have a look:
dsc at https://people.debian.org/~spaillard/rohc/1.7.0/rohc_1.7.0-1.dsc

 My ITP is attached.
[..] 
 Full lintian output at
 https://people.debian.org/~spaillard/rohc/1.7.0/rohc_1.7.0-1_amd64.changes.lintian
 
 I also wonder how far in precision I shall describe debian/copyright (debmake
 --copyright is a little buggy with the rohc sources as it considers doxygen
 comments as part of license).

debian/copyright is more detailed now.

-- 
Simon Paillard


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140819194913.gr11...@mraw.org



Fw: Bug#756654: ITP: rohc -- RObust Header Compression (ROHC) library

2014-08-05 Thread Simon Paillard
Hi all,

rohc is my first library package, I'd welcome a review.
My ITP is attached.

Furthermore, there is a lintian warning I can't get fixed:
W: librohc-dev: duplicate-changelog-files 
usr/share/doc/librohc-dev/ChangeLog.gz usr/share/doc/librohc-dev/changelog.gz

Full lintian output at
https://people.debian.org/~spaillard/rohc/1.7.0/rohc_1.7.0-1_amd64.changes.lintian

I also wonder how far in precision I shall describe debian/copyright (debmake
--copyright is a little buggy with the rohc sources as it considers doxygen
comments as part of license).

Thanks in advance !

-- 
Simon Paillard
---BeginMessage---
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Simon Paillard spaill...@debian.org

* Package name: rohc
  Version : 1.7.0
  Upstream Author : Didier Barvaux did...@rohc-lib.org
* URL : http://rohc-lib.org/
* License : LGPL-2.1+
  Programming Lang: C
  Description : RObust Header Compression (ROHC) library

RObust Header Compression (ROHC) is a standardized method defined by the IETF
in RFC3095 to compress the IP, UDP, RTP, and TCP headers of Internet packets.
This compression scheme differs from other compression schemes by the fact that
it performs well over links where the packet loss rate is high, such as
wireless links

The library is also provided with application like rohctunnel, which makes a
ROHC-over-UDP or ROHC-over-Ethernet tunnel.

The library is also used by packages not (yet?) in Debian:
* http://opensand.org/ A satellite telecommunication system emulation platform
* Patched versions of openvpn

A first version of packaging is available at
http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/users/spaillard/rohc.git/
https://people.debian.org/~spaillard/rohc/1.7.0/

I don't need a sponsor, but I'd welcome reviewers as it's my first library 
package.

-- 
Simon Paillard


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140731202323.23976.61280.reportbug@toshi


---End Message---


Re: Fw: Bug#756654: ITP: rohc -- RObust Header Compression (ROHC) library

2014-08-05 Thread Simon Paillard
On Tue, Aug 05, 2014 at 03:40:37PM +0200, Gergely Nagy wrote:
 Simon Paillard spaill...@debian.org writes:
 
  Furthermore, there is a lintian warning I can't get fixed:
  W: librohc-dev: duplicate-changelog-files 
  usr/share/doc/librohc-dev/ChangeLog.gz 
  usr/share/doc/librohc-dev/changelog.gz
 
 If you remove ChangeLog from debian/docs, that should get it fixed.
 dh_installchangelogs will pick up the upstream one.
 
 For the future, if you set DH_VERBOSE=1 when building the package,
 debhelper will tell you what it is doing, and you'll see which command
 is copying which file where. That should help you to resolve similar
 issues in the future.

Thanks Gergely, indeed debian/docs interfered with dh_installchangelogs.

-- 
Simon Paillard


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140805141820.gu32...@mraw.org



Re: How to enable an apache.conf file

2011-11-22 Thread Simon Paillard
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 08:07:39PM +0100, Arno Töll wrote:
 On 22.11.2011 18:54, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
I am installing a default apache.conf file but I am missing a neat
  step where this conf file would be enabled automatically. What tools
  can I use to do that ?
 
 By policy you must use wrapper tools provided by the Apache server. That
 means, you are supposed to call a2enmod in your postinst maintainer script.
 
 Do not forget to disable your module on purge with a2dismod.

http://webapps-common.alioth.debian.org/draft/html/ch-httpd.html also mentions
you should create in the conf.d of the http server, using a symlink.
 

-- 
Simon Paillard


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/2022192639.gq16...@glenfiddich.mraw.org



multiarch and lintian (was: most_5.0.0a-2.1_amd64.changes REJECTED)

2011-11-21 Thread Simon Paillard
Hi,

On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 11:48:12PM +, Debian FTP Masters wrote:
 Reject Reasons:
 most: lintian output: 'binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath usr/bin/most 
 /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu', automatically rejected package.
 most: If you have a good reason, you may override this lintian tag.

It seems to me it is a lintian false positive regarding multiarch path.
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=646817
Diff at http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=643339#23

In such a case, I find unfortunate to add a temporally override.
Should I wait for backported lintian to reach ftp-master ? 

Or am I wrong somewhere ?

Thanks,

-- 
Simon Paillard


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/2021212911.gk16...@glenfiddich.mraw.org



Re: multiarch and lintian (was: most_5.0.0a-2.1_amd64.changes REJECTED)

2011-11-21 Thread Simon Paillard
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 10:54:09PM +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote:
 * Simon Paillard spaill...@debian.org, 2011-11-21, 22:29:
 most: lintian output: 'binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath usr/bin/most 
 /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu', automatically rejected package.
 It seems to me it is a lintian false positive regarding multiarch path.
 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=646817
 
 Hmm, no #646817 is about private subdirectories /usr/lib/triplet.
 
 In this case, RPATH was set to a directory that's already within
 linker search path. That's always incorrect.
 
 Also, AFAICS this is a regression: most in the archive doesn't
 have any RPATH set.

Thanks for the explanation.

-- 
Simon Paillard


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/2021221743.gm16...@glenfiddich.mraw.org



Re: pbuilder and ${shlibs:Depends}

2011-03-18 Thread Simon Paillard
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 04:46:00PM +0200, Panayiotis Karabassis wrote:
 Hi, I have a question regarding pbuilder.
 
 My Debian package uses ${shlibs:Depends} in its Depends field.
 
 However, in a pbuilder environment not all dependencies are installed,
 and hence ${shlibs:Depends} does not expand to *all* real dependencies.

*Build* dependancies are not automatically guessed, you need to provide
explicit Build-Depends so that pbuilder installs them.

{shlibs:Depends} is to be used to produce dependancies for binary packages.
 
 My question is: how do I add the missing dependencies?
 
 a) Put them in Build-Depends so dpkg-shlibdeps can find them? (ugly)
 b) Drop ${shlibs:Depends} and list them manually?
 c) Something else?

Read:
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ap-pkg-sourcepkg.html
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-sharedlibs.html

-- 
Simon Paillard


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110318193208.gh12...@glenfiddich.ikibiki.org



Re: Change source code will break translations

2011-03-12 Thread Simon Paillard
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 10:04:53AM +0700, Mahyuddin Susanto wrote:
 I just found lintian complaints about typos in source code, but if i
 change/fix it i will break many translations (~5 lines per language).
 
 How can i do for it? make it override or just change it?

Unfuzzy complete translations when correcting typos and spelling
http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/best-pkging-practices.html#s6.5.2.3


-- 
Simon Paillard


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110312132317.gv27...@glenfiddich.ikibiki.org



Re: RFS: poedit (updated package)

2011-02-14 Thread Simon Paillard
Hi,

On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 11:23:07PM +, Pedro Ribeiro wrote:
 I've reviewed this issues and uploaded a new package to mentors.debian.net.
 
 I hope all is solved, now...

Some other suggestions:

- Your patch 01-desktop.patch no longer contains the DEP3 header (present in 
the sid poedit version)
- Add a watch file to monitor upstream releases:
  version=3
  http://sf.net/poedit/poedit-(.+)\.tar\.gz
- quilt to be removed now you use dpkg source v3.

-- 
Simon Paillard


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110214202208.gi31...@glenfiddich.ikibiki.org



Re: How to get packages into 6.0.1?

2011-02-11 Thread Simon Paillard
Hi,

On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 10:22:58AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
 bug #610240 was injected when trying to fix an RC bug in gnumed-client.
 Because this bug was actually not RC but quite nasty (no translations)
 I would like to know what the proper procedure would be to get it into
 6.0.1.

See:
http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/pkgs.html#upload-stable
 

-- 
Simon Paillard


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110211122239.gc25...@glenfiddich.ikibiki.org



Re: RFS: poedit (updated package)

2011-01-25 Thread Simon Paillard
Hi,

On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 11:35:09PM +, Pedro Ribeiro wrote:
 I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.4.6.1-3
 of my package poedit.
 
 It builds these binary packages:
 poedit - gettext catalog editor
 poedit-dbg - gettext catalog editor (debug)
 
 The package appears to be lintian clean.
 
 The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
 - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/poedit
 - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable
 main contrib non-free
 - dget
 http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/poedit/poedit_1.4.6.1-3.dsc
 
 I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.

Some remarks:

- There should be no debian-changes-1.4.6.1-3, but smaller patches for changes
  specific to Debian.
  debian/patches/01-desktop.patch |   22
  debian/patches/debian-changes-1.4.6.1-3 |88638 

  debian/patches/series   |1

- +++ poedit-1.4.6.1/debian/patches/debian-changes-1.4.6.1-3  2011-01-04 
01:44:08.0 +0100
@@ -0,0 +1,88638 @@
+Description: Upstream changes introduced in version 1.4.6.1-3

Upstream changes are supposed to be present in the upstream tarball
poedit_1.4.6.1.orig.tar.gz

- If you adopt the package, you shoud discuss on #543856 as some other people
  proposed to adopt poedit 
- Once discussion is over, follow carefully how to close oprhaning request at
  http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/#howto-o (it includes closing the bug in the
  Debian changelog)
- IMO, the debian/changelog should only contains entries that have been
  uploaded, so you probably want to discard entries specific to 1.4.6.1-2 and
  1.4.6.1-1, something like:

poedit (1.4.6.1-3) unstable; urgency=low

  * Lintian clean
  * New upstream version (Closes: #556620, #607749).
  * Adopt package (Closes: #543859). -- not the right bug number/package
  * Some minor corrections of this file.

 -- Pedro Ribeiro p.m42.ribe...@gmail.com  Thu, 27 Dec 2010 22:27:00 +0100


-- 
Simon Paillard


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110125084802.gn17...@glenfiddich.ikibiki.org



Re: watch file and kde-looks

2010-10-31 Thread Simon Paillard
On Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 02:28:29AM +0100, Iker Salmón San Millán wrote:
 I am trying to edit properly watch file in order tu be able to use uscan but
 i can't do it.
 I've tried a lot of combinations with no results.  I tought that th solution
 was going to be with downloadurlmangle option but i still have no results
 I don't know if it's posible to configure it with kde-look.

Which is the canonical place where the author publish the tarball ? 
 
 I have also been looking wih githubredir.debian.net but i don't know if it
 works also with gitorius
 http://gitorious.org/wicd-client-kde/
 
 where can i read anything else to find a clue?

Something like
http://gitorious.org/wicd-client-kde/wicd-client-kde/archive-tarball/v0.2.1
will work (but gitorious first reply is NOK, until the tarball is generated
i.e. a few seconds).

-- 
Simon Paillard


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20101101015348.gn27...@glenfiddich.ikibiki.org



Re: roxterm resizing bug serious enough for freeze exception?

2010-10-27 Thread Simon Paillard
Hi,

On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 08:54:06PM +0100, Tony Houghton wrote:
 With some window managers and/or when closing many roxterm tabs rapidly
 with keyboard auto-repeat, closing tabs may cause the window to shrink,
 reducing the number of columns and/or rows in the remaining tabs'
 terminals (see
 https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=3089323group_id=124080atid=698428
 and https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/roxterm/+bug/665730.

 Would this bug be considered serious enough to ask for another freeze
 exception?

It doesn't sound so, unless the patch (any existing patch today?) is small /
not invasive.

You should read the current freeze status:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2010/10/msg2.html

-- 
Simon Paillard


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20101027220032.ge2...@glenfiddich.ikibiki.org



Re: i18n issues, especially man pages

2010-09-05 Thread Simon Paillard
Hi,

On Sun, Sep 05, 2010 at 06:19:56PM +0100, Tony Houghton wrote:
 I've been sent a set of Spanish translations for roxterm, including the
 Docbook XML sources for the man pages, but I can't work out how to
 support internationalisation of these.

(Can't find any bug number for that)

 The first problem is that the translator tells me that the headings -
 NAME, SYNOPSIS, AUTHOR etc - which are generated by
 xmlto/xsltproc, didn't get translated. How can it be made to output
 localised versions?

The XML file needs to contain book lang=en with en can be replaced
by the two-letter ISO code for the language.
Then docbook tools will use their internal translation from
/usr/share/xml/docbook/stylesheet/nwalsh/common/es.xml (in the case of
spanish).

Using po4a is recommended, as it uses translators work (gettext po files
can then be used to translate this XML files, translations
statistics/status, possibility to send translation calls...).
http://po4a.alioth.debian.org/

po4a is good documented, #po4a does exist, you can ask debian-i18n@ as
well.

 Then the man pages are installed by using automake's man_MANS target.
 automake doesn't seem to have any documentation about how to handle
 localised man pages though.
 
 Are both these issues solvable without installing large localisation
 packages for each target language? Ie will it be easy to build the
 package, including all translations, on mine and any user's PC, or would
 it be better to ask the translator(s) to provide all generated files as
 well as sources and package them separately?

Definitely, you should not use the generated files, but the source file
(either XML if this is the format used by the translator, or po file and
a build-dep on po4a in the better case).

In any case you will need build-deps again xml tools that enable the
build of manpages.

You cannot reasonably ask to translators to keep a translation up to
date from a groff code.

Best regards.

-- 
Simon Paillard


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100905213409.ga5...@dedibox.ebzao.info



Re: Excluding non-linux archs

2010-04-10 Thread Simon Paillard
On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 03:54:46PM -0400, Chase Douglas wrote:
 I've got a package (rinputd) in debian now that I set Architecture:
 any. The package relies on the input layer of Linux, and thus FTBFS
 for kfreebsd-*. What's the best Architecture string to use to exclude
 other OS's?

See Common practices and problems found when porting to GNU/k*BSD:
http://glibc-bsd.alioth.debian.org/porting/PORTING

-- 
Simon Paillard


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100410210438.gj9...@dedibox.ebzao.info



Re: migration to testing

2010-03-27 Thread Simon Paillard
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 02:16:58PM +0300, Stanislav Maslovski wrote:
 One of my packages, fuse-convmvfs (uploaded by a sponsor), cannot
 migrate to testing. The migration is blocked by kfreebsd:
 
 * fuse-convmvfs/kfreebsd-amd64 unsatisfiable Depends: fuse-utils
 * fuse-convmvfs/kfreebsd-i386 unsatisfiable Depends: fuse-utils
 
 What is the recommended way of solving this?

fuse-utils is not build on kfreebsd-(amd64|i386) since it's
Linux-specific, see #528537:

| Please find below a patch to add GNU/kFreeBSD support to fuse. On this
| system, the kernel module and the utilities are provided in a separate
| source package called fuse4bsd. That's why the patch disable fuse-utils
| on non Linux systems.

Given previous versions of fuse-convmvfs exist in testing, I guess the
package is meant to be usable on kfreebsd even without fuse-utils
available. That would mean fuse-utils is actually a recommend ?

You might ask kfreebsd porters on debian-bsd list for details.

-- 
Simon Paillard


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100327120537.gc29...@dedibox.ebzao.info



Re: lintian error on my package dhcp-probe

2010-03-15 Thread Simon Paillard
Hi,

On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 09:04:22PM +0100, Laurent Guignard wrote:
 I have this error during a lintian check :
 
 I: dhcp-probe: spelling-error-in-manpage usr/share/man/man8/dhcp_probe.8.gz 
 overriden overridden
 N: 
 N:Lintian found a spelling error in the manpage. Lintian has a list of
 N:common misspellings that it looks for. It does not have a dictionary
 N:like a spelling checker does.
[..] 
 I have problem to interpret this message. I think it is a problem on the
 overridden word but i don't see where the spelling error.

On top of other replies, note the existence of debian-l10n-english,
which can proofread your text.

Moreoever, remember that debian-l10n-$lang can be useful even when you
are a $lang native.

Regards.

-- 
Simon Paillard


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100315201740.gq8...@dedibox.ebzao.info



Bittorrent infrastructure (was: Regarding GSoC)

2010-03-08 Thread Simon Paillard
On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 04:16:24PM -0500, Asheesh Laroia wrote:
 On Mon, 8 Mar 2010, Sukhbir Singh wrote:
  I am interested in participating in Google Summer of Code this
  year and have a project that pertains to the distribution of
  Debian over BitTorrent.This is somewhat a solution to the problem
  posted on the Idea List page ( 
  http://wiki.debian.org/SummerOfCode2010/RobustBitTorrentInfrastructure)
[..] 
 That sounds cool. Can you email a link to the paper to this list?
 You might also check with the debian-mirrors list to see if people
 there find it interesting.

Trackers are actually admined by cdimage people, so debian-cd is
relevant too.

About distributing Debian ISO, Metalink has been suggested by the past,
in order to benefit from *all* FTP, HTTP and bittorrent sources.

http://www.google.fr/search?hl=frq=metalink+debian+site%3Alists.debian.orgbtnG=Recherchermeta=aq=foq=

-- 
Simon Paillard


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100308214350.ge9...@dedibox.ebzao.info



Re: RFS: recoverjpeg (updated package)

2010-03-03 Thread Simon Paillard
On Tue, Mar 02, 2010 at 09:09:12PM -0600, William Vera wrote:
 I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 2.0-1
 of my package recoverjpeg.
 
 It builds these binary packages:
 recoverjpeg - tool to recover JPEG images from a filesystem image

Which features does it bring compared to testdisk/photorec which recover
many more types of files ?

BTW, testdisk/photorec is in the admin section, maybe this section would
more suitable than graphics for recoverjpeg as well ?

 - dget 
 http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/recoverjpeg/recoverjpeg_2.0-1.dsc

I guess the homepage should be http://www.rfc1149.net/devel/recoverjpeg
instead (though it is in french only).


-- 
Simon Paillard


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100303134258.gb6...@dedibox.ebzao.info



Re: Leftovers from etch installations

2009-09-25 Thread Simon Paillard
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 09:41:27AM +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
 I'm working on a package that has this dependency line:
 
 apache | apache-ssl | apache-perl | apache2
 
 Is there any chance that users of apache|apache-ssl|apache-perl in etch who
 upgraded to lenny or later would still have them installed, or is it safe
 to assume I can set the dependency to just apache2?
 
 I'm not sure whether to assume that because it's unavailable in lenny, it
 will have been upgraded, or just left as it is (assuming nothing else has
 been installed that depends on apache2, of course).

A package for Lenny/main cannot depend on apache, since it is not in
Lenny/main.

On Lenny, compare apt-cache rdepends apache / apache2.

-- 
Simon Paillard


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org