Re: Submitters (well, for everyone) tip of the day courtesy of Sven Hartge - Debian CI and licenserecon (lrc)
On 05.08.24 16:52, PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel wrote: WRT the license checks, I found out that there is an integration with Salsa CI available to get on the spot lrc reports, just by doing include: - https://salsa.debian.org/debian/licenserecon/raw/main/debian/licenserecon.yml > and why not activated by default ? Not everyone has a DEP5 compatible debian/copyright file and force-activating that check for those packages would immediately break their CI without providing any benefit. Grüße, Sven.
Bug#1077642: RFS: radsecproxy/1.11.0-1~bpo12+1 -- RADIUS protocol proxy supporting RadSec
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "radsecproxy": * Package name : radsecproxy Version : 1.11.0-1~bpo12+1 Upstream contact : Fabian Mauchle * URL : https://radsecproxy.github.io/ * License : BSD-3-clause, GPL-3+ with Autoconf-2.0~Archive exception, FSFAP * Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/debian/radsecproxy Section : net The source builds the following binary packages: radsecproxy - RADIUS protocol proxy supporting RadSec To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/radsecproxy/ Alternatively, you can download the package with 'dget' using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/radsecproxy/radsecproxy_1.11.0-1~bpo12+1.dsc Changes since the last upload: radsecproxy (1.11.0-1~bpo12+1) bookworm-backports; urgency=medium . * Rebuild for bookworm-backports. Grüße, Sven!
Bug#1077035: RFS: radsecproxy/1.11.0-1 -- RADIUS protocol proxy supporting RadSec
On 25.07.24 14:51, Phil Wyett wrote: One to look into at your leisure and not a showstopper. philwyett@ks-windu:~/Development/builder/debian/mentoring/radsecproxy-1.11.0$ lrc : Versions: recon 1.12 check 3.3.9-1 Parsing Source Tree Reading copyright Running licensecheck d/copyright | licensecheck BSD-3-clause| GPL-3+ with Autoconf-2.0~Archive exception ax_build_date_epoch.m4 Thank you for your review, but I will fix the license issue while I am at it. Grüße, Sven.
Bug#1077035: RFS: radsecproxy/1.11.0-1 -- RADIUS protocol proxy supporting RadSec
On 25.07.24 15:42, Sven Hartge wrote: On 25.07.24 14:51, Phil Wyett wrote: BSD-3-clause | GPL-3+ with Autoconf-2.0~Archive exception ax_build_date_epoch.m4 Thank you for your review, but I will fix the license issue while I am at it. I think lrc has a bug parsing debian/copyright with the Autoconf expection, because now it says: GPL-3+ with Autoconf-2~Archive exception| GPL-3+ with Autoconf-2.0~Archive exception ax_build_date_epoch.m4 (note the missing ".0" before the "~Archive") while d/copyright clearly states: Files: ax_build_date_epoch.m4 Copyright: 2016, Eric Bavier License: GPL-3+ with Autoconf-2.0~Archive exception Unless I am not seeing something here, which is entirely possible. Grüße, Sven
Bug#1077035: RFS: radsecproxy/1.11.0-1 -- RADIUS protocol proxy supporting RadSec
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "radsecproxy": * Package name : radsecproxy Version : 1.11.0-1 Upstream contact : Fabian Mauchle * URL : https://radsecproxy.github.io/ * License : BSD-3-clause, FSFAP * Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/debian/radsecproxy Section : net The source builds the following binary packages: radsecproxy - RADIUS protocol proxy supporting RadSec To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/radsecproxy/ Alternatively, you can download the package with 'dget' using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/radsecproxy/radsecproxy_1.11.0-1.dsc Changes since the last upload: radsecproxy (1.11.0-1) unstable; urgency=medium . * New upstream version 1.11.0 * Remove patches implemented upstream. * Reenable compiler error on deprecated-declarations. * Fix typos found by Lintian. Grüße, Sven.
Bug#1071589: RFS: radsecproxy/1.10.1-1 -- RADIUS protocol proxy supporting RadSec
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "radsecproxy": * Package name : radsecproxy Version : 1.10.1-1 Upstream contact : Fabian Mauchle * URL : https://radsecproxy.github.io/ * License : BSD-3-clause * Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/debian/radsecproxy Section : net The source builds the following binary packages: radsecproxy - RADIUS protocol proxy supporting RadSec To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/radsecproxy/ Alternatively, you can download the package with 'dget' using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/radsecproxy/radsecproxy_1.10.1-1.dsc Changes since the last upload: radsecproxy (1.10.1-1) unstable; urgency=medium . * New upstream version 1.10.1 * Drop patches applied upstream * Update copyright years * Declare conformance to Policy 4.7.0, no changes needed. Grüße, Sven.
Bug#1057691: RFS: radsecproxy/1.10.0-2~bpo12+1 -- RADIUS protocol proxy supporting RadSec
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "radsecproxy": * Package name : radsecproxy Version : 1.10.0-2~bpo12+1 Upstream contact : Fabian Mauchle * URL : https://radsecproxy.github.io/ * License : BSD-3-clause * Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/debian/radsecproxy Section : net The source builds the following binary packages: radsecproxy - RADIUS protocol proxy supporting RadSec To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/radsecproxy/ Alternatively, you can download the package with 'dget' using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/radsecproxy/radsecproxy_1.10.0-2~bpo12+1.dsc Changes since the last upload: radsecproxy (1.10.0-2~bpo12+1) bookworm-backports; urgency=medium . * Rebuild for bookworm-backports. Grüße, Sven
Bug#1057102: RFS: radsecproxy/1.10.0-2 -- RADIUS protocol proxy supporting RadSec
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "radsecproxy": * Package name : radsecproxy Version : 1.10.0-2 Upstream contact : Fabian Mauchle * URL : https://radsecproxy.github.io/ * License : BSD-3-clause * Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/debian/radsecproxy Section : net The source builds the following binary packages: radsecproxy - RADIUS protocol proxy supporting RadSec To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/radsecproxy/ Alternatively, you can download the package with 'dget' using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/radsecproxy/radsecproxy_1.10.0-2.dsc Changes since the last upload: radsecproxy (1.10.0-2) unstable; urgency=medium . * Update debian/copyright to match code * Add patch from Chris Lamb to make the build reproducible. (Closes: #1056118) Grüße, Sven.
Bug#1053401: RFS: radsecproxy/1.10.0-1 -- RADIUS protocol proxy supporting RadSec
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "radsecproxy": * Package name : radsecproxy Version : 1.10.0-1 Upstream contact : Fabian Mauchle * URL : https://radsecproxy.github.io/ * License : BSD-3-clause * Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/debian/radsecproxy Section : net The source builds the following binary packages: radsecproxy - RADIUS protocol proxy supporting RadSec To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/radsecproxy/ Alternatively, you can download the package with 'dget' using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/radsecproxy/radsecproxy_1.10.0-1.dsc Changes since the last upload: radsecproxy (1.10.0-1) unstable; urgency=medium . * New upstream version 1.10.0 * Remove patches applied upstream * Add patch to fix spelling detected by lintian Grüße, Sven!
Bug#1032429: RFS: radsecproxy/1.9.2-2 -- RADIUS protocol proxy supporting RadSec
On Mon, 6 Mar 2023 17:02:07 +0100 Sven Hartge wrote: Changes since the last upload: radsecproxy (1.9.2-2) unstable; urgency=medium . * Improve logcheck patterns to reduce noise * Make logcheck rules compatible with all syslog timestamp formats I really would like to get those changes into Bookworm to avoid unnecessary mail spam for those using logcheck. If anyone could quickly review the changes and do an upload, this would be appreciated tremendously. Thank you! Grüße, Sven.
Bug#1032429: RFS: radsecproxy/1.9.2-2 -- RADIUS protocol proxy supporting RadSec
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "radsecproxy": * Package name : radsecproxy Version : 1.9.2-2 Upstream contact : Fabian Mauchle * URL : https://radsecproxy.github.io/ * License : BSD-3-clause * Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/debian/radsecproxy Section : net The source builds the following binary packages: radsecproxy - RADIUS protocol proxy supporting RadSec To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/radsecproxy/ Alternatively, you can download the package with 'dget' using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/radsecproxy/radsecproxy_1.9.2-2.dsc Changes since the last upload: radsecproxy (1.9.2-2) unstable; urgency=medium . * Improve logcheck patterns to reduce noise * Make logcheck rules compatible with all syslog timestamp formats Grüße, Sven
Bug#1032127: RFS: radsecproxy/1.9.2-1~bpo11+1 -- RADIUS protocol proxy supporting RadSec
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "radsecproxy": * Package name : radsecproxy Version : 1.9.2-1~bpo11+1 Upstream contact : Fabian Mauchle * URL : https://radsecproxy.github.io/ * License : BSD-3-clause * Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/debian/radsecproxy Section : net The source builds the following binary packages: radsecproxy - RADIUS protocol proxy supporting RadSec To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/radsecproxy/ Alternatively, you can download the package with 'dget' using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/radsecproxy/radsecproxy_1.9.2-1~bpo11+1.dsc Changes since the last upload: radsecproxy (1.9.2-1~bpo11+1) bullseye-backports; urgency=medium . * Rebuild for bullseye-backports. * Disable disabling changelog-trimming for bullseye-backports Grüße, Sven!
Bug#1031406: RFS: radsecproxy/1.9.2-1 -- RADIUS protocol proxy supporting RadSec
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "radsecproxy": * Package name : radsecproxy Version : 1.9.2-1 Upstream contact : Fabian Mauchle * URL : https://radsecproxy.github.io/ * License : BSD-3-clause * Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/debian/radsecproxy Section : net The source builds the following binary packages: radsecproxy - RADIUS protocol proxy supporting RadSec To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/radsecproxy/ Alternatively, you can download the package with 'dget' using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/radsecproxy/radsecproxy_1.9.2-1.dsc Changes since the last upload: radsecproxy (1.9.2-1) unstable; urgency=medium . * New upstream version 1.9.2 * Update debian/watch to use Github API. * Declare conformance to Policy 4.6.2, no changes needed. * Update copyright statement for debian/* * Do not trim old debian/changelog entries. * Remove obsolete dependency on lsb-base. * Add patch to fix spelling errors found by lintian. Grüße, Sven!
Bug#997941: RFS: radsecproxy/1.9.1-1 -- RADIUS protocol proxy supporting RadSec
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "radsecproxy": * Package name: radsecproxy Version : 1.9.1-1 Upstream Author : Fabian Mauchle * URL : https://radsecproxy.github.io/ * License : BSD-3-clause * Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/debian/radsecproxy Section : net It builds those binary packages: radsecproxy - RADIUS protocol proxy supporting RadSec To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/radsecproxy/ Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/radsecproxy/radsecproxy_1.9.1-1.dsc Changes since the last upload: radsecproxy (1.9.1-1) unstable; urgency=medium . * New upstream version 1.9.1 Compatible with OpenSSL 3.0 . [ Faidon Liambotis ] * Replace myself (Faidon) with Sven as the maintainer . [ Sven Hartge ] * Compatible with Policy 4.6.0.0, no changes needed * Taking over full maintainership, many thanks to Faidon for his work in the past. Grüße, Sven Hartge.
Re: mentors.d.n weirdness when uploading for multiple suites
On 29.08.21 16:40, Baptiste Beauplat wrote: On 2021/08/26 10:15 PM, Baptiste Beauplat wrote: On 2021/08/26 02:41 PM, Sven Hartge wrote: I noticed a little weirdness when uploading a package for multiple suites, in my case for "bullseye-backports" and "buster-backports-sloppy". That should be fixed now. We changed the behavior of the repository so files can be shared between uploads as long as they have the same content (checksum). You can upload two version sharing the same orig and it will work fine. Note that, shared files have the same restriction as other files. If the content changes, all uploads using the previous version of that file will be removed from the repository to keep consistency. The dsc link for removed repository files should not appear in the package page. Very nice, thank you. That will make it substantially more easy to upload backports or security updates if they share the same upstream version without needing to do them in a piecemeal fashion. Grüße, Sven.
Bug#993170: RFS: radsecproxy/1.9.0-1~bpo10+1 -- RADIUS protocol proxy supporting RadSec
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "radsecproxy". Since this is the first upload to buster-backports-sloppy, a full binary upload will be needed. * Package name: radsecproxy Version : 1.9.0-1~bpo10+1 Upstream Author : Fabian Mauchle * URL : https://radsecproxy.github.io/ * License : BSD-3-clause * Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/debian/radsecproxy Section : net It builds those binary packages: radsecproxy - RADIUS protocol proxy supporting RadSec To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/radsecproxy/ Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/radsecproxy/radsecproxy_1.9.0-1~bpo10+1.dsc Changes since the last upload: radsecproxy (1.9.0-1~bpo10+1) buster-backports-sloppy; urgency=medium . * Rebuild for buster-backports-sloppy. Grüße, Sven!
mentors.d.n weirdness when uploading for multiple suites
Hello .*, I noticed a little weirdness when uploading a package for multiple suites, in my case for "bullseye-backports" and "buster-backports-sloppy". Reference is https://mentors.debian.net/package/radsecproxy/ I uploaded version 1.9.0-1~bpo10+1 first and then 1.9.0-1~bpo11+1 second. The latter seems to have superseded the first, with the first still being in the interface but somehow only "half". For example the URL to the DSC does not work and the URL in the RFS template is only "https://mentors.debian.netNone";. Simple fix is of course to just delete and reupload 1.9.0-1~bpo10+1 but I think I happen to stumble upon an edge-case bug in the mentors backend here. Grüße, Sven. -- Sigmentation fault. Core dumped.
Bug#992794: RFS: radsecproxy/1.9.0-1~bpo11+1 -- RADIUS protocol proxy supporting RadSec
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "radsecproxy". As this is the first upload to "bullseye-backports", a full binary upload will be necessary. * Package name: radsecproxy Version : 1.9.0-1~bpo11+1 Upstream Author : Fabian Mauchle * URL : https://radsecproxy.github.io/ * License : BSD-3-clause * Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/debian/radsecproxy Section : net It builds those binary packages: radsecproxy - RADIUS protocol proxy supporting RadSec To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/radsecproxy/ Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/radsecproxy/radsecproxy_1.9.0-1~bpo11+1.dsc Changes since the last upload: radsecproxy (1.9.0-1~bpo11+1) bullseye-backports; urgency=medium . * Rebuild for bullseye-backports. Grüße, Sven.
Bug#992268: RFS: radsecproxy/1.9.0-1 -- RADIUS protocol proxy supporting RadSec
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "radsecproxy": * Package name: radsecproxy Version : 1.9.0-1 Upstream Author : Fabian Mauchle * URL : https://radsecproxy.github.io/ * License : BSD-3-clause * Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/debian/radsecproxy Section : net It builds those binary packages: radsecproxy - RADIUS protocol proxy supporting RadSec To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/radsecproxy/ Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/radsecproxy/radsecproxy_1.9.0-1.dsc Changes since the last upload: radsecproxy (1.9.0-1) unstable; urgency=medium . * Prepare upload to unstable * Remove Homepage metadata field Grüße, Sven!
Re: Location for user installed plugin libraries and icons
The Wanderer wrote: > I genuinely do not see what insisting on uninstalling plugins at the > same time as the main program, for all user accounts, provides as a > benefit. The only maybe benefit I've seen suggested is cleaning up to > free disk space, and that seems to me to be so obviously heavily > outweighed by the other considerations that it should clearly not be > the deciding priority. Also beware of strange stuff the user may have done to the data in $HOME. On one of the multi-user systems I admin for my University one user had placed a symlink to /usr/bin as $HOME/bin and another symlink to / as $HOME/root. I have no idea as to *why* but imagine the fun you can have if you just naivly delete something following symlinks. Grüße, Sven. -- Sigmentation fault. Core dumped.
Bug#989424: RFS: radsecproxy/1.8.2-4~bpo10+1 -- RADIUS protocol proxy supporting RadSec
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "radsecproxy": * Package name: radsecproxy Version : 1.8.2-4~bpo10+1 Upstream Author : Fabian Mauchle * URL : https://radsecproxy.github.io/ * License : BSD-3-clause * Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/debian/radsecproxy Section : net It builds those binary packages: radsecproxy - RADIUS protocol proxy supporting RadSec To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/radsecproxy/ Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/radsecproxy/radsecproxy_1.8.2-4~bpo10+1.dsc Changes since the last upload: radsecproxy (1.8.2-4~bpo10+1) buster-backports; urgency=medium . * Rebuild for buster-backports. Grüße, Sven! OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#989196: RFS: radsecproxy/1.9.0-1~exp1 -- RADIUS protocol proxy supporting RadSec
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "radsecproxy": * Package name: radsecproxy Version : 1.9.0-1~exp1 Upstream Author : Fabian Mauchle * URL : https://radsecproxy.github.io/ * License : BSD-3-clause * Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/debian/radsecproxy Section : net It builds those binary packages: radsecproxy - RADIUS protocol proxy supporting RadSec To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/radsecproxy/ Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/radsecproxy/radsecproxy_1.9.0-1~exp1.dsc Changes since the last upload: radsecproxy (1.9.0-1~exp1) experimental; urgency=medium . * New upstream version 1.9.0 * Fix dyndisc example scripts input validation (CVE-2021-32642) Grüße, Sven! OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#989160: RFS: radsecproxy/1.8.2-4 -- RADIUS protocol proxy supporting RadSec
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "radsecproxy": * Package name: radsecproxy Version : 1.8.2-4 Upstream Author : Fabian Mauchle * URL : https://radsecproxy.github.io/ * License : BSD-3-clause * Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/debian/radsecproxy Section : net It builds those binary packages: radsecproxy - RADIUS protocol proxy supporting RadSec To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/radsecproxy/ Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/radsecproxy/radsecproxy_1.8.2-4.dsc Changes since the last upload: radsecproxy (1.8.2-4) unstable; urgency=high . * Fix CVE-2021-32642 Grüße, Sven. OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#988586: RFS: radsecproxy/1.9.0~rc1-1~exp1 -- RADIUS protocol proxy supporting RadSec
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "radsecproxy": * Package name: radsecproxy Version : 1.9.0~rc1-1~exp1 Upstream Author : Fabian Mauchle * URL : https://radsecproxy.github.io/ * License : BSD-3-clause * Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/debian/radsecproxy Section : net It builds those binary packages: radsecproxy - RADIUS protocol proxy supporting RadSec To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/radsecproxy/ Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/radsecproxy/radsecproxy_1.9.0~rc1-1~exp1.dsc Changes since the last upload: radsecproxy (1.9.0~rc1-1~exp1) experimental; urgency=medium . * New upstream version 1.9.0-rc1 * Add gbp.conf for experimental branch * Remove patches applied upstream Grüße, Sven. OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Location for user installed plugin libraries and icons
Jon Gough wrote: > So, any user installable application extension/plugin which has > executables and supporting data is left behind on the system when the > owning application is removed or updated using the system installation > process? This is accepted behaviour? Yes, this is accepted behaviour, because the system does not know if the user uses the file for anything else. Maybe $HOME is mounted from the network and the application using the files is still being used on a different system. > Shouldn't applications clean up after themselves and not leave user > systems with junk lying around? No. Grüße, S° -- Sigmentation fault. Core dumped.
Bug#984499: RFS: radsecproxy/1.8.2-4~exp1 -- RADIUS protocol proxy supporting RadSec
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "radsecproxy": * Package name: radsecproxy Version : 1.8.2-4~exp1 Upstream Author : Fabian Mauchle * URL : https://radsecproxy.github.io/ * License : BSD-3-clause * Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/debian/radsecproxy Section : net It builds those binary packages: radsecproxy - RADIUS protocol proxy supporting RadSec To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/radsecproxy/ Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/radsecproxy/radsecproxy_1.8.2-4~exp1.dsc Changes since the last upload: radsecproxy (1.8.2-4~exp1) experimental; urgency=medium . * Fix building with GCC-11 (Closes: #984314) * update branch in CI config * temporarily force GCC 11 for experimental Grüße, Sven.
Bug#975549: RFS: radsecproxy/1.8.2-3 -- RADIUS protocol proxy supporting RadSec
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "radsecproxy": * Package name: radsecproxy Version : 1.8.2-3 Upstream Author : Fabian Mauchle * URL : https://radsecproxy.github.io/ * License : BSD-3-clause * Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/debian/radsecproxy Section : net It builds those binary packages: radsecproxy - RADIUS protocol proxy supporting RadSec To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/radsecproxy/ Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/radsecproxy/radsecproxy_1.8.2-3.dsc Changes since the last upload: radsecproxy (1.8.2-3) unstable; urgency=medium . * Remove override for no longer existing lintian tag. * debian/copyright: use spaces rather than tabs to start continuation lines. * Set upstream metadata fields: Bug-Submit. * Remove obsolete field Name from debian/upstream/metadata (already present in machine-readable debian/copyright). * Bump Standards-Version to 4.5.1, no changes needed. * Update watch file format version to 4. Regards,
Bug#969035: RFS: radsecproxy/1.8.2-2~bpo10+1 -- RADIUS protocol proxy supporting RadSec
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "radsecproxy". This version of the package will be the first upload to buster-backports and a full binary upload is needed for it to clear NEW. * Package name: radsecproxy Version : 1.8.2-2~bpo10+1 Upstream Author : Fabian Mauchle * URL : https://radsecproxy.github.io/ * License : BSD-3-clause * Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/debian/radsecproxy Section : net It builds those binary packages: radsecproxy - RADIUS protocol proxy supporting RadSec To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/radsecproxy/ Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/radsecproxy/radsecproxy_1.8.2-2~bpo10+1.dsc Changes since the last upload: radsecproxy (1.8.2-2~bpo10+1) buster-backports; urgency=medium . * Rebuild for buster-backports. Regards, Sven.
Bug#968669: RFS: radsecproxy/1.8.2-2 -- RADIUS protocol proxy supporting RadSec
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "radsecproxy": * Package name: radsecproxy Version : 1.8.2-2 Upstream Author : Fabian Mauchle * URL : https://radsecproxy.github.io/ * License : BSD-3-clause * Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/debian/radsecproxy Section : net It builds those binary packages: radsecproxy - RADIUS protocol proxy supporting RadSec To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/radsecproxy/ Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/radsecproxy/radsecproxy_1.8.2-2.dsc Changes since the last upload: radsecproxy (1.8.2-2) unstable; urgency=medium . * Only warn on deprecated declerations for the OpenSSL3.0 transition until https://github.com/radsecproxy/radsecproxy/issues/70 has been fixed upstream. Regards,
Bug#968238: RFS: radsecproxy/1.8.2-1 -- RADIUS protocol proxy supporting RadSec
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "radsecproxy": * Package name: radsecproxy Version : 1.8.2-1 Upstream Author : Fabian Mauchle * URL : https://radsecproxy.github.io/ * License : BSD-3-clause * Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/debian/radsecproxy Section : net It builds those binary packages: radsecproxy - RADIUS protocol proxy supporting RadSec To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/radsecproxy/ Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/radsecproxy/radsecproxy_1.8.2-1.dsc Changes since the last upload: radsecproxy (1.8.2-1) unstable; urgency=medium . * New upstream version 1.8.2 * Upgrade debhelper compat level to 13. * Remove patches applied upstream * Move man-pages for radsecproxy[-hash] into section 8 to be compliant with the FHS. * Add lintian override for testsuite-autopkgtest-missing. Regards, -- Sven Hartge
Bug#964778: closing 964778
close 964778 thanks Newer version will be uploaded to backport later.
Bug#964778: RFS: radsecproxy/1.8.1-2~bpo10+1 -- RADIUS protocol proxy supporting RadSec
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "radsecproxy" * Package name: radsecproxy Version : 1.8.1-2~bpo10+1 Upstream Author : Fabian Mauchle * URL : https://radsecproxy.github.io/ * License : BSD-3-clause * Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/debian/radsecproxy Section : net It builds those binary packages: radsecproxy - RADIUS protocol proxy supporting RadSec To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/radsecproxy Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/radsecproxy/radsecproxy_1.8.1-2~bpo10+1.dsc Changes since the last upload: * Rebuild for buster-backports. Grüße, Sven!
Bug#964151: RFS: radsecproxy/1.8.1-2 -- RADIUS protocol proxy supporting RadSec
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "radsecproxy". This upload via mentors.debian.net has been allowed by my current sponsor and package maintainer Faidon Liambotis because of time constraints on his part currently not permitting him to properly review the changes. * Package name: radsecproxy Version : 1.8.1-2 Upstream Author : Fabian Mauchle * URL : https://radsecproxy.github.io/ * License : BSD-3-clause * Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/debian/radsecproxy Section : net It builds those binary packages: radsecproxy - RADIUS protocol proxy supporting RadSec To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/radsecproxy Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/radsecproxy/radsecproxy_1.8.1-2.dsc Changes since the last upload: * Add patch from Robert Scheck , fixing incompatibilities with GCC-10. Sourced from https://github.com/radsecproxy/radsecproxy/issues/63 * Bump Standards-Version to 4.5.0, no changes needed. Regards, -- Sven Hartge
Re: Not all files in my package installed
Tong Sun wrote: > -- > $ ls -l `dpkg -L dbab` > /dev/null > ls: cannot access '/usr/share/doc/dbab/README.Debian': No such file or > directory > ls: cannot access '/usr/share/doc/dbab/changelog.Debian.gz': No such file > or directory > ls: cannot access '/usr/share/doc/dbab/dbab-dnsmasq.intranet.conf': No such > file or directory > ls: cannot access '/usr/share/doc/dbab/dbab-dnsmasq.service.conf': No such > file or directory > ls: cannot access '/usr/share/doc/dbab/dbab-squid.localnet.conf': No such > file or directory > ls: cannot access '/usr/share/doc/dbab/dbab-squid.service.conf': No such > file or directory > ls: cannot access '/usr/share/doc/dbab/dbab.md.gz': No such file or > directory > ls: cannot access '/usr/share/man/man8': No such file or directory > ls: cannot access '/usr/share/man/man8/dbab-svr.8.gz': No such file or > directory > ls: cannot access '/usr/share/man/man8/dbab-add-list.8.gz': No such file or > directory > ls: cannot access '/usr/share/man/man8/dbab-chk-list.8.gz': No such file or > directory > ls: cannot access '/usr/share/man/man8/dbab-get-list.8.gz': No such file or > directory > ls: cannot access '/usr/share/man/man8/dhcp-add-wpad.8.gz': No such file or > directory > -- > What could possibly be wrong? Could be dpkg's path-include and path-exclude configuration on your local system, for example from localepurge. Does rgrep "path-" /etc/dpkg return anything for you? Grüße, Sven. -- Sigmentation fault. Core dumped.
Re: packaging stellar, gitlab-ci fails, wrong installation path?
Nico Schlömer wrote: > I'm starting to package Stellar, a tet mesh optimizer [1]. > The package is very basic, but still things are failing. I don't know why. > 1. The gitlab-ci build [2] fails with > ``` > Checking cache for default... > FATAL: file does not exist > Failed to extract cache > ``` > What does this mean? You can ignore this one. Salsa CI uses ccache to speed up compilation and stores this cache internally. If there was never anything compiled before, the extraction of the cache fails until it has been created once. The real failure is further down: | gbp:error: Non-native package 'stellar' has invalid version '1.0' Grüße, Sven. -- Sigmentation fault. Core dumped.
Re: repro: Uploading artifacts to coordinator... too large archive
Nico Schlömer wrote: > From the gmsh repro-build, I'm getting > ``` > /builds/science-team/gmsh/debian/output: found 38 matching files > ERROR: Uploading artifacts to coordinator... too large archive > id=227001 responseStatus=413 Request Entity Too Large status=413 > Request Entity Too Large token=XzzUdm1f > FATAL: too large > ``` > Anything one can do about that? Somehow the build results from the reprotest stage got very large, triggering a safety check in Gitlab. Which surprises me, since other larger projects like MariaDB use the pipelines without problems. Something smells fishy here. You can do two things in the interim period: a) disable the reprotest for now to get a clean pipeline until this is sorted (see https://salsa.debian.org/salsa-ci-team/pipeline#basic-use on how to skip a job) b) and report this problem via https://salsa.debian.org/salsa-ci-team/pipeline/issues to give it a better visibility for the CI team. Grüße, Sven. -- Sigmentation fault. Core dumped.
Re: dch "eating" changelog entries?
Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > On Mon, Mar 05, 2018 at 10:44:13PM +0100, Sven Hartge wrote: >> I am co-maintaining bacula with Carsten Leonhardt and this problem >> now occured several times for me. (Most probably because of misuse by >> me, but I want to understand what went wrong.) > … >> Note how the last entry is unfinished, because of ongoing >> development. When I now call "dch" to add another entry, the editor >> looks like this: > … >> dch of course complains loudly: > Bug: https://bugs.debian.org/784397 I found that bug as well, but it does not mention the part where dch just swallows an entry without any trace (other than the warnings). For what it's worth, I will add my problem to the bug of only as documentation and reference for the future. Grüße, Sven. -- Sigmentation fault. Core dumped.
dch "eating" changelog entries?
Hi! I am co-maintaining bacula with Carsten Leonhardt and this problem now occured several times for me. (Most probably because of misuse by me, but I want to understand what went wrong.) Take the following debian/changelog file for example: ---8< foobar (1.0-3) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium * Third -- foobar (1.0-2) unstable; urgency=medium * Second -- Sven Hartge Mon, 05 Mar 2018 22:31:33 +0100 foobar (1.0-1) unstable; urgency=medium * Initial release. -- Sven Hartge Mon, 05 Mar 2018 22:31:03 +0100 ---8< Note how the last entry is unfinished, because of ongoing development. When I now call "dch" to add another entry, the editor looks like this: ---8< foobar (1.0-3) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium * Third * -- foobar (1.0-1) unstable; urgency=medium * Initial release. -- Sven Hartge Mon, 05 Mar 2018 22:31:03 +0100 ---8< See how the entry for foobar_1.0-2 is completely missing? dch of course complains loudly: , | dch: warning: debian/changelog(l5): badly formatted trailer line | LINE: -- | dch: warning: debian/changelog(l7): found start of entry where expected more change data or trailer | LINE: foobar (1.0-2) unstable; urgency=medium | dch: warning: debian/changelog(l7): found end of file where expected more change data or trailer ` Of course one shouldn't dismiss such warnings easily and a bit more attention to what the tools tell us is necessary, but I still find it surprising that the next-to-last entry just vanishes without a trace. Only using "dch -e" does not damage the changelog, but since this only opens an editor without doing anything else this is not surprising. Any thoughts? Grüße, Sven. -- Sigmentation fault. Core dumped.
