Non-free question

2001-05-04 Thread Warren Stramiello

I'm considering packaging BET, a 128-bit blowfish-encrypted talk daemon.
However, it relies on a non-DFSG complian library, even though the program
itself is GPL.

I'm presuming BET should therefore go into non-free, and I should also
package the library itself. Is this correct? If so, are there any key
changes I need to make to a package to get it ready for non-free?

~Warren Stramiello


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Non-free question

2001-05-04 Thread Warren Stramiello

Sorry, didn't clarify. I should package the library for non-free and the
bet for contrib, correct?

~Warren Stramiello



--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Non-free question

2001-05-04 Thread Warren Stramiello
I'm considering packaging BET, a 128-bit blowfish-encrypted talk daemon.
However, it relies on a non-DFSG complian library, even though the program
itself is GPL.

I'm presuming BET should therefore go into non-free, and I should also
package the library itself. Is this correct? If so, are there any key
changes I need to make to a package to get it ready for non-free?

~Warren Stramiello



Re: Non-free question

2001-05-04 Thread Warren Stramiello
Sorry, didn't clarify. I should package the library for non-free and the
bet for contrib, correct?

~Warren Stramiello




NM Woes

2001-05-03 Thread Warren Stramiello
Hi, I'm just wondering if someone can find out for me what else I need to
do to get through the DAM approval phase; eg, what the holdup is. I hate
even to be asking this question since I'm sure the DAM folks are busy with
other things than just approving folks in queue, and I'm aware they're
volunteers. I was just wondering is it usual for a person to be in the
queue since the first week of January, and if there's anything I can do to
help them in the process.

Note I am not complaining, since I realize they are volunteers with other
things to do than simply create accounts all day. But I would like to know
who to contact to ask how I can help speed the process along.

And since I'm in the hospital with lymphomatic cancer, I've got time to
work on my packages ;-)

~Warren Stramiello




Re: NM Woes

2001-05-03 Thread Warren Stramiello
 Unfortunately, it's not that uncommon, although that is a bit long.

At this rate, it'll take less time to develop stage four cancer, get
treatment, and recover, than it took to become a Debian Developer ;-)

I should submit that to the webpage folks so they can put that catchy
phrase on the NM page if I ever get in. *grin*

 Have you asked your application manager what the hold-up is?  Usually there's
 some reason if it goes this long.  Maybe the DAM asked him a question
 which he hasn't answered?

Asked several months back, it seemed the queue was just going slowly. I
sent him another query today. My AM is Falk, and he rocked in getting me
through the rest of the process. Luckily I'm at Georgia Tech so there were
some developers here to sign my GPG key, which sped matters considerably.

 That sucks.  Well, you can still work on your packages.  If you need a
 sponser, you can contact me.  Since you've passed all but the DAM approval
 stage, I'd hope you wouldn't need this much longer.

The hospital does suck, but not so bad since I managed to convince the
hospital IT department to drop a 100bt line into my room, which they did
the *same day* I requested it. Admittedly I had to flaunt my gov't
clearance to prove to them I wasn't a threat to their network, but at
least the connect is decent when the nurses aren't chain-downloading from
napster. I haven't been able to touch my packages recently due to the lack
of a computer/connection, so I'm kinda dusting them off now to see how
badly in disarray they are, and which ones to concentrate on maintaining
and which ones to orphan since chemo tends to knock my conscious time down
a little.

Some of them are kinda redundant with packages in Debian already, such as
my maintenance of VFTP, a secure FTP server based off of OpenBSDFTP. I was
just wondering if that's cool, or if the redundancy is stupid...

~Warren