Bug#718792: bug 718792 (sponsorship-request on fio) still open?
Hello Martin, Hello Sven, is there a particular reason why this bug on sponsorship-requests is still open? thanks WM -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/52bf363c.8040...@debian.org
Bug#726791: willing to sponsor awstats
Am 2013-12-28 19:11, schrieb Niels Thykier: > On 2013-12-28 16:20, Willi Mann wrote: >> Hello Sergey, Hello Niels, >> >> I'd be willing to look at awstats 7.2~dfsg-1 and upload it if it looks >> OK to me. Uploaded. The repository at git.debian.org still only has some 7.1.1 version, though. WM -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/52bf2770.9050...@debian.org
Bug#726791: willing to sponsor awstats
Hello Sergey, Hello Niels, I'd be willing to look at awstats 7.2~dfsg-1 and upload it if it looks OK to me. Is there a packaging-related reason why Niels did not upload it for you so far? Bye Willi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/52beec55.5000...@debian.org
Re: Bug#675230: RFS: zeroc-icee/1.2.0-6.1 [RC]
Raúl Benencia wrote: > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: important > > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "zeroc-icee" I'll sponsor it as the changes really only fix the RC bug. The package should get some love from its maintainer though. Willi Mann from the Salzburg BSP -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/jrfhu5$a5k$1...@dough.gmane.org
Bug#675230: RFS: zeroc-icee/1.2.0-6.1 [RC]
Raúl Benencia wrote: > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: important > > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "zeroc-icee" I'll sponsor it as the changes really only fix the RC bug. The package should get some love from its maintainer though. Willi Mann from the Salzburg BSP -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors
Bug#675230: RFS: zeroc-icee/1.2.0-6.1 [RC]
Raúl Benencia wrote: > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: important > > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "zeroc-icee" I'll sponsor it as the changes really only fix the RC bug. The package should get some love from its maintainer though. Willi Mann from the Salzburg BSP -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors
Re: RFS: sqwebmail-de: german templates for sqwebmail (fixes RC-bug)
> at the upstream site, the patch is advertised as: > "Updated Templates for version 5.1.3 - Martin Kos (updated Patch against > 5.1.3 english)" > > This looks like it is a sqwebmail derivation with additional, > translation related copyright of the patch author. I'd say you try now > to contact Martin Kos about this and to confirm the amount of path > authors there are. I've written to Sebastian Pfeiffer who maintains the website, because there's no mail address of Martin Kos, as far as I can see. > Considered that the package is already in the archive with a similar > copyright file, I upload the package because it is much better than the > previous one. However, please clear this up with upstream. thanks Willi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RFS: tdicons
Michelle Konzack schrieb: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "tdicons". > > * Package name: tdicons > Version : 0.0.3-2 > Upstream Author : Michelle Konzack > * URL : http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/t/tdicons > * License : Artistic License > Section : misc > > It builds these binary packages: > tdicons- A huge collection of icons in four different sizes > tdicons-sidebars - A huge collection of icons in four different sizes > tdicons16 - A huge collection of icons in 16x16 pixel > tdicons32 - A huge collection of icons in 32x32 pixel > tdicons48 - A huge collection of icons in 48x48 pixel > tdicons64 - A huge collection of icons in 64x64 pixel Some of these icons seem to be already available (best example: audacity). does it really make sense to have the very same version more than once available in the archive? That seems to be a waste of disk space. Willi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RFS: sqwebmail-de: german templates for sqwebmail (fixes RC-bug)
Daniel Baumann schrieb: > Daniel Baumann wrote: >> Going now to bed, will take care tomorrow. > > ok, here we go: done, except > * debian/copyright is a bit strange formated, and there is no full > GPL blurb. look at e.g. libquicktime in experimental how to do it > right. that the patch doesn't contain an explicit copyright notice. Is the way I've done it Ok? http://wserver.wm1.at/~willi/debian/various/pool/main/s/sqwebmail-de/ Willi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RFS: sqwebmail-de: german templates for sqwebmail (fixes RC-bug)
Hi! I'm searching a sponsor for the my completely redone sqwebmail-de package. The current version in sid is very outdated: You cannot even send mail (with current sqwebmail in sid). I've redone the packaging completely, because the current build procedure is so simple that I didn't want to bother with the old packaging (which even came with autoconf from upstream ...): - Copy the english templates from sqwebmail to a build place - Apply the patch - Install the result to the right location. - Do the symlinks for de-at, de-ch, de-li, de-lu - Build the package. I've asked Stefan Hornburg (racke) who maintains sqwebmail and he agreed to sponsor, but he seems to be very busy. So I'm asking here in hope for a small chance to get the package into etch. (I've of course told him that I would post here). The takeover from previous maintainer has been acknowledged with "oh, that's great". The packaging is available from: http://wserver.wm1.at/~willi/debian/various/pool/main/s/sqwebmail-de/ Willi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RFS: logwatch (temporary sponsor)
Hi! I'm searching for a temporary sponsor for logwatch 7.3.1-2. It's available from http://pkg-logwatch.alioth.debian.org/apt/pool/main/l/logwatch/ I want to get 7.3.1 into etch, because the current 7.3-2 doesn't properly support postfix 2.3 any more and reports some other lines concerning logs from shadow as unmatched. 7.3.1-1 wasn't uploaded to the official archive, because my usual sponsor Michael Vogt is currently loaded with other work. So please build with -sa -v7.3-2 The diff also contains some fixes and improvements including a script to summarise the dpkg log. (They have of course been submitted upstream already.) My changes since the last uploaded revision are on svn.debian.org. http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/pkg-logwatch/trunk/ Just compare revision 47 with revision 53. Willi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
conffiles no longer needed except ...
Hi! I have no idea how to properly handle the following situation: My package logwatch previously had all their configuration files in /etc/logwatch/conf. They were marked as conffiles so dpkg was responsible for policy-compliant upgrading. However, since version 7.0 logwatch has a very cool(TM) way to specify the configuration. There is a directory default.conf, containing the proposed upstream configuration, there is an optional dist.conf dir containing the debian specific modifications (both in /usr/share/logwatch/), and there is /etc/logwatch/conf, containing optional site-specific modifications. (the ./conf is there because upstream allows local scripts to be put in ./scripts ..) Now the issue is, that all the old files in /etc/logwatch/conf are no longer needed, except if it was customized. If it was not customized, they should be removed, because they will interfere with the configuration by me and upstream, especially when some changes are needed. The question is: How should they be removed? - Just by putting a warning in NEWS.Debian, telling the local admin to remove them except if he modified it. (A NEWS.Debian file will be needed anyway, so users don't stumble over the new layout) - Trying to figure out in the maintainer scripts if the file has been modified, and if it hasn't been modified, delete it? - Provide the local user a script he can optionally run to remove unneeded files (of course with a hint in README.Debian and NEWS.Debian) - another way? The current list of files: http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_contents.pl?searchmode=filelist&word=logwatch&version=unstable&arch=all thanks for you replies Willi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: public domain
If i'm wrong, please correct me. http://qa.debian.org/~anibal/debian-NEW-summary.html says that Kenshi Muto has already uploaded 855resolution. See also: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=300341 Willi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Open ITP without apparent work on it
Martin Michlmayr schrieb: * Christoph Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-03-16 14:41]: Isn't there an "owner" tag for WNPP bugs? Then Shachar could set himself as the owner. This won't get you the messages forwarded either. Of course it will. The owner receives messages sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] What's your definition of "owner"? Willi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: package with more than one license: logwatch
Frank Küster wrote: Willi Mann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: For the general problems associated with different licenses in one package, you might find a look at http://bugs.debian.org/218105 informative. (Although I hope that your package isn't as mixed as ours). Thanks. Can anyone tell me please if attached copyright file is OK? What I'm unsure about is if it's enough to list all the mentioned names in the package or do I have to do the painful act of working out who owns a copyright on which of the many scripts? > That's the way to go. Of course you have to make sure that this is > legally possible at all (is any linking done?). Logwatch's language is perl. It mostly does cat logfile | filter1 | filter2 | filter3 ... But why do you think, linking would be a problem? Public Domain and X11 are both GPL-compatible. Willi This package was debianized by Willi Mann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, 12 Nov 2003 20:14:15 +0100. It was downloaded from ftp://ftp.kaybee.org/pub/linux/logwatch-5.1.tar.gz Logwatch consists of many individual scripts. Most of them were written by Kirk Bauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, who is also the maintainer of logwatch. Other authors and contributors: --- Dariusz Nierada <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> David Golden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Eric Moret <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Fabrizio Zeno Cornelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Gerald Teschl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> James Wysynski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Jim O'Halloran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Joe Digilio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Kenneth Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Lars Skjærlund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Luuk de Boer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Luuk de Boer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Manuel Mitnyan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> M. B. Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Michael Romeo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Michael Stovenour <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mike Tremaine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Osma Ahvenlampi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Pawe? Go?aszewski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Pawel Jarosz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sean Boran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Simon Liddington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Simon Liddington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> S. Schimkat Sven Conrad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sven Conrad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Willi Mann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Note that this is a semi-autogenerated list. See README.Debian for more information.) Licenses: - Except for a few scripts, logwatch is distributed under the permissive X11 license. The exceptions: scripts/services/clamav-milter: GPL scripts/services/rt314: Public Domain Text of the licenses: - X11 license: -BEGIN LICENSE -- Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to deal in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions: The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in all copies or substantial portions of the Software. THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE SOFTWARE. --END LICENSE-- GPL: -BEGIN LICENSE -- This package is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the Free Software Foundation; version 2 dated June, 1991. This package is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License for more details. You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License along with this package; if not, write to the Free Software Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place - Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307, USA. On Debian GNU/Linux systems, the complete text of the GNU General Public License can be found in `/usr/share/common-licenses/GPL'. --END LICENSE--
Re: package with more than one license: logwatch
Frank Küster wrote: Willi Mann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: For the general problems associated with different licenses in one package, you might find a look at http://bugs.debian.org/218105 informative. (Although I hope that your package isn't as mixed as ours). Thanks. Can anyone tell me please if attached copyright file is OK? What I'm unsure about is if it's enough to list all the mentioned names in the package or do I have to do the painful act of working out who owns a copyright on which of the many scripts? > That's the way to go. Of course you have to make sure that this is > legally possible at all (is any linking done?). Logwatch's language is perl. It mostly does cat logfile | filter1 | filter2 | filter3 ... But why do you think, linking would be a problem? Public Domain and X11 are both GPL-compatible. Willi This package was debianized by Willi Mann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, 12 Nov 2003 20:14:15 +0100. It was downloaded from ftp://ftp.kaybee.org/pub/linux/logwatch-5.1.tar.gz Logwatch consists of many individual scripts. Most of them were written by Kirk Bauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, who is also the maintainer of logwatch. Other authors and contributors: --- Dariusz Nierada <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> David Golden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Eric Moret <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Fabrizio Zeno Cornelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Gerald Teschl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> James Wysynski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Jim O'Halloran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Joe Digilio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Kenneth Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Lars Skjærlund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Luuk de Boer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Luuk de Boer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Manuel Mitnyan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> M. B. Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Michael Romeo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Michael Stovenour <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mike Tremaine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Osma Ahvenlampi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Pawe? Go?aszewski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Pawel Jarosz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sean Boran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Simon Liddington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Simon Liddington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> S. Schimkat Sven Conrad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sven Conrad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Willi Mann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Note that this is a semi-autogenerated list. See README.Debian for more information.) Licenses: - Except for a few scripts, logwatch is distributed under the permissive X11 license. The exceptions: scripts/services/clamav-milter: GPL scripts/services/rt314: Public Domain Text of the licenses: - X11 license: -BEGIN LICENSE -- Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to deal in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions: The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in all copies or substantial portions of the Software. THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE SOFTWARE. --END LICENSE-- GPL: -BEGIN LICENSE -- This package is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the Free Software Foundation; version 2 dated June, 1991. This package is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License for more details. You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License along with this package; if not, write to the Free Software Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place - Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307, USA. On Debian GNU/Linux systems, the complete text of the GNU General Public License can be found in `/usr/share/common-licenses/GPL'. --END LICENSE--
package with more than one license: logwatch
Hi! I'm facing a small problem with my package logwatch[0]. Logwatch's licensing file (License) [1] doesn't match the reality in two ways: 1) Logwatch consists of many perl scripts, many of them not written by the maintainer of logwatch (Kirk Bauer), but by various contributors (including me). There's no indication anyone transferred the copyright to Kirk, but the licensing file only says (c) Kirk Bauer. 2) Logwatch is distributed under the X11 License. Some scripts are distributed under two different licenses: One is Public Domain which is of course compatible to X11, and one is the GPL which is not X11 compatible (of course the other direction is compatible). I think for 1) it should be enough to say (c) Kirk Bauer and (others|contributors). ? I can think of these solutions for 2: - Distribute the debianized version under GPL. - Change the copyright file to say that most of logwatch is distributed under X11, but some parts are GPL. Can anyone tell me, what's the best way to handle this situation? Willi [0] http://packages.qa.debian.org/l/logwatch.html [1] debian/copyright with the License file: http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/l/logwatch/logwatch_5.1-5/copyright
package with more than one license: logwatch
Hi! I'm facing a small problem with my package logwatch[0]. Logwatch's licensing file (License) [1] doesn't match the reality in two ways: 1) Logwatch consists of many perl scripts, many of them not written by the maintainer of logwatch (Kirk Bauer), but by various contributors (including me). There's no indication anyone transferred the copyright to Kirk, but the licensing file only says (c) Kirk Bauer. 2) Logwatch is distributed under the X11 License. Some scripts are distributed under two different licenses: One is Public Domain which is of course compatible to X11, and one is the GPL which is not X11 compatible (of course the other direction is compatible). I think for 1) it should be enough to say (c) Kirk Bauer and (others|contributors). ? I can think of these solutions for 2: - Distribute the debianized version under GPL. - Change the copyright file to say that most of logwatch is distributed under X11, but some parts are GPL. Can anyone tell me, what's the best way to handle this situation? Willi [0] http://packages.qa.debian.org/l/logwatch.html [1] debian/copyright with the License file: http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/l/logwatch/logwatch_5.1-5/copyright -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RFS: ripmime - extracts attachments from mails
Hi! I'm searching for a sponsor for my ripmime package: Package name: ripmime Version : 1.3.1.1 Upstream Author : Paul L Daniels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> URL : http://www.pldaniels.com/ripmime License : 3-clause BSD Description : extracts attachments from mails ripMIME is a command line tool used to aid in the extraction of email borne attachments to files. ripMIME supports both the RFC MIME standards as well as being able to behave according to various MUA 'features' which are often used as exploitation holes. ITP-Bug: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=234349 Package is available from: http://www.wm1.at/willi/software/debian/ripmime/ It's both lintian and linda clean and builds in pbuilder. Things where I was unsure about: 1) License is 3-clause BSD but with s/University/PLD/d. Is it in this case right to copy the whole license to debian/copyright instead of what dh_make offers when using it with -c bsd (Short version with link to /usr/share/common-licenses/bsd)? 2) ripmime should be able to extract tnef-attachments. It depends on the endianness. I have hacked in endianness-detection by including . (And included #warnings to see in the build logs which endianness was used) However I can't test it because I don't have any tnef-attachments available. Is it acceptable that ripMIME is uploaded without having this feature tested? I really appreciate any sort of comments. Willi
RFS: ripmime - extracts attachments from mails
Hi! I'm searching for a sponsor for my ripmime package: Package name: ripmime Version : 1.3.1.1 Upstream Author : Paul L Daniels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> URL : http://www.pldaniels.com/ripmime License : 3-clause BSD Description : extracts attachments from mails ripMIME is a command line tool used to aid in the extraction of email borne attachments to files. ripMIME supports both the RFC MIME standards as well as being able to behave according to various MUA 'features' which are often used as exploitation holes. ITP-Bug: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=234349 Package is available from: http://www.wm1.at/willi/software/debian/ripmime/ It's both lintian and linda clean and builds in pbuilder. Things where I was unsure about: 1) License is 3-clause BSD but with s/University/PLD/d. Is it in this case right to copy the whole license to debian/copyright instead of what dh_make offers when using it with -c bsd (Short version with link to /usr/share/common-licenses/bsd)? 2) ripmime should be able to extract tnef-attachments. It depends on the endianness. I have hacked in endianness-detection by including . (And included #warnings to see in the build logs which endianness was used) However I can't test it because I don't have any tnef-attachments available. Is it acceptable that ripMIME is uploaded without having this feature tested? I really appreciate any sort of comments. Willi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
