Re: Sigrok packages review/mentoring
Dear Andreas
On 03/29/2017 11:14 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 11:09:20PM +0200, Zoltan Gyarmati wrote:
>> Ok, as you might saw i requested (and got) the Debian Science team
>> membership, and now i'm able to SSH into alioth.debian.org.
>> Just to make sure i don't mess up anything:
>> So now i'm supposed to create the the git repos under the paths
>> /git/debian-science/packages/{libsigrok.git|pulseview.git|...}
>> , right?
> Exactly. Just use the script
>
>setup-repository
>
> in this dir.
Ok, thanks!
As you might noted from the flood of notification mails over at
debian-science-commits :), i created the repos, listed below[1]
Please feel free to comment.
[1]
git://anonscm.debian.org/debian-science/packages/libsigrokdecode.git
git://anonscm.debian.org/debian-science/packages/sigrok-cli.git
git://anonscm.debian.org/debian-science/packages/libserialport.git
git://anonscm.debian.org/debian-science/packages/libsigrok.git
git://anonscm.debian.org/debian-science/packages/sigrok.git
git://anonscm.debian.org/debian-science/packages/sigrok-firmware-fx2lafw.git
git://anonscm.debian.org/debian-science/packages/pulseview.git
>
> Welcome in the team
Thanks for the warm welcoming,
Zoltan Gyarmati
https://zgyarmati.de
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Sigrok packages review/mentoring
Dear Andreas,
On 03/28/2017 08:42 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 01:41:58AM +0200, Zoltan Gyarmati wrote:
>> So as you mentioned for sponsoring you would like to have these git
>> repos hosted on
>> alioth.debian.org. Given that i have only -guest account there
>> (zgyarmati-guest), how
>> can i create a repository? What else I need to do (both technical- and
>> administration-wise) to get started?
> If you are a member of a packaging team (I think Debian Science is
> apropriate in this case) you have permissions to create Git repositories
> at git.debian.org:/git/debian-science/packages. Please check Debian
> Science policy or ask here if you have no idea how this can be done.
>
> The -guest is no restriction of permissions, just reflecting the fact
> that you do not (yet) have the Debian Developer status.
>
> Kind regards
>
>Andreas.
>
Ok, as you might saw i requested (and got) the Debian Science team
membership, and now i'm able to SSH into alioth.debian.org.
Just to make sure i don't mess up anything:
So now i'm supposed to create the the git repos under the paths
/git/debian-science/packages/{libsigrok.git|pulseview.git|...}
, right?
Thanks, regards,
Zoltan Gyarmati
https://zgyarmati.de
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Sigrok RFSs
Dear Dima, On 03/29/2017 09:13 AM, Dima Kogan wrote: > Zoltan Gyarmati <mr.zoltan.gyarm...@gmail.com> writes: > >> @Andreas, i've set the corresponding bugs to ITA, and i think we can >> start the review process at your convenience. I'm starting a separated >> thread about that here at debian-mentors. > Hi. It's on my list to look at your packages, I just haven't gotten > around to it yet. If you don't hear from me in a week or so, please send > me a complainy email. > > Sorry for the delay. > dima Great, thanks. I'm going to move the git repos where the packages are maintained under alioth.debian.org, where will be easier to review it. I'll add you to the aforementioned thread, and also remind you in a week or so ;) Thanks in advance, Zoltan Gyarmati https://zgyarmati.de signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Sigrok packages review/mentoring
Dear Andreas , I'm trying to summarize here the infos and thecurrent state of the adoption of the sigrok suite related packages in order to start the reviewing/mentoring process. 1. The corresponding ITA bugs: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=852830 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=852831 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=852832 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=852833 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=852834 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=852835 2. The source packages uploaded bt me to mentors.debian.org, which already ship the newest upstream versions: https://mentors.debian.net/package/sigrok-firmware-fx2lafw https://mentors.debian.net/package/pulseview https://mentors.debian.net/package/libsigrok https://mentors.debian.net/package/sigrok-cli https://mentors.debian.net/package/sigrok https://mentors.debian.net/package/libserialport 3. The git repos where currently the packaging is maintained: (atm in totally sync with the uploaded source packages) https://git.zgyarmati.de/debian-packaging/sigrok-firmware-fx2lafw-debian https://git.zgyarmati.de/debian-packaging/pulseview-debian https://git.zgyarmati.de/debian-packaging/libsigrok-debian https://git.zgyarmati.de/debian-packaging/sigrok-debian https://git.zgyarmati.de/debian-packaging/libsigrokdecode-debian https://git.zgyarmati.de/debian-packaging/libserialport-debian So as you mentioned for sponsoring you would like to have these git repos hosted on alioth.debian.org. Given that i have only -guest account there (zgyarmati-guest), how can i create a repository? What else I need to do (both technical- and administration-wise) to get started? Thanks in advance, regards -- Zoltan Gyarmati https://zgyarmati.de signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Sigrok RFSs
Dear Andreas, Aaron, On 03/16/2017 08:54 PM, Aaron Brady wrote: >> OK, thx. >> @Aaron, as you were/are also working on this, do you have any objection >> if i set these RFA bugs to ITA for myself and start the >> sponsoring/reviewing process of the uploaded packages [1] with Andreas >> and anybody else who is interested? >> Any comment from the electronics-devel side? >> >> Thanks for the help, regards, > > I have no objections, I just wanted to see a newer Sigrok in Debian. > You seem further along with the process than I was. > > It's a pity to have duplicated effort but thanks, Dima, for your > reviews of my packaging so far. > > Aaron Thanks Aaron, and I'm also sorry for the duplicated efforts here! @Andreas, i've set the corresponding bugs to ITA, and i think we can start the review process at your convenience. I'm starting a separated thread about that here at debian-mentors. Thanks in advance, regards, Zoltan Gyarmati https://zgyarmati.de signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Sigrok RFSs
Dear All, On 03/15/2017 02:48 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi Zoltan, > > On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 01:32:36PM +0100, Zoltan Gyarmati wrote: >> Please see my comments inline, > Sure. What else. :-P > >> Yes, i would be happy to push my listed git repos to a team VCS, and >> thank you for the >> offering the sponsoration although before we go any further (mainly to >> avoid any duplicated effort) >> i want to see what would be the way we cooperate on this with Aaron and >> the pkg-electronics team. >> As i'm rather new in contributing to Debian itself, i'm a bit lost here >> how to proceed with this, >> so maybe you and/or Dima and/or Bdale could figure out how to do this. > Some teams have developed a team policy that helps newcomers. I'm not > sure about the pkg-electronics team but reading the Debian Science > policy[3] could give some helpful hints that might be true for other > teams as well. (Actually the Debian Science policy os not really well > maintained, Debian Med one is better and Debian GIS and Debian Astro are > more current an possibly better structured. Just do a web search and > read what you consider the most readable one. Its an open task to merge > those documents and just maintain group specific issues separately but > nobody has taken over this task so far.) > >>> New packages can easily go to unstable. They will not migrate to testing >>> anyway. >> These are not new packages, they have been RFA-d by Uwe (the current >> maintainer) >> a month back see [1]. > Ahhh, OK, thank experimental is correct - sorry for the noise. > >>>> It seems we nicely teamed up to maintain this, >>>> how should we proceed, should be check the corresponding >>>> RFAs to ITA? >>> Hmmm, I admit I do not understand this question. >> As these packages are requested for adoption again, see [1] according >> to my understanding on >> the debian mentors docs (see for example [2]) i (or my mentor/sponsor?) >> have to set it to ITA. > Yes, please set it to ITA: OK, thx. @Aaron, as you were/are also working on this, do you have any objection if i set these RFA bugs to ITA for myself and start the sponsoring/reviewing process of the uploaded packages [1] with Andreas and anybody else who is interested? Any comment from the electronics-devel side? Thanks for the help, regards, Zoltan Gyarmati https://zgyarmati.de [1] https://mentors.debian.net/package/sigrok-firmware-fx2lafw https://mentors.debian.net/package/pulseview https://mentors.debian.net/package/libsigrok https://mentors.debian.net/package/sigrok-cli https://mentors.debian.net/package/sigrok https://mentors.debian.net/package/libserialport signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Sigrok RFSs
Dear Andreas & All, Please see my comments inline, On 03/15/2017 09:28 AM, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi Zoltan, > > On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 12:35:47AM +0100, Zoltan Gyarmati wrote: >>> I agree that if there is a pkg-electronics team that is fine for me. >>> What would be not fine is if this team is not updating the electronics >>> task of Debian Science. Please make sure that all relevant packages are >>> mentioned there! >> IMHO the pkg-electronics could be indeed a more appropriate place for >> maintaining >> these packages, and also, they should be listed on the Debian >> Science/Electronics task. > Fine. BTW, in principle there is most probably room for an own Debian > Electronics Blend with its own fine grained tasks. Two years ago Debian > Astro evolved from Debian Science and it was a great success. If you > are interested I could prepare some framework template for electronics. > >> I believe that the packages are ready for the first iteration of review, >> and i also >> uploaded them to mentors.debian.net, pls find here [1] the aggregated list. > Well, I admit I take the freedom to sponsor right from team VCS only. > If you want me to sponsor your packages (which I happily do) just tell > me via "Sponsoring of Blends" page the Vcs location and the task a > package belongs to. My reason for deriving from the established > sponsoring procedure is to make Blends more popular (which is obviously > needed :-P) Yes, i would be happy to push my listed git repos to a team VCS, and thank you for the offering the sponsoration although before we go any further (mainly to avoid any duplicated effort) i want to see what would be the way we cooperate on this with Aaron and the pkg-electronics team. As i'm rather new in contributing to Debian itself, i'm a bit lost here how to proceed with this, so maybe you and/or Dima and/or Bdale could figure out how to do this. > >> The only issue i became aware of that these packages are released for >> unstable >> but they should be uploaded to experimental (due to the stretch freeze), > New packages can easily go to unstable. They will not migrate to testing > anyway. These are not new packages, they have been RFA-d by Uwe (the current maintainer) a month back see [1]. > >> It seems we nicely teamed up to maintain this, >> how should we proceed, should be check the corresponding >> RFAs to ITA? > Hmmm, I admit I do not understand this question. As these packages are requested for adoption again, see [1] according to my understanding on the debian mentors docs (see for example [2]) i (or my mentor/sponsor?) have to set it to ITA. > > Thanks for your work on the electronics packages > >Andreas. > >> [1] >> https://mentors.debian.net/package/sigrok-firmware-fx2lafw >> https://mentors.debian.net/package/pulseview >> https://mentors.debian.net/package/libsigrok >> https://mentors.debian.net/package/sigrok-cli >> https://mentors.debian.net/package/sigrok >> https://mentors.debian.net/package/libserialport [1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=852830 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=852831 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=852832 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=852833 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=852834 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=852835 [2] https://wiki.debian.org/DebianMentorsFaq#How_do_I_make_my_first_package.3F Zoltan Gyarmati https://zgyarmati.de signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Sigrok RFSs
Dear All, On 03/14/2017 10:20 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi Dima, > > On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 01:58:15PM -0700, Dima Kogan wrote: >> Andreas Tille <andr...@an3as.eu> writes: >> >>> As far as I can see sigrok fits nicely into the Debian Science scope >>> and thus I'd recommend maintaining the packages in this team and sending >>> the RFPs on the relevant mailing list might make the right noise at the >>> right place. >> Hi. Aaron Brady has been working on getting the newer sigrok packages >> ready as part of the pkg-electronics team. I've been reviewing his >> packages so far. This was discussed at >> >> >> I think pkg-electronics is a more appropriate place for this, although >> it doesn't really matter. > I agree that if there is a pkg-electronics team that is fine for me. > What would be not fine is if this team is not updating the electronics > task of Debian Science. Please make sure that all relevant packages are > mentioned there! IMHO the pkg-electronics could be indeed a more appropriate place for maintaining these packages, and also, they should be listed on the Debian Science/Electronics task. > >> Zoltan: your packages are ready for review >> now, or you're still working on it? Can you please talk with Aaron to >> compare the two efforts? I can't review anything until next week, maybe, >> but can look at it then. I believe that the packages are ready for the first iteration of review, and i also uploaded them to mentors.debian.net, pls find here [1] the aggregated list. The only issue i became aware of that these packages are released for unstable but they should be uploaded to experimental (due to the stretch freeze), i can fix that one in the (most likely anyway needed:) next iteration. > Kind regards > > Andreas. > It seems we nicely teamed up to maintain this, how should we proceed, should be check the corresponding RFAs to ITA? [1] https://mentors.debian.net/package/sigrok-firmware-fx2lafw https://mentors.debian.net/package/pulseview https://mentors.debian.net/package/libsigrok https://mentors.debian.net/package/sigrok-cli https://mentors.debian.net/package/sigrok https://mentors.debian.net/package/libserialport Regards, Zoltan Gyarmati https://zgyarmati.de signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Sigrok RFSs
Dear Andreas, On 03/14/2017 12:06 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi Zoltan, > > On Sat, Mar 11, 2017 at 03:32:42AM +0100, Zoltan Gyarmati wrote: >> Dear Mentors, >> >> at the beggining of the last week i submitted a couple of RFSs[1] >> regarding to the packages related to the sigrok[2] suite and its updates >> since the last version released to Debian. >> I'll be the first to admit that it's rather big pile of stuff to review >> (we are talking about 6 source packages, also with soname upgrades and >> so on), and i also know that most of the DD community is busy with >> Stretch related tasks, but even then: >> what else (beside uploading the updated packages and file the RFSs) can >> i do to ease the reviewing work and mainly to find a sponsor to provide >> the certainly needed guidence? > As far as I can see sigrok fits nicely into the Debian Science scope > and thus I'd recommend maintaining the packages in this team and sending > the RFPs on the relevant mailing list might make the right noise at the > right place. > > If you are willing to understand the Debian Science tasks framework I > can offer Sponsering of Blends[3]. > > Hope this helps > >Andreas. > > >> [1] >> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=856974 >> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=856981 >> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=856987 >> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=856989 >> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=857002 >> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=857004 >> >> [2] http://sigrok.org/ > [3] https://wiki.debian.org/DebianPureBlends/SoB > > Sounds good, thanks for the response! In the next days i'm going to read through the corresponding docs and subscribe/check out the mailing list, and I'll contact you with my questions regarding to the next steps. Thanks, regards Zoltan Gyarmati https://zgyarmati.de signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Sigrok RFSs
Dear Mentors, at the beggining of the last week i submitted a couple of RFSs[1] regarding to the packages related to the sigrok[2] suite and its updates since the last version released to Debian. I'll be the first to admit that it's rather big pile of stuff to review (we are talking about 6 source packages, also with soname upgrades and so on), and i also know that most of the DD community is busy with Stretch related tasks, but even then: what else (beside uploading the updated packages and file the RFSs) can i do to ease the reviewing work and mainly to find a sponsor to provide the certainly needed guidence? @Uwe, i know you explitcly stated that it's unlikely that you have time to review and packaging work, but do you have some time any chance to comment the uploaded updates? [1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=856974 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=856981 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=856987 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=856989 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=857002 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=857004 [2] http://sigrok.org/ Thanks in advance, regards -- Zoltan Gyarmati https://zgyarmati.de 0x91F22561.asc Description: application/pgp-keys signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#857005: RFS: sigrok/0.3-1 [ITA]
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "sigrok" * Package name: sigrok Version : 0.3-1 Upstream Author : none (metapackage) * URL : none (metapackage) * License : none (metapackage) Section : electronics It builds those binary packages: sigrok - Logic analyzer and protocol decoder software suite (metapackage) To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/sigrok Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/sigrok/sigrok_0.3-1.dsc Changes since the last upload: * Bump dependency to sigrok-cli >= 0.6.0. * Bump dependency on pulseview >= 0.3.0. * Bump dependency on sigrok-firmware-fx2lafw >= 0.1.4. * Standards-Version: 3.9.8 (no changes required). * Bump debhelper compat and dependency to 10 * New maintainer (Closes: #852828) The package was recently RFA'd by the current maintainer Uwe, see #852834, and i would like to take over the maintenance of this package and the related packages in the sigrok suite (see at http://sigrok.org/wiki/Downloads). RFSs for the other packages are already sent. Unfortunately Uwe doesn't have time for sponsoring the package, so i would like to ask the community to guide me with the first steps. To ease this i uploaded my version to mentors.debian.net, see above. The packaging work is version controlled here: https://git.zgyarmati.de/debian-packaging/sigrok-debian which repository i plan to migrate to collab-maint eventually once i'm more set in the Debian infrastructure. Please feel free to contact with any comments or questions, best regards -- Zoltan Gyarmati https://zgyarmati.de signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#857004: RFS: sigrok-cli/0.6.0-1 [ ITA]
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "sigrok-cli" * Package name: sigrok-cli Version : 0.6.0-1 Upstream Author : http://sigrok.org * URL :http://sigrok.org/wiki/Sigrok-cli * License : GPL Section : electronics It builds those binary packages: sigrok-cli - command-line frontend for the sigrok software To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/sigrok-cli Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/sigrok-cli/sigrok-cli_0.6.0-1.dsc Changes since the last upload: * New upstream release. * Standards-Version: 3.9.8 (no changes required). * New maintainer (Closes: #852834). * Bump debhelper compat and dependency to 10 * Update sigrok dependencies' version The package was recently RFA'd by the current maintainer Uwe, see #852834, and i would like to take over the maintenance of this package and the related packages in the sigrok suite (see at http://sigrok.org/wiki/Downloads). RFSs for the other packages coming soon. Unfortunately Uwe doesn't have time for sponsoring the package, so i would like to ask the community to guide me with the first steps. To ease this i uploaded my version to mentors.debian.net, see above. The packaging work is version controlled here: https://git.zgyarmati.de/debian-packaging/sigrok-cli-debian which repository i plan to migrate to collab-maint eventually once i'm more set in the Debian infrastructure. Please feel free to contact with any comments or questions, best regards -- Zoltan Gyarmati https://zgyarmati.de signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#857002: RFS: pulseview/0.3.0-1 [ ITA]
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pulseview" * Package name: pulseview Version : 0.3.0-1 Upstream Author : http://sigrok.org * URL : http://sigrok.org/wiki/PulseView * License : GPL Section : electronics It builds those binary packages: pulseview - sigrok logic analyzer, oscilloscope, and MSO GUI To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/pulseview Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/pulseview/pulseview_0.3.0-1.dsc More information about hello can be obtained from https://www.example.com. Changes since the last upload: Changes since the last upload: * New upstream release * New maintainer (Closes: #852833) * Standards-Version: 3.9.8 (no changes required) * Update sigrok dependencies' version * Remove obsolete patches * Add patches to fix build errors * Build with Qt5, set build dependencies accordingly The package was recently RFA'd by the current maintainer Uwe, see # 852833, and i would like to take over the maintenance of this package and the related packages in the sigrok suite (see at http://sigrok.org/wiki/Downloads). RFSs for the other packages coming soon. Unfortunately Uwe doesn't have time for sponsoring the package, so i would like to ask the community to guide me with the first steps. To ease this i uploaded my version to mentors.debian.net, see above. The packaging work is version controlled here: https://git.zgyarmati.de/debian-packaging/pulseview-debian which repository i plan to migrate to collab-maint eventually once i'm more set in the Debian infrastructure. Please feel free to contact with any comments or questions, best regards -- Zoltan Gyarmati https://zgyarmati.de signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#856989: RFS: sigrok-firmware-fx2lafw/0.1.4-1 [ITA]
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal [important for RC bugs, wishlist for new packages] Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "sigrok-firmware-fx2lafw" * Package name: sigrok-firmware-fx2lafw Version : 0.1.4-1 Upstream Author : http://sigrok.org * URL : http://sigrok.org/wiki/Fx2lafw * License : GPL Section : electronics It builds those binary packages: sigrok-firmware-fx2lafw - Firmware for Cypress FX2(LP) based logic analyzers To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/sigrok-firmware-fx2lafw Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/sigrok-firmware-fx2lafw/sigrok-firmware-fx2lafw_0.1.4-1.dsc Changes since the last upload: * New upstream release. * Standards-Version: 3.9.8 (no changes required). * New maintainer (Closes: #852835). * Bump debhelper compat and dependency to 10 The package was recently RFA'd by the current maintainer Uwe, see #852835, and i would like to take over the maintenance of this package and the related packages in the sigrok suite (see at http://sigrok.org/wiki/Downloads). RFSs for the other packages coming soon. Unfortunately Uwe doesn't have time for sponsoring the package, so i would like to ask the community to guide me with the first steps. To ease this i uploaded my version to mentors.debian.net, see above. The packaging work is version controlled here: https://git.zgyarmati.de/debian-packaging/sigrok-firmware-fx2lafw-debian which repository i plan to migrate to collab-maint eventually once i'm more set in the Debian infrastructure. Please feel free to contact with any comments or questions, best regards -- Zoltan Gyarmati https://zgyarmati.de signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#856987: RFS: libsigrokdecode/0.4.1-1 [ITA]
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libsigrokdecode" * Package name: libsigrokdecode Version : 0.4.1-1 Upstream Author : http://sigrok.org/ * URL : http://sigrok.org/wiki/Libsigrokdecode * License : GPL Section : libs It builds those binary packages: libsigrokdecode-dev - sigrok protocol decoding library - development files libsigrokdecode2 - sigrok protocol decoding library - shared library libsigrokdecode3 - sigrok protocol decoding library - shared library To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/libsigrokdecode Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libs/libsigrokdecode/libsigrokdecode_0.4.1-1.dsc More information about the sigrok can be obtained from http://sigrok.org/. Changes since the last upload: * New upstream release 0.4.1 * New maintainer (Closes: #852831) * Increment package name suffix as upstream soname has changed * Add transitional package for libsigrokdecode2 * Standards-Version: 3.9.8 (no changes required) * Bump debhelper compat and dependency to 10 The package was recently RFA'd by the current maintainer Uwe, see #852831, and i would like to take over the maintenance of this package and the related packages in the sigrok suite (see at http://sigrok.org/wiki/Downloads). RFSs for the other packagescoming soon. Unfortunately Uwe doesn't have time for sponsoring the package, so i would like to ask the community to guide me with the first steps. To ease this i uploaded my version to mentors.debian.net, see above. The packaging work is version controlled here: https://git.zgyarmati.de/debian-packaging/libsigrokdecode-debian which repository i plan to migrate to collab-maint eventually once i'm more set in the Debian infrastructure. Please feel free to contact with any comments or questions, best regards -- Zoltan Gyarmati https://zgyarmati.de signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#856981: RFS: libsigrok/0.4.0-1 [ ITA]
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libsigrok" * Package name: libsigrok Version : 0.4.0-1 Upstream Author : http://sigrok.org/ * URL : http://sigrok.org/wiki/Libsigrok * License : GPL Section : libs It builds those binary packages: libsigrok-dev - sigrok hardware driver library - development files libsigrok2 - sigrok hardware driver library (transitional dummy package) libsigrok3 - sigrok hardware driver library - shared library libsigrokcxx3 - sigrok hardware driver library - shared library libsigrokcxx3-dev - sigrok C++ bindings - development files python-libsigrok3 - Python bindings for the libsigrok library To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/libsigrok Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libs/libsigrok/libsigrok_0.4.0-1.dsc More information about the sigrok can be obtained from http://sigrok.org/. Changes since the last upload: * New upstream release 0.4.0 * New maintainer (Closes: #852830) * Increase package name suffix as soname changed, add correspondig dummy package * Remove obsolote transitional dummy package libsigrok0-dev * Add binary and dev packages for C++ bindings * Add binary package for Python bindings * Patch Makefile.am to avoid build quiteness and install Python module under dist-packages * Add build-deps needed for C++/Python bindings The package was recently RFA'd by the current maintainer Uwe, see #852830, and i would like to take over the maintenance of this package and the related packages in the sigrok suite (see at http://sigrok.org/wiki/Downloads). RFSs for the other packagescoming soon. Unfortunately Uwe doesn't have time for sponsoring the package, so i would like to ask the community to guide me with the first steps. To ease this i uploaded my version to mentors.debian.net, see above. The packaging work is version controlled here: https://git.zgyarmati.de/debian-packaging/libsigrok-debian which repository i plan to migrate to collab-maint eventually once i'm more set in the Debian infrastructure. Please feel free to contact with any comments or questions, best regards -- Zoltan Gyarmati https://zgyarmati.de -- Zoltan Gyarmati https://zgyarmati.de signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#856974: RFS: libserialport/0.1.1-2 [ITA]
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libserialport" * Package name: libserialport Version : 0.1.1-2 Upstream Author : http://sigrok.org/ * URL : http://sigrok.org/wiki/Libserialport * License : LGPL Section : libs It builds those binary packages: libserialport-dev - Crossplatform serial port handling library - development files libserialport0 - Crossplatform serial port handling library - shared library To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/libserialport Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libs/libserialport/libserialport_0.1.1-2.dsc More information about hello can be obtained from https://www.example.com. Changes since the last upload: * New maintainer (Closes: #852832) * Add patch to fix build on kfreebsd (Closes: #816334) * Standards-Version: 3.9.8 (no changes required) * Increase debhelper compat to 10 * Added libserialport0.symbols file The package was recently RFA'd by the current maintainer Uwe, see #852832, and i would like to take over the maintenance of this package and the related packages in the sigrok suite (see at http://sigrok.org/wiki/Downloads). RFSs for the other packages coming soon. Unfortunately Uwe doesn't have time for sponsoring the package, so i would like to ask the community to guide me with the first steps. To ease this i uploaded my version to mentors.debian.net, see above. The packaging work is version controlled here: https://git.zgyarmati.de/debian-packaging/libserialport-debian which repository i plan to migrate to collab-maint eventually once i'm more set in the Debian infrastructure. Please feel free to contact with any comments or questions, best regards -- Zoltan Gyarmati https://zgyarmati.de signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Packaging a gui app
Dear Matt, libqt5gui5 is already depending on the needed X libraries, so unless your app is doing something tricky, you don't need to care about this. But we can tell more if we see the application in question... Regards, Zoltan Gyarmati https://zgyarmati.de On 02/26/2017 04:15 PM, matt jones wrote: > > I am packaging a gui that has dependencies for qt and such. How do I > go about ensuring that X is available as well? Do I list that as a > dependency as well. The upstream maintainers don’t call it out > specifically but it is understood. Links to docs are always welcome. > > > > Thanks! > > > > -- > > Matt Jones @CaffeinatedEng > > Senior Infrastructure Engineer - Yieldbot Inc. <http://yieldbot.com/> > > Co-Organizer - Boston Infrastructure Coders > <http://www.meetup.com/Boston-Infrastructure-Coders/> > > Organizer - Metrowest Golang Meetup > <http://www.meetup.com/Metrowest-Golang-Meetup/> > > https://linkedin.com/in/mattyjones > > > > > signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Packaging a gui app
Dear Matt, libqt5gui5 is already depending on the needed X libraries, so unless your app is doing something tricky, you don't need to care about this. But we can tell more if we see the application in question... Regards, Zoltan Gyarmati https://zgyarmati.de On 02/26/2017 04:15 PM, matt jones wrote: > > I am packaging a gui that has dependencies for qt and such. How do I > go about ensuring that X is available as well? Do I list that as a > dependency as well. The upstream maintainers don’t call it out > specifically but it is understood. Links to docs are always welcome. > > > > Thanks! > > > > -- > > Matt Jones @CaffeinatedEng > > Senior Infrastructure Engineer - Yieldbot Inc. <http://yieldbot.com/> > > Co-Organizer - Boston Infrastructure Coders > <http://www.meetup.com/Boston-Infrastructure-Coders/> > > Organizer - Metrowest Golang Meetup > <http://www.meetup.com/Metrowest-Golang-Meetup/> > > https://linkedin.com/in/mattyjones > > > > >
