Hi,
I forgot: If I understand the [Policy] correctly, this should be a
DELAYED/0, right?
[Policy]
https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/pkgs.html#nmu
On Sun, 2022-01-16 at 23:43 +0100, Evangelos Ribeiro Tzaras wrote:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: important
>
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "sofia-sip":
>
> * Package name : sofia-sip
> Version : 1.12.11+20110422.1-2.2
> Upstream Author : Pekka Pessi, Martti Mela, Kai Vehmanen
> * URL : http://sofia-sip.sourceforge.net/
> * License : LGPL-2.1
> * Vcs :
> http://git.debian.org/?p=users/ron/sofia-sip.git;a=summary
> Section : net
>
> It builds those binary packages:
>
> sofia-sip-bin - Sofia-SIP library utilities
> libsofia-sip-ua0 - Sofia-SIP library runtime
> libsofia-sip-ua-dev - Sofia-SIP library development files
> libsofia-sip-ua-glib3 - Sofia-SIP library glib/gobject interfaces
> runtime
> libsofia-sip-ua-glib-dev - Sofia-SIP library glib/gobject interface
> development files
> sofia-sip-doc - Sofia-SIP library documentation
>
> To access further information about this package, please visit the
> following URL:
>
> https://mentors.debian.net/package/sofia-sip/
>
> Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this
> command:
>
> dget -x
> https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/sofia-sip/sofia-sip_1.12.11+20110422.1-2.2.dsc
>
> I have uploaded the package on salsa under
> https://salsa.debian.org/devrtz/sofia-sip/-/tree/minimal-nmu
> Judging by debdiff (as mentioned in #965829) there is basically only
> some
> changes in the -doc package which I believe are due to a newer
> doxygen being used.
>
> I've also tested with one rdep (gnome-calls of which I'm the
> maintainer) that
> it still builds and runs fine.
>
> Changes since the last upload:
>
> sofia-sip (1.12.11+20110422.1-2.2) unstable; urgency=medium
> .
> * Non-maintainer upload.
> * Bump dh-compat to 13 (Closes: #965829)
>
> Regards,
