Bug#1040253: RFS: texlive-bin/2023.20230311.66589-1 -- TeX Live: LuaJIT, modified for use with LuaJITTeX (development part)
Hello, To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/texlive-bin/ Alternatively, you can download the package with 'dget' using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/t/texlive-bin/texlive-bin_2023.20230311.66589-1.dsc The mentors web page reported a few glitches like "closing already closed bugs" and "not DEP-5 copyright". They should be fixed now. Hilmar -- sigfault OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#1040253: RFS: texlive-bin/2023.20230311.66589-1 -- TeX Live: LuaJIT, modified for use with LuaJITTeX (development part)
On 04.07.2023 16:34, Nicholas D Steeves wrote: Hi, Thank you, you have the right idea, and this action is appreciated! :) Assuming all of those deps are in Debian main, it sounds like the "+ds" suffix would be the most appropriate. I've changed the make-orig-tar script to append the string next time an orig.tar.xz is created. Hilmar -- sigfault OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#1040253: RFS: texlive-bin/2023.20230311.66589-1 -- TeX Live: LuaJIT, modified for use with LuaJITTeX (development part)
Hello Hilmar, Preuße, Hilmar writes: > On 04.07.2023 15:42, Nicholas D Steeves wrote: > >>>texlive-bin (2023.20230311.66589-1) experimental; urgency=medium >>>. >>> * New upstream snapshot made for TL 2023. >>>- Remove sources of dvisvgm from orig.tar.xz, we don't build >>> it anyways. >> >> Thus shouldn't the upstream_version have a suffix like +dfsg, +ds (for >> "Debian Source"), or +repack, as appropriate, depending on the reason >> dvisvgm is excluded? >> > I can add it, if it is needed. This is ultimately up to your sponsor, but I think it's needed. It's also friendlier to upstream, because it's possible that a bug exists when using Debian-package-provided deps rather than texlive-bin-bundled deps (or vice versa). The repack suffix makes it clear to upstream that their source was modified. > The original tar ball contains a lots of source code, which exists as > separate package in Debian. Hence I decided to remove the source code to > get a smaller tar ball: > > # packaged separately: > rm -rf $verstr/texk/dvisvgm > rm -rf $verstr/utils/biber > rm -rf $verstr/utils/asymptote > rm -rf $verstr/utils/xindy > rm -rf $verstr/utils/ps2eps > rm -rf $verstr/utils/t1utils > > The split off was done years ago, just this time I decided to remove the > (duplicate) code. Thank you, you have the right idea, and this action is appreciated! :) Assuming all of those deps are in Debian main, it sounds like the "+ds" suffix would be the most appropriate. Regards, Nicholas signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#1040253: RFS: texlive-bin/2023.20230311.66589-1 -- TeX Live: LuaJIT, modified for use with LuaJITTeX (development part)
On 04.07.2023 15:42, Nicholas D Steeves wrote: Hi Nicholas, texlive-bin (2023.20230311.66589-1) experimental; urgency=medium . * New upstream snapshot made for TL 2023. - Remove sources of dvisvgm from orig.tar.xz, we don't build it anyways. Thus shouldn't the upstream_version have a suffix like +dfsg, +ds (for "Debian Source"), or +repack, as appropriate, depending on the reason dvisvgm is excluded? I can add it, if it is needed. The original tar ball contains a lots of source code, which exists as separate package in Debian. Hence I decided to remove the source code to get a smaller tar ball: # packaged separately: rm -rf $verstr/texk/dvisvgm rm -rf $verstr/utils/biber rm -rf $verstr/utils/asymptote rm -rf $verstr/utils/xindy rm -rf $verstr/utils/ps2eps rm -rf $verstr/utils/t1utils The split off was done years ago, just this time I decided to remove the (duplicate) code. Hilmar -- sigfault OpenPGP_0x0C871C4C653C1F59.asc Description: OpenPGP public key OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#1040253: RFS: texlive-bin/2023.20230311.66589-1 -- TeX Live: LuaJIT, modified for use with LuaJITTeX (development part)
Hello Hilmar, > texlive-bin (2023.20230311.66589-1) experimental; urgency=medium > . > * New upstream snapshot made for TL 2023. > - Remove sources of dvisvgm from orig.tar.xz, we don't build > it anyways. Thus shouldn't the upstream_version have a suffix like +dfsg, +ds (for "Debian Source"), or +repack, as appropriate, depending on the reason dvisvgm is excluded? Regards, Nicholas signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#1040253: RFS: texlive-bin/2023.20230311.66589-1 -- TeX Live: LuaJIT, modified for use with LuaJITTeX (development part)
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "texlive-bin": * Package name : texlive-bin Version : 2023.20230311.66589-1 Upstream contact : Karl Berry * URL : https://www.tug.org/texlive/ * License : TL License, GPLv2, LPPL * Vcs : https://github.com/debian-tex/texlive-bin Section : tex The source builds the following binary packages: texlive-binaries - Binaries for TeX Live texlive-binaries-sse2 - Binaries for TeX Live (the JIT part) libkpathsea6 - TeX Live: path search library for TeX (runtime part) libkpathsea-dev - TeX Live: path search library for TeX (development part) libptexenc1 - TeX Live: pTeX encoding library libptexenc-dev - TeX Live: ptex encoding library (development part) libsynctex2 - TeX Live: SyncTeX parser library libsynctex-dev - TeX Live: SyncTeX parser library (development part) libtexlua53 - transitional package (lib) libtexlua53-5 - TeX Live: Lua 5.3, modified for use with LuaTeX libtexlua53-dev - transitional package (dev) libtexlua-dev - TeX Live: Lua 5.3, modified for use with LuaTeX (development part) libtexluajit2 - TeX Live: LuaJIT, modified for use with LuaJITTeX libtexluajit-dev - TeX Live: LuaJIT, modified for use with LuaJITTeX (development part) To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/texlive-bin/ Alternatively, you can download the package with 'dget' using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/t/texlive-bin/texlive-bin_2023.20230311.66589-1.dsc Changes since the last upload: texlive-bin (2023.20230311.66589-1) experimental; urgency=medium . * New upstream snapshot made for TL 2023. - Remove sources of dvisvgm from orig.tar.xz, we don't build it anyways. - New luatex version + Fixes issues with discretionaries when priorities are used (Closes: #1018206). + Contains fix for CVE-2023-32668 (Closes: #1036470), add Breaks statement for old context. - Refresh / Disable patches. * Fix BD: - Add libpotrace-dev - Replace libfontconfig1-dev by libfontconfig-dev * Fix / Add Lintian Overrides. * Add syntax fixes for: - luatex.1 (Closes: #1037553). - bibtex.original.1 (Closes: #1039975). - detex.1 (Closes: #1039976). - kpsewhich.1 (Closes: #1039977) - axohelp.1 (Closes: #1039978) * Split luajit based binaries into texlive-binaries-sse2 to make TL usable on non sse2 capable CPU's at all (Closes: #1035461). Regards, -- Hilmar Preusse OpenPGP_0x0C871C4C653C1F59.asc Description: OpenPGP public key OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature
