Bug#851696: RFS: python-qtpy/1.2.0-1
Hi Fred, On Tue, 2017-01-17 at 19:30 +, PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel wrote: > Hello Ghislain. > > do you know if this version is compatible with the reverse dependencies > already in Debian ? First of, the upstream changelog did not mention any API breakage, only fixes and new features (support for qtmultimedia). > python-qtpy > Reverse Depends: > python-spyder > python-ginga > python-qtawesome > python-glue Both qtpy 1.1.2 and qtpy 1.2.0 works with spyder 3.0.2 (tested in a venv). Since qtpy was designed for spyder, it is probably the best possible test we have in hand. > We are close from the freeze and I do not want to end up with a bunch of > autorm packages due to this kind of upload. I know, and there is still roughly a week to go. Since I use the packaged spyder, pyzo and git-cola quite extensively, I should be able to catch potential breakage quite quickly. > BUT if you can show that there is no problem I am ok to sponsorize this > package. Your call. Ghis
Bug#851696: RFS: python-qtpy/1.2.0-1
Hi Fred, On Tue, 2017-01-17 at 19:30 +, PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel wrote: > Hello Ghislain. > > do you know if this version is compatible with the reverse dependencies > already in Debian ? First of, the upstream changelog did not mention any breakage, only fixes and new features (support for qtmultimedia). Upstream has had a good track record at keeping these in check so far. > python-qtpy > Reverse Depends: > python-spyder > python-ginga > python-qtawesome > python-glue Both qtpy 1.1.2 and qtpy 1.2.0 works with spyder 3.0.2 (tested in a venv). Since qtpy was designed for spyder in the first place, it is probably the best possible test we have in hand. In addition, I have checked pyzo and git-cola. Both works fine with qtpy 1.1.2 and 1.2.0. > We are close from the freeze and I do not want to end up with a bunch of > autorm packages due to this kind of upload. Based on my initial testing, I am confident this is safe. I'd still have a week to fix things if disaster strikes, but I'd be really suprised. > BUT if you can show that there is no problem I am ok to sponsorize this > package. Your call. Ghis
Bug#851696: RFS: python-qtpy/1.2.0-1
Hello Ghislain. do you know if this version is compatible with the reverse dependencies already in Debian ? python-qtpy Reverse Depends: python-spyder python-ginga python-qtawesome python-glue We are close from the freeze and I do not want to end up with a bunch of autorm packages due to this kind of upload. BUT if you can show that there is no problem I am ok to sponsorize this package. Cheers Fred
Bug#851696: RFS: python-qtpy/1.2.0-1
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "python-qtpy" * Package name: python-qtpy Version : 1.2.0-1 Upstream Author : The Spyder Development Team * URL : https://github.com/spyder-ide/qtpy * License : Expat Section : python It builds those binary packages: python-qtpy - abtraction layer for PySide/PyQt4/PyQt5 (Python 2) python3-qtpy - abtraction layer for PySide/PyQt4/PyQt5 (Python 3) To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/python-qtpy Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/python-qtpy/python-qtpy_1.2.0-1.dsc Successful build on debomatic: http://debomatic-amd64.debian.net/distribution#unstable/python-qtpy/1.2.0-1/buildlog Changes since the last upload: * Switch to git-dpm * New upstream release * Bump minimum Python versions (2.7, 3.3) * Add new dependency on pyqt5.qtmultimedia * Simplify setup for tests in pybuild * Drop superfluous Testsuite field * Upgrade packaging to debhelper 10 * Support the nocheck build profile - Add versioned dependency on dpkg-dev - Mark test dependencies as !nocheck - Disable tests if nocheck requested * Fix whitespaces in rules file Regards, Ghislain Vaillant
