Bug#872559: RFS: opengrm-ngram/1.3.2-1 -- opengrm n-gram library

2017-08-30 Thread Giulio Paci 
I noticed that the building failed on several architectures.

I have the impression that some of them failed due to memory exhaustion and 
some other were aborted.

I monitored RAM on amd64 and found out that most files require about 650MB of 
RAM in order to be compiled, but a couple of them require 3.5GB and 2.0GB.

So I decided to artificially limit parallelism if it cannot be guaranteed that 
each process will have at least 2.0GB of RAM.

The idea is that the build may still fail on amd64 build machines with 2 cores 
and 4.0GB of RAM, but should work on larger machines. On 32bit systems it 
should work even
with 2 core and 4.0GB as those files are expected to require less memory on 
32bit systems.

Can you upload the new version?
On mips64el the build failed while running the test suite. However I cannot see 
why (i.e., the build logs are not showing src/test/test-suite.log), can you 
provide me that
file?

Best regards,
Giulio

Bug#872559: RFS: opengrm-ngram/1.3.2-1 -- opengrm n-gram library

2017-08-29 Thread Giulio Paci 
On 29/08/2017 12:39, Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 03:48:26PM +0200, Giulio Paci wrote:
>>  * Package name: opengrm-ngram
>>Version : 1.3.2-1
> 
>> It closes BUG:
>>   #871061
>>
>> It builds those binary packages:
>>
>>  libngram-dev - opengrm n-gram library (development)
>>  libngram-tools - opengrm n-gram library (tools)
>>  libngram2  - opengrm n-gram library (runtime)
> 
> Looks good.
> 
> It does FTBFS on kfreebsd-i386 against the outdated openfst, which is good
> (no misbuilt packages).  I wonder, though, perhaps an explicit
> "Build-Depends: libfst-dev >= 1.6.3-1" wouldn't be better to avoid it being
> tried over and over?

I agree. I added an explicit dependency on 1.6.3 instead of 1.5.2.

Cheers,
Giulio

Bug#872559: RFS: opengrm-ngram/1.3.2-1 -- opengrm n-gram library

2017-08-29 Thread Adam Borowski 
On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 03:48:26PM +0200, Giulio Paci wrote:
>  * Package name: opengrm-ngram
>Version : 1.3.2-1

> It closes BUG:
>   #871061
> 
> It builds those binary packages:
> 
>  libngram-dev - opengrm n-gram library (development)
>  libngram-tools - opengrm n-gram library (tools)
>  libngram2  - opengrm n-gram library (runtime)

Looks good.

It does FTBFS on kfreebsd-i386 against the outdated openfst, which is good
(no misbuilt packages).  I wonder, though, perhaps an explicit
"Build-Depends: libfst-dev >= 1.6.3-1" wouldn't be better to avoid it being
tried over and over?


Meow!
-- 
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ 
⣾⠁⢰⠒⠀⣿⡁ Vat kind uf sufficiently advanced technology iz dis!?
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ -- Genghis Ht'rok'din
⠈⠳⣄

Bug#872559: RFS: opengrm-ngram/1.3.2-1 -- opengrm n-gram library

2017-08-18 Thread Giulio Paci 
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for a new version of the package "opengrm-ngram"

 * Package name: opengrm-ngram
   Version : 1.3.2-1
   Upstream Author : Brian Roark 
 * URL : http://www.openfst.org/twiki/bin/view/GRM/NGramLibrary
 * License : APACHE-2.0
   Section : libs

It closes BUG:
  #871061

It builds those binary packages:

 libngram-dev - opengrm n-gram library (development)
 libngram-tools - opengrm n-gram library (tools)
 libngram2  - opengrm n-gram library (runtime)

To access further information about this package, please visit the
following Vcs URL:

 git clone git://anonscm.debian.org/collab-maint/opengrm-ngram.git

Bests,
Giulio.



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature