Bug#932915: RFS: qcoan/2.0-6

2022-05-18 Thread Bastian Germann

Control: tags -1 moreinfo

As for your other RFSs you have to get your changelog in order.
It has to have one version entry with exactly one line including "Closes: 
#933008".
It needs to target unstable or experimental.

Please provide a manpage for qcoan.

When you have addressed these please untag moreinfo.



Bug#932915: RFS: qcoan/2.0-6

2019-07-30 Thread Elmar Stellnberger

Hi Adam

  Thanks for the work you have put into qcoan. I hope that we will get 
someone else to have a look at the program soon. I have now added the 
missing dependency for qcoan.


Regards,
Elmar

Am 30.07.19 um 06:16 schrieb Adam Borowski:

On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 02:02:58PM +0200, Elmar Stellnberger wrote:

I have now changed something in the dependencies and hope that this will
work better for you.


Alas:
qmake -qt=qt5 qcoan.pro
Project ERROR: Unknown module(s) in QT: core gui widgets

After adding qtbase5-dev, it builds.

But unfortunately, due to hardware problems, I cannot really continue.  All
my machines that both 1. work and 2. are adequate for mucking with gui
stuff, are on a different continent; unless situation improves I won't be
able to review this in quite a while.

Thus, I'm afraid it'd be best to ask someone else for now.


Meow!





Bug#932915: RFS: qcoan/2.0-6

2019-07-29 Thread Adam Borowski
On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 02:02:58PM +0200, Elmar Stellnberger wrote:
> I have now changed something in the dependencies and hope that this will
> work better for you.

Alas:
qmake -qt=qt5 qcoan.pro
Project ERROR: Unknown module(s) in QT: core gui widgets

After adding qtbase5-dev, it builds.

But unfortunately, due to hardware problems, I cannot really continue.  All
my machines that both 1. work and 2. are adequate for mucking with gui
stuff, are on a different continent; unless situation improves I won't be
able to review this in quite a while.

Thus, I'm afraid it'd be best to ask someone else for now.


Meow!
-- 
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Debian is one big family.  Including that weird uncle
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ and ultra-religious in-laws.
⠈⠳⣄



Bug#932915: RFS: qcoan/2.0-6

2019-07-29 Thread Elmar Stellnberger
I have now changed something in the dependencies and hope that this will 
work better for you.


Am 28.07.19 um 02:02 schrieb Adam Borowski:

On Sat, Jul 27, 2019 at 10:00:45AM +0200, Elmar Stellnberger wrote:

This is a strange error. I have tested the package locally on Debian 10 as
well as on Debian 8 and Debian 9 via the OpenSuSE build service.


Well, "Debian 9" is oldstable, while all new packages must go to unstable
(and at most get backported later).  That's a difference of two major
releases (ok, maybe 1.2 releases as to-be-Bullseye is very young, although
it did already see the flurry of post-Buster upload).  No wonder the package
fails to build.


For the obs it tests building the package in a previously empty chroot and
installs only the packages given via the build dependencies.  Consequently
I can exclude that there is some missing dependency.


Also, I see that that OpenSuSE build service uses some hacked up homebrewed
dependency resolution -- it likely has a different behaviour than native
Debian tools, which also may be the culprit.


I´m afraid you will have to research what causes that error message on your
computer.


The official archive requires all packages to be buildable on unstable using
sbuild; pbuilder may also work -- it has different defaults (notably,
doesn't strip alternative build-dependencies) but those don't apply to your
package.

I haven't started the real review yet -- just tried if it builds -- but I
already see that the -dbg package is obsolete; these are built automatically
since quite a while ago.


On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 07:02:13PM +0200, Elmar Stellnberger wrote:

   * Package name: qcoan
 Version : 2.0-6



Meow!





Bug#932915: RFS: qcoan/2.0-6

2019-07-28 Thread Adam Borowski
On Sun, Jul 28, 2019 at 11:17:10AM +0200, Elmar Stellnberger wrote:
> I have now installed a plain Bullseye chroot with debootstrap, installed all
> packages in build-depends and then run dpkg-buildpackage and see it builds
> without any problem. There needs to be something messed up with your build
> environment. Please have a look!

Full log:
http://ix.io/1PTG

It's obvious there's a missing Build-Dependency, although qmake's error
message is not very helpful.  I don't know QT well enough to assist you
there.

My build environment is for all matters that matter here identical with
official buildds[1] -- so even if I injected that dependency into my
chroot, the package would fail to build after upload.

I'd recommend testing in a tool such as pbuilder that ensures a build
environment without extra packages.


Meow!

[1]. I run 5.2 kernel, they run 4.19 or 4.9; for some uses filesystem matters
as well.  Or amount of memory or cores.  Or microarchitecture.
-- 
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Debian is one big family.  Including that weird uncle
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ and ultra-religious in-laws.
⠈⠳⣄



Bug#932915: RFS: qcoan/2.0-6

2019-07-28 Thread Elmar Stellnberger
I have now installed a plain Bullseye chroot with debootstrap, installed 
all packages in build-depends and then run dpkg-buildpackage and see it 
builds without any problem. There needs to be something messed up with 
your build environment. Please have a look!


Am 28.07.19 um 02:02 schrieb Adam Borowski:

On Sat, Jul 27, 2019 at 10:00:45AM +0200, Elmar Stellnberger wrote:

This is a strange error. I have tested the package locally on Debian 10 as
well as on Debian 8 and Debian 9 via the OpenSuSE build service.


Well, "Debian 9" is oldstable, while all new packages must go to unstable
(and at most get backported later).  That's a difference of two major
releases (ok, maybe 1.2 releases as to-be-Bullseye is very young, although
it did already see the flurry of post-Buster upload).  No wonder the package
fails to build.


For the obs it tests building the package in a previously empty chroot and
installs only the packages given via the build dependencies.  Consequently
I can exclude that there is some missing dependency.


Also, I see that that OpenSuSE build service uses some hacked up homebrewed
dependency resolution -- it likely has a different behaviour than native
Debian tools, which also may be the culprit.


I´m afraid you will have to research what causes that error message on your
computer.


The official archive requires all packages to be buildable on unstable using
sbuild; pbuilder may also work -- it has different defaults (notably,
doesn't strip alternative build-dependencies) but those don't apply to your
package.

I haven't started the real review yet -- just tried if it builds -- but I
already see that the -dbg package is obsolete; these are built automatically
since quite a while ago.


On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 07:02:13PM +0200, Elmar Stellnberger wrote:

   * Package name: qcoan
 Version : 2.0-6



Meow!





Bug#932915: RFS: qcoan/2.0-6

2019-07-27 Thread Adam Borowski
On Sat, Jul 27, 2019 at 10:00:45AM +0200, Elmar Stellnberger wrote:
> This is a strange error. I have tested the package locally on Debian 10 as
> well as on Debian 8 and Debian 9 via the OpenSuSE build service.

Well, "Debian 9" is oldstable, while all new packages must go to unstable
(and at most get backported later).  That's a difference of two major
releases (ok, maybe 1.2 releases as to-be-Bullseye is very young, although
it did already see the flurry of post-Buster upload).  No wonder the package
fails to build.

> For the obs it tests building the package in a previously empty chroot and
> installs only the packages given via the build dependencies.  Consequently
> I can exclude that there is some missing dependency.

Also, I see that that OpenSuSE build service uses some hacked up homebrewed
dependency resolution -- it likely has a different behaviour than native
Debian tools, which also may be the culprit.

> I´m afraid you will have to research what causes that error message on your
> computer.

The official archive requires all packages to be buildable on unstable using
sbuild; pbuilder may also work -- it has different defaults (notably,
doesn't strip alternative build-dependencies) but those don't apply to your
package.

I haven't started the real review yet -- just tried if it builds -- but I
already see that the -dbg package is obsolete; these are built automatically
since quite a while ago.

> > On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 07:02:13PM +0200, Elmar Stellnberger wrote:
> > >   * Package name: qcoan
> > > Version : 2.0-6


Meow!
-- 
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Debian is one big family.  Including that weird uncle
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ and ultra-religious in-laws.
⠈⠳⣄



Bug#932915: RFS: qcoan/2.0-6

2019-07-27 Thread Elmar Stellnberger
This is a strange error. I have tested the package locally on Debian 10 
as well as on Debian 8 and Debian 9 via the OpenSuSE build service. For 
the obs it tests building the package in a previously empty chroot and 
installs only the packages given via the build dependencies. 
Consequently I can exclude that there is some missing dependency.
I´m afraid you will have to research what causes that error message on 
your computer.


https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/home:estellnb:elstel/qcoan

Regards,
Elmar


Am 27.07.19 um 06:45 schrieb Adam Borowski:

On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 07:02:13PM +0200, Elmar Stellnberger wrote:

  * Package name: qcoan
Version : 2.0-6



   Changes since the last upload:

   The package is now available under GPLv3


I'm afraid it fails with:

dh_testroot
rm -f build-qt/* changelog.Debian.gz
dh_clean
  debian/rules build
#find ..  # -> ../SOURCES, ../BUILD/ - .at.bz2 extracted here, current dir, 
../qcoan_2.0-0.dsc, ../qcoan_2.0-0.diff.gz, ../DEBS,
  ../OTHER
qmake qcoan.pro
qmake: could not find a Qt installation of ''
make: *** [debian/rules:23: build] Error 1


Meow!





Bug#932915: RFS: qcoan/2.0-6

2019-07-26 Thread Adam Borowski
On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 07:02:13PM +0200, Elmar Stellnberger wrote:
>  * Package name: qcoan
>Version : 2.0-6

>   Changes since the last upload:
> 
>   The package is now available under GPLv3

I'm afraid it fails with:

dh_testroot   
rm -f build-qt/* changelog.Debian.gz
dh_clean
 debian/rules build
#find ..  # -> ../SOURCES, ../BUILD/ - .at.bz2 extracted here, current dir, 
../qcoan_2.0-0.dsc, ../qcoan_2.0-0.diff.gz, ../DEBS,
 ../OTHER
qmake qcoan.pro
qmake: could not find a Qt installation of ''
make: *** [debian/rules:23: build] Error 1


Meow!
-- 
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Debian is one big family.  Including that weird uncle
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ and ultra-religious in-laws.
⠈⠳⣄



Bug#932915: RFS: qcoan/2.0-6

2019-07-24 Thread Elmar Stellnberger

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist

Dear mentors,

  I am looking for a sponsor for my package "qcoan":

 * Package name: qcoan
   Version : 2.0-6
   Upstream Author : Elmar Stellnberger
 * URL : https://www.elstel.org/coan/
 * License : GPLv3
   Section : devel

  To access further information about this package, please visit the 
following URL:


  https://mentors.debian.net/package/qcoan


  Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

  dget -xu 
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/q/qcoan/qcoan_2.0-6.dsc


  More information about qcoan can be obtained from 
https://www.elstel.org/coan/.


  Changes since the last upload:

  The package is now available under GPLv3

Regards,
Elmar Stellnberger