Re: Help with d-shlibs needed
Hi, On Thu, Apr 03, 2014 at 09:39:29PM +0600, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: On Thu, Apr 03, 2014 at 04:03:02PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: Isn't it just much easier to use a install file pointing the right places? No. You need to adapt to different versions Huh? well, the former packaging contained files debian/libbamtools2.2.0* which would have needed to be renamed to debian/libbamtools2.3.0* for the new version. There is no need to do so when using d-shlibs. And yes, I know that you could do a different rules file and care with this. But I was asked why I'm using the tool that was *designed* to handle libraries for a library package. I've thought a short answer would be sufficient. Does this makes things more clear and has anybody an idea how to solve the original problem? Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140404085522.ga19...@an3as.eu
Re: Help with d-shlibs needed
On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 10:55:22AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: Isn't it just much easier to use a install file pointing the right places? No. You need to adapt to different versions Huh? well, the former packaging contained files debian/libbamtools2.2.0* which would have needed to be renamed to debian/libbamtools2.3.0* That's quite strange name for a library. Can you elaborate? -- WBR, wRAR -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140404094639.ga24...@belkar.wrar.name
Re: Help with d-shlibs needed
On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 03:46:39PM +0600, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: Isn't it just much easier to use a install file pointing the right places? No. You need to adapt to different versions Huh? well, the former packaging contained files debian/libbamtools2.2.0* which would have needed to be renamed to debian/libbamtools2.3.0* That's quite strange name for a library. Can you elaborate? Nevermind, got it. -- WBR, wRAR -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140404095218.ga25...@belkar.wrar.name
Help with d-shlibs needed
Hi, I tried to migrate bamtools (not yet released package!) at git://anonscm.debian.org/debian-med/bamtools.git to d-shlibs but it ended up by d-shlibmove --commit \ --multiarch \ --devunversioned \ --exclude-la \ --movedev debian/tmp/usr/include/* usr/include \ debian/tmp/usr/lib/lib*.so Library package automatic movement utility -- zlib1g-dev package exists. set -e install -d -m 755 debian/libbamtools-dev/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu install -d -m 755 debian/libbamtools2.3.0/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu mv debian/tmp/usr/lib/libbamtools.a debian/libbamtools-dev/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu mv debian/tmp/usr/lib/libbamtools.so debian/libbamtools-dev/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu mv /tmp/buildd/bamtools-2.3.0+dfsg/debian/tmp/usr/lib/libbamtools.so.2.3.0 debian/libbamtools2.3.0/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu mv /tmp/buildd/bamtools-2.3.0+dfsg/debian/tmp/usr/lib/libbamtools.so.2.3.0 debian/libbamtools2.3.0/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu PKGDEV=libbamtools-dev PKGSHL=libbamtools2.3.0 install -d -m 755 debian/libbamtools-dev/usr/include mv debian/tmp/usr/include/bamtools debian/libbamtools-dev/usr/include mv: cannot stat '/tmp/buildd/bamtools-2.3.0+dfsg/debian/tmp/usr/lib/libbamtools.so.2.3.0': No such file or directory Please note that the file /tmp/buildd/bamtools-2.3.0+dfsg/debian/tmp/usr/lib/libbamtools.so.2.3.0 just can not be found since it was moved correctly five lines above. Is there anything I'm missing in the d-shlibs usage or is this just a bug in d-shlibs? Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140403112101.ga22...@an3as.eu
Re: Help with d-shlibs needed
On 2014-04-03, Andreas Tille andr...@an3as.eu wrote: Hi, I tried to migrate bamtools (not yet released package!) at git://anonscm.debian.org/debian-med/bamtools.git to d-shlibs but it ended up by What's d-shlibs and why do you use it? Isn't it just much easier to use a install file pointing the right places? /Sune -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/lhjjnu$b38$1...@ger.gmane.org
Re: Help with d-shlibs needed
On Thu, Apr 03, 2014 at 12:21:18PM +, Sune Vuorela wrote: On 2014-04-03, Andreas Tille andr...@an3as.eu wrote: Hi, I tried to migrate bamtools (not yet released package!) at git://anonscm.debian.org/debian-med/bamtools.git to d-shlibs but it ended up by What's d-shlibs apt-cache show d-shlibs and why do you use it? To easily create library packages. I'm using it quite successfully in several of my packages. Isn't it just much easier to use a install file pointing the right places? No. You need to adapt to different versions and usually (if d-shlibs works as expected) things work very smoothly. Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140403140302.ga29...@an3as.eu
Re: Help with d-shlibs needed
On Thu, Apr 03, 2014 at 04:03:02PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: Isn't it just much easier to use a install file pointing the right places? No. You need to adapt to different versions Huh? -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: Digital signature
