Re: signed mails to control@ (was: How to set BTS tags nicely)
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 03:05:25PM +0100, David Paleino wrote: To be honest, last time I tried sending a signed mail to control@ was something like a year ago. Something may have changed since then, since I've just made a test mail (see #455005). But I've also changed something: now I send my GPG signature as PGP/MIME, before I was sending it as PGP/Inline. I bet that control@ can't handle PGP/Inline signed messages. Please file a bug with an example; I'm sure I made this work when I originally fixed debbugs to handle PGP signatures years ago. If it's broken now then something has gone wrong since then. Thanks, -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: signed mails to control@ (was: How to set BTS tags nicely)
On Sat, 23 Feb 2008 13:44:09 +, Colin Watson wrote: On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 03:05:25PM +0100, David Paleino wrote: To be honest, last time I tried sending a signed mail to control@ was something like a year ago. Something may have changed since then, since I've just made a test mail (see #455005). But I've also changed something: now I send my GPG signature as PGP/MIME, before I was sending it as PGP/Inline. I bet that control@ can't handle PGP/Inline signed messages. Please file a bug with an example; I'm sure I made this work when I originally fixed debbugs to handle PGP signatures years ago. If it's broken now then something has gone wrong since then. Bug filed as #467190. Kindly, David -- . ''`. Debian maintainer | http://wiki.debian.org/DavidPaleino : :' : Linuxer #334216 --|-- http://www.hanskalabs.net/ `. `'` GPG: 1392B174 | http://snipr.com/qa_page `- 2BAB C625 4E66 E7B8 450A C3E1 E6AA 9017 1392 B174 signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: How to set BTS tags nicely
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 02:47:10PM +0100, David Paleino wrote: To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] I do the same except BCC so if anyone replies they don't spammed by the BTS complaining about their reply being commands it doesn't understand. - Craig -- Craig Small GnuPG:1C1B D893 1418 2AF4 45EE 95CB C76C E5AC 12CA DFA5 http://www.enc.com.au/ csmall at : enc.com.au http://www.debian.org/ Debian GNU/Linux, software should be Free -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: How to set BTS tags nicely
On Tue, 12 Feb 2008, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: On Tue, 12 Feb 2008, David Paleino wrote: I usually do: To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Better change that cc to bcc. That way, spammers (and people) replying to your mail will not hammer the poor control bot. It's no big deal if people send mail improperly to control; it deals with it fairly sanely. Don Armstrong -- ou could say to the Universe this is not /fair/. And the Universe would say: Oh it isn't? Sorry. -- Terry Pratchett _Soul Music_ p357 http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: How to set BTS tags nicely
On Tue, 12 Feb 2008, David Paleino wrote: I usually do: To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Better change that cc to bcc. That way, spammers (and people) replying to your mail will not hammer the poor control bot. -- One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond where the shadows lie. -- The Silicon Valley Tarot Henrique Holschuh -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: signed mails to control@ (was: How to set BTS tags nicely)
Hi David, * David Paleino [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-02-12 15:10]: Il giorno Tue, 12 Feb 2008 14:53:21 +0100 Nico Golde [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto: * David Paleino [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-02-12 14:50]: [...] I usually sign all my emails -- but when I include commands to the BTS I cannot do that, as the GPG header is confusing the server. So, this is how you would do it. I add more to the original question: is it possible to send GPG-signed mails to [EMAIL PROTECTED] What problems did you experience? Cause I sign all my mails no matter if they go to the control address or not and never had any problem with that. To be honest, last time I tried sending a signed mail to control@ was something like a year ago. Something may have changed since then, since I've just made a test mail (see #455005). But I've also changed something: now I send my GPG signature as PGP/MIME, before I was sending it as PGP/Inline. I bet that control@ can't handle PGP/Inline signed messages. Yes this seems to be the reason then :) Cheers Nico -- Nico Golde - http://ngolde.de - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - GPG: 0x73647CFF For security reasons, all text in this mail is double-rot13 encrypted. http://people.debian.org/~nion/sponsoring-checklist.html pgpXnTiaIpfnt.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: signed mails to control@ (was: How to set BTS tags nicely)
Il giorno Tue, 12 Feb 2008 14:53:21 +0100 Nico Golde [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto: Hi David, Hi Nico, * David Paleino [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-02-12 14:50]: [...] I usually sign all my emails -- but when I include commands to the BTS I cannot do that, as the GPG header is confusing the server. So, this is how you would do it. I add more to the original question: is it possible to send GPG-signed mails to [EMAIL PROTECTED] What problems did you experience? Cause I sign all my mails no matter if they go to the control address or not and never had any problem with that. To be honest, last time I tried sending a signed mail to control@ was something like a year ago. Something may have changed since then, since I've just made a test mail (see #455005). But I've also changed something: now I send my GPG signature as PGP/MIME, before I was sending it as PGP/Inline. I bet that control@ can't handle PGP/Inline signed messages. Kindly, David -- . ''`. Debian maintainer | http://wiki.debian.org/DavidPaleino : :' : Linuxer #334216 --|-- http://www.hanskalabs.net/ `. `'` GPG: 1392B174 | http://snipr.com/qa_page `- 2BAB C625 4E66 E7B8 450A C3E1 E6AA 9017 1392 B174 signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: How to set BTS tags nicely
Le 12 févr. 08 à 14:47, David Paleino a écrit : Il giorno Tue, 12 Feb 2008 14:35:46 +0100 Thibaut Paumard [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto: Sometimes, I want to send new information to a bug report and set tags or otherwise modify the bug at the same time (for instance, but not only, sending a patch and setting the patch tag). I have tried setting a pseudo-header in my e-mail to bug- id@bugs.debian.org to no avail. It seems I must send two separate e- mails, one with the information to bug-id@ and the other with the commands to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I usually do: To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ... Thanks, I guess I could have figured that out :-) Does what I want (display the modifications to the bug report as well as the information that goes with them). Never had a problem with signed e-mails to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Best regards, Thibaut. PGP.sig Description: Ceci est une signature électronique PGP
Re: How to set BTS tags nicely
Il giorno Tue, 12 Feb 2008 14:35:46 +0100 Thibaut Paumard [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto: Hi, Hi, There is a trivial question I've been asking myself for some time, and I guess it will be best abswered here. Sometimes, I want to send new information to a bug report and set tags or otherwise modify the bug at the same time (for instance, but not only, sending a patch and setting the patch tag). I have tried setting a pseudo-header in my e-mail to bug- id@bugs.debian.org to no avail. It seems I must send two separate e- mails, one with the information to bug-id@ and the other with the commands to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Is it really how I should do, or is there a more correct way to proceed? I usually do: To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ... tags nn +patch moreinfo unreproducible blah blah blah thanks Hi, the bug you reported [..] I usually sign all my emails -- but when I include commands to the BTS I cannot do that, as the GPG header is confusing the server. So, this is how you would do it. I add more to the original question: is it possible to send GPG-signed mails to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cheers, David -- . ''`. Debian maintainer | http://wiki.debian.org/DavidPaleino : :' : Linuxer #334216 --|-- http://www.hanskalabs.net/ `. `'` GPG: 1392B174 | http://snipr.com/qa_page `- 2BAB C625 4E66 E7B8 450A C3E1 E6AA 9017 1392 B174 signature.asc Description: PGP signature
How to set BTS tags nicely
Hi, There is a trivial question I've been asking myself for some time, and I guess it will be best abswered here. Sometimes, I want to send new information to a bug report and set tags or otherwise modify the bug at the same time (for instance, but not only, sending a patch and setting the patch tag). I have tried setting a pseudo-header in my e-mail to bug- id@bugs.debian.org to no avail. It seems I must send two separate e- mails, one with the information to bug-id@ and the other with the commands to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Is it really how I should do, or is there a more correct way to proceed? Greetings, Thibaut. PGP.sig Description: Ceci est une signature électronique PGP
signed mails to control@ (was: How to set BTS tags nicely)
Hi David, * David Paleino [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-02-12 14:50]: [...] I usually sign all my emails -- but when I include commands to the BTS I cannot do that, as the GPG header is confusing the server. So, this is how you would do it. I add more to the original question: is it possible to send GPG-signed mails to [EMAIL PROTECTED] What problems did you experience? Cause I sign all my mails no matter if they go to the control address or not and never had any problem with that. Kind regards Nico -- Nico Golde - http://ngolde.de - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - GPG: 0x73647CFF For security reasons, all text in this mail is double-rot13 encrypted. http://people.debian.org/~nion/sponsoring-checklist.html pgp6OvTygScaw.pgp Description: PGP signature
