Re: Package Names Containing Versions

2010-07-30 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Chris Baines cbain...@gmail.com writes:

 Sorry, replying to my own message, I have just stumbled upon the Debian
 Shared Library Packaging guide
 (http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer/column/libpkg-guide/libpkg-guide.html#naminglibpkg
  ). Which explains the solution to my problem.

 Chris

 On Thu, 2010-07-29 at 15:46 +0100, Chris Baines wrote:
 Hello Mentors,
 
 I am looking at releasing the next upstream version of simgear as this
 is holding back both one of my upcoming packages (fgrun) and the
 upgrading of the FlightGear program. 
 
 The source package (old) currently produces two binary packages
 simgear1.9.1 and simgear-dev. I am wondering why the former package is
 named simgear1.9.1 and not just simgear as 1.9.1 is the version? 
 
 Initially I thought it was because is allows it to be installed
 alongside another version of the package but this is not possible as it
 conflicts with all other versions of simgear.
 
 Thanks,
 
 Chris

But then you have to fix the package so it can be installed alongside
another version. Otherwise having different names is pointless.

MfG
Goswin


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87iq3xe3f0@frosties.localdomain



Package Names Containing Versions

2010-07-29 Thread Chris Baines
Hello Mentors,

I am looking at releasing the next upstream version of simgear as this
is holding back both one of my upcoming packages (fgrun) and the
upgrading of the FlightGear program. 

The source package (old) currently produces two binary packages
simgear1.9.1 and simgear-dev. I am wondering why the former package is
named simgear1.9.1 and not just simgear as 1.9.1 is the version? 

Initially I thought it was because is allows it to be installed
alongside another version of the package but this is not possible as it
conflicts with all other versions of simgear.

Thanks,

Chris


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1280414766.2745.41.ca...@chris-debian-desktop



Re: Package Names Containing Versions

2010-07-29 Thread Chris Baines
Sorry, replying to my own message, I have just stumbled upon the Debian
Shared Library Packaging guide
(http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer/column/libpkg-guide/libpkg-guide.html#naminglibpkg
 ). Which explains the solution to my problem.

Chris

On Thu, 2010-07-29 at 15:46 +0100, Chris Baines wrote:
 Hello Mentors,
 
 I am looking at releasing the next upstream version of simgear as this
 is holding back both one of my upcoming packages (fgrun) and the
 upgrading of the FlightGear program. 
 
 The source package (old) currently produces two binary packages
 simgear1.9.1 and simgear-dev. I am wondering why the former package is
 named simgear1.9.1 and not just simgear as 1.9.1 is the version? 
 
 Initially I thought it was because is allows it to be installed
 alongside another version of the package but this is not possible as it
 conflicts with all other versions of simgear.
 
 Thanks,
 
 Chris



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1280421138.10526.3.ca...@chris-debian-desktop