Re: RFS: daptup (new package, 3rd try)
Ben Finney wrote: Eugene V. Lyubimkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: It builds these binary packages: daptup - see changes in new upgradeable lists after aptitude update The package synopsis should be an appositive clause as described in URL:http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/ch-best-pkging-practices#s-bpp-pkg-synopsis. Essentially this means the synopsis should make sense when inserted into the template packagename is {the,a,an} synopsis. A possible improved synopsis might be: reporter of changes in list of available packages from repositories Other improvements are certainly possible. Thanks for this correction. Done as how you suggested and re-uploaded: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/daptup/daptup_0.4.0-2.dsc -- Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, Ukrainian C++ developer. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
RFS: daptup (new package, 3rd try)
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package daptup. * Package name: daptup Version : 0.4-1 Upstream Author : Eugene V. Lyubimkin * URL : http://sf.net/projects/daptup * License : GPLv3 Section : admin It builds these binary packages: daptup - see changes in new upgradeable lists after aptitude update Daptup runs aptitude update inside and then outputs three lists: - packages came to archive with this update; - new upgradeable packages; - changes in watched packages (not installed, such packages have to be specified in configuration file). The package appears to be lintian clean. The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/daptup - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/daptup/daptup_0.4-1.dsc -- Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, Ukrainian C++ developer. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: RFS: daptup (new package, 3rd try)
Eugene V. Lyubimkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: It builds these binary packages: daptup - see changes in new upgradeable lists after aptitude update The package synopsis should be an appositive clause as described in URL:http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/ch-best-pkging-practices#s-bpp-pkg-synopsis. Essentially this means the synopsis should make sense when inserted into the template packagename is {the,a,an} synopsis. A possible improved synopsis might be: reporter of changes in list of available packages from repositories Other improvements are certainly possible. -- \ “The fact that I have no remedy for all the sorrows of the | `\ world is no reason for my accepting yours. It simply supports | _o__) the strong probability that yours is a fake.” —Henry L. Mencken | Ben Finney -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]