Re: Help: Updates of Upstream Versioning
also sprach Ben Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.02.26.1746 +0100]: > I'm updating some code from an upstream source, so do I give this > version a different version number? Use the Debian revision and send patches upstream. -- Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list! .''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' :proud Debian developer, admin, user, and author `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system Invalid/expired PGP subkeys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver! signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Help: Updates of Upstream Versioning
Hello Ben, * Ben Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-02-26 17:48]: > I'm updating some code from an upstream source, so do I give this > version a different version number? > > For example, if it's 0.3.1, should I call it 0.3.1.1 or use a different > format? No. In my opinion it is the best thing to just include the patch via dpatch. Regards Nico -- Nico Golde - [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GPG: 1024D/73647CFF http://www.ngolde.de | mutt-ng.berlios.de | grml.org VIM has two modes - the one in which it beeps and the one in which it doesn't -- encrypted mail preferred pgpDqXDRH4Xud.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Help: Updates of Upstream Versioning
On Sat, 2005-02-26 at 17:55 +0100, Nico Golde wrote: > Hello Ben, > > * Ben Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-02-26 17:48]: > > I'm updating some code from an upstream source, so do I give this > > version a different version number? > > > > For example, if it's 0.3.1, should I call it 0.3.1.1 or use a different > > format? > > No. In my opinion it is the best thing to just include the > patch via dpatch. > Regards Nico The updates are to do with copywritten artwork, and upstream may not want the updates. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Help: Updates of Upstream Versioning
On Sat, Feb 26, 2005 at 05:11:54PM +, Ben Hill wrote: > > > I'm updating some code from an upstream source, so do I give this > > > version a different version number? > > > > > > For example, if it's 0.3.1, should I call it 0.3.1.1 or use a different > > > format? > > > > No. In my opinion it is the best thing to just include the > > patch via dpatch. > > Regards Nico > > The updates are to do with copywritten artwork, and upstream may not > want the updates. So keep them as patches and don't change orig.tar.gz and upstream version. regards fEnIo -- ,''`. Bartosz Fenski | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | pgp:0x13fefc40 | irc:fEnIo : :' : 32-050 Skawina - Glowackiego 3/15 - w. malopolskie - Poland `. `' phone:+48602383548 | proud Debian maintainer and user `- http://skawina.eu.org | jid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | rlu:172001 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
