On Mon, 2006-05-01 at 23:12 -0400, Brett Smith wrote > I've prepared an initial package at > <http://www.brettcsmith.org/debian/libxml-ruby/>. I've got a sponsor > lined up already and he's provided me with a lot of useful feedback, but > I'd love to get any other comments that could help get this package in > great shape. One thing that's particularly bothering me is a patch to > the project's Rakefile in .diff.gz, to disable a dependency on Ruby > Gems. I'd like to handle this patch with one of the formal patch > systems if possible, but if I do that, I can't easily call rake from the > clean target, which seems like a bigger problem.
For such a small patch, ignoring dpatch is fine and probably preferable. (Other, dpatch-liking people, may disagree with me about this.) -- Joe Wreschnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
