Re: RFS: New version of cvs-autoreleasedeb
Eike zyro Sauer wrote: > Raphael Goulais schrieb: > > - Why do you remove /var/log/cvs-autoreleasedeb.log at postrm, since > >the log files are in /var/log/cvs-autoreleasedeb/ ? Also, I don't > >think you should remove the log files anyway, even on a purge. > > Is this consensus? > I thought I'd get rid of everything a package made when purging. I'm not familiar with this package, but policy is quite clear: Log files should be removed when the package is purged (but not when it is only removed). This should be done by the `postrm' script when it is called with the argument `purge' (see Section 6.7, `Details of removal and/or configuration purging'). -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: RFS: New version of cvs-autoreleasedeb
On 2004-02-20 Eike zyro Sauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Raphael Goulais schrieb: > > - Why do you remove /var/log/cvs-autoreleasedeb.log at postrm, since > >the log files are in /var/log/cvs-autoreleasedeb/ ? Also, I don't > >think you should remove the log files anyway, even on a purge. > Is this consensus? No, it is not. > I thought I'd get rid of everything a package made when purging. I would not go that far (Reductio ad absurdum: Removing /var/mail/* when uninstalling the MTA) but logfiles should indeed be deleted on purge, see policy 10.8. cu andreas
Re: RFS: New version of cvs-autoreleasedeb
Raphael Goulais schrieb: > - Why do you remove /var/log/cvs-autoreleasedeb.log at postrm, since >the log files are in /var/log/cvs-autoreleasedeb/ ? Also, I don't >think you should remove the log files anyway, even on a purge. Is this consensus? I thought I'd get rid of everything a package made when purging. Ciao, Eike
Re: RFS: New version of cvs-autoreleasedeb
Eike zyro Sauer wrote: > Raphael Goulais schrieb: > > - Why do you remove /var/log/cvs-autoreleasedeb.log at postrm, since > >the log files are in /var/log/cvs-autoreleasedeb/ ? Also, I don't > >think you should remove the log files anyway, even on a purge. > > Is this consensus? > I thought I'd get rid of everything a package made when purging. I'm not familiar with this package, but policy is quite clear: Log files should be removed when the package is purged (but not when it is only removed). This should be done by the `postrm' script when it is called with the argument `purge' (see Section 6.7, `Details of removal and/or configuration purging'). -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: RFS: New version of cvs-autoreleasedeb
On 2004-02-20 Eike zyro Sauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Raphael Goulais schrieb: > > - Why do you remove /var/log/cvs-autoreleasedeb.log at postrm, since > >the log files are in /var/log/cvs-autoreleasedeb/ ? Also, I don't > >think you should remove the log files anyway, even on a purge. > Is this consensus? No, it is not. > I thought I'd get rid of everything a package made when purging. I would not go that far (Reductio ad absurdum: Removing /var/mail/* when uninstalling the MTA) but logfiles should indeed be deleted on purge, see policy 10.8. cu andreas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RFS: New version of cvs-autoreleasedeb
Raphael Goulais schrieb: > - Why do you remove /var/log/cvs-autoreleasedeb.log at postrm, since >the log files are in /var/log/cvs-autoreleasedeb/ ? Also, I don't >think you should remove the log files anyway, even on a purge. Is this consensus? I thought I'd get rid of everything a package made when purging. Ciao, Eike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RFS: New version of cvs-autoreleasedeb
> - Why do you remove /var/log/cvs-autoreleasedeb.log at postrm, since >the log files are in /var/log/cvs-autoreleasedeb/ ? Also, I don't >think you should remove the log files anyway, even on a purge. The log used to be in /var/cvs-autoreleasedeb.log a long time ago, I missed this. I agree that the log shouldn't be removed. Fixed. > - It sounds dangerous to purge the user and group on a failed or >aborted upgrade. Done. > - some dh_ scripts are called but not used (this is cosmetic) I didn't review completely, but removed some I saw that I really didn't use. I'll review better in the next releases. > - The dir contained in orig.tar.gz is postfixed with .orig. This is >not the good way (see warning when building the package). H... That's the way cvs-buildpackage does... I just use it. Maybe a bug could be submitted against cvs-buildpackage. The standards version was updated also. The version 0.5-2 is available at: https://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=57915&package_id=53579&release_id=218421 daniel signature.asc Description: Esta é uma parte de mensagem assinada digitalmente
Re: RFS: New version of cvs-autoreleasedeb
> - Why do you remove /var/log/cvs-autoreleasedeb.log at postrm, since >the log files are in /var/log/cvs-autoreleasedeb/ ? Also, I don't >think you should remove the log files anyway, even on a purge. The log used to be in /var/cvs-autoreleasedeb.log a long time ago, I missed this. I agree that the log shouldn't be removed. Fixed. > - It sounds dangerous to purge the user and group on a failed or >aborted upgrade. Done. > - some dh_ scripts are called but not used (this is cosmetic) I didn't review completely, but removed some I saw that I really didn't use. I'll review better in the next releases. > - The dir contained in orig.tar.gz is postfixed with .orig. This is >not the good way (see warning when building the package). H... That's the way cvs-buildpackage does... I just use it. Maybe a bug could be submitted against cvs-buildpackage. The standards version was updated also. The version 0.5-2 is available at: https://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=57915&package_id=53579&release_id=218421 daniel signature.asc Description: Esta =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=E9?= uma parte de mensagem assinada digitalmente
Re: RFS: New version of cvs-autoreleasedeb
On Fri, 2004-02-20 at 11:39, Raphael Goulais wrote: > Some remarks first : And updating the standard version :) Raphael
Re: RFS: New version of cvs-autoreleasedeb
On Fri, 2004-02-20 at 11:39, Raphael Goulais wrote: > Some remarks first : And updating the standard version :) Raphael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RFS: New version of cvs-autoreleasedeb
On Thu, 2004-02-19 at 19:56, Daniel Ruoso wrote: > I'm looking for a sponsor for the version 0.5-1 of cvs-autoreleasedeb > that already is into the archive. Some remarks first : - Why do you remove /var/log/cvs-autoreleasedeb.log at postrm, since the log files are in /var/log/cvs-autoreleasedeb/ ? Also, I don't think you should remove the log files anyway, even on a purge. - It sounds dangerous to purge the user and group on a failed or aborted upgrade. - some dh_ scripts are called but not used (this is cosmetic) - The dir contained in orig.tar.gz is postfixed with .orig. This is not the good way (see warning when building the package). Cheers, Raphael PS: If you think I'm wrong on some point, just tell me why :)
Re: RFS: New version of cvs-autoreleasedeb
On Thu, 2004-02-19 at 19:56, Daniel Ruoso wrote: > I'm looking for a sponsor for the version 0.5-1 of cvs-autoreleasedeb > that already is into the archive. I'm can do it, if nobody replied to you before. Raphael
Re: RFS: New version of cvs-autoreleasedeb
On Thu, 2004-02-19 at 19:56, Daniel Ruoso wrote: > I'm looking for a sponsor for the version 0.5-1 of cvs-autoreleasedeb > that already is into the archive. Some remarks first : - Why do you remove /var/log/cvs-autoreleasedeb.log at postrm, since the log files are in /var/log/cvs-autoreleasedeb/ ? Also, I don't think you should remove the log files anyway, even on a purge. - It sounds dangerous to purge the user and group on a failed or aborted upgrade. - some dh_ scripts are called but not used (this is cosmetic) - The dir contained in orig.tar.gz is postfixed with .orig. This is not the good way (see warning when building the package). Cheers, Raphael PS: If you think I'm wrong on some point, just tell me why :) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RFS: New version of cvs-autoreleasedeb
On Thu, 2004-02-19 at 19:56, Daniel Ruoso wrote: > I'm looking for a sponsor for the version 0.5-1 of cvs-autoreleasedeb > that already is into the archive. I'm can do it, if nobody replied to you before. Raphael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
