Re: RFS: iguanair (try #2)

2009-06-08 Thread Stefanos Harhalakis
On Monday 08 June 2009, Jack Kelly wrote:
 2009/6/8 Stefanos Harhalakis v...@v13.gr:
  The package appears to be lintian clean except from an the override of:
 
  iguanair source: configure-generated-file-in-source config.status
 
  I believe that the override is justified since the upstream tarball
  doesn't include a configure.in source and cannot be remade with
  auto-tools.

 config.status is generated by configure, not autoconf, so you'll
 probably find that you can take it out.

I'm already removing it in the clean target:

debian.rules:
clean::
rm -f config.status

Isn't that sufficient?


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: RFS: iguanair (try #2)

2009-06-08 Thread Jack Kelly
2009/6/8 Stefanos Harhalakis v...@v13.gr:
 On Monday 08 June 2009, Jack Kelly wrote:
 2009/6/8 Stefanos Harhalakis v...@v13.gr:
  The package appears to be lintian clean except from an the override of:
 
  iguanair source: configure-generated-file-in-source config.status
 
  I believe that the override is justified since the upstream tarball
  doesn't include a configure.in source and cannot be remade with
  auto-tools.

 config.status is generated by configure, not autoconf, so you'll
 probably find that you can take it out.

 I'm already removing it in the clean target:

 debian.rules:
 clean::
        rm -f config.status

 Isn't that sufficient?

I'm not a dev, but if lintian's complaining, then probably not. If you
remove it manually, then won't it be removed by the diff when you make
the source package?

-- Jack


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: RFS: iguanair (try #2)

2009-06-08 Thread V13
On Tuesday 09 June 2009, Jack Kelly wrote:
 2009/6/8 Stefanos Harhalakis v...@v13.gr:
  On Monday 08 June 2009, Jack Kelly wrote:
  2009/6/8 Stefanos Harhalakis v...@v13.gr:
   The package appears to be lintian clean except from an the override
   of:
  
   iguanair source: configure-generated-file-in-source config.status
  
   I believe that the override is justified since the upstream tarball
   doesn't include a configure.in source and cannot be remade with
   auto-tools.
 
  config.status is generated by configure, not autoconf, so you'll
  probably find that you can take it out.
 
  I'm already removing it in the clean target:
 
  debian.rules:
  clean::
 rm -f config.status
 
  Isn't that sufficient?

 I'm not a dev, but if lintian's complaining, then probably not. If you
 remove it manually, then won't it be removed by the diff when you make
 the source package?

The lintian explanation[1] says:

The clean rule in debian/rules should remove this file.
[...]
Note that Lintian cannot reliably detect the removal in the clean rule, so 
once you fix this, please ignore or override this warning.

I also try not to touch anything outside debian/ directory since it will make 
lintian complain because there are patches too.

[1] http://lintian.debian.org/tags/configure-generated-file-in-source.html


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: RFS: iguanair (try #2)

2009-06-08 Thread Jack Kelly
2009/6/9 V13 v...@v13.gr:
 On Tuesday 09 June 2009, Jack Kelly wrote:
 2009/6/8 Stefanos Harhalakis v...@v13.gr:
  On Monday 08 June 2009, Jack Kelly wrote:
  2009/6/8 Stefanos Harhalakis v...@v13.gr:
   The package appears to be lintian clean except from an the override
   of:
  
   iguanair source: configure-generated-file-in-source config.status
  
   I believe that the override is justified since the upstream tarball
   doesn't include a configure.in source and cannot be remade with
   auto-tools.
 
  config.status is generated by configure, not autoconf, so you'll
  probably find that you can take it out.
 
  I'm already removing it in the clean target:
 
  debian.rules:
  clean::
         rm -f config.status
 
  Isn't that sufficient?

 I'm not a dev, but if lintian's complaining, then probably not. If you
 remove it manually, then won't it be removed by the diff when you make
 the source package?

 The lintian explanation[1] says:

 The clean rule in debian/rules should remove this file.
 [...]
 Note that Lintian cannot reliably detect the removal in the clean rule, so
 once you fix this, please ignore or override this warning.

 I also try not to touch anything outside debian/ directory since it will make
 lintian complain because there are patches too.

 [1] http://lintian.debian.org/tags/configure-generated-file-in-source.html

Okay, good to know. Thanks.

-- Jack


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: RFS: iguanair (try #2)

2009-06-07 Thread Jack Kelly
2009/6/8 Stefanos Harhalakis v...@v13.gr:
 The package appears to be lintian clean except from an the override of:

 iguanair source: configure-generated-file-in-source config.status

 I believe that the override is justified since the upstream tarball doesn't
 include a configure.in source and cannot be remade with auto-tools.

config.status is generated by configure, not autoconf, so you'll
probably find that you can take it out.

-- Jack


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: RFS: iguanair

2009-05-22 Thread Paul Wise
2009/5/22 Stefanos Harhalakis v...@v13.gr:

 iguanair   - IguanaWorks IR daemon/driver
 iguanair-python - IguanaWorks IR python bindings

Should be python-iguanair.

 iguanair-reflasher - IguanaWorks IR reflasher utility
 libiguanair - IguanaWorks IR support library

Package name should contain the SONAME/ABI number, details in the
libpkg-guide (please read the two bugs on it too).

-- 
bye,
pabs

http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: RFS: iguanair

2009-05-22 Thread Stefanos Harhalakis
Hello and thank you for the review,

On Friday 22 May 2009, Paul Wise wrote:
 2009/5/22 Stefanos Harhalakis v...@v13.gr:
  iguanair   - IguanaWorks IR daemon/driver
  iguanair-python - IguanaWorks IR python bindings

 Should be python-iguanair.

Fixed.

  iguanair-reflasher - IguanaWorks IR reflasher utility
  libiguanair - IguanaWorks IR support library

 Package name should contain the SONAME/ABI number, details in the
 libpkg-guide (please read the two bugs on it too).

I believe I fixed it. Following the instruction of libpkg-guide I changed the 
libiguanair package to libiguanair0 (which matches the SONAME). From what I've 
read on one of the bug reports, I understand that the correct naming for -dev 
is libiguanair-dev so I left it as-is.

The new version is in mentors using the same version:
- URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/i/iguanair
- Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main 
contrib non-free
- dget 
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/i/iguanair/iguanair_0.99-1.dsc


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org