Re: Taking over maintainership of gringotts

2012-07-24 Thread Bart Martens
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 12:05:59AM +0200, Jose G. López wrote:
 Arno Töll wrote:
  but it certainly won't hurt. Not too many people care about that flag
  (you know, even less than about RFS bugs).
 
 Thanks Arno, but since Bart seems to be reviewing these packages, I
 suppose he will sponsor them.

Other sponsors are welcome to review and upload these packages at any time
without talking to me.

 
 Bart, I made the changes requested in your comments but I'm not sure if
 I have to re-upload the packages bumping a new revision 1.2.10.-2 or I
 keep them on revision -1.

I suggest to replace gringotts at mentors with the same number 1.2.10-1.

 Another doubt is with bug #633167. It belongs to gringotts source
 package but whit the split I can't close it in libgringotts. I think
 we'll have to close it manually, won't we?

You can simply use Closes: #633167 in debian/changelog of the package with
the fix.

I see that gringotts 1.2.10~pre3-1 has Merge libgringotts source package in
debian/changelog.  You seem to be undoing that now.  Intentional ?

Regards,

Bart Martens


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120724060947.gb2...@master.debian.org



Re: Taking over maintainership of gringotts

2012-07-24 Thread Jose G. López
El 24/07/12 08:09, Bart Martens escribió:
 Other sponsors are welcome to review and upload these packages at any time
 without talking to me.
 

For sure. Sorry.


 Bart, I made the changes requested in your comments but I'm not sure if
 I have to re-upload the packages bumping a new revision 1.2.10.-2 or I
 keep them on revision -1.
 
 I suggest to replace gringotts at mentors with the same number 1.2.10-1.
 

Done. Now we have two versions at mentors with the same version. I
thought they would be overwritten ...

 Another doubt is with bug #633167. It belongs to gringotts source
 package but whit the split I can't close it in libgringotts. I think
 we'll have to close it manually, won't we?
 
 You can simply use Closes: #633167 in debian/changelog of the package with
 the fix.
 

I can't in gringotts source package where it belongs now. I mention this
on libgringotts changelog but don't like to close it automatically.

 I see that gringotts 1.2.10~pre3-1 has Merge libgringotts source package in
 debian/changelog.  You seem to be undoing that now.  Intentional ?
 

Yes, it's intentional. I comment this in changelogs and in the first
post here. IMHO I think would be better for new software using its
functionality.

Sorry for the delay I tested the packages again. I don't want to waste
your time.

Thanks and regards.




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: Taking over maintainership of gringotts

2012-07-23 Thread Bart Martens
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 05:03:10PM +0200, Jose G. López wrote:
 Hello,
 
 I would like to take over maintainership of gringotts. I contacted
 Wesley J. Landaker last week
 He told me to contact here and try to find a sponsor.

So he agreed.

 I'm not sure if I have
 to send an ITA against wnpp ...

I suggest to open an ITA briefly stating that he agreed.

 I can upload the packages to mentors for
 review but I prefer to wait for instructions.

I suggest to proceed without waiting.

Regards,

Bart Martens


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120723152325.ga22...@master.debian.org



Re: Taking over maintainership of gringotts

2012-07-23 Thread Jose G. López
El 23/07/12 17:23, Bart Martens escribió:
 I suggest to open an ITA briefly stating that he agreed.
 
 I can upload the packages to mentors for
 review but I prefer to wait for instructions.
 
 I suggest to proceed without waiting.
 
 Regards,
 
 Bart Martens

Thanks Bart,

I did as you say but I see the ITA bug should have been sent to previous
RFA, I'm sorry, now I read and understand clearly ( The procedures for
closing these bugs are as follows) from http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp

Should I send also a RFS bug for requesting a sponsor?, I'm very newbie,
sorry ...

Regards.



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: Taking over maintainership of gringotts

2012-07-23 Thread Bart Martens
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 10:08:18PM +0200, Jose G. López wrote:
 El 23/07/12 17:23, Bart Martens escribió:
  I suggest to open an ITA briefly stating that he agreed.
  
  I can upload the packages to mentors for
  review but I prefer to wait for instructions.
  
  I suggest to proceed without waiting.
  
  Regards,
  
  Bart Martens
 
 Thanks Bart,
 
 I did as you say but I see the ITA bug should have been sent to previous
 RFA, I'm sorry, now I read and understand clearly ( The procedures for
 closing these bugs are as follows) from http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp

The RFA has been retitled to ITA and merged with the new ITA, so this is OK.

 
 Should I send also a RFS bug for requesting a sponsor?, I'm very newbie,
 sorry ...

The package at mentors is marked needs sponsor = yes so an RFS bug is not
really needed.

Regards,

Bart Martens


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120723201948.gg22...@master.debian.org



Re: Taking over maintainership of gringotts

2012-07-23 Thread Arno Töll
Hi,

On 23.07.2012 22:19, Bart Martens wrote:
 The package at mentors is marked needs sponsor = yes so an RFS bug is not
 really needed.

but it certainly won't hurt. Not too many people care about that flag
(you know, even less than about RFS bugs).


-- 
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: Taking over maintainership of gringotts

2012-07-23 Thread Jose G. López
Arno Töll wrote:
 but it certainly won't hurt. Not too many people care about that flag
 (you know, even less than about RFS bugs).

Thanks Arno, but since Bart seems to be reviewing these packages, I
suppose he will sponsor them.

Bart, I made the changes requested in your comments but I'm not sure if
I have to re-upload the packages bumping a new revision 1.2.10.-2 or I
keep them on revision -1.
Another doubt is with bug #633167. It belongs to gringotts source
package but whit the split I can't close it in libgringotts. I think
we'll have to close it manually, won't we?

Sorry for the hassle ...

Regards.



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature