Re: ldd, dpkg-shlibdeps and libsocks.so
* Ben Collins | It is a bug in libsocks4, which should compile the library with -soname | libsocks.so.4. I'm willing to bet that libsocks.so is created by | ldconfig when libsocks4 is installed, else it wouldn't even work without | the -dev package installed. So reassigning the bug against libsocks-dev is the right thing to do? Thanks! -- Tollef Fog Heen Unix _IS_ user friendly... It's just selective about who its friends are. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ldd, dpkg-shlibdeps and libsocks.so
* Ben Collins | It is a bug in libsocks4, which should compile the library with -soname | libsocks.so.4. I'm willing to bet that libsocks.so is created by | ldconfig when libsocks4 is installed, else it wouldn't even work without | the -dev package installed. So reassigning the bug against libsocks-dev is the right thing to do? Thanks! -- Tollef Fog Heen Unix _IS_ user friendly... It's just selective about who its friends are.
Re: ldd, dpkg-shlibdeps and libsocks.so
On Sun, Apr 01, 2001 at 11:46:15PM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: I am the maintainer of suck, which links against libsocks. However, it seems like there is something strange going on when it comes to linking: $ldd `which suck` libsocks.so = /usr/lib/libsocks.so (0x4001f000) libnsl.so.1 = /lib/libnsl.so.1 (0x4002d000) libc.so.6 = /lib/libc.so.6 (0x40043000) /lib/ld-linux.so.2 = /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x4000) $ Here, suck is linked against libsocks.so, without a version number. This makes dpkg-shlibdeps complain about 'format of libsocks.so not recognized'. (Which really is 'format of file name "libsocks.so" not recognized'). Why does this happen, and is this a bug in suck, dpkg-shlibdeps or libsocks4? It is a bug in libsocks4, which should compile the library with -soname libsocks.so.4. I'm willing to bet that libsocks.so is created by ldconfig when libsocks4 is installed, else it wouldn't even work without the -dev package installed. Ben -- ---===-=-==-=---==-=-- / Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \ ` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] ' `---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---' -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ldd, dpkg-shlibdeps and libsocks.so
On Sun, Apr 01, 2001 at 11:46:15PM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: I am the maintainer of suck, which links against libsocks. However, it seems like there is something strange going on when it comes to linking: $ldd `which suck` libsocks.so = /usr/lib/libsocks.so (0x4001f000) libnsl.so.1 = /lib/libnsl.so.1 (0x4002d000) libc.so.6 = /lib/libc.so.6 (0x40043000) /lib/ld-linux.so.2 = /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x4000) $ Here, suck is linked against libsocks.so, without a version number. This makes dpkg-shlibdeps complain about 'format of libsocks.so not recognized'. (Which really is 'format of file name libsocks.so not recognized'). Why does this happen, and is this a bug in suck, dpkg-shlibdeps or libsocks4? It is a bug in libsocks4, which should compile the library with -soname libsocks.so.4. I'm willing to bet that libsocks.so is created by ldconfig when libsocks4 is installed, else it wouldn't even work without the -dev package installed. Ben -- ---===-=-==-=---==-=-- / Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \ ` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] ' `---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'
