Re: sponsor wanted for 'ketchup' package

2004-07-01 Thread Manoj Srivastava
On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 12:37:40 -0700, Brian Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: 

 Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 * Anibal Monsalve Salazar [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-06-28
   22:21:14 +1000]:

 I don't think you should create a debian package for small script,
 IMO.
 Agree. Even if I don't know where it should go, but definiately
 finding a backage which would include ketchup sounds a better idea.

 Maybe kernel-package?

Umm , I missed the beginnihg of this thread. What does
 ketchup do?

manoj
-- 
I've got some amyls.  We could either party later or, like, start his
heart. Cheech and Chong's Next Movie
Manoj Srivastava   [EMAIL PROTECTED]  http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05  CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B  924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C



Re: sponsor wanted for 'ketchup' package

2004-07-01 Thread Anibal Monsalve Salazar
On Thu, Jul 01, 2004 at 12:57:22AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 12:37:40 -0700, Brian Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: 
 Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 * Anibal Monsalve Salazar [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-06-28
   22:21:14 +1000]:

 I don't think you should create a debian package for small script,
 IMO.
 Agree. Even if I don't know where it should go, but definiately
 finding a backage which would include ketchup sounds a better idea.

 Maybe kernel-package?

   Umm , I missed the beginnihg of this thread. What does
 ketchup do?

The thread starts at:

http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2004/06/msg00277.html

   manoj
-- 
I've got some amyls.  We could either party later or, like, start his
heart. Cheech and Chong's Next Movie
Manoj Srivastava   [EMAIL PROTECTED]  http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05  CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B  924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C

Regards,

Anibal Monsalve Salazar
--
 .''`.  Debian GNU/Linux  | Building 28C
: :' :  Free Operating System | Monash University VIC 3800, Australia
`. `'   http://debian.org/| http://www-personal.monash.edu/~anibal/
  `-  |


pgpdBH3kTXlY0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: sponsor wanted for 'ketchup' package

2004-07-01 Thread Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi
* Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-07-01 00:57:22 -0500]:

  Maybe kernel-package?
 Exactly. That's the best place for it IMHO.

   Umm , I missed the beginnihg of this thread. What does
  ketchup do?
 Fetch the latest kernel version based on the user's choice (stable,
-pre, -mm), compiles and install it as far as I remember correctly.

Regards,
Laszlo/GCS



Re: sponsor wanted for 'ketchup' package

2004-07-01 Thread Jack Wasey

Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi wrote:



Umm , I missed the beginnihg of this thread. What does
ketchup do?


 Fetch the latest kernel version based on the user's choice (stable,
-pre, -mm), compiles and install it as far as I remember correctly.


Actually, it only fetches the required patches, verifies signatures, and 
applies them. Compilation and installation are left to the user. 
Importantly, it only fetches the 30 or megabyte archive when necessary, 
saving a lot of bandwidth: good for kernel.org as well as dial-up users.


There was a suggestion that this script could be packaged in an existing 
package. I had a look but there was no obvious place. Debian is geared 
completely towards debian packaged source, patches and kernel binaries, 
and this doesn't fit with that. Any suggestions, please?


Jack Wasey



Re: sponsor wanted for 'ketchup' package

2004-07-01 Thread Anibal Monsalve Salazar
On Thu, Jul 01, 2004 at 12:57:22AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 12:37:40 -0700, Brian Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: 
 Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 * Anibal Monsalve Salazar [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-06-28
   22:21:14 +1000]:

 I don't think you should create a debian package for small script,
 IMO.
 Agree. Even if I don't know where it should go, but definiately
 finding a backage which would include ketchup sounds a better idea.

 Maybe kernel-package?

   Umm , I missed the beginnihg of this thread. What does
 ketchup do?

The thread starts at:

http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2004/06/msg00277.html

   manoj
-- 
I've got some amyls.  We could either party later or, like, start his
heart. Cheech and Chong's Next Movie
Manoj Srivastava   [EMAIL PROTECTED]  http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05  CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B  924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C

Regards,

Anibal Monsalve Salazar
--
 .''`.  Debian GNU/Linux  | Building 28C
: :' :  Free Operating System | Monash University VIC 3800, Australia
`. `'   http://debian.org/| http://www-personal.monash.edu/~anibal/
  `-  |


pgpY77EB5CJvH.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: sponsor wanted for 'ketchup' package

2004-07-01 Thread Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi
* Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-07-01 00:57:22 -0500]:

  Maybe kernel-package?
 Exactly. That's the best place for it IMHO.

   Umm , I missed the beginnihg of this thread. What does
  ketchup do?
 Fetch the latest kernel version based on the user's choice (stable,
-pre, -mm), compiles and install it as far as I remember correctly.

Regards,
Laszlo/GCS


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: sponsor wanted for 'ketchup' package

2004-07-01 Thread Jack Wasey
Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi wrote:

Umm , I missed the beginnihg of this thread. What does
ketchup do?
 Fetch the latest kernel version based on the user's choice (stable,
-pre, -mm), compiles and install it as far as I remember correctly.
Actually, it only fetches the required patches, verifies signatures, and 
applies them. Compilation and installation are left to the user. 
Importantly, it only fetches the 30 or megabyte archive when necessary, 
saving a lot of bandwidth: good for kernel.org as well as dial-up users.

There was a suggestion that this script could be packaged in an existing 
package. I had a look but there was no obvious place. Debian is geared 
completely towards debian packaged source, patches and kernel binaries, 
and this doesn't fit with that. Any suggestions, please?

Jack Wasey
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: sponsor wanted for 'ketchup' package

2004-07-01 Thread Geert Stappers
On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 05:32:08PM +, Jack Wasey wrote:
 Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi wrote:
  
 Umm , I missed the beginnihg of this thread. What does
  ketchup do?
  
   Fetch the latest kernel version based on the user's choice (stable,
  -pre, -mm), compiles and install it as far as I remember correctly.
 
 Actually, it only fetches the required patches, verifies signatures, and 
 applies them. Compilation and installation are left to the user. 
 Importantly, it only fetches the 30 or megabyte archive when necessary, 
 saving a lot of bandwidth: good for kernel.org as well as dial-up users.
 
 There was a suggestion that this script could be packaged in an existing 
 package. I had a look but there was no obvious place. Debian is geared 
 completely towards debian packaged source, patches and kernel binaries, 
 and this doesn't fit with that.

I also skipped the begin of the thread.
Funny to see after several posting _why_ a script is created.

From http://people.debian.org/~mpalmer/debian-mentors_FAQ.html

 So, tell us what exactly your package does, and why it should be in Debian.
 If there is already a program that does a similar thing, say why your one is better.
 Put a little hot spice in there to hold people's interest. in other words,
 think like an advertising executive. Just remember to wash the slime off afterwards.

 Any suggestions, please?

Mmmm, kernel-package?
from http://packages.debian.org/stable/misc/kernel-package

Package: kernel-package (7.107)
Debian Linux kernel package build scripts.

This package provides the capability to create a debian kernel-image package
by just running make-kpkg kernel_image in a kernel source directory tree.
It can also package the relevant kernel headers into a kernel-headers package.
In general, this package is very useful if you need to create a custom kernel,
if, for example, the default kernel does not support some of your hardware,
or you wish a leaner, meaner kernel.
It also scripts the steps that need be taken to compile the kernel,
which is quite convenient (forgetting a crucial step once was the
initial motivation for this package).
Please look at /usr/share/doc/kernel-package/Rationale.gz for a full list
of advantages of this package.

 
 Jack Wasey

Cheers
Geert Stappers


pgpY7S2mxhgON.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: sponsor wanted for 'ketchup' package

2004-06-30 Thread Manoj Srivastava
On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 12:37:40 -0700, Brian Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: 

 Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 * Anibal Monsalve Salazar [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-06-28
   22:21:14 +1000]:

 I don't think you should create a debian package for small script,
 IMO.
 Agree. Even if I don't know where it should go, but definiately
 finding a backage which would include ketchup sounds a better idea.

 Maybe kernel-package?

Umm , I missed the beginnihg of this thread. What does
 ketchup do?

manoj
-- 
I've got some amyls.  We could either party later or, like, start his
heart. Cheech and Chong's Next Movie
Manoj Srivastava   [EMAIL PROTECTED]  http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05  CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B  924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: sponsor wanted for 'ketchup' package

2004-06-28 Thread Anibal Monsalve Salazar
On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 08:41:22AM +0100, Jack Wasey wrote:
Thanks for looking, Anibal.

Please see:
http://www.jackwasey.co.uk/debian

I don't think you should create a debian package for small script, IMO.

I've added the requested files and an index page. N.b. I do not have a diff.gz
file - I made no changes to the original script, although some might be
necessary in the future.

Regards,
Jack

--
Jack Wasey
http://www.jackwasey.co.uk

Quoting Anibal Monsalve Salazar [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

On Sun, Jun 27, 2004 at 12:30:16AM +0100, Jack Wasey wrote:
Please find my packaging of the wonderful 'ketchup' script here:
http://www.jackwasey.co.uk/debian/ketchup_0.7.0-1_all.deb

I would like to get hold of your ketchup_0.7.0-1.{dsc,diff.gz} and
ketchup_orig_0.7.0.tar.gz files. I want to run pbuilder on them and read

Wrong filename. ketchup_0.7.0_orig.tar.gz is the right filename.

your debian/{copyright,changelog,rules} files.

Where are ketchup_0.7.0-1.{dsc,diff.gz} and ketchup_orig_0.7.0.tar.gz?

Ditto.

Regards,

Anibal Monsalve Salazar

Regards,

Anibal Monsalve Salazar
--
 .''`.  Debian GNU/Linux  | Building 28C
: :' :  Free Operating System | Monash University VIC 3800, Australia
`. `'   http://debian.org/| http://www-personal.monash.edu/~anibal/
  `-  |


pgpZQ4TnQjpAH.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: sponsor wanted for 'ketchup' package

2004-06-28 Thread Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi
* Anibal Monsalve Salazar [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-06-28 22:21:14 +1000]:

 I don't think you should create a debian package for small script, IMO.
 Agree. Even if I don't know where it should go, but definiately finding
a backage which would include ketchup sounds a better idea.

 I would like to get hold of your ketchup_0.7.0-1.{dsc,diff.gz} and
 ketchup_orig_0.7.0.tar.gz files. I want to run pbuilder on them and read
 
 Wrong filename. ketchup_0.7.0_orig.tar.gz is the right filename.
 ketchup_0.7.0.orig.tar.gz is the correct one.

Cheers,
Laszlo/GCS


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: sponsor wanted for 'ketchup' package

2004-06-28 Thread Brian Nelson
Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 * Anibal Monsalve Salazar [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-06-28 22:21:14 +1000]:

 I don't think you should create a debian package for small script, IMO.
  Agree. Even if I don't know where it should go, but definiately finding
 a backage which would include ketchup sounds a better idea.

Maybe kernel-package?

-- 
You win again, gravity!



Re: sponsor wanted for 'ketchup' package

2004-06-28 Thread Anibal Monsalve Salazar
On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 08:41:22AM +0100, Jack Wasey wrote:
Thanks for looking, Anibal.

Please see:
http://www.jackwasey.co.uk/debian

I don't think you should create a debian package for small script, IMO.

I've added the requested files and an index page. N.b. I do not have a diff.gz
file - I made no changes to the original script, although some might be
necessary in the future.

Regards,
Jack

--
Jack Wasey
http://www.jackwasey.co.uk

Quoting Anibal Monsalve Salazar [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

On Sun, Jun 27, 2004 at 12:30:16AM +0100, Jack Wasey wrote:
Please find my packaging of the wonderful 'ketchup' script here:
http://www.jackwasey.co.uk/debian/ketchup_0.7.0-1_all.deb

I would like to get hold of your ketchup_0.7.0-1.{dsc,diff.gz} and
ketchup_orig_0.7.0.tar.gz files. I want to run pbuilder on them and read

Wrong filename. ketchup_0.7.0_orig.tar.gz is the right filename.

your debian/{copyright,changelog,rules} files.

Where are ketchup_0.7.0-1.{dsc,diff.gz} and ketchup_orig_0.7.0.tar.gz?

Ditto.

Regards,

Anibal Monsalve Salazar

Regards,

Anibal Monsalve Salazar
--
 .''`.  Debian GNU/Linux  | Building 28C
: :' :  Free Operating System | Monash University VIC 3800, Australia
`. `'   http://debian.org/| http://www-personal.monash.edu/~anibal/
  `-  |


pgpaH4dMFV8Np.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: sponsor wanted for 'ketchup' package

2004-06-28 Thread Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi
* Anibal Monsalve Salazar [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-06-28 22:21:14 +1000]:

 I don't think you should create a debian package for small script, IMO.
 Agree. Even if I don't know where it should go, but definiately finding
a backage which would include ketchup sounds a better idea.

 I would like to get hold of your ketchup_0.7.0-1.{dsc,diff.gz} and
 ketchup_orig_0.7.0.tar.gz files. I want to run pbuilder on them and read
 
 Wrong filename. ketchup_0.7.0_orig.tar.gz is the right filename.
 ketchup_0.7.0.orig.tar.gz is the correct one.

Cheers,
Laszlo/GCS


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: sponsor wanted for 'ketchup' package

2004-06-28 Thread Brian Nelson
Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 * Anibal Monsalve Salazar [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-06-28 22:21:14 +1000]:

 I don't think you should create a debian package for small script, IMO.
  Agree. Even if I don't know where it should go, but definiately finding
 a backage which would include ketchup sounds a better idea.

Maybe kernel-package?

-- 
You win again, gravity!


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: sponsor wanted for 'ketchup' package

2004-06-27 Thread Anibal Monsalve Salazar
On Sun, Jun 27, 2004 at 12:30:16AM +0100, Jack Wasey wrote:
Please find my packaging of the wonderful 'ketchup' script here:
http://www.jackwasey.co.uk/debian/ketchup_0.7.0-1_all.deb

I would like to get hold of your ketchup_0.7.0-1.{dsc,diff.gz} and
ketchup_orig_0.7.0.tar.gz files. I want to run pbuilder on them and read
your debian/{copyright,changelog,rules} files.

Where are ketchup_0.7.0-1.{dsc,diff.gz} and ketchup_orig_0.7.0.tar.gz?

Regards,

Anibal Monsalve Salazar
--
 .''`.  Debian GNU/Linux  | Building 28C
: :' :  Free Operating System | Monash University VIC 3800, Australia
`. `'   http://debian.org/| http://www-personal.monash.edu/~anibal/
  `-  |


pgpwUGVKyBqYi.pgp
Description: PGP signature