Re: licensecheck says UNKNOWN
On Monday, July 13, 2020 10:50:00 AM EDT Ryan Pavlik wrote: > Unfortunately licensecheck doesn't currently recognize > SPDX-License-Identifier (I haven't check to see if there's a request > filed for that). Fortunately there are issues filed (#904518) and an author assures that support will be added. The changelog suggests that there is already preliminary support for the GPL at least. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: licensecheck says UNKNOWN
Unfortunately licensecheck doesn't currently recognize SPDX-License-Identifier (I haven't check to see if there's a request filed for that). It appears to only recognize license boilerplate. This is probably the #1 reason I have to populate debian/fill.copyright.blanks.yml for scan-copyrights/cme update dpkg-copyright - files with SPDX identifiers but no boilerplate. Hope this helps. Ryan On 7/12/20 2:07 AM, Geert Stappers wrote: > Hi Collective Knowledge, > > > Program licensecheck says UNKNOWN for an unknown reason to me. > > Adding an SPDX ID, https://spdx.dev/ids/ > nor adding an email address did solve it. > > > What is licensecheck trying to say with UNKNOWN ? > And why is it important for packaging? > > > Groeten > Geert Stappers >
licensecheck says UNKNOWN
Hi Collective Knowledge, Program licensecheck says UNKNOWN for an unknown reason to me. Adding an SPDX ID, https://spdx.dev/ids/ nor adding an email address did solve it. What is licensecheck trying to say with UNKNOWN ? And why is it important for packaging? Groeten Geert Stappers -- Silence is hard to parse
