Re: sponsor for QEmacs maybe
I have contacted the author. He says that the next version (0.3) will probably come out later this week, so I might wait till then before investigating the segfaults. (At present, boot-floppies is using nano-tiny. It used to use ae.) Edmund
Re: sponsor for QEmacs maybe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 29-Apr-2001 Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS wrote: (At present, boot-floppies is using nano-tiny. It used to use ae.) Good, ae sucks, nano is much better IMO. - -- carlos laviola - icq #55799523 $ chown us:us /your_base -R chown: what you say!! -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE67KORZAYCJzUW03IRAvCOAJ9B9isxFGObhSM2coAP84nhaRtMggCdGCXl RjjZjGa0G4+aNbiDHniAMME= =4KgA -END PGP SIGNATURE-
sponsor for QEmacs maybe
QEmacs is a tiny full-screen editor with UTF-8 support, a hex mode and the ability to edit huge files efficiently: http://www-stud.enst.fr/~bellard/qemacs/ It's not very mature yet, but it seems good enough to be useful. There didn't seem to be a Debian package, and I felt it was about time I learnt something about how to make Debian packages, so I made one: http://rano.org/qemacs/ Does anyone want to review this and either take it over as maintainer for the benefit of Debian or tell me what I've done wrong for my benefit? Edmund -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: sponsor for QEmacs maybe
Christian T. Steigies [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Sat, Apr 28, 2001 at 01:42:19AM +0400, Peter Novodvorsky wrote: John H. Robinson, IV [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Current snapshot (please do not redistribute since it is not finished): qemacs-0.2.tar.gz Current version of qemacs segafaults after a typing ~ 20 letters, somewhere in strcpy. I think it is ready still to enter distribution... Can you explain this reasoning a little more? The software should not be distributed, plus it segfaults, why do you recommend that for the distribution? And maybe even for the boot-floppies? I'm sorry, I'm sleepy and should go to bed. I meant s/is/is not/. Please, excuse me. ;-) -- Peter Novodvorsky http://www.altlinux.ru/AltLinux Team, Russia Debian.Org http://debian.org/~nidd Debian --- no need to wait for tomorrow. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: sponsor for QEmacs maybe
John H. Robinson, IV [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Current snapshot (please do not redistribute since it is not finished): qemacs-0.2.tar.gz Current version of qemacs segafaults after a typing ~ 20 letters, somewhere in strcpy. I think it is ready still to enter distribution... -- Peter Novodvorsky http://www.altlinux.ru/AltLinux Team, Russia Debian.Org http://debian.org/~nidd Debian --- no need to wait for tomorrow. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: sponsor for QEmacs maybe
On Sat, Apr 28, 2001 at 01:42:19AM +0400, Peter Novodvorsky wrote: John H. Robinson, IV [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Current snapshot (please do not redistribute since it is not finished): qemacs-0.2.tar.gz Current version of qemacs segafaults after a typing ~ 20 letters, somewhere in strcpy. I think it is ready still to enter distribution... Can you explain this reasoning a little more? The software should not be distributed, plus it segfaults, why do you recommend that for the distribution? And maybe even for the boot-floppies? Christian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
sponsor for QEmacs maybe
QEmacs is a tiny full-screen editor with UTF-8 support, a hex mode and the ability to edit huge files efficiently: http://www-stud.enst.fr/~bellard/qemacs/ It's not very mature yet, but it seems good enough to be useful. There didn't seem to be a Debian package, and I felt it was about time I learnt something about how to make Debian packages, so I made one: http://rano.org/qemacs/ Does anyone want to review this and either take it over as maintainer for the benefit of Debian or tell me what I've done wrong for my benefit? Edmund
Re: sponsor for QEmacs maybe
On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 10:24:50PM +0100, Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS wrote: QEmacs is a tiny full-screen editor with UTF-8 support, a hex mode and the ability to edit huge files efficiently: http://www-stud.enst.fr/~bellard/qemacs/ have you contacted the author? has he given his blessing to QEmacs being pacakged? i ask because i came across this: Download Current snapshot (please do not redistribute since it is not finished): qemacs-0.2.tar.gz -john
Re: sponsor for QEmacs maybe
John H. Robinson, IV [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Current snapshot (please do not redistribute since it is not finished): qemacs-0.2.tar.gz Current version of qemacs segafaults after a typing ~ 20 letters, somewhere in strcpy. I think it is ready still to enter distribution... -- Peter Novodvorsky http://www.altlinux.ru/AltLinux Team, Russia Debian.Org http://debian.org/~nidd Debian --- no need to wait for tomorrow.
Re: sponsor for QEmacs maybe
On Sat, Apr 28, 2001 at 01:42:19AM +0400, Peter Novodvorsky wrote: John H. Robinson, IV [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Current snapshot (please do not redistribute since it is not finished): qemacs-0.2.tar.gz Current version of qemacs segafaults after a typing ~ 20 letters, somewhere in strcpy. I think it is ready still to enter distribution... Can you explain this reasoning a little more? The software should not be distributed, plus it segfaults, why do you recommend that for the distribution? And maybe even for the boot-floppies? Christian
Re: sponsor for QEmacs maybe
Christian T. Steigies [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Sat, Apr 28, 2001 at 01:42:19AM +0400, Peter Novodvorsky wrote: John H. Robinson, IV [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Current snapshot (please do not redistribute since it is not finished): qemacs-0.2.tar.gz Current version of qemacs segafaults after a typing ~ 20 letters, somewhere in strcpy. I think it is ready still to enter distribution... Can you explain this reasoning a little more? The software should not be distributed, plus it segfaults, why do you recommend that for the distribution? And maybe even for the boot-floppies? I'm sorry, I'm sleepy and should go to bed. I meant s/is/is not/. Please, excuse me. ;-) -- Peter Novodvorsky http://www.altlinux.ru/AltLinux Team, Russia Debian.Org http://debian.org/~nidd Debian --- no need to wait for tomorrow.
