tslib RM bug
Hello, at the moment I'm working on tslib to adopt the package. I see that there is a RM bug[1] for tslib. I would like to continue working on it, hence my question: What is the best way to stop this and the blocking bugs? CU Jörg [1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=751768 -- pgp Fingerprint: 7D13 3C60 0A10 DBE1 51F8 EBCB 422B 44B0 BE58 1B6E pgp Key: BE581B6E CAcert Key S/N: 0E:D4:56 Jörg Frings-Fürst D-54526 Niederkail Threema: SYR8SJXB IRC: j_...@freenode.net j_...@oftc.net signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: tslib RM bug
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 3:48 AM, Jörg Frings-Fürst wrote: What is the best way to stop this and the blocking bugs? Personally I don't understand your motivation for wanting to maintain tslib (evdev should replace it), but if you don't think the package should be removed, you should close the RM bug with an explanation. https://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/caktje6htv__gxqyngaskdy4ejubyo9f11ue2y_aow7cmorc...@mail.gmail.com
Re: tslib RM bug
Hello Paul, thank you for your answer. Am Donnerstag, den 31.07.2014, 12:10 +0800 schrieb Paul Wise: On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 3:48 AM, Jörg Frings-Fürst wrote: What is the best way to stop this and the blocking bugs? Personally I don't understand your motivation for wanting to maintain tslib (evdev should replace it), but if you don't think the package should be removed, you should close the RM bug with an explanation. [...] Upps. I don't have the info about the replacement. This info and the RM bug are not on the PTS. bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise CU Jörg -- pgp Fingerprint: 7D13 3C60 0A10 DBE1 51F8 EBCB 422B 44B0 BE58 1B6E pgp Key: BE581B6E CAcert Key S/N: 0E:D4:56 Jörg Frings-Fürst D-54526 Niederkail Threema: SYR8SJXB IRC: j_...@freenode.net j_...@oftc.net signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: tslib RM bug
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 1:24 PM, Jörg Frings-Fürst wrote: Upps. I don't have the info about the replacement. This info and the RM bug are not on the PTS. The RM bug should be mentioned on the PTS but isn't, that seems like a bug. Since we are transitioning the PTS to the package tracker, the bug won't be fixed on the PTS. -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CAKTje6Fn2mC9OcXs0xF2RPABUhwXgLYUbn2qOK=hucuyjkm...@mail.gmail.com
