: Favor confirmar

2007-05-08 Thread G.Carvalho


, 

 

Gostariamos de saber se recebeu nosso e-mail sobre como adquirir os ?

 

Tudo pronto para iniciar a sua divulgaçao? 

 

 


Cordi

Bug#417415: marked as done (fluidsynth-dssi: Insufficient Description)

2007-05-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 08 May 2007 22:02:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#417415: fixed in fluidsynth-dssi 0.9.1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: fluidsynth-dssi
Severity: minor

What ist "DSSI"?
* Dynamic Server Side Include?
* Distributed Super Server Interface?
* Disfunctional Stupid Sound Infrastructure?
Please add some words do debian/control:Description explaining what DSSI
is, because neither any forward nor backward dependent packages mention
anything about DSSI. Only by doing an "apt-cache search dssi" I now have
an idea about what this package might be about...


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (499, 'testing'), (450, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.20.3-station
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: fluidsynth-dssi
Source-Version: 0.9.1-2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
fluidsynth-dssi, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

fluidsynth-dssi_0.9.1-2.diff.gz
  to pool/main/f/fluidsynth-dssi/fluidsynth-dssi_0.9.1-2.diff.gz
fluidsynth-dssi_0.9.1-2.dsc
  to pool/main/f/fluidsynth-dssi/fluidsynth-dssi_0.9.1-2.dsc
fluidsynth-dssi_0.9.1-2_amd64.deb
  to pool/main/f/fluidsynth-dssi/fluidsynth-dssi_0.9.1-2_amd64.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Free Ekanayaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated fluidsynth-dssi package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Mon,  2 Apr 2007 20:40:56 +0200
Source: fluidsynth-dssi
Binary: fluidsynth-dssi
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.9.1-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Multimedia Team 
Changed-By: Free Ekanayaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 fluidsynth-dssi - DSSI wrapper for the FluidSynth SoundFont-playing software 
synthe
Closes: 417415
Changes: 
 fluidsynth-dssi (0.9.1-2) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Added description about DSSI in control (Closes: #417415)
Files: 
 d61523121ccf797ee8084276dc9894f3 829 sound optional fluidsynth-dssi_0.9.1-2.dsc
 a166bc82af0b7351c4a71052714f9dde 16358 sound optional 
fluidsynth-dssi_0.9.1-2.diff.gz
 e242cb5611041987debdb788270160a0 44922 sound optional 
fluidsynth-dssi_0.9.1-2_amd64.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFGQO+AcanJGlcVnlkRAh86AJ9OE3Lol0ez9Jn603pZWnk+J3TIYgCfWvRf
3+IOmJ7uCBulzewngiAYuwA=
=/MNQ
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--- End Message ---


fluidsynth-dssi_0.9.1-2_amd64.changes ACCEPTED

2007-05-08 Thread Debian Installer

Accepted:
fluidsynth-dssi_0.9.1-2.diff.gz
  to pool/main/f/fluidsynth-dssi/fluidsynth-dssi_0.9.1-2.diff.gz
fluidsynth-dssi_0.9.1-2.dsc
  to pool/main/f/fluidsynth-dssi/fluidsynth-dssi_0.9.1-2.dsc
fluidsynth-dssi_0.9.1-2_amd64.deb
  to pool/main/f/fluidsynth-dssi/fluidsynth-dssi_0.9.1-2_amd64.deb


Override entries for your package:
fluidsynth-dssi_0.9.1-2.dsc - source sound
fluidsynth-dssi_0.9.1-2_amd64.deb - optional sound

Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Closing bugs: 417415 


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processing of fluidsynth-dssi_0.9.1-2_amd64.changes

2007-05-08 Thread Archive Administrator
fluidsynth-dssi_0.9.1-2_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  fluidsynth-dssi_0.9.1-2.dsc
  fluidsynth-dssi_0.9.1-2.diff.gz
  fluidsynth-dssi_0.9.1-2_amd64.deb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: create_0.1.3-2_amd64.changes REJECTED

2007-05-08 Thread Joerg Jaspert
On 11013 March 1977, Daniel James wrote:

>> The package name is a little bit too generic - "create".
>> And yes, even if its upstreams name (a very bad name selection looking at its
>> contents).
> How about 'creative-resources' for a package name?

Thats way better, and also fits more for what is in.

-- 
bye Joerg
 we have release cycles, that's why it takes so long to get a
release out; if we had release race cars, things would go a lot faster


pgpdINOyc0e45.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: create_0.1.3-2_amd64.changes REJECTED

2007-05-08 Thread Daniel James

Hi Joerg,


The package name is a little bit too generic - "create".
And yes, even if its upstreams name (a very bad name selection looking at its
contents).


How about 'creative-resources' for a package name?

Cheers!

Daniel


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



create_0.1.3-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

2007-05-08 Thread Joerg Jaspert
please see -2 reject


===

If you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if the
override file requires editing, reply to this email.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



create_0.1.3-2_amd64.changes REJECTED

2007-05-08 Thread Joerg Jaspert
Hi Maintainer,

rejected, sorry. The package name is a little bit too generic - "create".
And yes, even if its upstreams name (a very bad name selection looking at its
contents).

-- 
bye Joerg



===

If you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if the
override file requires editing, reply to this email.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]