Processing of qtractor_0.0.6.728-1_amd64.changes

2007-10-22 Thread Archive Administrator
qtractor_0.0.6.728-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  qtractor_0.0.6.728-1.dsc
  qtractor_0.0.6.728.orig.tar.gz
  qtractor_0.0.6.728-1.diff.gz
  qtractor_0.0.6.728-1_amd64.deb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Some of your Debian packages might need attention

2007-10-22 Thread DDPOMail robot
Dear Debian Multimedia Team,

The following possible problem(s) were detected in the package(s)
you maintain in Debian:

=== ardour:
= This package has not been in testing for 78 days.
= This package has not been able to migrate from unstable
  to testing for 163 days.
  See http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=ardour

=== rosegarden:
= This package has not been able to migrate from unstable
  to testing for 183 days.
  See http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=rosegarden

=== sineshaper:
= This package has not been in testing for 178 days.
= This package has not been able to migrate from unstable
  to testing for 178 days.
  See http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=sineshaper

This is an automated mail. These mails are sent monthly.
For more information about these mails, refer to
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/DdpoByMail

We are sorry if this mail was useless for you. If you think it was
avoidable (that we can detect easily that the problems weren't
actually problems), please reply to it and let us know.

If you don't want to receive this type of mail any more, you can reply
to this mail and use one of the following commands at the beginning of
the mail:
- unsubscribe email
You will no longer receive any mail for any package
- ignore package email
You will no longer receive information about that package in those
mails. So if that package is the only one with problems, you won't
receive anything.
- ignore bug email
You will no longer receive information about this bug.

All commands are manually processed, but you will receive
confirmation. The commands are just here so that we know precisely
what you want.

A more detailed status of your packages is available from the DDPO.
See: 
http://qa.debian.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have questions. The wiki
page will be updated with useful information.
-- 
DDPOMail, run by Lucas Nussbaum


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Some of your Debian packages might need attention

2007-10-22 Thread Felipe Sateler
On Monday 22 October 2007 12:56:30 DDPOMail robot wrote:

 === rosegarden:
 = This package has not been able to migrate from unstable
   to testing for 183 days.
   See http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=rosegarden

 === sineshaper:
 = This package has not been in testing for 178 days.
 = This package has not been able to migrate from unstable
   to testing for 178 days.
   See http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=sineshaper

These two packages are not migrating due to unmet (build-)dependencies. 
Rosegarden is waiting for guile to build, and sineshaper is waiting for 
gtk+-2.0. Is it possible to make the DDPO robot ingore these, or is there a 
reason to not ignore them? 


-- 

Felipe Sateler


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: Some of your Debian packages might need attention

2007-10-22 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 22/10/07 at 15:57 -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
 On Monday 22 October 2007 12:56:30 DDPOMail robot wrote:
 
  === rosegarden:
  = This package has not been able to migrate from unstable
to testing for 183 days.
See http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=rosegarden
 
  === sineshaper:
  = This package has not been in testing for 178 days.
  = This package has not been able to migrate from unstable
to testing for 178 days.
See http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=sineshaper
 
 These two packages are not migrating due to unmet (build-)dependencies. 
 Rosegarden is waiting for guile to build, and sineshaper is waiting for 
 gtk+-2.0. Is it possible to make the DDPO robot ingore these, or is there a 
 reason to not ignore them? 

Hi,

I added a note about that case on
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/DdpoByMail .

Thank you for the report,
-- 
| Lucas Nussbaum
| [EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |



Re: FTBS of ardour

2007-10-22 Thread Felipe Sateler
On Sunday 21 October 2007 08:19:23 Nico Golde wrote:
 Hi Ardour maintainers,
 Did someone of you already look into:
 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=446597?
 I ask because this is the only thing missing from fixing the
 security flaw in ardour described on:
 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=445889

I've been looking into this. The pkg-config issue is trivial, a pkg-config 
build-dep was missing. I'm having a problem with the abs issue, though: I 
can't understand why it is there, and it doesn't appear here on i386. I think 
the problem is there because (for some strange reason) abs(long long) is 
defined on i386 and other archs but not on mips. I (hopefully, I don't have a 
mips machine to test on) work around that by making it an abs(double) and 
then casting to nframes_t. This appears to work here.

Attached is a patch that makes the necessary changes.



-- 

Felipe Sateler
diff -Nru trunk/debian/control trunk.new/debian/control
--- trunk/debian/control	2007-10-22 19:27:07.0 -0300
+++ trunk.new/debian/control	2007-10-22 19:37:03.0 -0300
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
 Priority: optional
 Maintainer: Debian Multimedia Team debian-multimedia@lists.debian.org
 Uploaders: Guenter Geiger (Debian/GNU) [EMAIL PROTECTED], Robert Jordens [EMAIL PROTECTED], Free Ekanayaka [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Build-Depends: autotools-dev, quilt, patchutils (= 0.2.25), cdbs (= 0.4.27-1), debhelper (= 4.1.0), scons, dh-buildinfo, libsigc++-2.0-dev, libxml2-dev (= 2.5.7), libasound2-dev (= 0.9.4), libsndfile1-dev, libsamplerate0-dev, liblrdf0-dev (= 0.3.1-4), ladspa-sdk (= 1.1-2), libjack-dev, libgtkmm-2.4-dev, libglade2-dev, libpango1.0-dev, libgnomecanvasmm-2.6-dev, libgnomecanvas2-dev, libglib2.0-dev, libglademm-2.4-dev, gettext, intltool, libboost-dev, libsoundtouch1-dev, liblo0-dev, libcairomm-1.0-dev (= 1.2.4)
+Build-Depends: autotools-dev, quilt, patchutils (= 0.2.25), cdbs (= 0.4.27-1), debhelper (= 4.1.0), scons, dh-buildinfo, libsigc++-2.0-dev, libxml2-dev (= 2.5.7), libasound2-dev (= 0.9.4), libsndfile1-dev, libsamplerate0-dev, liblrdf0-dev (= 0.3.1-4), ladspa-sdk (= 1.1-2), libjack-dev, libgtkmm-2.4-dev, libglade2-dev, libpango1.0-dev, libgnomecanvasmm-2.6-dev, libgnomecanvas2-dev, libglib2.0-dev, libglademm-2.4-dev, gettext, intltool, libboost-dev, libsoundtouch1-dev, liblo0-dev, libcairomm-1.0-dev (= 1.2.4), pkg-config
 Standards-Version: 3.7.2
 
 Package: ardour
diff -Nru trunk/gtk2_ardour/editor_mouse.cc trunk.new/gtk2_ardour/editor_mouse.cc
--- trunk/gtk2_ardour/editor_mouse.cc	2007-10-22 19:30:28.0 -0300
+++ trunk.new/gtk2_ardour/editor_mouse.cc	2007-10-22 19:38:39.0 -0300
@@ -1530,8 +1530,8 @@
 		*/
 		if (!drag_info.move_threshold_passed) {
 
-			bool x_threshold_passed =  (abs ((nframes64_t) (drag_info.current_pointer_x - drag_info.grab_x))  4LL);
-			bool y_threshold_passed =  (abs ((nframes64_t) (drag_info.current_pointer_y - drag_info.grab_y))  4LL);
+			bool x_threshold_passed =  (((nframes64_t) abs (drag_info.current_pointer_x - drag_info.grab_x))  4LL);
+			bool y_threshold_passed =  (((nframes64_t) abs (drag_info.current_pointer_y - drag_info.grab_y))  4LL);
 			
 			drag_info.move_threshold_passed = (x_threshold_passed || y_threshold_passed);
 			


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.