Re: Ardour still not present in testing

[Paul Wise]

I'm going to have a go at killing all these libraries right now, but
someone needs to get in contact with upstream and educate them about
the evilness of embedded code copies.

-- 
bye,
pabs

http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Ardour still not present in testing

[Paul Wise]

On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 12:13 AM, Daniel James <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>  Is there any way we can resolve this? Can we just get security support
> removed so that the embedding of libraries is no longer an issue?

Security isn't the only reason embedded libraries are bad.

>  I seriously doubt that Ardour is installed on any security-critical
> servers.

Don't you care about the security of users desktops or audio workstations?

-- 
bye,
pabs

http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

rosegarden_1.7.0-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED

[Debian Installer]

Accepted:
rosegarden-data_1.7.0-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/r/rosegarden/rosegarden-data_1.7.0-1_all.deb
rosegarden_1.7.0-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/r/rosegarden/rosegarden_1.7.0-1.diff.gz
rosegarden_1.7.0-1.dsc
  to pool/main/r/rosegarden/rosegarden_1.7.0-1.dsc
rosegarden_1.7.0-1_amd64.deb
  to pool/main/r/rosegarden/rosegarden_1.7.0-1_amd64.deb
rosegarden_1.7.0.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/r/rosegarden/rosegarden_1.7.0.orig.tar.gz


Override entries for your package:
rosegarden-data_1.7.0-1_all.deb - optional sound
rosegarden_1.7.0-1.dsc - source sound
rosegarden_1.7.0-1_amd64.deb - extra sound

Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processing of rosegarden_1.7.0-1_amd64.changes

[Archive Administrator]

rosegarden_1.7.0-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  rosegarden_1.7.0-1.dsc
  rosegarden_1.7.0.orig.tar.gz
  rosegarden_1.7.0-1.diff.gz
  rosegarden_1.7.0-1_amd64.deb
  rosegarden-data_1.7.0-1_all.deb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Ardour still not present in testing

[Felipe Sateler]

On Thursday 01 May 2008 12:13:38 Daniel James wrote:
> Hi Felipe,
>
> > Actually, when/if it builds it won't go either, since it has 4 RC bugs
> > and there is no version in testing.
>
> Is there any way we can resolve this? Can we just get security support
> removed so that the embedding of libraries is no longer an issue?
>
> I seriously doubt that Ardour is installed on any security-critical
> servers.

I think this should be taken to the release and security teams.
Note though that there are non-security related RC bugs, these would need to 
be fixed first.


-- 
Felipe Sateler


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: Ardour still not present in testing

[Daniel James]

Hi Felipe,

Actually, when/if it builds it won't go either, since it has 4 RC bugs and 
there is no version in testing.


Is there any way we can resolve this? Can we just get security support 
removed so that the embedding of libraries is no longer an issue?


I seriously doubt that Ardour is installed on any security-critical servers.

Cheers!

Daniel


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Possible problems in your Debian packages

[DDPOMail robot]

=== ardour:
= 5 bug(s) that should be fixed for the next Debian release:
- #442495 
  ardour: FTBFS if build twice in a row
  Part of release goal: double compilation support
- #446405 
  ardour: Embeds too many libs
- #458660 
  ardour: FTBFS: build times out
- #463005 
  ardour-i686: Undefined art_alloc -- program unusable!
- #474422 
  ardour - FTBFS: Built-in libsigc++, broken
= Missing build(s) on ia64,mips,s390,sparc,powerpc
  This might need manual action from your side.
  See http://buildd.debian.org/pkg.cgi?pkg=ardour
= Not in testing for 270 days.
  If things don't change, it won't be part of lenny!
  See 

=== create-resources:
= 1 bug(s) that should be fixed for the next Debian release:
- #442529 
  create-resources: FTBFS if build twice in a row
  Part of release goal: double compilation support

=== fusd-kor:
= 1 bug(s) that should be fixed for the next Debian release:
- #447248 
  fusd-kor - FTBFS: failure: cannot read files list file: No such file or 
directory
= Not in testing for 108 days.
  If things don't change, it won't be part of lenny!
  See 

=== gigedit:
= 1 bug(s) that should be fixed for the next Debian release:
- #473943 
  gigedit: FTBFS: ld: cannot find -luuid

=== glashctl:
= 1 bug(s) that should be fixed for the next Debian release:
- #474791 
  glashctl: FTBFS: lashserverinterface.cpp:39: error: 'strdup' was not declared 
in this scope

=== ocp: (you co-maintain it)
= 1 bug(s) that should be fixed for the next Debian release:
- #454913 
  opencubicplayer -- Doesn't purge all files after piuparts 
Install+Upgrade+Purge test
  Part of release goal: piuparts-clean archive

=== qtractor:
= 1 bug(s) that should be fixed for the next Debian release:
- #475991 
  qtractor: FTBFS: src/qtractorAtomic.h:44: error: 'q_atomic_test_and_set_int' 
was not declared in this scope

=== schism: (you co-maintain it)
= 1 bug(s) that should be fixed for the next Debian release:
- #478625 
  schism: bashism in debian/rules
  Part of release goal: switch /bin/sh to dash

=== traverso: (you co-maintain it)
= 2 bug(s) that should be fixed for the next Debian release:
- #467096 
  traverso: compiled with optimisations not supported on all i386 
subarchitectures
- #478264 
  traverso: error while loading shared libraries: libQtOpenGL.so.4:
= Not in testing for 42 days.
  If things don't change, it won't be part of lenny!
  See 

=== Packages with a new upstream version according to DEHS:
  clxclient  3.6.1  (Debian: 3.3.2-1)
  flake  0.11  (Debian: 0.10-3)
  gavl  0.2.7  (Debian: 0.2.5-1)
  glashctl  0.4.3  (Debian: 0.4.2-4)
  kmidimon  0.5.1  (Debian: 0.5.0-2)
  openmovieeditor  0.0.20080209  (Debian: 0.0.20080102-2.1)
  qtractor  0.1.2  (Debian: 0.1.0-1.2)

 interesting stuff probably ends here 
This is an automated mail. These mails are sent monthly.
For more information about these mails, refer to
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/DdpoByMail

We are sorry if this mail was useless for you. If you think it was
avoidable (that we can detect easily that the problems weren't
actually problems), please reply to it and let us know.

If you don't want to receive this type of mail any more, you can reply
to this mail and use one of the following commands at the beginning of
the mail:
- unsubscribe 
You will no longer receive any mail for any package
- ignore  
You will no longer receive information about that package in those
mails. So if that package is the only one with problems, you won't
receive anything.
- ignore  
You will no longer receive information about this bug.

All commands are manually processed, but you will receive
confirmation. The commands are just here so that we know precisely
what you want.

A more detailed status of your packages is available from the DDPO.
See: 
http://qa.debian.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have questions. The wiki
page will be updated with useful information.
-- 
DDPOMail, run by Lucas Nussbaum


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]