lv2core_3.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Dear Maintainer, REJECT: missing license/copyright data in debian/copyright. autowaf.py is also (C) 2008 Nedko Arnaudov and is GPL 2+. The GPL is only mentioned with respect to the debian/* files lv2.h is also (C) 2000-2002 Richard W.E. Furse, Paul Barton-Davis, Stefan Westerfield and is LGPL 2.1+. bye, stew === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-multimedia-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#492871: moreninfo
tag 492871 moreinfo thanks This alone is not very useful. Please see: http://wiki.debian.org/HowToGetABacktrace thanks, stew -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-multimedia-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Rosegarden and Gnome
On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 06:38:53PM +0100, Grammostola Rosea wrote: > tim hall wrote: >> Grammostola Rosea wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I want to install Rosegarden on Gnome, but it takes a lot of kde >>> packages with it in Debian, like konqueror etc. It basically messes >>> up my Gnome installation quit a bit... In what way does it mess up gnome? >>> >>> >>> Uncompressed Size: 10,2M >>> Depends: kdelibs4c2a (>= 4:3.5.9), libasound2 (> 1.0.16), libc6 (>= >>> 2.7-1), libfftw3-3, libfontconfig1 (>= 2.4.0), libgcc1 (>= >>>1:4.1.1-21), libice6 (>= 1:1.0.0), libjack0 (>= 0.109.2), >>> liblo0ldbl (>= 0.23), liblrdf0, libqt3-mt (>= 3:3.3.8b), libsm6, >>>libstdc++6 (>= 4.2.1-4), libx11-6, libxext6, libxft2 (> >>> 2.1.1), khelpcenter, rosegarden-data (= 1:1.7.0-1), >>>libxml-twig-perl, sndfile-programs, xterm, kdebase-bin, >>> konqueror | www-browser, flac >>> >>> >>> Are these packages really needed? Yes >>> What packages are 100% needed? The ones listed above >>> Can't you guys make the depends which are not really depends, >>> recommended packages? Yes, I have. >You know apt and aptitude install recommended >>> packages by default, but you can turn it off if you want... >> How does it mess up your GNOME install? >> Is this problem specific to the 1.7.0 version? >> >> I suspect that the majority of these dependencies are correct; >> Rosegarden is a fairly hefty application. I don't actually understand >> the dep on konqueror | www-browser (should be satisfied by any >> sensible browser) AND khelpcenter - I guess you would need a >> web-brower to read the manual? Yes, when you ask for 'help' in rosegarden, it loads the help in a web browser, which is why there is a dependency on "konqueror | www-browser" >> standardized on the GNOME framework. The rosegarden devs recognize >> this disparity, but so far the people-power required to make a gtk >> port has not manifested AFAIA. No, there is a current effort upstream to switch rosegarden from kde to qt, but not one to port it to gtk. I wouldn't expect a port to gtk. >> > I installed 1.7.2 version, so the issue doesn't seems to be fixed. I > included Rosegarden in a custom build live-cd, so maybe that's why he > installed konqueror... What exactly is the issue? > > depends: kdelibs4c2a (>= 4:3.5.9), libasound2 (> 1.0.16), libc6 (>= > 2.7-1), libfftw3-3, libfontconfig1 (>= 2.4.0), libgcc1 (>= > 1:4.1.1), libice6 (>= 1:1.0.0), libjack0 (>= 0.116.1), > liblo0ldbl (>= 0.23), liblrdf0, libqt3-mt (>= 3:3.3.8b), libsm6, > libstdc++6 (>= 4.2.1), libx11-6, libxext6, libxft2 (> 2.1.1), > rosegarden-data (= 1:1.7.2-1), libxml-twig-perl, > sndfile-programs, xterm | x-terminal-emulator, kdebase-bin, > konqueror | www-browser, flac > Recommends: jackd, lilypond, swh-plugins | ladspa-plugin, khelpcenter > Suggests: qjackctl > > Isn't it possible to make konqueror | www-browser a recommends? Doesn't > that solve the konqueror issue? No, this should not be a recommends, it can be a depends. If you don't want to install konqueror, you can install anything that Provides: www-browser, such as iceweasel or epiphany-browser. "apt-cache showpkg www-browser" will list all of the available www-browser package in the "Reverse Provides:" section. stew signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#494296: reassigning
retitle 494296 kdebase-bin: Uninstallable in Sid tag 494296 unreproducible reassign 494296 kdebase-bin thanks I cannot reproduce this bug either, marking it as unreproducible, but since this is a problem installing kdebase-bin not rosegarden, I'm reassigning. Can you please show us the output of "apt-cache policy kdebase-bin" and tell us what happens if you try to install kdebase-bin directly? stew signature.asc Description: Digital signature
RFS: rosegarden 1.6.1-3
I checked in a 1.6.1-3 revision of rosegarden to the demudi repository on alioth. It adds a patch which fixes build problems with g++ 4.3, which is now the default on (at least) ppc and arm, which is currently causing build failures: http://buildd.debian.org/pkg.cgi?pkg=rosegarden I'd appriciate if someone would consider uploading it. Thanks, stew signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#460477: not kdesu but kdialog
We are not depending on kdebase-bin becuase of kdesu but becuase of kdialog. Is this binary also changing locations? Is there somewhere that you could point me that documents these changes? thanks, stew signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#457007: [Rosegarden-devel] 1.6.1rc1 to test
tags 457007 fixed-upstream tags 457007 confirmed tags 457007 pending thanks On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 01:47:35PM +, Chris Cannam wrote: > > http://www.rosegardenmusic.com/pre/rosegarden-1.6.1rc1.tar.bz2 > > This has two fixes in it -- the fix to saving un-ramped tempos, and a fairly > substantial fix to handling of logarithmic control ports in LADSPA plugins > (which should improve the plugin control dialogs for many plugins). Any > testing appreciated. > > I've called this one rc1 (rather than a prerelease) because, if nobody points > out any mistakes in the above two fixes, or any further showstoppers, it will > be simply renamed to 1.6.1 and released. For this reason the Rosegarden > binary in the package should already identify itself as 1.6.1 in the splash, > rather than 1.6.1-pre-anything. > > > Chris > I built debian packages for i386 and amd64 using these sources that can be used for testing. find them here: http://vireo.org/debian/rosegarden/binary and debian sources: http://vireo.org/debian/rosegarden/source I'll wait for a non-rc version before I actually upload to debian. stew signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#457007: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: [Rosegarden-devel] [Rosegarden-user] bug in debian unstable]
Package: rosegarden Version: 1:1.6.0-1 Forwarded: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Severity: Normal X-Debbugs-CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Forwarding this bug which was originally reported to the rosegarden-user list to the Debian bug tracking system thanks, stew - Forwarded message from Chris Cannam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - From: Chris Cannam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], Paul Ulrich Niggli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [Rosegarden-devel] [Rosegarden-user] bug in debian unstable Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 20:15:37 + On Tuesday 18 December 2007 15:59, Paul Ulrich Niggli wrote: > I think, i found a bug in debian-unstable package > of rosegarden.when i save tempo-changes as > fixed,they get opend as ramp to following tempo. OK, thanks for the test files and description off-list. I was simply misreading the problem -- it's to do with saving files, not loading files. To reproduce without an example file: * start RG (1.6.0) with empty composition * add new (non-ramped) tempo change with any tempo other than 120, at any point after the start (anything that makes the tempo actually change) * save the file * reload it * note that the opening tempo is now ramped to the one you just added This is a pretty significant bug -- the sort of thing one rolls out a point release for, when it's fixed. We have to fix it first of course. Thanks for the report. Chris - SF.Net email is sponsored by: Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace ___ Rosegarden-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] - use the link below to unsubscribe https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel - End forwarded message - signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: rosegarden 1.6
On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 09:35:54AM +, Free Ekanayaka wrote: > Hi Mike, > > I've seen you've been working on rosegarden 1.6. When you think the > package is ready I can upload it. Ciao! > > Free > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > I had emailed you about it on sunday. It's ready. One major change is that in this version, I dropped the rosegarden2 and rosegarden4 transitional packages. Thanks, stew signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Some of your Debian packages might need attention
On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 12:17:15PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote: > On Thursday 23 August 2007 08:30:05 DDPOMail robot wrote: > > > > > === rosegarden: > > = This package has not been able to migrate from unstable > > to testing for 123 days. > > This one is waiting for libopenexr-dev >=1.2.2-3 on hppa, which already is > there. Maybe a rebuild should be asked on hppa? > Yes, I just sent mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] requesting a rebuild. thanks, stew signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#422289: -m3dnow -msse
It looks like: CFLAGS += -m3dnow -msse was recently added to debian/rules. Those flags would not be valid outside of i686. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#414027: the fix is to install konqueror
The work-around for this bug is to install konqueror which provides kfmclient. However, I'm not comfortable adding konqueror as a rosegarden dependency. Currently they invoke the browser using a KDE call to KApp::invokeBrowser. I'm going to try to track down the implementation and see if there is a way that it could call x-www-browser instead. stew signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#410587: tagging as upstream
severity 410587 wishlist tag 410587 upstream forwarded 410587 [EMAIL PROTECTED] thanks I have sent this request to the upstream developers that they include the changelog in their next release. thanks, stew signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#410587: what upstream changelog
tags 410587 moreinfo thanks As far as I know, there is no upstream changelog in the upstream changelog. If there is an upstream changelog that I'm missing, please tell me where it is. Otherwise, i'll close this bug soon. Thanks, stew signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#409255: setting priority to grave
severity 409255 grave thanks I'm upgrading this bug to grave at the behest of vorlon: 16:37 < vorlon> stew: yes, a bug of that level should be grave thanks, stew signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#392635: more details?
Can you give some more details about how you have midi setup? Is the piano connected via midi cables or usb? How have you assigned midi in the MIDI devices section? " (Composition -> Studio -> Manage MIDI Devices) Thanks, stew -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#390409: check asound timers
also, can you show me the output of: cat /proc/asound/timers That will should definitively show whether your system timers are at 1khz or 400hz thanks, stew signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#390409: (no subject)
Have you tried the recommendations in the rosegarden FAQ? http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=390409 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#210978: unable to reproduce
tags 288591 moreinfo tags 210978 moreinfo tags 254637 moreinfo tags 291473 moreinfo tags 311869 moreinfo tags 317446 moreinfo thanks This is an old bug filed against an old version of rosegarden. I am not able to reproduce it. Are you still able to reproduce this bug with a more current version of rosegarden? Thanks, stew -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#392181: rosegarden: Documentation in README.Debian about rtc / jackd / low-latency needs to be updated
Package: rosegarden Version: 1:1.4.0-1 Severity: wishlist The documentation in /usr/share/doc/rosegarden/README.Debian is a bit out of date with respect to low latency / RTC. Some things have changed since it was written, and it points you to a no longer existent file in the jackd documentation. stew -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-2-amd64 Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages rosegarden depends on: ii kdelibs4c2a 4:3.5.4-3core libraries and binaries for al ii khelpcenter 4:3.5.4-2+b2 help center for KDE ii libasound2 1.0.12-1 ALSA library ii libc6 2.3.6.ds1-4 GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libfontconfig1 2.4.1-2 generic font configuration library ii libgcc1 1:4.1.1-14 GCC support library ii libjack0.100.0-00.101.1-1JACK Audio Connection Kit (librari ii liblircclient0 0.8.0-7 LIRC client library ii liblo0 0.23-2.1 Lightweight OSC library ii liblrdf00.4.0-1 a library to manipulate RDF files ii libqt3-mt 3:3.3.6-4Qt GUI Library (Threaded runtime v ii libstdc++6 4.1.1-14 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libx11-62:1.0.0-9X11 client-side library ii libxft2 2.1.8.2-8FreeType-based font drawing librar ii rosegarden-data 1:1.4.0-1music editor and MIDI/audio sequen Versions of packages rosegarden recommends: pn jackd (no description available) ii ladspa-sdk [ladspa-plugin]1.1-4.1sample tools for linux-audio-dev p -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#387907: rosegarden: missing dependancy on qjackctl
On Sun, 2006-09-17 at 14:47 +0300, Ognyan Kulev wrote: > > I'm using GNOME and when started, rosegarden complained that there is > no jackd. I have jackd packages and it turned that qjackctl should > also be installed. It's good if this is reflected in dependancies > in some way. qjackctl is not required for rosegarden. I have never had that package installed, and rosegarden works fine for me. Can you provide the output of rosegarden when you start it when qjackctl is not installed? Thanks, stew -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
rosegarden-1.2.4-1
I updated the rosegarden package in svn to the current upstream release (1.2.4) This version is a bugfix release from upstream. It incorporates a few of the fixes we had made in 1.2.3, which is great. Our debian/patches directory was reduced. Free, Could you make another upload? thanks, stew signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#16255: more info needed
tags 16255 moreinfo thanks as always -- I am not able to reproduce this bug. I tried exporting a multi-track file to a midi file then re-importing it, and it was re-imported as distince tracks, not as one track. If you are still able to reproduce this bug, please provide a file I can test with. If I don't hear back soon, I will probably close this bug, as it is now 8 years old, and not likely to still exist. thanks! stew -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#288591: can't reproduce
tags 288501 moreinfo thanks thanks thanks -- I'm not able to reproduce this with the current version of rosegarden. Are you still able to reproduce this with the current version of rosegarden? thanks, stew -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#304372:
tags 346448 moreinfo tags 304372 moreinfo thanks I'm unable to reproduce this bug. Are you able to reproduce this bug with the lastest rosegarden package? stew -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: we got our first bugs filed against rosegarden
> "Free Ekanayaka" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said on 06/19/2006: > |--==> Mike O'Connor writes: > > MO> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=373885 > MO> I just checked in a new control file that declares Conflicts: against > MO> the older rosegarden2,4 packages to try to fix this bug. > > MO> Hopefully later today I'll get time to start going through all the old > MO> bugs and either close the obviously outdated ones, or tag them with > MO> moreinfo. > > Thanks for having dealt with this, when you feel the package is ready > for a new upload please ping me. > > Ciao, > > Free > > OK, I just checked in changes that fix 373885, and I created a patch that fixes the segfault in 374716. I'm sending that patch upstream. I was unable to reproduce 374814, can anyone else reproduce it? I have requested more info from the submitter, we'll see what we get. And I started pinging the old bugs, and I'm closing some of the ones that are clearly no longer relevant. Free, The package is probably in a good state to upload, unless you want to wait to see if we can get more info on 374814. thanks, stew -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#374814: can't reproduce
tags 374814 moreinfo thanks I cannot reproduce this big here. I have no /etc/lircrc nor a ~/.lircrc. What lirc related pacakges do you have installed? Can you provide an strace log? thanks, stew -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
we got our first bugs filed against rosegarden
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=373885 I just checked in a new control file that declares Conflicts: against the older rosegarden2,4 packages to try to fix this bug. Hopefully later today I'll get time to start going through all the old bugs and either close the obviously outdated ones, or tag them with moreinfo. stew -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Rosegarden 1.2.3
On Wed, 2006-06-07 at 13:29 +0200, Free Ekanayaka wrote: > |--==> Free Ekanayaka writes: > > FE> Hi Mike, > FE> I'm starting to work on the rosegarden source package you have > FE> injected in the demudi Alioth SVN repository. It builds fine, but > FE> there are still some little things to tweak, which I'm going to commit > FE> soon. > > FE> I nobody else wants to step in, I'd be glad to sponsor the upload of > FE> this package. > > I've just built an i386 version of the new package. You can find it at: > > deb http://archive.64studio.com custom main > deb-src http://archive.64studio.com custom main > > it's compiled against sid, so you will need some packages from sid > (most noticeably kdelibs). > > Please if you can give it a test, if everything is ok I'd upload it to > the Debian archive. > > Cheers, > > Free > I spent some time today testing dist-upgrades from sarge in a chroot with rosegarden4 and rosegarden2 installed, and made some changes which made the upgrade paths work. Otherwise I think its in good shape. stew -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [Fwd: RFC/RFS: rosegarden4: music editor and MIDI/audio sequencer]
On Fri, 2006-03-24 at 08:17 +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > > Free, are you fine with the idea of using
> > > http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/demudi for rosegarden as well?
> > >
> >
> > My account on alioth is stew-guest. I'd need to be put into the demudi
> > group.
>
> You're added, could you do svn-inject ?
OK, I ran svn-inject. its in:
svn://svn.debian.org/svn/demudi/rosegarden
Here are the things people should be aware of:
The previous build of rosegarden4 build-deps on gcc3.4 for 3 arches that
were previously getting ICE with gcc4. I changed that back hoping that
whatever was causing the ICE has since been fixed. (the arches in
question are {arm, hppa, m68k}.
The manpage in the package is docbook2man generated and authored by the
previous maintainer, but I haven't been able to locate the source, or
the previous maintainer. The manpages are licensed GFDL with no
invariant sections no front or back cover texts. So the license is free
according to GR 2006-01, but the missing manpage source is troublesome.
There are two new binaries that as of right now don't have manpages:
rosegarden-lilypondview, rosegarden-project-package.
I get these linda warnings:
W: rosegarden; Shared object /usr/bin/rosegarden is linked with version 0.9.7
and 0.9.8 of libssl.
This is becuase liblrdf0 is old and needs to be rebuilt. I filed a bug
to request it to be rebuilt:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=353361
Its aparantly waiting on some other package. I have talked on irc with
both the maintainer and with vorlon about it.
I moved the meat of the package from rosegarden4 to rosegarden and made
rosegarden4 a dummy package. Please double check that I have correctly
setup the inter-package dependencies correctly.
Thats all I can think of for now. Let me know how it looks.
thanks,
stew
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [Fwd: RFC/RFS: rosegarden4: music editor and MIDI/audio sequencer]
On Mon, 2006-03-20 at 09:10 +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote: > Hi, > > > > Cool. I didn't realize that rosegarden4 was orphaned at all. > > > I am interested in getting this thing updated in Debian. > > > > > > I prefer working out of a svn/cvs repos rather than shifting around > > > whole packages. > > > > I ran svn-inject, and my package is here: > > > > svn://svn.vireo.org/rosegarden/rosegarden4 > > Humph, I was hoping that you'd inject it to somewhere like the demudi > repos so that I can have read/write access. > > Free, are you fine with the idea of using > http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/demudi for rosegarden as well? > My account on alioth is stew-guest. I'd need to be put into the demudi group. stew -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [Fwd: RFC/RFS: rosegarden4: music editor and MIDI/audio sequencer]
> > Cool. I didn't realize that rosegarden4 was orphaned at all. > I am interested in getting this thing updated in Debian. > > I prefer working out of a svn/cvs repos rather than shifting around > whole packages. I ran svn-inject, and my package is here: svn://svn.vireo.org/rosegarden/rosegarden4 > > > I've looked at rosegarden4 sources and it blew my mind away; it's > using 'scons' for building, and decided to throw away > autoconf/automake/Makefile set up ? yeah. Don't konw what the motivation was there. The rosegarden-devel list is already talking about possibly moving from scons to something else: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_id=9886891&forum_id=271 > > How did you handle the 'rosegarden' -> 'rosegarden4' rename that was > probably Debian-local, did you just throw it away? > In my current packaging I have kept the debian specific renaming from rosegarden -> rosegarden4, however I'm hoping this won On Sun, 2006-03-19 at 12:52 +0100, Free Ekanayaka wrote: > The rosegarden and rosegarden2 packages in Debian are both dummy ones: > > http://packages.debian.org/unstable/sound/rosegarden > http://packages.debian.org/unstable/sound/rosegarden2 > > and very old: > > http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/r/rosegarden/rosegarden_2.1pl4-2/changelog > http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/r/rosegarden2/rosegarden2_2.1pl4-2.1/changelog > > As we are at it, would it make sense to ask for their removal? > The rosegarden package is a dummy package, but rosegarden2 is not. It is, however old and dead upstream. I hadn't requested removal yet, becuase at the time that the packages were all orphaned, someone expressed interest in rosegarden2 becuase of a strong dislike of kde. Doing some searching now, I can no longer find this reference, and since nobody has expressed any interest in the packages via the wnpp bugs, it probably would be apropriate to request the removal of rosegarden2. What's not clear to me is what to do with the orphaned rosegarden package. Should that now point to rosegarden4 or should it be removed? or should it become the real package and have rosegarden4 be a dummy package pointing to rosegarden. What do you guys think? Thanks, stew -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [Fwd: RFC/RFS: rosegarden4: music editor and MIDI/audio sequencer]
On Fri, 2006-03-17 at 15:20 +, tim hall wrote: > I assume this is a glibc6 / gcc4 build, so I won't be testing this > immediately. My binary package is built in an up to date pbuilder, so it is the lastest libc6 and gcc packages in sid. I kept the debhelper compatibility at 4 so that the source could be easily backported however. > Do you mind if I announce these packages on > [EMAIL PROTECTED] so we can get some testing done? Not at all. I certainly want them tested. > > This package strikes me as an ideal candidate for Debian-multimedia to > sponsor / co-maintain, this requires at least one DD on this list to be > enthusiastic about the idea. Rosegarden4 is one of Linux Audio's > flagship apps IMO and it has always looked bad that Debian constantly > ships with the version before last. This wasn't necessarily Enrique's > fault, although he could have made a formal RFH sooner. > > I hope you will be able to work with Willem van Engen > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> who intends to package the dssi stuff, I also > think that this list will be the right place to co-ordinate efforts. I'm > glad you found us. I agree that this package is a good one for co-maintainance or team maiintainence. It is, as you say, a flagship product, and its features are broad, and getting broader as it has a very active upstream. stew -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Fwd: RFC/RFS: rosegarden4: music editor and MIDI/audio sequencer]
I've packaged a newer version of rosegarden4. I have been trying to normal means of finding a sponsor for this package (mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED], and asking a bunch of times on #debian-mentors), but I haven't yet been successful. I didn't know about this mailing list previously, so I thought I'd try here. Attached is my original RFC/RFS that I had sent to debian-mentors. Thanks, stew --- Begin Message --- I intend to adopt rosegarden4. The ITA is here: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=352541 --- Description: music editor and MIDI/audio sequencer Rosegarden4 is a KDE application which provides a mixed Audio/MIDI sequencer (for playback and recording), a multi-track editor, music editing using both piano-roll and score notation, MIDI file IO, lilypond and Csound files export, etc. . Rosegarden4 is a complete rewrite of the old rosegarden application, available in the "rosegarden" debian package. I have prepared packages and they are available here: deb http://vireo.org/debian/rosegarden4/binary/ deb-src http://vireo.org/debian/rosegarden4/source/ Here is my changelist: Changes: rosegarden4 (1.2.3-1) unstable; urgency=low . * New Maintainer (Closes: #352541) * New upstream version * No longer building a verbose debug version (Closes: #311087) * Fixed typo in manpage (Closes: #341660) * Split arch-indep files into a rosegarden4-data pacakge (Closes: #233437) * The upstream menu icon is now included (Closes: #299390) * Moved jackd from Depends: to Recommends: (Closes: #219286) --- I would appreciate any comments anyone may have on my packaging. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- End Message ---
