lv2core_3.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Dear Maintainer, REJECT: missing license/copyright data in debian/copyright. autowaf.py is also (C) 2008 Nedko Arnaudov and is GPL 2+. The GPL is only mentioned with respect to the debian/* files lv2.h is also (C) 2000-2002 Richard W.E. Furse, Paul Barton-Davis, Stefan Westerfield and is LGPL 2.1+. bye, stew === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-multimedia-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#492871: moreninfo
tag 492871 moreinfo thanks This alone is not very useful. Please see: http://wiki.debian.org/HowToGetABacktrace thanks, stew -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-multimedia-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
RFS: rosegarden 1.6.1-3
I checked in a 1.6.1-3 revision of rosegarden to the demudi repository on alioth. It adds a patch which fixes build problems with g++ 4.3, which is now the default on (at least) ppc and arm, which is currently causing build failures: http://buildd.debian.org/pkg.cgi?pkg=rosegarden I'd appriciate if someone would consider uploading it. Thanks, stew signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#460477: not kdesu but kdialog
We are not depending on kdebase-bin becuase of kdesu but becuase of kdialog. Is this binary also changing locations? Is there somewhere that you could point me that documents these changes? thanks, stew signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#457007: [Rosegarden-devel] 1.6.1rc1 to test
tags 457007 fixed-upstream tags 457007 confirmed tags 457007 pending thanks On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 01:47:35PM +, Chris Cannam wrote: http://www.rosegardenmusic.com/pre/rosegarden-1.6.1rc1.tar.bz2 This has two fixes in it -- the fix to saving un-ramped tempos, and a fairly substantial fix to handling of logarithmic control ports in LADSPA plugins (which should improve the plugin control dialogs for many plugins). Any testing appreciated. I've called this one rc1 (rather than a prerelease) because, if nobody points out any mistakes in the above two fixes, or any further showstoppers, it will be simply renamed to 1.6.1 and released. For this reason the Rosegarden binary in the package should already identify itself as 1.6.1 in the splash, rather than 1.6.1-pre-anything. Chris I built debian packages for i386 and amd64 using these sources that can be used for testing. find them here: http://vireo.org/debian/rosegarden/binary and debian sources: http://vireo.org/debian/rosegarden/source I'll wait for a non-rc version before I actually upload to debian. stew signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: rosegarden 1.6
On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 09:35:54AM +, Free Ekanayaka wrote: Hi Mike, I've seen you've been working on rosegarden 1.6. When you think the package is ready I can upload it. Ciao! Free -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] I had emailed you about it on sunday. It's ready. One major change is that in this version, I dropped the rosegarden2 and rosegarden4 transitional packages. Thanks, stew signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Some of your Debian packages might need attention
On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 12:17:15PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote: On Thursday 23 August 2007 08:30:05 DDPOMail robot wrote: === rosegarden: = This package has not been able to migrate from unstable to testing for 123 days. This one is waiting for libopenexr-dev =1.2.2-3 on hppa, which already is there. Maybe a rebuild should be asked on hppa? Yes, I just sent mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] requesting a rebuild. thanks, stew signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#422289: -m3dnow -msse
It looks like: CFLAGS += -m3dnow -msse was recently added to debian/rules. Those flags would not be valid outside of i686. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#410587: tagging as upstream
severity 410587 wishlist tag 410587 upstream forwarded 410587 [EMAIL PROTECTED] thanks I have sent this request to the upstream developers that they include the changelog in their next release. thanks, stew signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#410587: what upstream changelog
tags 410587 moreinfo thanks As far as I know, there is no upstream changelog in the upstream changelog. If there is an upstream changelog that I'm missing, please tell me where it is. Otherwise, i'll close this bug soon. Thanks, stew signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#210978: unable to reproduce
tags 288591 moreinfo tags 210978 moreinfo tags 254637 moreinfo tags 291473 moreinfo tags 311869 moreinfo tags 317446 moreinfo thanks This is an old bug filed against an old version of rosegarden. I am not able to reproduce it. Are you still able to reproduce this bug with a more current version of rosegarden? Thanks, stew -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#392181: rosegarden: Documentation in README.Debian about rtc / jackd / low-latency needs to be updated
Package: rosegarden Version: 1:1.4.0-1 Severity: wishlist The documentation in /usr/share/doc/rosegarden/README.Debian is a bit out of date with respect to low latency / RTC. Some things have changed since it was written, and it points you to a no longer existent file in the jackd documentation. stew -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-2-amd64 Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages rosegarden depends on: ii kdelibs4c2a 4:3.5.4-3core libraries and binaries for al ii khelpcenter 4:3.5.4-2+b2 help center for KDE ii libasound2 1.0.12-1 ALSA library ii libc6 2.3.6.ds1-4 GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libfontconfig1 2.4.1-2 generic font configuration library ii libgcc1 1:4.1.1-14 GCC support library ii libjack0.100.0-00.101.1-1JACK Audio Connection Kit (librari ii liblircclient0 0.8.0-7 LIRC client library ii liblo0 0.23-2.1 Lightweight OSC library ii liblrdf00.4.0-1 a library to manipulate RDF files ii libqt3-mt 3:3.3.6-4Qt GUI Library (Threaded runtime v ii libstdc++6 4.1.1-14 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libx11-62:1.0.0-9X11 client-side library ii libxft2 2.1.8.2-8FreeType-based font drawing librar ii rosegarden-data 1:1.4.0-1music editor and MIDI/audio sequen Versions of packages rosegarden recommends: pn jackd none (no description available) ii ladspa-sdk [ladspa-plugin]1.1-4.1sample tools for linux-audio-dev p -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#387907: rosegarden: missing dependancy on qjackctl
On Sun, 2006-09-17 at 14:47 +0300, Ognyan Kulev wrote: I'm using GNOME and when started, rosegarden complained that there is no jackd. I have jackd packages and it turned that qjackctl should also be installed. It's good if this is reflected in dependancies in some way. qjackctl is not required for rosegarden. I have never had that package installed, and rosegarden works fine for me. Can you provide the output of rosegarden when you start it when qjackctl is not installed? Thanks, stew -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#374814: can't reproduce
tags 374814 moreinfo thanks I cannot reproduce this big here. I have no /etc/lircrc nor a ~/.lircrc. What lirc related pacakges do you have installed? Can you provide an strace log? thanks, stew -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#304372:
tags 346448 moreinfo tags 304372 moreinfo thanks I'm unable to reproduce this bug. Are you able to reproduce this bug with the lastest rosegarden package? stew -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Rosegarden 1.2.3
On Wed, 2006-06-07 at 13:29 +0200, Free Ekanayaka wrote: |--== Free Ekanayaka writes: FE Hi Mike, FE I'm starting to work on the rosegarden source package you have FE injected in the demudi Alioth SVN repository. It builds fine, but FE there are still some little things to tweak, which I'm going to commit FE soon. FE I nobody else wants to step in, I'd be glad to sponsor the upload of FE this package. I've just built an i386 version of the new package. You can find it at: deb http://archive.64studio.com custom main deb-src http://archive.64studio.com custom main it's compiled against sid, so you will need some packages from sid (most noticeably kdelibs). Please if you can give it a test, if everything is ok I'd upload it to the Debian archive. Cheers, Free I spent some time today testing dist-upgrades from sarge in a chroot with rosegarden4 and rosegarden2 installed, and made some changes which made the upgrade paths work. Otherwise I think its in good shape. stew -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [Fwd: RFC/RFS: rosegarden4: music editor and MIDI/audio sequencer]
On Fri, 2006-03-17 at 15:20 +, tim hall wrote: I assume this is a glibc6 / gcc4 build, so I won't be testing this immediately. My binary package is built in an up to date pbuilder, so it is the lastest libc6 and gcc packages in sid. I kept the debhelper compatibility at 4 so that the source could be easily backported however. Do you mind if I announce these packages on [EMAIL PROTECTED] so we can get some testing done? Not at all. I certainly want them tested. This package strikes me as an ideal candidate for Debian-multimedia to sponsor / co-maintain, this requires at least one DD on this list to be enthusiastic about the idea. Rosegarden4 is one of Linux Audio's flagship apps IMO and it has always looked bad that Debian constantly ships with the version before last. This wasn't necessarily Enrique's fault, although he could have made a formal RFH sooner. I hope you will be able to work with Willem van Engen [EMAIL PROTECTED] who intends to package the dssi stuff, I also think that this list will be the right place to co-ordinate efforts. I'm glad you found us. I agree that this package is a good one for co-maintainance or team maiintainence. It is, as you say, a flagship product, and its features are broad, and getting broader as it has a very active upstream. stew -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
