Some of your Debian packages might need attention

2008-04-01 Thread DDPOMail robot
Dear Debian Multimedia Team,

The following possible problem(s) were detected in the package(s)
you maintain in Debian:

=== ams:
= A newer upstream version exists for this package (or your watch file
   is broken):
  upstream: 1.8.8-rc2 Debian: 1.8.8~rc2-3.1

=== ardour:
= This package has 3 bug(s) that should be fixed for the next Debian release:
- #442495 
  ardour: FTBFS if build twice in a row
  Bug part of a release goal: double compilation support
- #446405 
  ardour: Embeds too many libs
  This is a Release-Critical bug!
- #458660 
  ardour: FTBFS: build times out
  This is a Release-Critical bug!
= This package has not been in testing for 240 days.
  If things don't change, it won't be part of lenny!
  See 

=== audacity:
= This package has 1 bug(s) that should be fixed for the next Debian release:
- #442497 
  audacity: FTBFS if build twice in a row
  Bug part of a release goal: double compilation support

=== create-resources:
= This package has 1 bug(s) that should be fixed for the next Debian release:
- #442529 
  create-resources: FTBFS if build twice in a row
  Bug part of a release goal: double compilation support

=== flake:
= A newer upstream version exists for this package (or your watch file
   is broken):
  upstream: 0.11 Debian: 0.10-3

=== fusd-kor:
= This package has 1 bug(s) that should be fixed for the next Debian release:
- #447248 
  fusd-kor - FTBFS: failure: cannot read files list file: No such file or 
directory
  This is a Release-Critical bug!
= This package has not been in testing for 78 days.
  If things don't change, it won't be part of lenny!
  See 

=== gavl:
= This package has 1 bug(s) that should be fixed for the next Debian release:
- #442569 
  gavl: FTBFS if build twice in a row
  Bug part of a release goal: double compilation support
= A newer upstream version exists for this package (or your watch file
   is broken):
  upstream: 0.2.7 Debian: 0.2.5-1

=== glashctl:
= A newer upstream version exists for this package (or your watch file
   is broken):
  upstream: 0.4.3 Debian: 0.4.2-4

=== kmidimon:
= A newer upstream version exists for this package (or your watch file
   is broken):
  upstream: 0.5.1 Debian: 0.5.0-2

=== ocp: (you co-maintain this package)
= This package has 1 bug(s) that should be fixed for the next Debian release:
- #454913 
  opencubicplayer -- Doesn't purge all files after piuparts 
Install+Upgrade+Purge test
  Bug part of a release goal: piuparts-clean archive

=== openmovieeditor:
= A newer upstream version exists for this package (or your watch file
   is broken):
  upstream: 0.0.20080209 Debian: 0.0.20080102-2.1

=== qtractor:
= A newer upstream version exists for this package (or your watch file
   is broken):
  upstream: 0.1.2 Debian: 0.1.0-1.2

=== rosegarden:
= This package has not been able to migrate from unstable
  to testing for 345 days.
  See 

=== traverso: (you co-maintain this package)
= This package has 1 bug(s) that should be fixed for the next Debian release:
- #467096 
  traverso: compiled with optimisations not supported on all i386 
subarchitectures
  This is a Release-Critical bug!
= This package has not been in testing for 12 days.
  If things don't change, it won't be part of lenny!
  See 

This is an automated mail. These mails are sent monthly.
For more information about these mails, refer to
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/DdpoByMail

We are sorry if this mail was useless for you. If you think it was
avoidable (that we can detect easily that the problems weren't
actually problems), please reply to it and let us know.

If you don't want to receive this type of mail any more, you can reply
to this mail and use one of the following commands at the beginning of
the mail:
- unsubscribe 
You will no longer receive any mail for any package
- ignore  
You will no longer receive information about that package in those
mails. So if that package is the only one with problems, you won't
receive anything.
- ignore  
You will no longer receive information about this bug.

All commands are manually processed, but you will receive
confirmation. The commands are just here so that we know precisely
what you want.

A more detailed status of your packages is available from the DDPO.
See: 
http://qa.debian.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have questions. The wiki
page will be updated with useful information.
-- 
DDPOMail, run by Lucas Nussbaum


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, em

Re: Some of your Debian packages might need attention

2008-03-03 Thread Felipe Sateler
On Monday 03 March 2008 06:11:53 DDPOMail robot wrote:
> Dear Debian Multimedia Team,
>
> The following possible problem(s) were detected in the package(s)
> you maintain in Debian:
>
> === ardour:
> = This package has 3 bug(s) that should be fixed for the next Debian
> release: - #442495 
>   ardour: FTBFS if build twice in a row
>   Bug part of a release goal: double compilation support
> - #446405 
>   ardour: Embeds too many libs
>   This is a Release-Critical bug!
> - #458660 
>   ardour: FTBFS: build times out
>   This is a Release-Critical bug!
> = This package has not been in testing for 211 days.
>   If things don't change, it won't be part of lenny!
>   See 

Huh? The svn repo contains version 1:2.2-2 of ardour, but the version in the 
archive is 1:2.3.1-1. Maybe forgot to commit the changes to the repo?

-- 
Felipe Sateler


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Some of your Debian packages might need attention

2008-03-03 Thread DDPOMail robot
Dear Debian Multimedia Team,

The following possible problem(s) were detected in the package(s)
you maintain in Debian:

=== ardour:
= This package has 3 bug(s) that should be fixed for the next Debian release:
- #442495 
  ardour: FTBFS if build twice in a row
  Bug part of a release goal: double compilation support
- #446405 
  ardour: Embeds too many libs
  This is a Release-Critical bug!
- #458660 
  ardour: FTBFS: build times out
  This is a Release-Critical bug!
= This package has not been in testing for 211 days.
  If things don't change, it won't be part of lenny!
  See 

=== audacity:
= This package has 1 bug(s) that should be fixed for the next Debian release:
- #442497 
  audacity: FTBFS if build twice in a row
  Bug part of a release goal: double compilation support

=== create-resources:
= This package has 1 bug(s) that should be fixed for the next Debian release:
- #442529 
  create-resources: FTBFS if build twice in a row
  Bug part of a release goal: double compilation support

=== fusd-kor:
= This package has 1 bug(s) that should be fixed for the next Debian release:
- #447248 
  fusd-kor - FTBFS: failure: cannot read files list file: No such file or 
directory
  This is a Release-Critical bug!
= This package has not been in testing for 49 days.
  If things don't change, it won't be part of lenny!
  See 

=== gavl:
= This package has 1 bug(s) that should be fixed for the next Debian release:
- #442569 
  gavl: FTBFS if build twice in a row
  Bug part of a release goal: double compilation support

=== ocp: (you co-maintain this package)
= This package has 1 bug(s) that should be fixed for the next Debian release:
- #454913 
  opencubicplayer -- Doesn't purge all files after piuparts 
Install+Upgrade+Purge test
  Bug part of a release goal: piuparts-clean archive

=== rosegarden:
= This package has not been able to migrate from unstable
  to testing for 316 days.
  See 

=== traverso: (you co-maintain this package)
= This package has 1 bug(s) that should be fixed for the next Debian release:
- #467096 
  traverso: missing theme file - crash on start
  This is a Release-Critical bug!

This is an automated mail. These mails are sent monthly.
For more information about these mails, refer to
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/DdpoByMail

We are sorry if this mail was useless for you. If you think it was
avoidable (that we can detect easily that the problems weren't
actually problems), please reply to it and let us know.

If you don't want to receive this type of mail any more, you can reply
to this mail and use one of the following commands at the beginning of
the mail:
- unsubscribe 
You will no longer receive any mail for any package
- ignore  
You will no longer receive information about that package in those
mails. So if that package is the only one with problems, you won't
receive anything.
- ignore  
You will no longer receive information about this bug.

All commands are manually processed, but you will receive
confirmation. The commands are just here so that we know precisely
what you want.

A more detailed status of your packages is available from the DDPO.
See: 
http://qa.debian.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have questions. The wiki
page will be updated with useful information.
-- 
DDPOMail, run by Lucas Nussbaum


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Some of your Debian packages might need attention

2008-02-05 Thread DDPOMail robot
Dear Debian Multimedia Team,

The following possible problem(s) were detected in the package(s)
you maintain in Debian:

=== ams:
= A newer upstream version exists for this package (or your watch file
   is broken):
  upstream: 1.8.8-rc2 Debian: 1.8.8~rc2-3

=== amsynth:
= This package has not been able to migrate from unstable
  to testing for 54 days.
  See 

=== ardour:
= This package has 4 bug(s) that should be fixed for the next Debian release:
- #442495 
  ardour: FTBFS if build twice in a row
  Bug part of a release goal: double compilation support
- #446405 
  ardour: Embeds too many libs
  This is a Release-Critical bug!
- #458660 
  ardour: FTBFS: build times out
  This is a Release-Critical bug!
- #463005 
  ardour-i686: Undefined art_alloc -- program unusable!
  This is a Release-Critical bug!
= This package has not been in testing for 184 days.
  If things don't change, it won't be part of lenny!
  See 

=== audacity:
= This package has 1 bug(s) that should be fixed for the next Debian release:
- #442497 
  audacity: FTBFS if build twice in a row
  Bug part of a release goal: double compilation support

=== create-resources:
= This package has 1 bug(s) that should be fixed for the next Debian release:
- #442529 
  create-resources: FTBFS if build twice in a row
  Bug part of a release goal: double compilation support

=== flake:
= A newer upstream version exists for this package (or your watch file
   is broken):
  upstream: 0.11 Debian: 0.10-3

=== fusd-kor:
= This package has 1 bug(s) that should be fixed for the next Debian release:
- #447248 
  fusd-kor - FTBFS: failure: cannot read files list file: No such file or 
directory
  This is a Release-Critical bug!
= This package has not been in testing for 22 days.
  If things don't change, it won't be part of lenny!
  See 

=== gavl:
= This package has 1 bug(s) that should be fixed for the next Debian release:
- #442569 
  gavl: FTBFS if build twice in a row
  Bug part of a release goal: double compilation support
= A newer upstream version exists for this package (or your watch file
   is broken):
  upstream: 0.2.7 Debian: 0.2.5-1

=== glashctl:
= A newer upstream version exists for this package (or your watch file
   is broken):
  upstream: 0.4.3 Debian: 0.4.2-4

=== ocp: (you co-maintain this package)
= This package has 1 bug(s) that should be fixed for the next Debian release:
- #454913 
  opencubicplayer -- Doesn't purge all files after piuparts 
Install+Upgrade+Purge test
  Bug part of a release goal: piuparts-clean archive

=== rosegarden:
= This package has not been able to migrate from unstable
  to testing for 289 days.
  See 

This is an automated mail. These mails are sent monthly.
For more information about these mails, refer to
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/DdpoByMail

We are sorry if this mail was useless for you. If you think it was
avoidable (that we can detect easily that the problems weren't
actually problems), please reply to it and let us know.

If you don't want to receive this type of mail any more, you can reply
to this mail and use one of the following commands at the beginning of
the mail:
- unsubscribe 
You will no longer receive any mail for any package
- ignore  
You will no longer receive information about that package in those
mails. So if that package is the only one with problems, you won't
receive anything.
- ignore  
You will no longer receive information about this bug.

All commands are manually processed, but you will receive
confirmation. The commands are just here so that we know precisely
what you want.

A more detailed status of your packages is available from the DDPO.
See: 
http://qa.debian.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have questions. The wiki
page will be updated with useful information.
-- 
DDPOMail, run by Lucas Nussbaum


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Some of your Debian packages might need attention

2008-01-09 Thread DDPOMail robot
Dear Debian Multimedia Team,

The following possible problem(s) were detected in the package(s)
you maintain in Debian:

=== ardour:
= This package has 1 RC bug(s) more than 20 days old:
- #446405 
  ardour: Embeds too many libs
= This package has not been in testing for 157 days.
  If things don't change, it won't be part of lenny!
= This package has not been able to migrate from unstable
  to testing for 242 days.
  See 

=== audacity:
= This package has 1 RC bug(s) more than 20 days old:
- #453283 
  CVE-2007-6061: possible symlink attack

=== fusd-kor:
= This package has 1 RC bug(s) more than 20 days old:
- #447248 
  fusd-kor - FTBFS: failure: cannot read files list file: No such file or 
directory

=== rosegarden:
= This package has not been able to migrate from unstable
  to testing for 262 days.
  See 

This is an automated mail. These mails are sent monthly.
For more information about these mails, refer to
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/DdpoByMail

We are sorry if this mail was useless for you. If you think it was
avoidable (that we can detect easily that the problems weren't
actually problems), please reply to it and let us know.

If you don't want to receive this type of mail any more, you can reply
to this mail and use one of the following commands at the beginning of
the mail:
- unsubscribe 
You will no longer receive any mail for any package
- ignore  
You will no longer receive information about that package in those
mails. So if that package is the only one with problems, you won't
receive anything.
- ignore  
You will no longer receive information about this bug.

All commands are manually processed, but you will receive
confirmation. The commands are just here so that we know precisely
what you want.

A more detailed status of your packages is available from the DDPO.
See: 
http://qa.debian.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have questions. The wiki
page will be updated with useful information.
-- 
DDPOMail, run by Lucas Nussbaum


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Some of your Debian packages might need attention

2007-11-26 Thread DDPOMail robot
Dear Debian Multimedia Team,

The following possible problem(s) were detected in the package(s)
you maintain in Debian:

=== ardour:
= This package has not been in testing for 113 days.
= This package has not been able to migrate from unstable
  to testing for 198 days.
  See 

=== fusd-kor:
= This package has 1 RC bug(s) more than 21 days old:
- #447248 
  fusd-kor - FTBFS: failure: cannot read files list file: No such file or 
directory

=== openmovieeditor:
= This package has not been in testing for 84 days.
= This package has not been able to migrate from unstable
  to testing for 84 days.
  See 

=== rosegarden:
= This package has not been able to migrate from unstable
  to testing for 218 days.
  See 

=== wavbreaker:
= This package has not been able to migrate from unstable
  to testing for 66 days.
  See 

This is an automated mail. These mails are sent monthly.
For more information about these mails, refer to
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/DdpoByMail

We are sorry if this mail was useless for you. If you think it was
avoidable (that we can detect easily that the problems weren't
actually problems), please reply to it and let us know.

If you don't want to receive this type of mail any more, you can reply
to this mail and use one of the following commands at the beginning of
the mail:
- unsubscribe 
You will no longer receive any mail for any package
- ignore  
You will no longer receive information about that package in those
mails. So if that package is the only one with problems, you won't
receive anything.
- ignore  
You will no longer receive information about this bug.

All commands are manually processed, but you will receive
confirmation. The commands are just here so that we know precisely
what you want.

A more detailed status of your packages is available from the DDPO.
See: 
http://qa.debian.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have questions. The wiki
page will be updated with useful information.
-- 
DDPOMail, run by Lucas Nussbaum


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Some of your Debian packages might need attention

2007-10-22 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 22/10/07 at 15:57 -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> On Monday 22 October 2007 12:56:30 DDPOMail robot wrote:
> 
> > === rosegarden:
> > = This package has not been able to migrate from unstable
> >   to testing for 183 days.
> >   See 
> >
> > === sineshaper:
> > = This package has not been in testing for 178 days.
> > = This package has not been able to migrate from unstable
> >   to testing for 178 days.
> >   See 
> 
> These two packages are not migrating due to unmet (build-)dependencies. 
> Rosegarden is waiting for guile to build, and sineshaper is waiting for 
> gtk+-2.0. Is it possible to make the DDPO robot ingore these, or is there a 
> reason to not ignore them? 

Hi,

I added a note about that case on
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/DdpoByMail .

Thank you for the report,
-- 
| Lucas Nussbaum
| [EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |



Re: Some of your Debian packages might need attention

2007-10-22 Thread Felipe Sateler
On Monday 22 October 2007 12:56:30 DDPOMail robot wrote:

> === rosegarden:
> = This package has not been able to migrate from unstable
>   to testing for 183 days.
>   See 
>
> === sineshaper:
> = This package has not been in testing for 178 days.
> = This package has not been able to migrate from unstable
>   to testing for 178 days.
>   See 

These two packages are not migrating due to unmet (build-)dependencies. 
Rosegarden is waiting for guile to build, and sineshaper is waiting for 
gtk+-2.0. Is it possible to make the DDPO robot ingore these, or is there a 
reason to not ignore them? 


-- 

Felipe Sateler


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Some of your Debian packages might need attention

2007-10-22 Thread DDPOMail robot
Dear Debian Multimedia Team,

The following possible problem(s) were detected in the package(s)
you maintain in Debian:

=== ardour:
= This package has not been in testing for 78 days.
= This package has not been able to migrate from unstable
  to testing for 163 days.
  See 

=== rosegarden:
= This package has not been able to migrate from unstable
  to testing for 183 days.
  See 

=== sineshaper:
= This package has not been in testing for 178 days.
= This package has not been able to migrate from unstable
  to testing for 178 days.
  See 

This is an automated mail. These mails are sent monthly.
For more information about these mails, refer to
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/DdpoByMail

We are sorry if this mail was useless for you. If you think it was
avoidable (that we can detect easily that the problems weren't
actually problems), please reply to it and let us know.

If you don't want to receive this type of mail any more, you can reply
to this mail and use one of the following commands at the beginning of
the mail:
- unsubscribe 
You will no longer receive any mail for any package
- ignore  
You will no longer receive information about that package in those
mails. So if that package is the only one with problems, you won't
receive anything.
- ignore  
You will no longer receive information about this bug.

All commands are manually processed, but you will receive
confirmation. The commands are just here so that we know precisely
what you want.

A more detailed status of your packages is available from the DDPO.
See: 
http://qa.debian.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have questions. The wiki
page will be updated with useful information.
-- 
DDPOMail, run by Lucas Nussbaum


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Some of your Debian packages might need attention

2007-09-26 Thread DDPOMail robot
Dear Debian Multimedia Team,

The following possible problem(s) were detected in the package(s)
you maintain in Debian:

=== ardour:
= This package has not been in testing for 52 days.
= This package has not been able to migrate from unstable
  to testing for 137 days.
  See 

=== rosegarden:
= This package has not been able to migrate from unstable
  to testing for 157 days.
  See 

=== sineshaper:
= This package has not been in testing for 152 days.
= This package has not been able to migrate from unstable
  to testing for 152 days.
  See 

This is an automated mail. These mails are sent monthly.
For more information about these mails, refer to
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/DdpoByMail

We are sorry if this mail was useless for you. If you think it was
avoidable (that we can detect easily that the problems weren't
actually problems), please reply to it and let us know.

If you don't want to receive this type of mail any more, you can reply
to this mail and use one of the following commands at the beginning of
the mail:
- unsubscribe 
You will no longer receive any mail for any package
- ignore  
You will no longer receive information about that package in those
mails. So if that package is the only one with problems, you won't
receive anything.
- ignore  
You will no longer receive information about this bug.

All commands are manually processed, but you will receive
confirmation. The commands are just here so that we know precisely
what you want.

A more detailed status of your packages is available from the DDPO.
See: 
http://qa.debian.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have questions. The wiki
page will be updated with useful information.
-- 
DDPOMail, run by Lucas Nussbaum


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Some of your Debian packages might need attention

2007-08-23 Thread Mike O'Connor
On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 12:17:15PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> On Thursday 23 August 2007 08:30:05 DDPOMail robot wrote:
> 
> >
> > === rosegarden:
> > = This package has not been able to migrate from unstable
> >   to testing for 123 days.
> 
> This one is waiting for libopenexr-dev >=1.2.2-3 on hppa, which already is 
> there. Maybe a rebuild should be asked on hppa?
> 

Yes,  I just sent mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] requesting a rebuild.

thanks, 
stew



signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: Some of your Debian packages might need attention

2007-08-23 Thread Felipe Sateler
On Thursday 23 August 2007 08:30:05 DDPOMail robot wrote:
> Dear Debian Multimedia Team,
>
> The following possible problem(s) were detected in the package(s)
> you maintain in Debian:
>
> === ardour:
> = This package has not been able to migrate from unstable
>   to testing for 103 days.

Ardour has been FTBFS on mips 
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=ardour;ver=1%3A2.0.5-1;arch=mips;stamp=1186492760

>
> === rosegarden:
> = This package has not been able to migrate from unstable
>   to testing for 123 days.

This one is waiting for libopenexr-dev >=1.2.2-3 on hppa, which already is 
there. Maybe a rebuild should be asked on hppa?

>
> === sineshaper:
> = This package has not been in testing for 118 days.
> = This package has not been able to migrate from unstable
>   to testing for 118 days.

This one also has been FTBFS on mips and mipsel
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=sineshaper;ver=0.4.2-4;arch=mips;stamp=1179137740
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=sineshaper;ver=0.4.2-4;arch=mipsel;stamp=1179146345


All build failures on mips and mipsel have been a segmentation fault in ld. 
Maybe [EMAIL PROTECTED] should be asked on why is this happening?


-- 

Felipe Sateler


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Some of your Debian packages might need attention

2007-08-23 Thread DDPOMail robot
Dear Debian Multimedia Team,

The following possible problem(s) were detected in the package(s)
you maintain in Debian:

=== ardour:
= This package has not been able to migrate from unstable
  to testing for 103 days.

=== rosegarden:
= This package has not been able to migrate from unstable
  to testing for 123 days.

=== sineshaper:
= This package has not been in testing for 118 days.
= This package has not been able to migrate from unstable
  to testing for 118 days.

This is a semi-automated mail. These mails are sent monthly.
For more information about these mails, refer to
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/DdpoByMail

We are sorry if this mail was useless for you. If you think it was
avoidable (that we can detect easily that the problems weren't
actually problems), please reply to it and let us know.

If you don't want to receive this type of mail any more, you can reply
to this mail and use one of the following commands at the beginning of
the mail:
- unsubscribe 
You will no longer receive any mail for any package
- ignore  
You will no longer receive information about that package in those
mails. So if that package is the only one with problems, you won't
receive anything.
- ignore  
You will no longer receive information about this bug.

All commands are manually processed, but you will receive
confirmation. The commands are just here so that we know precisely
what you want.

A more detailed status of your packages is available from the DDPO.
See: 
http://qa.debian.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have questions. The wiki
page will be updated with useful information.
-- 
DDPOMail, run by Lucas Nussbaum


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Some of your Debian packages might need attention

2007-07-16 Thread DDPOMail robot
Dear Debian Multimedia Team,

The following possible problem(s) were detected in the package(s)
you maintain in Debian:

=== ardour:
= This package has 1 RC bug(s) more than 30 days old:
- #424412 
  Tries to overwrite files from old ardour-gtk package

This is an semi-automated mail. These mails will be sent monthly.
For more information about these mails, refer to
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/DdpoByMail

We are sorry if this mail was useless for you. If you think it was
avoidable (that we can detect easily that the problems weren't
actually problems), please reply to it and let us know.

If you don't want to receive this type of mail anymore, you can reply
to this mail and use one of the following commands at the beggining of
the mail:
- unsubscribe 
You will no longer receive any mail for any package
- ignore  
You will no longer receive information about that package in those
mails. So if that package is the only one with problems, you won't
receive anything.
- ignore  
You will no longer receive information about this bug.

All commands are manually processed, but you will receive
confirmation. The commands are just here so that we know precisely
what you want.

A more detailed status of your packages is available from the DDPO.
See: 
http://qa.debian.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Don't hesitate to reply to that mail if you have questions. The wiki
page will be updated with useful information.
-- 
DDPOMail, run by Lucas Nussbaum


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Some of your Debian packages might need attention

2007-06-22 Thread DDPOMail robot
Dear Debian Multimedia Team,

The following possible problem(s) were detected in the package(s)
you maintain in Debian:

 ardour:
  This package has 1 RC bug(s) more than 30 days old:
   - #424412

This is an semi-automated mail. These mails will be sent monthly.
For more information about these mails, refer to
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/DdpoByMail

We are sorry if this mail was useless for you. If you think it was
avoidable (that we can detect easily that the problems weren't
actually problems), please reply to it and let us know.

If you don't want to receive this type of mail anymore, you can reply
to this mail and use one of the following commands at the beggining of
the mail:
- unsubscribe 
You will no longer receive any mail for any package
- ignore  
You will no longer receive information about that package in those
mails. So if that package is the only one with problems, you won't
receive anything.
Both commands are manually processed, but you will receive
confirmation. The commands are just here so that we know precisely
what you want.

A more detailed status of your packages is available from the DDPO.
See: 
http://qa.debian.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Don't hesitate to reply to that mail if you have questions. The wiki
page will be updated with useful information.
-- 
DDPOMail, run by Lucas Nussbaum


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]