Re: stk backport to buster?
On Thu, 28 Jan 2021, Felipe Sateler wrote: > No, I'm not. As a matter of fact, I've been grossly neglecting stk > since a few years. Maybe you could be interested in taking over? It is > not much maintenance, but the annoyance is the unstable-abi that > requires transitions on each update. Thanks for the offer, but I don’t feel I’m the right person for this. I don’t really know C++, for one, and I’ve never had a shared library package before let alone a tricky one. I’m only a user because polyphone uses it which “just works”. bye, //mirabilos -- tarent solutions GmbH Rochusstraße 2-4, D-53123 Bonn • http://www.tarent.de/ Tel: +49 228 54881-393 • Fax: +49 228 54881-235 HRB 5168 (AG Bonn) • USt-ID (VAT): DE122264941 Geschäftsführer: Dr. Stefan Barth, Kai Ebenrett, Boris Esser, Alexander Steeg * Mit unserem Consulting bieten wir Unternehmen maßgeschneiderte Angebote in Form von Beratung, Trainings sowie Workshops in den Bereichen Softwaretechnologie, IT Strategie und Architektur, Innovation und Umsetzung sowie Agile Organisation. Besuchen Sie uns auf https://www.tarent.de/consulting . Wir freuen uns auf Ihren Kontakt. *
Re: stk backport to buster?
Hi, On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 8:58 PM Thorsten Glaser wrote: > Hi maintainers, > > are you planning to backport stk? This would be a prerequisite for > a backport of polyphone; I could have a look at it myself if simply > rebuilding would work, or if there’s not too much CFrustFrust involved. > No, I'm not. As a matter of fact, I've been grossly neglecting stk since a few years. Maybe you could be interested in taking over? It is not much maintenance, but the annoyance is the unstable-abi that requires transitions on each update. -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler
Re: stk backport to buster?
Hi Thorsten On 2021-01-28 00:52:07, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > Hi maintainers, > > are you planning to backport stk? This would be a prerequisite for > a backport of polyphone; I could have a look at it myself if simply > rebuilding would work, or if there’s not too much CFrustFrust involved. I'm not. Cheerst > > (I actually have the same question about bionic-backports, but I’ve > got absolutely no idea how packages can even end up in there… there > will probably be _quite_ some users wanting polyphone…) > > Thanks, > //mirabilos > -- > tarent solutions GmbH > Rochusstraße 2-4, D-53123 Bonn • http://www.tarent.de/ > Tel: +49 228 54881-393 • Fax: +49 228 54881-235 > HRB 5168 (AG Bonn) • USt-ID (VAT): DE122264941 > Geschäftsführer: Dr. Stefan Barth, Kai Ebenrett, Boris Esser, Alexander Steeg > > * > > Mit unserem Consulting bieten wir Unternehmen maßgeschneiderte Angebote in > Form von Beratung, Trainings sowie Workshops in den Bereichen > Softwaretechnologie, IT Strategie und Architektur, Innovation und Umsetzung > sowie Agile Organisation. > > Besuchen Sie uns auf https://www.tarent.de/consulting . > Wir freuen uns auf Ihren Kontakt. > > * -- Sebastian Ramacher
stk backport to buster?
Hi maintainers, are you planning to backport stk? This would be a prerequisite for a backport of polyphone; I could have a look at it myself if simply rebuilding would work, or if there’s not too much CFrustFrust involved. (I actually have the same question about bionic-backports, but I’ve got absolutely no idea how packages can even end up in there… there will probably be _quite_ some users wanting polyphone…) Thanks, //mirabilos -- tarent solutions GmbH Rochusstraße 2-4, D-53123 Bonn • http://www.tarent.de/ Tel: +49 228 54881-393 • Fax: +49 228 54881-235 HRB 5168 (AG Bonn) • USt-ID (VAT): DE122264941 Geschäftsführer: Dr. Stefan Barth, Kai Ebenrett, Boris Esser, Alexander Steeg * Mit unserem Consulting bieten wir Unternehmen maßgeschneiderte Angebote in Form von Beratung, Trainings sowie Workshops in den Bereichen Softwaretechnologie, IT Strategie und Architektur, Innovation und Umsetzung sowie Agile Organisation. Besuchen Sie uns auf https://www.tarent.de/consulting . Wir freuen uns auf Ihren Kontakt. *
