svn commit notifications sent to this list
Here I'am again. I would like to have this mailing list subscribed to the -commit mailing list of our projects on alioth, so that we receive notifications of commits together with commit messages and patches. My experience in other pkg- projects on alitoh is that notifications will improve monitoring the liveness of a project and foster fruitful discussions on list. That's why we have the CIA bot on the IRC channel, and that's why I'm asking the list to be subscribed instead of simply subscribing myself to the -commit mailing list. Last time I asked Jerome opposed to that, but now, AFAIK, he is no longer a member of the ocaml maint task force, having no longer the maintainership of any ocaml related package. (That's what he said, don't remember if on this list or to me in private mail, I'm not trying to kicking out anyone of course) So, here comes the poll: does subscribing this list to the -commit list of the pkg-ocaml-maint alioth project bother any of you, guys? Thanks for your attention, Cheers. PS you can have a look at the amount of traffic on the -commit list on its archives available here: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-ocaml-maint-commits/ -- Stefano Zacchiroli -*- Computer Science PhD student @ Uny Bologna, Italy [EMAIL PROTECTED],debian.org,bononia.it} -%- http://www.bononia.it/zack/ If there's any real truth it's that the entire multidimensional infinity of the Universe is almost certainly being run by a bunch of maniacs. -!- signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: svn commit notifications sent to this list
Hi, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: So, here comes the poll: does subscribing this list to the -commit list of the pkg-ocaml-maint alioth project bother any of you, guys? I don't really see the point in merging two mailing lists (users who want commits can subscribe to -commits independently) but if there's a consensus about it I won't oppose to it. BTW, Zack I don't think I have write access to the webpage of d-o-m. It would be nice if you could put our new policy on it. Cheers, Samuel. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: svn commit notifications sent to this list
On Fri, Jul 21, 2006 at 10:20:47AM +0200, Samuel Mimram wrote: BTW, Zack I don't think I have write access to the webpage of d-o-m. It would be nice if you could put our new policy on it. You do have write access. Still, there was an issue with the .txt version of the policy which was erroneously bearing the zack group id instead of the pkg-ocaml-maint one. Now it is fixed. Cheers. -- Stefano Zacchiroli -*- Computer Science PhD student @ Uny Bologna, Italy [EMAIL PROTECTED],debian.org,bononia.it} -%- http://www.bononia.it/zack/ If there's any real truth it's that the entire multidimensional infinity of the Universe is almost certainly being run by a bunch of maniacs. -!- signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: bug 347465 is forwarded to http://caml.inria.fr/mantis/view.php?id=3944
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20 forwarded 347465 http://caml.inria.fr/mantis/view.php?id=3944 Bug#347465: mldonkey-server: bus error on sparc Bug#344615: missinglib: ftbfs [sparc] *** [test] Bus error Forwarded-to-address changed from http://caml.inria.fr/mantis/view.php?id=3944, merge 347465 344615 to http://caml.inria.fr/mantis/view.php?id=3944. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: svn commit notifications sent to this list
Stefano Zacchiroli writes: So, here comes the poll: does subscribing this list to the -commit list of the pkg-ocaml-maint alioth project bother any of you, guys? Thanks for your attention, Cheers. I have nothing against this ! Please proceed if you want to. Kind regard Sylvain Le Gall -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#379128: mldonkey-server: cannot install nor remove
Package: mldonkey-server Version: 2.7.7-4 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable after trying to upgrade mldonkey server, for each action I get : Please set both variables MLDONKEY_USER and MLDONKEY_GROUP in /etc/default/mldonkey-server invoke-rc.d: initscript mldonkey-server, action stop failed. dpkg: error processing mldonkey-server (--purge): subprocess pre-removal script returned error exit status 1 Please set both variables MLDONKEY_USER and MLDONKEY_GROUP in /etc/default/mldonkey-server invoke-rc.d: initscript mldonkey-server, action start failed. dpkg: error while cleaning up: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 (and this even if launch at startup is false...) Filling those fields allows to complete installation. init script should test for their existence only if real start is needed. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.16-2-k7 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages mldonkey-server depends on: ii adduser 3.95 Add and remove users and groups ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.2Debian configuration management sy ii dpkg1.13.22 package maintenance system for Deb ii libbz2-1.0 1.0.3-3 high-quality block-sorting file co ii libc6 2.3.6-15 GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libfreetype62.2.1-2 FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib ii libgcc1 1:4.1.1-9GCC support library ii libgd2-xpm 2.0.33-5 GD Graphics Library version 2 ii libjpeg62 6b-13The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG ii libmagic1 4.17-2 File type determination library us ii libpng12-0 1.2.8rel-5.2 PNG library - runtime ii libstdc++6 4.1.1-9 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libx11-62:1.0.0-7X11 client-side library ii libxpm4 1:3.5.4.2-3 X11 pixmap library ii mime-support3.37-1 MIME files 'mime.types' 'mailcap ii ucf 2.0012 Update Configuration File: preserv ii zlib1g 1:1.2.3-13 compression library - runtime mldonkey-server recommends no packages. -- debconf information: mldonkey-server/max_hard_download_rate: 0 * mldonkey-server/launch_at_startup: false mldonkey-server/config_exist_no_options: mldonkey-server/plugin: Directconnect, Opennap, Overnet, Soulseek, Bittorent, Gnutella mldonkey-server/mldonkey_group: mldonkey mldonkey-server/false_password: mldonkey-server/max_hard_upload_rate: 0 mldonkey-server/max_alive: 24 mldonkey-server/run_as_user: mldonkey mldonkey-server/reown_file: false mldonkey-server/mldonkey_niceness: 0 mldonkey-server/config_exist_no_dir: mldonkey-server/fasttrack_problem: mldonkey-server/shared_directories: share mldonkey-server/mldonkey_dir: /var/lib/mldonkey mldonkey-server/restart_after_upgrade: true mldonkey-server/client_name: nez-casse mldonkey-server/mldonkey_move: false mldonkey-server/mldonkey_umask: 0022 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mldonkey-server package
fails to install fully; message is: Errors were encountered while processing: mldonkey-server E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) A package failed to install. Trying to recover: Setting up mldonkey-server (2.7.7-5) ... /var/lib/dpkg/info/mldonkey-server.postinst: 3: function: not found dpkg: error processing mldonkey-server (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 127 Errors were encountered while processing: mldonkey-server Press return to continue. change line 3 in named file to read: init_error () and its ok. thanks peter -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: svn commit notifications sent to this list
So, here comes the poll: does subscribing this list to the -commit list of the pkg-ocaml-maint alioth project bother any of you, guys? Well, I would say that I'm not fond of it. I'm actually subscribed to -maint mostly because I maintain one Ocaml-related package and want to hear about possible transition/problems with Ocaml stuff. Getting commit messages would be extra useless stuff for me and I'd vote for keeping the lists separated. However, I'm not an active member in the community here so don't consider my advice with too much value. If changing things is suitable and valuable for you guys, then I'm OK with that and I'll live with that. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#379142: mldonkey-server: bashism in postinst
Package: mldonkey-server Version: 2.7.7-5 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 10.4 The 'function' command is not the POSIX shell way of defining functions. Setting up mldonkey-server (2.7.7-5) ... /var/lib/dpkg/info/mldonkey-server.postinst: 3: function: not found dpkg: error processing mldonkey-server (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 127 Errors were encountered while processing: mldonkey-server -- Michał Politowski Talking has been known to lead to communication if practiced carelessly. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: ocaml-sha1 library
The upstream author made his interface compatible with the stdlib's Digest module. My packaging now doesn't touch the upstream Caml source code at all. I found it easier to use a completely different, shorter Makefile, based on OCamlMakefile. I put it in the debian/ subdirectory, and in debian/rules I just call $(MAKE) -f debian/Makefile ... Is this acceptable practice? -- Eric Cooper e c c @ c m u . e d u -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#378934: mldonkey-server: postinst breaks (dpkg failure) when mlnet fails to start
* Eduard Bloch [Thu, 20 Jul 2006 01:19:56 +0200]: (btw, packages.d.o still says it is there) (JFTR, you're confusing 2.7.3-2 with 2.7.7-2.) -- Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org A hacker does for love what other would not do for money.
