Re: Status of llvm-toolchain-3.8?
On 30/10/2017 10:39, Stéphane Glondu wrote: Is there any plans to fix llvm-toolchain-3.8? I wish we could removed it but it is far from ready (we were blocked by the ocaml transition but I dropped the ocaml support to mitigate that) I will try to fix that in the next few days. Sorry about that I saw that you removed the OCaml bindings (libllvm-3.8-ocaml-dev) from llvm-toolchain-3.8, but there is still libllvm-ocaml-dev (from llvm-defaults) that depends on libllvm-3.8-ocaml-dev. I think you need to remove libllvm-ocaml-dev from llvm-defaults to disentangle LLVM and OCaml. llvm-toolchain-3.8 FTBFS on armel and armhf, so it cannot migrate to testing. This situation blocks ocaml. My attempts to find a solution to this were not very satisfactory... I think that changing llvm-defaults meta-packages to llvm > 3.8 (a version that does not FTBFS, so >= 4.0) can help. Cheers, -- Stéphane
Re: Status of llvm-toolchain-3.8?
On 20/10/2017 10:27, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: At the moment, llvm-toolchain-3.8 FTBFS with "gcc-7.2: Command not found" and this blocks the OCaml transition. I see there are already bugs open related to gcc-7 (#871011 and #853523), but these do not have recent activity. I also see that this package has been requested to be removed (#873331), but again no recent activity on this bug. Is there any plans to fix llvm-toolchain-3.8? I wish we could removed it but it is far from ready (we were blocked by the ocaml transition but I dropped the ocaml support to mitigate that) I will try to fix that in the next few days. Sorry about that I saw that you removed the OCaml bindings (libllvm-3.8-ocaml-dev) from llvm-toolchain-3.8, but there is still libllvm-ocaml-dev (from llvm-defaults) that depends on libllvm-3.8-ocaml-dev. I think you need to remove libllvm-ocaml-dev from llvm-defaults to disentangle LLVM and OCaml. Cheers, -- Stéphane
Re: Status of llvm-toolchain-3.8?
Le 20/10/2017 à 10:09, Stéphane Glondu a écrit : > Hello, > > At the moment, llvm-toolchain-3.8 FTBFS with "gcc-7.2: Command not > found" and this blocks the OCaml transition. > > I see there are already bugs open related to gcc-7 (#871011 and > #853523), but these do not have recent activity. > > I also see that this package has been requested to be removed > (#873331), but again no recent activity on this bug. > > Is there any plans to fix llvm-toolchain-3.8? I wish we could removed it but it is far from ready (we were blocked by the ocaml transition but I dropped the ocaml support to mitigate that) I will try to fix that in the next few days. Sorry about that S
