Processing of libreoffice_6.4.0~rc1-5_source.changes
libreoffice_6.4.0~rc1-5_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: libreoffice_6.4.0~rc1-5.dsc libreoffice_6.4.0~rc1-5.debian.tar.xz libreoffice_6.4.0~rc1-5_source.buildinfo Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)
Processed: affects 947853
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > affects 947853 libreoffice-java-common Bug #947853 [libjuh-java,libjurt-java,libridl-java,libunoloader-java] uninstallable due to wrong ure epoch in Breaks: Added indication that 947853 affects libreoffice-java-common > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 947853: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=947853 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: submitter 947853
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > submitter 947853 David Witbrodt Bug #947853 [libjuh-java,libjurt-java,libridl-java,libunoloader-java] uninstallable due to wrong ure epoch in Breaks: Changed Bug submitter to 'David Witbrodt ' from 'Rene Engelhard '. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 947853: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=947853 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#947853: uninstallable due to wrong ure epoch in Breaks:
Package: libjuh-java,libjurt-java,libridl-java,libunoloader-java Version: 1:6.4.0~rc1-3 Severity: serious Tags: pending On Tue, Dec 31, 2019 at 12:54:16PM -0500, David Witbrodt wrote: > It looks like you introduced some "Breaks" in 1:6.4.0~rc1-3 that were not > present before, and now things like libjuh-java have a Breaks on > ure (< 1:6.4.0~beta1-1). The epoch "1" on ure is problematic: > > # apt-cache policy libreoffice ure > libreoffice: > Installed: 1:6.4.0~rc1-4 > [...] > ure: > Installed: 6.4.0~rc1-4 > > As you can see, ure is versioned without the epoch, while libreoffice*.deb > packages _are_ versioned with the epoch. In addition to my reply on-list: Making a proper bugreport out if this since ftp-master is currently broken and a upload will take even if done now... Will mark as reported by you once I have the number. > PS: if I have misdiagnosed anything above, sorry for the noise. It looked > to me like a versioning problem has been introduced, and (if that is so) I > wanted to make you aware of it ASAP. No, completely correct anaysis. Regards, Rene >
Re: Heads up: version 1:6.4.0~rc1-4 makes libreoffice-java-common uninstallable
Hi, On Tue, Dec 31, 2019 at 12:54:16PM -0500, David Witbrodt wrote: > It looks like you introduced some "Breaks" in 1:6.4.0~rc1-3 that were not > present before, and now things like libjuh-java have a Breaks on Jup. See #947446. > ure (< 1:6.4.0~beta1-1). The epoch "1" on ure is problematic: > > # apt-cache policy libreoffice ure > libreoffice: > Installed: 1:6.4.0~rc1-4 > [...] > ure: > Installed: 6.4.0~rc1-4 > > As you can see, ure is versioned without the epoch, while libreoffice*.deb > packages _are_ versioned with the epoch. *sigh*. Indeed. Will upload a new version ASAP. Regards, Rene
Heads up: version 1:6.4.0~rc1-4 makes libreoffice-java-common uninstallable
Hello again, I wrote the email the other day (instead of using the BTS) about the doc-base issue with libreoffice-common. I upgraded to version 1:6.4.0~rc1-4 today and noticed that I could not upgrade without removing libreoffice-java-common and the packages it depends on. It looks like you introduced some "Breaks" in 1:6.4.0~rc1-3 that were not present before, and now things like libjuh-java have a Breaks on ure (< 1:6.4.0~beta1-1). The epoch "1" on ure is problematic: # apt-cache policy libreoffice ure libreoffice: Installed: 1:6.4.0~rc1-4 [...] ure: Installed: 6.4.0~rc1-4 As you can see, ure is versioned without the epoch, while libreoffice*.deb packages _are_ versioned with the epoch. I worked around the issue by uninstalling libreoffice-java-common, which I was able to do because I am not using any package with a hard dependency on it. But anyone using libreoffice-reports-builder (or another package with a hard dependency on l-j-common) will not be able to upgrade. HTH, Dave W. PS: if I have misdiagnosed anything above, sorry for the noise. It looked to me like a versioning problem has been introduced, and (if that is so) I wanted to make you aware of it ASAP.
