Re: OOo 2.0 rc, and current status
Le samedi 05 mars 2005 à 11:50 -0500, David A. Cobb a écrit : Rene Engelhard wrote: Hi, David A. Cobb wrote: I only discovered the page and the working group by way of the back-door. That is, through the OpenOffice.org page on Installing for Linux. As it is, I would not have read that except for the 2.0 _beta_ announcement -- I already had both a 1.1.2, and a 1.9.79 installation working. Err? If you already have a Debian installation with the openoffice.org package you already *have* our packages. Well, the 1.9.79 was created by downloading the RPM's from OO.org and pushing them through alien. You'll find debian-ooo's work here http://people.debian.org/~halls/openoffice/test/ooo1.9-java/ as a quick search on this ml's archives would have told you. Are we speaking of the Debian OOo page, here? Or the OO.org Linux page? Either way, with a 'last updated' date prominently displayed, a I'd guess both. I've already filed an issue with OO.org about the link. I'll look into doing a bit more there. . . . once sarge is there. I do NOT want to re-kindle /that/ discussion! Get the site from Debian CVS and send patches? :) cvs -d :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs/debian-openoffice co openoffice.debian.net Thanks. I'll look at it. Grüße/Regards, René m f G,
Re: OOo 2.0 rc, and current status
Hi, David A. Cobb wrote: I guess I need to start with, Is anyone here awake? I see that No, the question here is where you were the last months. If you would have been here (or using Debian sarge/sid) you would have seen that there were regular openoffice.org updates for sarge and sid and experimental. the openoffice.debian.net page is woefully out of date. Altho' if it's any consolation, openoffice.org has an address in Germany that doesn't even respond: they were last updated December 2003. Yes, we know. That site isn't our priority. You could send us patches if you want FWIW. There AFAIK was one who volunteered to maintain that page but he disappeared again... And well, what exactly do you want updated? NEWS? Except the upload of new versions theer is nothing important there (well, we could mention 1.1.x, but the 1.1.0-2 stuff has the most important NEWS in Debian OpenOffice.org history), the patches? The links should be quite self explaining how to change them to get a site with the newest ones. The package overview? Is automatically updated (since it's just a link to the official DDPO). Anyway, I will look whether I can find some time at this weekend to update the page... The news of a 2.0 Release Candidate availability hit my mailbox today. I hope we are planning on packaging it! I have downloaded the That's plain wrong. It's 2.0 *beta*. Release Candidate is still a few months away. Beta doesn't mean RC, betais some time before you even can think about calling stuff a RC. There is still so many stuff to do... OOo setup program. I would like to help here. If I can do anything to make the news more current, or to speedup the packaging effort, please let me know. There are still so many bugs in that. Is the non-Java build currently working (see the other post why we can't yet build with gcj-4.0, expecially since major fixed for that wsere introduced _after_ beta, m82 to be precise). I ddidn't folow that too closely since I have to do official testbuilds for suns qa (see below) with Suns Java anyhow..? Does it build fine using the system libs (I guess the answer to the last one is yes). Anyway we both which are doing OOo packaging don't have that much time and still have to do 1.1.x stuff (and I am trying to get upstreams buildsystem - wrt configure, libs, etc - a bit more in shape for 2.0 final) Grüße/Regards, René -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73 `- Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: OOo 2.0 rc, and current status
Rene Engelhard wrote: Hi, David A. Cobb wrote: I guess I need to start with, Is anyone here awake? I see that No, the question here is where you were the last months. OK. Any of the months from June 2004 through February 2005, mostly trying to get a stable and working Debian installation in place of Windoze. Problems have to do mostly with nVidia hardware, and getting used to the way apt does things so I don't shoot my foot completely off. I only discovered the page and the working group by way of the back-door. That is, through the OpenOffice.org page on Installing for Linux. As it is, I would not have read that except for the 2.0 _beta_ announcement -- I already had both a 1.1.2, and a 1.9.79 installation working. I mistook the out-of-datedness of the web-page to mean the working group wasn't very active. Perhaps I should have lurked awhile; but it seemed interesting things were about to happen. If you would have been here (or using Debian sarge/sid) you would have seen that there were regular openoffice.org updates for sarge and sid and experimental. the openoffice.debian.net page is woefully out of date. Altho' if it's any consolation, openoffice.org has an address in Germany that doesn't even respond: they were last updated December 2003. Yes, we know. That site isn't our priority. You could send us patches if you want FWIW. There AFAIK was one who volunteered to maintain that page but he disappeared again... Are we speaking of the Debian OOo page, here? Or the OO.org Linux page? Either way, with a 'last updated' date prominently displayed, a fairly-simple current status bullet could cure the impression of not being current. Perhaps you could point me toward some instruction in preparing proposed patches for the Debian page(s)? I did some, over a year ago, for the OO.org; but found it hard to have a meeting of the minds with the CollabNet way of doing things. And well, what exactly do you want updated? NEWS? Except the upload of new versions theer is nothing important there (well, we could mention 1.1.x, but the 1.1.0-2 stuff has the most important NEWS in Debian OpenOffice.org history), the patches? The links should be quite self explaining how to change them to get a site with the newest ones. The package overview? Is automatically updated (since it's just a link to the official DDPO). Anyway, I will look whether I can find some time at this weekend to update the page... The news of a 2.0 Release Candidate availability hit my mailbox today. I hope we are planning on packaging it! I have downloaded the That's plain wrong. It's 2.0 *beta*. Release Candidate is still a few months away. Beta doesn't mean RC, betais some time before you even can think about calling stuff a RC. There is still so many stuff to do... Ahh. Pardon the hasty mis-understanding. I didn't have the announcement right under my nose when I wrote that. OOo setup program. I would like to help here. If I can do anything to make the news more current, or to speedup the packaging effort, please let me know. There are still so many bugs in that. Is the non-Java build currently working (see the other post why we can't yet build with gcj-4.0, expecially since major fixed for that wsere introduced _after_ beta, m82 to be precise). I ddidn't folow that too closely since I have to do official testbuilds for suns qa (see below) with Suns Java anyhow..? Does it build fine using the system libs (I guess the answer to the last one is yes). Anyway we both which are doing OOo packaging don't have that much time and still have to do 1.1.x stuff (and I am trying to get upstreams buildsystem - wrt configure, libs, etc - a bit more in shape for 2.0 final) Grüße/Regards, René -- David A. Cobb, Software Engineer, Public Access Advocate By God's Grace, I am a Christian man; by my actions a great sinner. -- The Way of a Pilgrim: R.French, Tr. Life is too short to tolerate crappy software! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OOo 2.0 rc, and current status
Hi, David A. Cobb wrote: I only discovered the page and the working group by way of the back-door. That is, through the OpenOffice.org page on Installing for Linux. As it is, I would not have read that except for the 2.0 _beta_ announcement -- I already had both a 1.1.2, and a 1.9.79 installation working. Err? If you already have a Debian installation with the openoffice.org package you already *have* our packages. I mistook the out-of-datedness of the web-page to mean the working group wasn't very active. Perhaps I should have lurked awhile; but it seemed interesting things were about to happen. No. They already happened. The packages in Debian were regularily updated. Are we speaking of the Debian OOo page, here? Or the OO.org Linux page? Either way, with a 'last updated' date prominently displayed, a I'd guess both. fairly-simple current status bullet could cure the impression of not being current. that would mean that it would need a update anyway :-) Anyway, the site is now updated. In my opinion, the site should vanish after sarge anyway, since the main OOo development is done in ssarge/sid/experimental now and the mirrors showed on that site are obsolte (except for the woody backport(s) which must not be there anymore once sarge is there. Anyone wants to upgrade anyhow from the old versions the backports have ;) ) Perhaps you could point me toward some instruction in preparing proposed patches for the Debian page(s)? I did some, over a year ago, for the Get the site from Debian CVS and send patches? :) cvs -d :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs/debian-openoffice co openoffice.debian.net Grüße/Regards, René -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73 `- Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: OOo 2.0 rc, and current status
Rene Engelhard wrote: Hi, David A. Cobb wrote: I only discovered the page and the working group by way of the back-door. That is, through the OpenOffice.org page on Installing for Linux. As it is, I would not have read that except for the 2.0 _beta_ announcement -- I already had both a 1.1.2, and a 1.9.79 installation working. Err? If you already have a Debian installation with the openoffice.org package you already *have* our packages. Well, the 1.9.79 was created by downloading the RPM's from OO.org and pushing them through alien. Are we speaking of the Debian OOo page, here? Or the OO.org Linux page? Either way, with a 'last updated' date prominently displayed, a I'd guess both. I've already filed an issue with OO.org about the link. I'll look into doing a bit more there. . . . once sarge is there. I do NOT want to re-kindle /that/ discussion! Get the site from Debian CVS and send patches? :) cvs -d :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs/debian-openoffice co openoffice.debian.net Thanks. I'll look at it. Grüße/Regards, René m f G, -- David A. Cobb, Software Engineer, Public Access Advocate By God's Grace, I am a Christian man; by my actions a great sinner. -- The Way of a Pilgrim: R.French, Tr. Life is too short to tolerate crappy software! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OOo 2.0 rc, and current status
Hi, I guess I need to start with, Is anyone here awake? I see that the openoffice.debian.net page is woefully out of date. Altho' if it's any consolation, openoffice.org has an address in Germany that doesn't even respond: they were last updated December 2003. The news of a 2.0 Release Candidate availability hit my mailbox today. I hope we are planning on packaging it! I have downloaded the OOo setup program. I would like to help here. If I can do anything to make the news more current, or to speedup the packaging effort, please let me know. -- David A. Cobb, Software Engineer, Public Access Advocate By God's Grace, I am a Christian man; by my actions a great sinner. -- The Way of a Pilgrim: R.French, Tr. Life is too short to tolerate crappy software! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]