Bug#930666: Please document consensus on use of dh sequencer
package: debian-policy Dear policy team: I just published a consensus call on a discussion we had to canvas the project on the use of Debhelper's dh sequencer. https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/tslmuif7pwy@suchdamage.org I'd like to ask the policy editors to facilitate using the normal process to document this consensus in policy. My understanding is that the editors already have some ideas about how that might work. Obviously I'm available to help as desired. In the interest of setting expectations, if this issue is still open in December, I plan to check in and see whether I think the approach of going through the normal policy process still makes sense. signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: Converting dev-ref to use rST
Hi, I found one Italian translation error. (bogus duplicate copy of msgstr) On Sun, Jun 16, 2019 at 10:03:35PM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote: > Hi, > > I realize I can do better ... Instead of sed, I am replacing text with a short python script to deal with markup across lines. Please wait... Osamu
