Bug#577666: debian-policy: Section list missing: base debian-installer
Osamu Aoki os...@debian.org writes: The list of all sections is defined in policy: http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-archive.html#s-subsections As for descriptions of each of those, you could use: http://packages.debian.org/unstable/ But there are 2 additional entries in the second list: base debian-installer I think these should be included and there should be link to http://packages.debian.org/unstable/ I've added a mention of the special debian-installer section and a link to that web page for the next version of Policy. Thanks! -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87zkzd9xka@windlord.stanford.edu
Bug#577666: debian-policy: Section list missing: base debian-installer
Hi, On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 08:38:38AM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote: The list of all sections is defined in policy: http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-archive.html#s-subsections As for descriptions of each of those, you could use: http://packages.debian.org/unstable/ But there are 2 additional entries in the second list: base debian-installer I think these should be included and there should be link to http://packages.debian.org/unstable/ No. base is dead, there is no base. I now remember you there were announcement ... Should I file another bug report for http://packages.debian.org/unstable/? Funny thing is that it points only to: vmelilo (1.5.4) [debports] Linux kernel boot loader for m68k VME processor boards. This is strange. The officially supported list of sections from dak is: ... snip. Thans for the details. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100415153452.ga5...@osamu.debian.net
Bug#577666: debian-policy: Section list missing: base debian-installer
No. base is dead, there is no base. I now remember you there were announcement ... Funny thing is that it points only to: vmelilo (1.5.4) [debports] Linux kernel boot loader for m68k VME processor boards. This is strange. No, just the ports archive having an outdated and nowadays broken config. -- bye, Joerg Gna, schon wieder Seti [...] Dabei ist es schon schwierig genug, auf *diesem* Planeten intelligentes Leben zu finden. [Charly Kuehnast in dasr] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87bpdk3a69@delenn.ganneff.de
Bug#577666: debian-policy: Section list missing: base debian-installer
Package: debian-policy Version: 3.8.4.0 Severity: normal The list of all sections is defined in policy: http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-archive.html#s-subsections As for descriptions of each of those, you could use: http://packages.debian.org/unstable/ But there are 2 additional entries in the second list: base debian-installer I think these should be included and there should be link to http://packages.debian.org/unstable/ Osamu -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-3-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash debian-policy depends on no packages. debian-policy recommends no packages. Versions of packages debian-policy suggests: ii doc-base 0.9.5 utilities to manage online documen -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100413133628.ga15...@osamu.debian.net
