Re: Flash < v7 compatible?

2006-07-14 Thread Yavor Doganov
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 
> So on the PPC, when you need to read a flash page, what are the
> alternatives?

Gnash, as has been pointed out.  But basically, if a website has
something in flash, its content is not important.  Or at least, for
the creators of the page, users and their rights are not important.

Which is a good enough reason not to visit such pages.

-- 
In the GNU Project, discrimination against proprietary software is not
just a policy -- it's the principle and the purpose.  Proprietary
software is fundamentally unjust and wrong, so when we have the
opportunity to place it at a disadvantage, that is a good thing. --RMS


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Flash < v7 compatible?

2006-07-14 Thread Chasecreek Systemhouse

On 7/14/06, Helge Kreutzmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


[1] Last year I tried to find the prices of an huge german DSL provider
but failed. Later (after deciding for an competitor) I saw on an
windows box that all price information was "stored" in a flash
movie. Well, too bad for them.


This has been and is my experience -- however I find my 7 year old
needs flash for some kids related web content.  I just gonna have to
bite the bullet and buy a Windows i386 box.
--
WC (Bill) Jones -- http://youve-reached-the.endoftheinternet.org/


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Flash < v7 compatible?

2006-07-14 Thread Helge Kreutzmann
Hello,
On Fri, Jul 14, 2006 at 01:28:17PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> There are at least two free flash player. One is swf-player, the other is
> never, but i never tested it and didn't remember the name.

It is called gnash and under heavy development. I read that the
browser plugin is now getting usable, but haven't tried. Check out
www.gnu.org for the exact location (or try the package in
experimental).

Personally I consider flash synonym for "we don't want your attention
or money"[1] which is perfectly fine with me.

Greetings

Helge

[1] Last year I tried to find the prices of an huge german DSL provider 
but failed. Later (after deciding for an competitor) I saw on an
windows box that all price information was "stored" in a flash
movie. Well, too bad for them.
-- 
Dr. Helge Kreutzmann, Dipl.-Phys.   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   gpg signed mail preferred 
64bit GNU powered  http://www.itp.uni-hannover.de/~kreutzm
  Help keep free software "libre": http://www.ffii.de/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: Flash < v7 compatible?

2006-07-14 Thread Patrick Bachmann

Sven Luther wrote:

So on the PPC, when you need to read a flash page, what are the
alternatives?



There are at least two free flash player. One is swf-player, the other is
never, but i never tested it and didn't remember the name.

swf-player is not really working for the newer flash stuff, but it may work
for some.


Another solution is to get the linux x86 version of the Macromedia 
plug-in running within qemu. Some folks [0] did it with version 6 of 
the player.


Patrick
---
[0] http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic.php?t=117774


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Flash < v7 compatible?

2006-07-14 Thread Sven Luther
On Fri, Jul 14, 2006 at 07:24:33AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 14, 2006 at 07:17:04PM +1000, David Howe wrote:
> > Unfortunately flash although not great, is very pervasive across the 
> > net. Its absence in ppc linux is  fairly remarkable and compares badly 
> > with the status of flash for i386
> > 
> > Yes, I have tried the alternatives, basically i think they are not worth 
> > the hassle.
> > 
> > d
>  
> What are the alternatives.  I hate flash; I use dialup internet over a
> noisy rural phone line.  On a 486.  I'm upgrading to an RS/6000 H50
> because I want the reliability in an inexpensive (huge) package.
> However, the driving factor in the upgrade is the dismal performance of
> firefox and web access in general.  On many websites I access (generally
> sites with a product catalog), flash is __required__ to access anything
> other than the 'what the heck is this' icon.
> 
> So on the PPC, when you need to read a flash page, what are the
> alternatives?

There are at least two free flash player. One is swf-player, the other is
never, but i never tested it and didn't remember the name.

swf-player is not really working for the newer flash stuff, but it may work
for some.

Friendly,

Sven Luther


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Flash < v7 compatible?

2006-07-14 Thread dtutty
On Fri, Jul 14, 2006 at 07:17:04PM +1000, David Howe wrote:
> Unfortunately flash although not great, is very pervasive across the 
> net. Its absence in ppc linux is  fairly remarkable and compares badly 
> with the status of flash for i386
> 
> Yes, I have tried the alternatives, basically i think they are not worth 
> the hassle.
> 
> d
 
What are the alternatives.  I hate flash; I use dialup internet over a
noisy rural phone line.  On a 486.  I'm upgrading to an RS/6000 H50
because I want the reliability in an inexpensive (huge) package.
However, the driving factor in the upgrade is the dismal performance of
firefox and web access in general.  On many websites I access (generally
sites with a product catalog), flash is __required__ to access anything
other than the 'what the heck is this' icon.

So on the PPC, when you need to read a flash page, what are the
alternatives?

Thanks,

Doug.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Flash < v7 compatible?

2006-07-14 Thread Sven Luther
On Fri, Jul 14, 2006 at 07:17:04PM +1000, David Howe wrote:
> Unfortunately flash although not great, is very pervasive across the 
> net. Its absence in ppc linux is  fairly remarkable and compares badly 
> with the status of flash for i386
> 
> Yes, I have tried the alternatives, basically i think they are not worth 
> the hassle.

The only alternative is to find truckloads of cash, and then convince
macromedia (now bought by adobe) to do a powerpc/linux build of it.

Now, with apple leaving the powerpc market, this is even less likely to
happen.

So, if you are disatisfied with the powerpc/flash situation, get beyond one
of the free flash projects.

Friendly,

Sven Luther


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Flash < v7 compatible?

2006-07-14 Thread David Howe
Unfortunately flash although not great, is very pervasive across the 
net. Its absence in ppc linux is  fairly remarkable and compares badly 
with the status of flash for i386


Yes, I have tried the alternatives, basically i think they are not worth 
the hassle.


d

Jeremiah Benham wrote:

On Thu, Jul 13, 2006 at 04:54:06AM -0400, Chasecreek Systemhouse wrote:
  

=\
Is it me or has the use of Windows as a "great" graphics platform now
surpassed Apple?  I mean I understand that the flash which is



 Yes! because flash is just the zenith of all computer
graphics!!!  


I have never found any proprietary software that qualifies as "great".

Jeremiah


  



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Flash < v7 compatible?

2006-07-13 Thread Jeremiah Benham
On Thu, Jul 13, 2006 at 04:54:06AM -0400, Chasecreek Systemhouse wrote:
> =\
> Is it me or has the use of Windows as a "great" graphics platform now
> surpassed Apple?  I mean I understand that the flash which is

 Yes! because flash is just the zenith of all computer
graphics!!!  

I have never found any proprietary software that qualifies as "great".

Jeremiah


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Flash < v7 compatible?

2006-07-13 Thread Chasecreek Systemhouse

=\
Is it me or has the use of Windows as a "great" graphics platform now
surpassed Apple?  I mean I understand that the flash which is
available is not as feature rich as that which is available for
Windows but is there some way to get a faster development cycle --
maybe shoot for Flash version 8 compatibilty before we all die?

In closing I wold like to direct interested parties to:
http://www.flashsandy.org/tutorials/2-create-a-first-box

Thank you for listening to my rant  /=

=)
--
WC (Bill) Jones -- http://youve-reached-the.endoftheinternet.org/


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]