Re: Bug#722542: gcc-spu went away but is still being used
On 2013-11-26 13:46, Agustin Henze wrote: Hi all, I'm glad to announce that I've adopted this package :) Hi, Thanks for taking care of this package. :) and I've uploaded a new version (2.0.0-1). This version doesn't build newlib-spu anymore. It arrived on the archive a few days ago, should I request the removal of the old packages for close this bug? If they have no more rdeps in sid, then yes. I just read[0] that rene should take over about it. But newlib orig 1.18 still there :/ and the cruft-report doesn't show results about newlib. I don't understand what happens, it's the first time that I have to deal with something like this. If someone can point me what is the correct way that I should proceed I'll be very grateful. [0] https://wiki.debian.org/ftpmaster_Removals I believe filing the bug will be correct in this case. :) ~Niels -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-powerpc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/52966e3a.3020...@thykier.net
Re: Bug#722542: gcc-spu went away but is still being used
Hi all, I'm glad to announce that I've adopted this package :) and I've uploaded a new version (2.0.0-1). This version doesn't build newlib-spu anymore. It arrived on the archive a few days ago, should I request the removal of the old packages for close this bug? I just read[0] that rene should take over about it. But newlib orig 1.18 still there :/ and the cruft-report doesn't show results about newlib. I don't understand what happens, it's the first time that I have to deal with something like this. If someone can point me what is the correct way that I should proceed I'll be very grateful. [0] https://wiki.debian.org/ftpmaster_Removals -- TiN signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Bug#722542: gcc-spu went away but is still being used
Control: severity -1 serious On 2013-09-12 14:37, Matthias Klose wrote: Control: reassign -1 newlib Am 12.09.2013 08:31, schrieb Niels Thykier: Package: gcc-defaults,newlib Severity: important Dear maintainers of gcc-defaults and newlib, I noticed that gcc-defaults have removed the gnu-spu package in sid, but newlib still build-depends on it. Since there was no bug against either package, I am assuming no one has noticed this so far. As it is, this is one (of several) things blocking gcc-defaults migration to testing. This bug can be fixed either by re-introducing gcc-spu (possibly as a transitional package, if gcc-spu is no longer needed) or by newlib no longer Build-Depending on gcc-spu (since it is the last package using it). I will leave it to you to decide how this will be solved; please reassign this bug to the proper package. I don't maintain the spu cross toolchain anymore, as previously written to the gcc and powerpc ML. So newlib maybe shouldn't build the spu packages anymore. Matthias Hi all, This is currently blocking gcc-defaults from migrating to testing (and by extension a lot of other packages that is currently waiting for gcc-defaults), so I am bumping the severity to RC. ~Niels -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-powerpc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/523c330d.9070...@thykier.net
Re: Bug#722542: gcc-spu went away but is still being used
Am 12.09.2013 18:06, schrieb Geoff Levand: Hi, On Thu, 2013-09-12 at 14:37 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: Control: reassign -1 newlib Am 12.09.2013 08:31, schrieb Niels Thykier: Package: gcc-defaults,newlib Severity: important Dear maintainers of gcc-defaults and newlib, I noticed that gcc-defaults have removed the gnu-spu package in sid, but newlib still build-depends on it. Since there was no bug against either package, I am assuming no one has noticed this so far. As it is, this is one (of several) things blocking gcc-defaults migration to testing. This bug can be fixed either by re-introducing gcc-spu (possibly as a transitional package, if gcc-spu is no longer needed) or by newlib no longer Build-Depending on gcc-spu (since it is the last package using it). I will leave it to you to decide how this will be solved; please reassign this bug to the proper package. I don't maintain the spu cross toolchain anymore, as previously written to the gcc and powerpc ML. So newlib maybe shouldn't build the spu packages anymore. I guess this means users will also need to build newlib (in addition to the gnu-spu) if they want to do spu programming for cell. yes. Matthias, please let us know in general what a user needs to do for this. well, the spu cross toolchain needs packaging from a separate source package, like done for the mingw64 packages. I suppose newlib needs an update too, Arthur Loiret is MIA, so the package maybe should be orphaned or taken over as well. Matthias -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-powerpc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5232e9f9.9090...@debian.org
Re: Bug#722542: gcc-spu went away but is still being used
Control: reassign -1 newlib Am 12.09.2013 08:31, schrieb Niels Thykier: Package: gcc-defaults,newlib Severity: important Dear maintainers of gcc-defaults and newlib, I noticed that gcc-defaults have removed the gnu-spu package in sid, but newlib still build-depends on it. Since there was no bug against either package, I am assuming no one has noticed this so far. As it is, this is one (of several) things blocking gcc-defaults migration to testing. This bug can be fixed either by re-introducing gcc-spu (possibly as a transitional package, if gcc-spu is no longer needed) or by newlib no longer Build-Depending on gcc-spu (since it is the last package using it). I will leave it to you to decide how this will be solved; please reassign this bug to the proper package. I don't maintain the spu cross toolchain anymore, as previously written to the gcc and powerpc ML. So newlib maybe shouldn't build the spu packages anymore. Matthias -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-powerpc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5231b56d.8020...@debian.org
Re: Bug#722542: gcc-spu went away but is still being used
Hi, On Thu, 2013-09-12 at 14:37 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: Control: reassign -1 newlib Am 12.09.2013 08:31, schrieb Niels Thykier: Package: gcc-defaults,newlib Severity: important Dear maintainers of gcc-defaults and newlib, I noticed that gcc-defaults have removed the gnu-spu package in sid, but newlib still build-depends on it. Since there was no bug against either package, I am assuming no one has noticed this so far. As it is, this is one (of several) things blocking gcc-defaults migration to testing. This bug can be fixed either by re-introducing gcc-spu (possibly as a transitional package, if gcc-spu is no longer needed) or by newlib no longer Build-Depending on gcc-spu (since it is the last package using it). I will leave it to you to decide how this will be solved; please reassign this bug to the proper package. I don't maintain the spu cross toolchain anymore, as previously written to the gcc and powerpc ML. So newlib maybe shouldn't build the spu packages anymore. I guess this means users will also need to build newlib (in addition to the gnu-spu) if they want to do spu programming for cell. Matthias, please let us know in general what a user needs to do for this. -Geoff -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-powerpc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1379002007.17454.11.camel@smoke
