Re: RfT: MOL 0.9.71~pre9 uploaded to unstable
On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 11:02:27AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 10:44:20AM +0200, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote: > > I agree that the out of tree module building for MOL should be done in > > linux-modules-extra-2.6. This was the main reason why I did not > > upload the modules as well. I could not figure out how to add a module > > only for one particular arch. Is this possible at all with the current > > framework? > > Yes it is. Check spca5xx/defines. OK that works. Is relation of *-source packages to *-modules-$kernelversion hardcoded or is there a way to have mol-modules-source as the kernel modules source package name and mol-modules-$kernelversion as the name of the binary package containing the kernel modules? I would like to have this because mol-source as the package name for the package containing only the source for the mol kernel modules is misleading. Gaudenz BTW: aurélien told me that he fixed the mailinglist configuration for pkg-mol-devel. -- Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better. ~ Samuel Beckett ~ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RfT: MOL 0.9.71~pre9 uploaded to unstable
Gaudenz Steinlin wrote: > This is a request for testers. I just uploaded a new version of > Mac-on-Linux to unstable. Please test the new versions and report bugs. > I'm specially interested in tests of Mac OS 9.x and earlier and earlier > versions of Mac OS X as I can't test these myself. Hi and thank you for taking care of MOL. I tried to build de modules from de source package in incoming against my local kernel. The modules build but the package can not be installed because it tries to overwrite some /lib/modules/2.6.18/modules.* from my kernel package. Nevertheless, I installed the modules 'by hand' and launching Panther (inside X, I have not tested with framebuffer) works fine, even the network that I didn't managed to make work before. Yannick -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RfT: MOL 0.9.71~pre9 uploaded to unstable
On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 10:44:20AM +0200, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote: > I agree that the out of tree module building for MOL should be done in > linux-modules-extra-2.6. This was the main reason why I did not > upload the modules as well. I could not figure out how to add a module > only for one particular arch. Is this possible at all with the current > framework? Yes it is. Check spca5xx/defines. Bastian -- You're too beautiful to ignore. Too much woman. -- Kirk to Yeoman Rand, "The Enemy Within", stardate unknown -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RfT: MOL 0.9.71~pre9 uploaded to unstable
[ waldi: This is about adding mol-moules-source to linux-modules-extra-2.6 ] BTW to all: Comaintainers for MOL are always welcome. There is plenty of work to be done. Just ask on [EMAIL PROTECTED] if you are interested. On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 03:10:06AM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: > Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 01:13:47AM +0200, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote: > > Now, it would make sense to add the kernel modules to the out-of-tree > > package > > Bastian Blank is working on. I wanted to do this myself, but clearly don't > > have time for it. Would you take care of that ? > > Since I'm lacking a PPC machine to build a test package, I can try to > help in case you or Gaudenz have problems to add it there since I > already did it to spca5xx modules. Assistance would be appreciated. I agree that the out of tree module building for MOL should be done in linux-modules-extra-2.6. This was the main reason why I did not upload the modules as well. I could not figure out how to add a module only for one particular arch. Is this possible at all with the current framework? Mol modules should only be built on powerpc. They are useless on other architectures. gaudenz > > -- > O T A V I OS A L V A D O R > - > E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] UIN: 5906116 > GNU/Linux User: 239058 GPG ID: 49A5F855 > Home Page: http://www.freedom.ind.br/otavio > - > "Microsoft gives you Windows ... Linux gives > you the whole house." > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -- Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better. ~ Samuel Beckett ~ pgp3zKR3SVb9N.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: RfT: MOL 0.9.71~pre9 uploaded to unstable
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 01:13:47AM +0200, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote: >> Hi >> >> This is a request for testers. I just uploaded a new version of >> Mac-on-Linux to unstable. Please test the new versions and report bugs. >> I'm specially interested in tests of Mac OS 9.x and earlier and earlier >> versions of Mac OS X as I can't test these myself. >> >> This new version of MOL should support all Versions of Mac OS and Mac OS >> X. >> >> If you use the official Debian kernel images you can download kernel >> module packages from http://pkg-mol.alioth.debian.org/packages/ (where >> you also find all the other packages). For self compiled kernel you have >> to use mol-modules-source. >> >> I'm still trying to figure out how to best build the kernel module >> packages. >> Thanks for testing! >> >> Gaudenz >> >> -- >> Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter. >> Try again. Fail again. Fail better. >> ~ Samuel Beckett ~ > > Gaudenz, > > Thanks for taking care of mol :). > > Now, it would make sense to add the kernel modules to the out-of-tree package > Bastian Blank is working on. I wanted to do this myself, but clearly don't > have time for it. Would you take care of that ? Since I'm lacking a PPC machine to build a test package, I can try to help in case you or Gaudenz have problems to add it there since I already did it to spca5xx modules. -- O T A V I OS A L V A D O R - E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] UIN: 5906116 GNU/Linux User: 239058 GPG ID: 49A5F855 Home Page: http://www.freedom.ind.br/otavio - "Microsoft gives you Windows ... Linux gives you the whole house." -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RfT: MOL 0.9.71~pre9 uploaded to unstable
On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 01:13:47AM +0200, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote: > Hi > > This is a request for testers. I just uploaded a new version of > Mac-on-Linux to unstable. Please test the new versions and report bugs. > I'm specially interested in tests of Mac OS 9.x and earlier and earlier > versions of Mac OS X as I can't test these myself. > > This new version of MOL should support all Versions of Mac OS and Mac OS > X. > > If you use the official Debian kernel images you can download kernel > module packages from http://pkg-mol.alioth.debian.org/packages/ (where > you also find all the other packages). For self compiled kernel you have > to use mol-modules-source. > > I'm still trying to figure out how to best build the kernel module > packages. > Thanks for testing! > > Gaudenz > > -- > Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter. > Try again. Fail again. Fail better. > ~ Samuel Beckett ~ Gaudenz, Thanks for taking care of mol :). Now, it would make sense to add the kernel modules to the out-of-tree package Bastian Blank is working on. I wanted to do this myself, but clearly don't have time for it. Would you take care of that ? Once the module sources are in that package, they will be rebuilt by the kernel team with each abi bump, so it makes sense to have it there. Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RfT: MOL 0.9.71~pre9 uploaded to unstable
Gaudenz Steinlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > If you use the official Debian kernel images you can download kernel > module packages from http://pkg-mol.alioth.debian.org/packages/ (where > you also find all the other packages). For self compiled kernel you have > to use mol-modules-source. > > I'm still trying to figure out how to best build the kernel module > packages. I suggest the adding of it to linux-modules-extra-2.6 -- O T A V I OS A L V A D O R - E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] UIN: 5906116 GNU/Linux User: 239058 GPG ID: 49A5F855 Home Page: http://www.freedom.ind.br/otavio - "Microsoft gives you Windows ... Linux gives you the whole house." -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
