Re: apparent gcc4 regression in xprint on powerpc

[Felix C. Stegerman]

On 2005-11-09 19:44:27, Drew Parsons wrote:
> One of the users (Felix, cc:d here) is attempting to build Xprt himself
> so we'll hear what his success is (he needs a fresh binary to get
> unstripped symbols so we can obtain a backtrace from gdb).

I'm compiling it now ...


Felix


P.S. I seem to be getting a lot of mail twice, since people CC me
even though I'm substribed to both debian-user and debian-powerpc.
;-)

-- 
Felix C. Stegerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

"Any sufficiently advanced bug is indistinguishable from a feature."
 -- R. Kulawiec


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: apparent gcc4 regression in xprint on powerpc

[Falk Hueffner]

Drew Parsons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Current gcc is 4.0.2-1. Is the segfault in xprint -12 something you
> might expect to occur, and would a rebuilt with gcc 4.0.2 be likely to
> repair it?

Not very likely, but it should definitely be done before trying
anything else. Trying gcc-snapshot would also be nice.

-- 
Falk


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]